do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1598 of 3 August 2023 amending Decision 2012/285/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Guinea-Bissau (Official Journal of the European Union L 196 of 4 August 2023)
Date: 2023-08-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Guinea-Bissau, economic sanctions, freezing of assets, humanitarian aid, international sanctions








L_2023200EN.01004601.xml










10.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 200/46







Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1598 of 28 July 2023 amending Decision 2012/285/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Guinea-Bissau

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 196 of 4 August 2023
)








1.


On the second cover page, in the table of contents, and on page 23, in the title:




for:


                  ‘… of 28 July 2023 …’,

read:


                  ‘… of 3 August 2023 …’.







2.


On page 24, in the concluding formula:




for:


                  ‘Done at Brussels, 28 July 2023.’,

read:


                  ‘Done at Brussels, 3 August 2023.’.
Case C-522/23 P: Appeal brought on 10 August 2023 by NO against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 20 June 2023 in Case T-771/22, NO v Commission
Date: 2023-08-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Ireland, State aid, admissibility, control of State aid, legal expenses, legal system, public legal official








C_202402004EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2004


18.3.2024





Appeal brought on 10 August 2023 by NO against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 20 June 2023 in Case T-771/22, NO v Commission
(Case C-522/23 P)
(C/2024/2004)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: NO (represented by: E. Smartt, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 30 January 2024, the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) held that the appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded and that the Appelant should bear his own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2004/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1593 of 3 August 2023 amending Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Guinea-Bissau (Official Journal of the European Union L 196 of 4 August 2023)
Date: 2023-08-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Guinea-Bissau, economic sanctions, freezing of assets, humanitarian aid, international sanctions








L_2023200EN.01004701.xml










10.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 200/47







Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1593 of 28 July 2023 amending Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Guinea-Bissau

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 196 of 4 August 2023
)








1.


On the cover page, in the table of contents, and on page 1, in the title:




for:


                  ‘… of 28 July 2023 …’,

read:


                  ‘… of 3 August 2023 …’.







2.


On page 2, in the concluding formula:




for:


                  ‘Done at Brussels, 28 July 2023.’,

read:


                  ‘Done at Brussels, 3 August 2023.’.
Case C-516/23, Qatar Airways: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 10 August 2023 — NW and YS v Qatar Airways
Date: 2023-08-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, consumer protection, customers, reduced price, reservation, ticket, traveller








C_202300126EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/126


16.10.2023





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 10 August 2023 — NW and YS v Qatar Airways
(Case C-516/23, Qatar Airways)
(C/2023/126)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Frankfurt am Main

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: NW, YS

Defendant: Qatar Airways

Questions referred







1.


Is Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the passenger travels free of charge under the first alternative in [the first sentence of] Article 3(3) of that regulation in the case where he or she is required to pay only fees and aviation taxes for the flight ticket?










2.


If the first question is answered in the negative:
Is Regulation No 261/2004 to be interpreted as meaning that it does not concern a fare available (indirectly) to the public within the meaning of the second alternative in [the first sentence of] Article 3(3) of that regulation in the case where the flight was booked as part of a special offer provided by an air carrier for a limited period and in limited quantity, and which was available only to a certain group of professions?










3.


If the second question is also answered in the negative and Regulation No 261/2004 is regarded as applicable:






(a)


Is Article 8(1)(c) of that regulation to be interpreted as meaning that there must be a temporal link between, on the one hand, the original booked and cancelled flight and, on the other, the desired re-routing at a later date?










(b)


How should that temporal link, if necessary, be defined?










(1)  Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/126/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2870/2000 of 19 December 2000 laying down Community reference methods for the analysis of spirits drinks (Official Journal of the European Union L 333, 29 December 2000)
Date: 2023-08-10
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: alcoholic beverage, food inspection, health control, qualitative analysis, research body








L_2023200EN.01004801.xml










10.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 200/48







Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2870/2000 of 19 December 2000 laying down Community reference methods for the analysis of spirits drinks

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 333, 29 December 2000
)


On page 37, in Chapter III (Determination of volatile substances and methanol of spirit drinks), Section III.2 (Gas chromatographic determination of volatile congeners: aldehydes, higher alcohols, ethyl acetate and methanol), point 5.4 (Reagents and materials) of the Annex:
for:


                  ‘2-methylpropan-1-ol (CAS 78-33-1).’,

read:


                  ‘2-methylpropan-1-ol (CAS 78-83-1).’.
Corrigendum to Council Decision of 25 July 2023 amending Decision 98/481/EC approving the external auditors of the European Central Bank (Official Journal of the European Union C 275 of 4 August 2023) 2023/C 281/08
Date: 2023-08-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: European System of Central Banks, Germany, accountant, auditing, central bank, euro area








C_2023281EN.01002301.xml










10.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 281/23






Corrigendum to Council Decision of 14 July 2023 amending Decision 98/481/EC approving the external auditors of the European Central Bank

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 275 of 4 August 2023
)

(2023/C 281/08)






1.


