do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-684/23: Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
Date: 2023-10-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, Statute for Members of the Parliament, equal treatment, financial solvency, ownership, pension fund, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, retirement conditions, supplementary pension








C_202400066EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/66


15.1.2024





Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
(Case T-684/23)
(C/2024/66)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J. Martínez Gimeno, X. Codina García-Andrade, F. Díaz-Grande Rojo and S. Fernández Tourné, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Payment Notice on the ground that Article 76(1a) of the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 19 May and 9 July 2008 concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (‘the Implementing Measures’), as amended by the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023, (1) is unlawful, and annul all payments of entitlements made subsequent to the Payment Notice for the same reason;










—


order the European Parliament to issue new payment notices in respect of the applicant’s entitlements under the Additional Voluntary Pension Scheme (‘AVPS’) up to the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, both in respect of the same Payment Notice and in respect of all the subsequent payment notices issued since that date;










—


order the European Parliament, in accordance with those new payment notices, to maintain the sums already paid to the applicant by way of AVPS entitlements and to pay the difference between the amount of the Payment Notice (and those issued up until judgment) and the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, together with statutory interest from the date on which that difference had to be paid until payment in full; and










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Case T-620/23, Barón Crespo v Parliament.


(1)  Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (2023/C 227/05) (OJ 2023 C 227, p. 5).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/66/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-799/23: Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
Date: 2023-10-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, Statute for Members of the Parliament, equal treatment, financial solvency, ownership, pension fund, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, retirement conditions, supplementary pension








C_202400181EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/181


15.1.2024





Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
(Case T-799/23)
(C/2024/181)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J. Martínez Gimeno, X. Codina García-Andrade, F. Díaz-Grande Rojo and S. Fernández Tourné, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Payment Notice on the ground that Article 76(1a) of the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 19 May and 9 July 2008 concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (‘the Implementing Measures’), as amended by the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023, (1) is unlawful, and annul all payments of entitlements made subsequent to the Payment Notice for the same reason;










—


order the European Parliament to issue new payment notices in respect of the applicant’s entitlements under the Additional Voluntary Pension Scheme (‘AVPS’) up to the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, both in respect of the same Payment Notice and in respect of all the subsequent payment notices issued since that date;










—


order the European Parliament, in accordance with those new payment notices, to maintain the sums already paid to the applicant by way of AVPS entitlements and to pay the difference between the amount of the Payment Notice (and those issued up until judgment) and the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, together with statutory interest from the date on which that difference had to be paid until payment in full; and










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Case T-620/23, Barón Crespo v Parliament.


(1)  Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (2023/C 227/05) (OJ 2023 C 227, p. 5).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/181/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1038/23: Action brought on 8 October 2023 — UB v Frontex
Date: 2023-10-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: competition (EU), paramilitary force, principle of legal certainty, recruitment, transparency in decision-making








C_202301310EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/1310


11.12.2023





Action brought on 8 October 2023 — UB v Frontex
(Case T-1038/23)
(C/2023/1310)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: UB (represented by: S. Pappas and A. Kila, lawyers)

Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the implied decision of the Agency, by which it refused to invite the applicant for a second interview and thus to allow for his opportunity to be timely recruited for the position of the European Border and Coast Guard Officer, Standing Corps — intermediate level in Frontex;










—


annul the decision of 29 June 2023 of the Executive Director, by which the complaint of 14 February 2023 of the applicant against the implied decision of the Agency was rejected as inadmissible; and,










—


order the defendant to bear its costs as well as the applicant’s costs for the current proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of the recruitment notice and of the principle of legal certainty.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of legitimate expectations.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of transparency and good administration, and more specifically lack of sufficient and adequate reasoning.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1310/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-835/23: Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
Date: 2023-10-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, Statute for Members of the Parliament, equal treatment, financial solvency, ownership, pension fund, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, retirement conditions, supplementary pension








