do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11158 – DEUTSCHE BÖRSE / SIMCORP) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 340/05
Date: 2023-08-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, financial services, investment company, merger control, provision of services, software








C_2023340EN.01000501.xml










27.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/5







Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11158 – DEUTSCHE BÖRSE / SIMCORP)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 340/05)

On 23 August 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11158. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11187 – MITSUI / CELANESE / NUTRINOVA JV)
Date: 2023-08-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: chemical product, chemical salt, economic concentration, fertiliser, management, merger control, organic acid, polymer, preservative, special polymer, sweetener








C_202400641EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/641


5.1.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11187 – MITSUI / CELANESE / NUTRINOVA JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/641)

On 23 August 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11187. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/641/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11228 – BENTELER / BEIJING AUTOMOTIVE / JVS) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 305/05
Date: 2023-08-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: China, economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle industry, sale, subsidiary, supply, vehicle parts








C_2023305EN.01000501.xml










29.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 305/5






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11228 – BENTELER / BEIJING AUTOMOTIVE / JVS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 305/05)
On 23 August 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11228. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 22 August 2023 2023/C 298/04
Date: 2023-08-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023298EN.01000401.xml










23.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 298/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

22 August 2023
(2023/C 298/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0887 




JPY


Japanese yen


158,70 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4535 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85288 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,8630 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9565 




ISK


Iceland króna


143,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,5195 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,000 




HUF


Hungarian forint


382,03 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4643 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9376 




TRY


Turkish lira


29,6136 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6878 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4716 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5328 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8264 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4754 




KRW


South Korean won


1 454,59 




ZAR


South African rand


20,3932 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9387 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 699,27 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0603 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,251 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,126 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,3891 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,4223 




INR


Indian rupee


90,3220 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-610/22: Order of the General Court of 23 August 2023 — Nienaber v EUIPO (BoneKare) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark BoneKare — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2023-08-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, agricultural product, animal feedingstuffs, dietary product, food supplement, pharmaceutical product, plant health product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, veterinary medicinal product








C_202300338EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/338


30.10.2023





Order of the General Court of 23 August 2023 — Nienaber v EUIPO (BoneKare)
(Case T-610/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark BoneKare - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2023/338)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: Jannah Nienaber (Cloppenburg, Germany), Andreas Nienaber (Cloppenburg) (represented by: J. Eberhardt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 August 2022 (Case R 348/2022-1).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Ms Jannah Nienaber and Mr Andreas Nienaber shall bear their own costs.










3.


The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 441, 21.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/338/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-609/22: Order of the General Court of 23 August 2023 — Nienaber v EUIPO — St. Hippolyt Mühle Ebert (BoneKare) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark BoneKare — Absolute ground for invalidity — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2023-08-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, animal feedingstuffs, food supplement, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202300337EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/337


30.10.2023





Order of the General Court of 23 August 2023 — Nienaber v EUIPO — St. Hippolyt Mühle Ebert (BoneKare)
(Case T-609/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark BoneKare - Absolute ground for invalidity - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2023/337)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Andreas Nienaber (Cloppenburg, Germany) (represented by: J. Eberhardt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: St. Hippolyt Mühle Ebert GmbH (Dielheim, Germany) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 August 2022 (Case R 436/2022-1).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Mr Andreas Nienaber shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by St. Hippolyt Mühle Ebert GmbH.










3.


The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 441, 21.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/337/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-13/23: Order of the General Court of 23 August 2023 — Balaban v EUIPO — Shenzhen Stahlwerk Welding Technology (STAHLWERK) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark STAHLWERK — Absolute ground for invalidity — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2023-08-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electric cable, electrical equipment, electronic device, metalworking, protective equipment, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202300340EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/340


30.10.2023





Order of the General Court of 23 August 2023 — Balaban v EUIPO — Shenzhen Stahlwerk Welding Technology (STAHLWERK)
(Case T-13/23) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark STAHLWERK - Absolute ground for invalidity - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2023/340)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Okan Balaban (Bornheim, Germany) (represented by: T. Schaaf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Shenzhen Stahlwerk Welding Technology Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, China) (represented by: A. Hoyer, lawyer)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 31 October 2022 (Case R 2060/2021-5).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 83, 6.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/340/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Update of the list of national services responsible for border control as referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (See the list of previous publications at the end of this update.) 2023/C 298/05
Date: 2023-08-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs, European Commission
Subjects: Romania, Schengen Agreement, border control, external border of the EU, foreign national, identity document, residence permit








C_2023298EN.01000501.xml










23.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 298/5






Update of the list of national services responsible for border control as referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (1)

(2023/C 298/05)
The publication of the list of national services responsible for border control as referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (2) is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the Commission in conformity with Article 39 of the Schengen Borders Code.
In addition to the publication in the Official Journal, a regular update is available on the website of the Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs.

LIST OF NATIONAL SERVICES RESPONSIBLE FOR BORDER CONTROL

ROMANIA

Replacement of the information published in OJ C 375, 17.10.2018, p. 5
.






—


for Romania: Poliţia de Frontieră Română (Romanian Border Police);





List of previous publications


OJ C 247, 13.10.2006, p. 17.

OJ C 77, 5.4.2007, p. 11.

OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 1.

OJ C 164, 18.7.2007, p. 45.

OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 21.

OJ C 331, 31.12.2008, p. 15.

OJ C 87, 1.4.2010, p. 15.

OJ C 180, 21.6.2012, p. 2.

OJ C 98, 5.4.2013, p. 2.

OJ C 256, 5.9.2013, p. 14.

OJ C 360, 10.12.2013, p. 17.

OJ C 218, 7.7.2017, p. 19.

OJ C 431, 15.12.2017, p. 8.

OJ C 345, 27.9.2018, p. 4.

OJ C 375, 17.10.2018, p. 5.

OJ C 74, 3.3.2021, p. 5.

OJ C 141, 22.4.2021, p. 2.


(1)  See the list of previous publications at the end of this update.

(2)  OJ L 77, 23.3.2016, p. 1.