On the second cover page, in the table of contents, and on page 19, in the title:




for:

‘… of 14 July 2023 …’,

read:

‘… of 25 July 2023 …’.







2.


On page 20, in the concluding formula:




for:

‘Done at Brussels, 14 July 2023.’,

read:

‘Done at Brussels, 25 July 2023.’.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 9 August 2023 2023/C 281/01
Date: 2023-08-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023281EN.01000101.xml










10.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 281/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

9 August 2023
(2023/C 281/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0968 




JPY


Japanese yen


157,35 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4511 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86180 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,7195 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9627 




ISK


Iceland króna


144,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,2063 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,293 




HUF


Hungarian forint


388,44 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4670 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9480 




TRY


Turkish lira


29,6458 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6779 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4740 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5766 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8103 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4761 




KRW


South Korean won


1 441,47 




ZAR


South African rand


20,8921 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9030 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 661,91 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0146 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,728 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,361 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,3664 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,8106 




INR


Indian rupee


90,8795 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-520/23 P: Appeal brought on 10 August 2023 by UGA Nutraceuticals Srl against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 28 June 2023 in Case T-495/22, UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — BASF (OMEGOR)
Date: 2023-08-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, dietary product, food supplement, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, veterinary medicinal product








C_202401078EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1078


5.2.2024





Appeal brought on 10 August 2023 by UGA Nutraceuticals Srl against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 28 June 2023 in Case T-495/22, UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — BASF (OMEGOR)
(Case C-520/23 P)
(C/2024/1078)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: UGA Nutraceuticals Srl (represented by: J. Graffer, A. Ottolini and M. Riva, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 15 December 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that the appellant should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1078/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1202 of 21 June 2023 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2325 as regards the recognition of certain control authorities and control bodies for the purpose of importing organic products into the Union (Official Journal of the European Union L 159 of 22 June 2023)
Date: 2023-08-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: consumer protection, food inspection, import (EU), organic certification, organic farming, organic product, quality control of agricultural products, third country








L_2023200EN.01004501.xml










10.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 200/45







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1202 of 21 June 2023 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2325 as regards the recognition of certain control authorities and control bodies for the purpose of importing organic products into the Union

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 159 of 22 June 2023
)


On page 63, in point (1) of Annex I, in the amendments to the table in point 5 of the entry for ‘INDIA’ in Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2325:
for:


                  ‘the rows for code numbers IN-ORG-002, IN-ORG-023, IN-ORG-027 and IN-ORG-034 are deleted;’,

read:


                  ‘the rows for code numbers IN-ORG-002, IN-ORG-023 and IN-ORG-034 are deleted;’.
Case C-521/23 P: Appeal brought on 10 August 2023 by UGA Nutraceuticals Srl against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 28 June 2023 in Case T-496/22, UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — BASF (OMEGOR VITALITY)
Date: 2023-08-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, dietary product, egg, fishery product, food supplement, meat, milk product, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202401079EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1079


5.2.2024





Appeal brought on 10 August 2023 by UGA Nutraceuticals Srl against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 28 June 2023 in Case T-496/22, UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — BASF (OMEGOR VITALITY)
(Case C-521/23 P)
(C/2024/1079)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: UGA Nutraceuticals Srl (represented by: J. Graffer, A. Ottolini and M. Riva, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 15 December 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that the appellant should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1079/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-494/23: Action brought on 10 August 2023 — HG v Commission
Date: 2023-08-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European civil service, claim, debt, interest








C_202300061EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/61


9.10.2023





Action brought on 10 August 2023 — HG v Commission
(Case T-494/23)
(C/2023/61)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: HG (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the present action admissible and well-founded




consequently:






