do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1650 of 15 May 2023 correcting the Swedish language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for strong customer authentication and common and secure open standards of communication (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2023-08-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Translation, European Commission
Subjects: consumer protection, electronic banking, electronic money, financial legislation, financial services, information security, payment system, provision of services, safety standard, technical standard








L_2023208EN.01000101.xml










23.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 208/1








            COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2023/1650
of 15 May 2023
         
correcting the Swedish language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for strong customer authentication and common and secure open standards of communication
(Text with EEA relevance)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC (1), and in particular Article 98(4), second subparagraph, thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Swedish language version of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389 (2) contains errors in Articles 30, 31 and 36 as regards the types of service providers concerned by a specific requirement. Those errors affect the substance of those provisions.












(2)


The Swedish language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

(Does not concern the English language.)



Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 15 May 2023.


For the Commission


The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35.

(2)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389 of 27 November 2017 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for strong customer authentication and common and secure open standards of communication (OJ L 69, 13.3.2018, p. 23).
Case T-501/23: Action brought on 15 August 2023 — Listan v EUIPO (Silent Loop)
Date: 2023-08-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, audiovisual equipment, computer equipment, electronic equipment, multimedia, registered trade mark, service, software, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_2023338EN.01004302.xml










25.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 338/43






Action brought on 15 August 2023 — Listan v EUIPO (Silent Loop)
(Case T-501/23)
(2023/C 338/56)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Listan GmbH (Glinde, Germany) (represented by: S. Pietzcker and C. Spintig, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘Silent Loop’– Application No 1 624 519

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 June 2023 in Case R 187/2023-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those of the applicant.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-502/23: Action brought on 15 August 2023 — HX v Council
Date: 2023-08-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2023338EN.01004401.xml










25.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 338/44






Action brought on 15 August 2023 — HX v Council
(Case T-502/23)
(2023/C 338/57)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties


Applicant: HX (represented by: St. Koev, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the action admissible and well founded in its entirety and find that all the pleas in law set out therein are well founded;










—


hold that the contested acts may be annulled in part;










—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1035 of 25 May 2023 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria, (1) in so far as it concerns the applicant;










—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1027 of 25 May 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria, (2) in so far as it concerns the applicant, and










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay all of the applicant’s costs, expenses, fees and other expenditure linked to his defence.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging manifest infringement of the rights of the defence and the right to a fair trial.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging failure to state reasons on the part of the Council.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to effective judicial protection.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging an error of assessment on the part of the Council.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to property, of the principle of proportionality and of the freedom to conduct a business.










6.


Sixth plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to a normal life.










7.


Seventh plea in law, alleging a serious infringement of the right to the protection of reputation.






(1)  
            OJ 2023 L 139, p. 49.

(2)  
            OJ 2023 L 139, p. 1.