C_202400217EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/217


15.1.2024





Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
(Case T-835/23)
(C/2024/217)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J. Martínez Gimeno, X. Codina García-Andrade, F. Díaz-Grande Rojo and S. Fernández Tourné, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Payment Notice on the ground that Article 76(1a) of the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 19 May and 9 July 2008 concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (‘the Implementing Measures’), as amended by the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023, (1) is unlawful, and annul all payments of entitlements made subsequent to the Payment Notice for the same reason;










—


order the European Parliament to issue new payment notices in respect of the applicant’s entitlements under the Additional Voluntary Pension Scheme (‘AVPS’) up to the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, both in respect of the same Payment Notice and in respect of all the subsequent payment notices issued since that date;










—


order the European Parliament, in accordance with those new payment notices, to maintain the sums already paid to the applicant by way of AVPS entitlements and to pay the difference between the amount of the Payment Notice (and those issued up until judgment) and the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, together with statutory interest from the date on which that difference had to be paid until payment in full; and










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Case T-620/23, Barón Crespo v Parliament.


(1)  Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (2023/C 227/05) (OJ 2023 C 227, p. 5).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/217/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-961/23: Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
Date: 2023-10-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, Statute for Members of the Parliament, equal treatment, financial solvency, ownership, pension fund, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, retirement conditions, supplementary pension








C_202400343EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/343


15.1.2024





Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
(Case T-961/23)
(C/2024/343)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J. Martínez Gimeno, X. Codina García-Andrade, F. Díaz-Grande Rojo and S. Fernández Tourné, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Payment Notice on the ground that Article 76(1a) of the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 19 May and 9 July 2008 concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (‘the Implementing Measures’), as amended by the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023, (1) is unlawful, and annul all payments of entitlements made subsequent to the Payment Notice for the same reason;










—


order the European Parliament to issue new payment notices in respect of the applicant’s entitlements under the Additional Voluntary Pension Scheme (‘AVPS’) up to the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, both in respect of the same Payment Notice and in respect of all the subsequent payment notices issued since that date;










—


order the European Parliament, in accordance with those new payment notices, to maintain the sums already paid to the applicant by way of AVPS entitlements and to pay the difference between the amount of the Payment Notice (and those issued up until judgment) and the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, together with statutory interest from the date on which that difference had to be paid until payment in full; and










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Case T-620/23, Barón Crespo v Parliament.


(1)  Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (2023/C 227/05) (OJ 2023 C 227, p. 5).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/343/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-979/23: Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
Date: 2023-10-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, Statute for Members of the Parliament, equal treatment, financial solvency, ownership, pension fund, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, retirement conditions, supplementary pension








C_202400361EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/361


15.1.2024





Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
(Case T-979/23)
(C/2024/361)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J. Martínez Gimeno, X. Codina García-Andrade, F. Díaz-Grande Rojo and S. Fernández Tourné, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Payment Notice on the ground that Article 76(1a) of the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 19 May and 9 July 2008 concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (‘the Implementing Measures’), as amended by the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023, (1) is unlawful, and annul all payments of entitlements made subsequent to the Payment Notice for the same reason;










—


order the European Parliament to issue new payment notices in respect of the applicant’s entitlements under the Additional Voluntary Pension Scheme (‘AVPS’) up to the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, both in respect of the same Payment Notice and in respect of all the subsequent payment notices issued since that date;










—


order the European Parliament, in accordance with those new payment notices, to maintain the sums already paid to the applicant by way of AVPS entitlements and to pay the difference between the amount of the Payment Notice (and those issued up until judgment) and the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, together with statutory interest from the date on which that difference had to be paid until payment in full; and










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Case T-620/23, Barón Crespo v Parliament.


