do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11179 – BRIDGEPOINT / WINDAR)
Date: 2023-10-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: advanced technology industry, economic concentration, financial services, healthcare industry, investment company, merger control, offshore wind energy production, power plant, turbine








C_202300179EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/179


11.10.2023






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11179 – BRIDGEPOINT / WINDAR)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2023/179)

On 2 October 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11179. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/179/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 29 September 2023
Date: 2023-10-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202300003EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/3


2.10.2023






Euro exchange rates (1)


            29 September 2023
         
(C/2023/3)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0594 




JPY


Japanese yen


158,10 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4571 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86458 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,5325 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9669 




ISK


Iceland króna


144,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,2535 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,339 




HUF


Hungarian forint


389,50 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6283 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9735 




TRY


Turkish lira


29,0514 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6339 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4227 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2959 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7575 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4443 




KRW


South Korean won


1 425,26 




ZAR


South African rand


19,9813 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7352 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 383,62 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9741 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,969 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,679 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,3065 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,5030 




INR


Indian rupee


88,0165 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/3/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11225 – APOLLO / APPLUS)
Date: 2023-10-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Catalonia, Spain, United States, approval, economic concentration, investment, investment company, merger control, provision of services, public sector








C_202300290EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/290


17.10.2023






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11225 – APOLLO / APPLUS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2023/290)

On 2 October 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11225. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/290/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-600/23, Royal Football Club Seraing: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 2 October 2023 — Royal Football Club Seraing v Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), Union Royale Belge des Sociétés de Football Association (URBSFA), Union européenne des Sociétés de Football Association (UEFA)
Date: 2023-10-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: arbitration, judicial review, preliminary ruling procedure, professional sport, proof, right to justice, ruling, sports body








C_202400707EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/707


22.1.2024





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 2 October 2023 — Royal Football Club Seraing v Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), Union Royale Belge des Sociétés de Football Association (URBSFA), Union européenne des Sociétés de Football Association (UEFA)
(Case C-600/23, Royal Football Club Seraing)
(C/2024/707)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant, appellant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Royal Football Club Seraing

Defendants, respondents and respondents in the appeal on a point of law: Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), Union Royale Belge des Sociétés de Football-Association (URBSFA), Union européenne des Sociétés de Football Association (UEFA)

Other party: Doyen Sports Investment Ltd

Questions referred







1.


Does Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union, read in conjunction with Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, preclude the application of provisions of national law such as Article 24 and Article 171[3](9) of the Code judiciaire (Belgian Judicial Code), laying down the principle of res judicata, to an arbitral award the conformity of which with EU law has been reviewed by a court of a State that is not a Member State of the European Union, which is not permitted to refer a question to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling?










2.


Does Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union, read in conjunction with Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, preclude the application of a rule of national law according probative value vis-à-vis third parties, subject to evidence to the contrary which it is for them to adduce, to an arbitral award the conformity of which with EU law has been reviewed by a court of a State that is not a Member State of the European Union, which is not permitted to refer a question to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling?






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/707/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11256 – SHELL / EGO)
Date: 2023-10-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, electrical energy, energy market, merger control, natural gas, oil industry, petrochemicals, renewable energy








C_202300168EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/168


10.10.2023






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11256 – SHELL / EGO)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2023/168)

On 2 October 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11256. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/168/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-607/23: Action brought on 2 October 2023 — Desimo v EUIPO — Dulces y conservas Helios (ELIOS)
Date: 2023-10-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, foodstuff, fruit, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law, vegetable








C_202300676EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/676


13.11.2023





Action brought on 2 October 2023 — Desimo v EUIPO — Dulces y conservas Helios (ELIOS)
(Case T-607/23)
(C/2023/676)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Desimo, Lda (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: J. Mioludo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dulces y conservas Helios, SA (Arroyo de la Encomienda, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark ELIOS — Application for registration No 18 026 520

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 July 2023 in joined cases R 1826/2022-5 and R 1833/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and fully dismiss the opposition proceeding No. B 3 089 265;










—


grant the registration of the trade mark at issue to all the designated goods and services;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/676/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-605/23: Action brought on 2 October 2023 — Vinatis v EUIPO — Global Rambla Restauración (VINATIS)
Date: 2023-10-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, business administration, business management, consultancy, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law, wholesale trade, wine








C_202300776EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/776


20.11.2023





Action brought on 2 October 2023 — Vinatis v EUIPO — Global Rambla Restauración (VINATIS)
(Case T-605/23)
(C/2023/776)
Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties


Applicant: Vinatis (Annecy, France) (represented by: J. Canlorbe, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Global Rambla Restauración, SL (Barcelona, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark VINATIS — Application for registration No 18 274 852

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 July 2023 in Case R 2286/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in part in so far as it upheld the opposition in respect of certain services of the contested mark in Class 35;










—


reject the opposition for all the services in Class 35 against which the opposition is directed;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/776/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-604/23: Action brought on 2 October 2023 — ePlus/EUIPO — Telefónica Germany (e.plus)
Date: 2023-10-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, provision of services, registered trade mark, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_202300775EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/775


20.11.2023





Action brought on 2 October 2023 — ePlus/EUIPO — Telefónica Germany (e.plus)
(Case T-604/23)
(C/2023/775)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: ePlus Inc. (Herndon, Virginia, États-Unis) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, J. Fuhrmann and A. Malkmes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Munich, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark e.plus — European Union trade mark No 1 132 299

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 June 2023 in joined cases R 1199/2022-1 and R 1711/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision as regards points 2, 4, 5, and 6 of the operative part of that decision;










—


alter the contested decision to the effect that the appeal to the Board of Appeal of other party to the proceedings before it is dismissed and that the appeal of the applicant before it leads to the contested mark being revoked for all services of class 38, that the costs of the appeal proceedings in case R 1199/2022-1 are borne by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, and that each party bears the costs of the appeal proceedings in case R 1711/2022-1;










—


order EUIPO and, if the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal intervenes, the Intervener to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/775/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2023-10-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: Ukraine, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), iron, originating product, piping, steel, tube








C_202300005EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/5


2.10.2023






Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(C/2023/5)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no duly substantiated request for a review was lodged with regard to imports from Ukraine, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will expire.
This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (2).









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel


Ukraine


Anti-dumping duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1469 of 1 October 2018 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel, originating in Russia and Ukraine, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 246, 2.10.2018, p. 20)


3.10.2023






(1)  
            OJ C 12, 13.1.2023, p. 10.

(2)  
            OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(3)  The measure will expire at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/5/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11216 – LIBERTY / ISD DUNAFERR)
Date: 2023-10-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: coke, economic concentration, iron and steel industry, merger control, mining industry








C_202300246EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/246


12.10.2023






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11216 – LIBERTY / ISD DUNAFERR)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2023/246)

On 2 October 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11216. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/246/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)