do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director CERT-EU (grade AD 14) in the Directorate–General Digital Services (DIGIT) (COM/2023/10439)
Date: 2023-10-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security, European Commission
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), information profession, information security, job vacancy, managing director, recruitment








C_202300180EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/180


10.10.2023






NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS
Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director CERT-EU
(grade AD 14) in the Directorate–General Digital Services (DIGIT)
(COM/2023/10439)
(C/2023/180)

The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2023/10439) for the function of Director CERT-EU (grade AD 14) in the Directorate-General for Digital Services (DIGIT).
To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website: https://europa.eu/!jNGKwf


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/180/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-526/22: Order of the General Court of 10 October 2023 — Sberbank v Commission and SRB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Adoption by the SRB of a resolution scheme — Endorsement decision by the Commission — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2023-10-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, Slovenia, aid to undertakings, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, crisis management, establishment








C_202400409EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/409


3.1.2024





Order of the General Court of 10 October 2023 — Sberbank v Commission and SRB
(Case T-526/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Adoption by the SRB of a resolution scheme - Endorsement decision by the Commission - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/409)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sberbank of Russia PAO (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: D. Rovetta, M. Campa, M. Pirovano, M. Moretto and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Nijenhuis, acting as Agents), Single Resolution Board, represented by: K.-P. Wojcik, H. Ehlers, J. Rius Riu and L. Forestier, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, S. Schelo and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Re:

By its action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment (i) of Decision SRB/EES/2022/20 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 1 March 2022 on the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Sberbank banka d.d., (ii) of Valuation Reports 1 and 2 in relation to Sberbank banka d.d., drawn up by the SRB on 27 and 28 February 2022 respectively, and (iii) of Commission Decision (EU) 2022/947 of 1 March 2022 endorsing the resolution scheme for Sberbank banka d.d. (OJ 2022 L 164, p. 63).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


There is no need to rule on the application to intervene made by the European Central Bank (ECB).










3.


Sberbank of Russia PAO shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and the Single Resolution Board (SRB), with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.










4.


Sberbank of Russia, the Commission, the SRB and the ECB shall each bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C 441, 21.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/409/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-625/20: Order of the General Court of 10 October 2023 — Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Commission decision requesting information — Withdrawal of the contested measure — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2023-10-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to information, cartel, competition law, equal treatment, legal basis, restriction on competition, right to justice








C_202400416EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/416


3.1.2024





Order of the General Court of 10 October 2023 — Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises v Commission
(Case T-625/20) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Commission decision requesting information - Withdrawal of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/416)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Les Mousquetaires (Paris, France), ITM Entreprises (Paris) (represented by: N. Jalabert Doury and K. Mebarek, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Berghe and I. Rogalski, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 5191 final of 23 July 2020, relating to proceedings under Article 18(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (AT.40466 — Alliance Casino & Intermarché)

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises.






(1)  
            OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/416/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-539/19: Order of the General Court of 10 October 2023 — Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Commission decision ordering an inspection — Withdrawal of the contested measure — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2023-10-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU competition policy, EU control, cartel, control of restrictive practices, restriction on competition








C_202400431EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/431


3.1.2024





Order of the General Court of 10 October 2023 — Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises v Commission
(Case T-539/19) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Commission decision ordering an inspection - Withdrawal of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/431)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Les Mousquetaires (Paris, France), ITM Entreprises (Paris) (represented by: N. Jalabert-Doury, K. Mebarek and B. Chemama, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Berghe and I. Rogalski, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: O. Segnana and A.-L. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of, first, Commission Decision C(2019) 3762 final of 13 May 2019, ordering Mousquetaires and all companies directly or indirectly controlled by them to submit to an inspection in accordance with Article 20(1) and (4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (AT.40466 — Tute 1), and, secondly, several decisions adopted by the European Commission, including one dated 18 June 2019, to continue the inspection.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises.










3.


The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/431/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-527/22: Order of the General Court of 10 October 2023 — Sberbank v SRB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Decision of the SRB not to adopt a resolution scheme — Shareholders — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2023-10-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, admissibility, aid to undertakings, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, shareholder








C_202400477EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/477


3.1.2024





Order of the General Court of 10 October 2023 — Sberbank v SRB
(Case T-527/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Decision of the SRB not to adopt a resolution scheme - Shareholders - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/477)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sberbank of Russia PAO (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: D. Rovetta, M. Campa, M. Pirovano, M. Moretto and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by: K.-P. Wojcik, H. Ehlers, J. Rius Riu and L. Forestier, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, S. Schelo and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Re:

By its action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment (i) of Decision SRB/EES/2022/19 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 1 March 2022 not to adopt a resolution scheme in respect of Sberbank Europe AG, within the meaning of Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 225, p. 1), and (ii) of Valuation Report 1 in respect of Sberbank Europe AG of 27 February 2022, drawn up by the SRB.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


There is no need to rule on the application to intervene made by the European Central Bank (ECB).










3.


Sberbank of Russia PAO shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB), with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.