(1)  Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (2023/C 227/05) (OJ 2023 C 227, p. 5).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/361/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-976/23: Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
Date: 2023-10-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, Statute for Members of the Parliament, equal treatment, financial solvency, ownership, pension fund, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, retirement conditions, supplementary pension








C_202400358EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/358


15.1.2024





Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
(Case T-976/23)
(C/2024/358)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J. Martínez Gimeno, X. Codina García-Andrade, F. Díaz-Grande Rojo and S. Fernández Tourné, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Payment Notice on the ground that Article 76(1a) of the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 19 May and 9 July 2008 concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (‘the Implementing Measures’), as amended by the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023, (1) is unlawful, and annul all payments of entitlements made subsequent to the Payment Notice for the same reason;










—


order the European Parliament to issue new payment notices in respect of the applicant’s entitlements under the Additional Voluntary Pension Scheme (‘AVPS’) up to the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, both in respect of the same Payment Notice and in respect of all the subsequent payment notices issued since that date;










—


order the European Parliament, in accordance with those new payment notices, to maintain the sums already paid to the applicant by way of AVPS entitlements and to pay the difference between the amount of the Payment Notice (and those issued up until judgment) and the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, together with statutory interest from the date on which that difference had to be paid until payment in full; and










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Case T-620/23, Barón Crespo v Parliament.


(1)  Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (2023/C 227/05) (OJ 2023 C 227, p. 5).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/358/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-729/23: Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
Date: 2023-10-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, Statute for Members of the Parliament, equal treatment, financial solvency, ownership, pension fund, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, retirement conditions, supplementary pension








C_202400111EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/111


15.1.2024





Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
(Case T-729/23)
(C/2024/111)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J. Martínez Gimeno, X. Codina García-Andrade, F. Díaz-Grande Rojo and S. Fernández Tourné, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Payment Notice on the ground that Article 76(1a) of the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 19 May and 9 July 2008 concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (‘the Implementing Measures’), as amended by the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023, (1) is unlawful, and annul all payments of entitlements made subsequent to the Payment Notice for the same reason;










—


order the European Parliament to issue new payment notices in respect of the applicant’s entitlements under the Additional Voluntary Pension Scheme (‘AVPS’) up to the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, both in respect of the same Payment Notice and in respect of all the subsequent payment notices issued since that date;










—


order the European Parliament, in accordance with those new payment notices, to maintain the sums already paid to the applicant by way of AVPS entitlements and to pay the difference between the amount of the Payment Notice (and those issued up until judgment) and the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, together with statutory interest from the date on which that difference had to be paid until payment in full; and










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Case T-620/23, Barón Crespo v Parliament.


(1)  Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (2023/C 227/05) (OJ 2023 C 227, p. 5).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/111/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-758/23: Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
Date: 2023-10-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, Statute for Members of the Parliament, equal treatment, financial solvency, ownership, pension fund, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, retirement conditions, supplementary pension








C_202400140EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/140


15.1.2024





Action brought on 8 October 2023 — ZZ v Parliament
(Case T-758/23)
(C/2024/140)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J. Martínez Gimeno, X. Codina García-Andrade, F. Díaz-Grande Rojo and S. Fernández Tourné, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Payment Notice on the ground that Article 76(1a) of the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 19 May and 9 July 2008 concerning implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (‘the Implementing Measures’), as amended by the Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023, (1) is unlawful, and annul all payments of entitlements made subsequent to the Payment Notice for the same reason;










—


order the European Parliament to issue new payment notices in respect of the applicant’s entitlements under the Additional Voluntary Pension Scheme (‘AVPS’) up to the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, both in respect of the same Payment Notice and in respect of all the subsequent payment notices issued since that date;










—


order the European Parliament, in accordance with those new payment notices, to maintain the sums already paid to the applicant by way of AVPS entitlements and to pay the difference between the amount of the Payment Notice (and those issued up until judgment) and the amount which would have been applicable in accordance with the wording of Article 76 of the Implementing Measures prior to the 2023 Decision, together with statutory interest from the date on which that difference had to be paid until payment in full; and










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Case T-620/23, Barón Crespo v Parliament.


(1)  Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 12 June 2023 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (2023/C 227/05) (OJ 2023 C 227, p. 5).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/140/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)