—


annul the compensation decisions dated 10 October 2022 (BUDG.C.4.001/AM/444), 13 October 2022 (BUDG.C.4.001/PRS/444), 11 November 2022 (BUDG.C.4.001/AM/444_3), 12 December 2022 (BUDG.C.4.001/AM/444_4), 9 January 2023 (BUDG.C.4.001/AM/444_5), 19 January 2023 (BUDG.C.4.001/PRS/444_6), 9 February 2023 (BUDG.C.4.001/LM/444), 10 March 2023 (BUDG.C.4.001/LM/444) and 11 April 2023 (BUDG.C.4.001/PRS/444), all for an amount of EUR 3 350, with the exception of the decision of 13 October 2022 for an amount of EUR 274,59 and the decision of 19 January 2023 for an amount of EUR 368;










—


in so far as necessary, annul the decision rejecting the applicant’s complaint, dated 5 May 2023;










—


order the defendant to reimburse the sums recovered in respect of the decisions adopted, that is, EUR 24 092,59, that amount to be increased by default interest calculated at the rate of the European Central Bank, plus two percentage points;










—


order the defendant to pay all of the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of Articles 98, 100, 101 and 102 of the Financial Regulation of 2018 (1) and failure to comply with the reasonable time requirement. The applicant submits, inter alia, that the Authorising Officer did not send the debit note within the five-year period provided for in the Financial Regulation.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging breach of the principle of good administration and of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials. The applicant submits in that regard that the lack of information as to the rules applicable or applied in the present case or as to the rescheduling plan (monthly instalments and duration and reasons for the amounts and duration) constitutes a breach of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials and of the principle of good administration.






(1)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ 2018 L 193, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/61/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-482/23: Action brought on 10 August 2023 — Qozgar v EUIPO — L’Oréal (CLEOPATRA)
Date: 2023-08-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202300031EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/31


9.10.2023





Action brought on 10 August 2023 — Qozgar v EUIPO — L’Oréal (CLEOPATRA)
(Case T-482/23)
(C/2023/31)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Afaaq Ahmad Qozgar (Thiruvananthapuram, India) (represented by: L. Pivec, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: L’Oréal (Clichy, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark CLEOPATRA — Application for registration No 18 140 949

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2023 in Case R 2509/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the contested decision and alter the decision of the Opposition Division by rejecting the opposition of the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;










—


order EUIPO and the the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear their own costs and order EUIPO to pay those incurred by the applicant in the present proceedings, as well as in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and before the Opposition Division.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of procedural requirements with regard to the time limit by which proof of use has to be provided by the opposing party;










—


Failure to state reasons with regard to evidence and arguments of the applicant and the absence of evidence and arguments of the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;










—


Infringement of the rules for comparison of goods and for assessment of the distinctiveness of the trade mark at issue.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/31/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-517/23, Apothekerkammer Nordrhein: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 10 August 2023 — Apothekerkammer Nordrhein v DocMorris NV
Date: 2023-08-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: advertising, discount sale, distance selling, medicinal product, pharmaceutical legislation, pharmacy








C_202300640EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/640


13.11.2023





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 10 August 2023 — Apothekerkammer Nordrhein v DocMorris NV
(Case C-517/23, Apothekerkammer Nordrhein)
(C/2023/640)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Defendant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Apothekerkammer Nordrhein

Applicant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: DocMorris NV

Questions referred







1.


Does advertising for the purchase of prescription medicinal products from the entire range of products of a pharmacy fall within the scope of the rules on the advertising of medicinal products in Directive 2001/83 (1) (Titles VIII and VIIIa, Articles 86 to 100)?










2.


If Question 1 is to be answered in the affirmative:
Is it consistent with the provisions of Title VIII of Directive 2001/83, in particular Article 87(3), if a national rule (here: letter (a) of the first clause of point 2 of the second half of the first sentence of Paragraph 7(1) of the HWG) is interpreted as prohibiting the advertising of the entire range of prescription medicinal products of a mail-order pharmacy established in another Member State using promotional gifts in the form of vouchers for a monetary amount or a percentage discount for subsequent purchases of other products?










3.


Furthermore, if Question 1 is to be answered in the affirmative:
Is it consistent with the provisions of Title VIII of Directive 2001/83, in particular Article 87(3), if a national rule (here: letter (a) of the first clause of point 2 of the second half of the first sentence of Paragraph 7(1) of the HWG) is interpreted as permitting the advertising of the entire range of prescription medicinal products of a mail-order pharmacy established in another Member State using promotional gifts in the form of immediately effective price reductions and payments?






(1)  Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2001 L 311, p. 67).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/640/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)