4.


Sberbank of Russia, the SRB and the ECB shall each bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C 441, 21.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/477/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-622/23, rhtb: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 October 2023 — rhtb: projekt gmbh v Parkring 14-16 Immobilienverwertung GmbH
Date: 2023-10-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, provision of services, taxable income








C_202301438EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/1438


18.12.2023





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 October 2023 — rhtb: projekt gmbh v Parkring 14-16 Immobilienverwertung GmbH
(Case C-622/23, rhtb)
(C/2023/1438)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: rhtb: projekt gmbh

Respondent on a point of law: Parkring 14-16 Immobilienverwertung GmbH

Question referred

Must Article 2(1)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) read in conjunction with Article 73 of that directive be interpreted as meaning that the amount which a customer owes to a contractor even where the work has not been (fully) carried out, but the contractor was ready to provide the service and, through circumstances attributable to the customer (for example, cancellation of the work), was prevented from doing so, is subject to VAT?


(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1438/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-614/20: Order of the General Court of 10 October 2023 — Casino, Guichard-Perrachon v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Commission decision requesting information — Withdrawal of the contested measure — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2023-10-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU control, cartel, chain store, control of restrictive practices, restriction on competition, retail selling








C_202400425EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/425


3.1.2024





Order of the General Court of 10 October 2023 — Casino, Guichard-Perrachon v Commission
(Case T-614/20) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Commission decision requesting information - Withdrawal of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/425)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Casino, Guichard-Perrachon (Saint-Étienne, France) (represented by: I. Simic and Y. Boubacir, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Berghe and I. Rogalski, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 5192 final of 23 July 2020, relating to proceedings under Article 18(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (AT.40466 — Alliance Casino & Intermarché).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Casino, Guichard-Perrachon.






(1)  
            OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/425/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2178 of 10 October 2023 conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name Sable de Camargue (PDO)
Date: 2023-10-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: France, Occitanie, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, rosé wine, still wine








L_202302178EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series L













2023/2178


18.10.2023







            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/2178
of 10 October 2023
         
conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Sable de Camargue’ (PDO)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99(1) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


In accordance with Article 97(2) and (4) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Sable de Camargue’ forwarded by France and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(3)


In accordance with Article 99(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Sable de Camargue’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Sable de Camargue’ (PDO) is hereby protected.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 10 October 2023.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(2)  
            OJ C 183, 25.5.2023, p. 7.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2023/2178/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-795/22, Direccion000 and Others: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana — Spain) — Adolfo v Direccion000 CB, Alfonso, Álvaro, Fondo de Garantía Salarial (FOGASA) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 53 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Social policy — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Organisation of working time — Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 7 — Right to paid annual leave — Allowance in lieu of leave not taken after the termination of the employment relationship — One-year limitation period — Adequate information provided to the worker)
Date: 2023-10-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: allowances and expenses, arrangement of working time, labour standard, limitation of legal proceedings, paid leave, termination of employment, worker information, working conditions








C_202301428EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/1428


18.12.2023





Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana — Spain) — Adolfo v Direccion000 CB, Alfonso, Álvaro, Fondo de Garantía Salarial (FOGASA)
(Case C-795/22, (1) Direccion000 and Others)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 53 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Social policy - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Organisation of working time - Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Directive 2003/88/EC - Article 7 - Right to paid annual leave - Allowance in lieu of leave not taken after the termination of the employment relationship - One-year limitation period - Adequate information provided to the worker)
(C/2023/1428)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Adolfo

Respondents: Direccion000 CB, Alfonso, Álvaro, Fondo de Garantía Salarial (FOGASA)

Operative part of the order

Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, and Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
must be interpreted as precluding national legislation pursuant to which the right to paid annual leave acquired by a worker is lost at the end of a period of one year from the end of the annual reference period to which the leave relates, where the worker has not actually been given the opportunity by his or her employer to exercise that right, including in cases where that worker has failed to initiate, before the end of the employment relationship, a procedure having the effect of interrupting the limitation period.


(1)  Date lodged: 30.12.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1428/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2174 of 10 October 2023 approving amendments to the product specification for a protected designation of origin or a protected geographical indication (Côtes du Roussillon (PDO))
Date: 2023-10-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: France, Occitanie, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, red wine, rosé wine, white wine








L_202302174EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series L













2023/2174


17.10.2023







            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/2174
of 10 October 2023
         
approving amendments to the product specification for a protected designation of origin or a protected geographical indication (‘Côtes du Roussillon’ (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Commission has examined France’s application for the approval of amendments to the product specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Côtes du Roussillon’, submitted pursuant to Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(2)


The Commission published the application for the approval of amendments to the product specification in the Official Journal of the European Union (2), as required by Article 97(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(3)


No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(4)


The amendments to the product specification should therefore be approved in accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(5)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the product specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Côtes du Roussillon’ (PDO) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 10 October 2023.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(2)  
            OJ C 224, 27.6.2023, p. 26.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2023/2174/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)