do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice amending the notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/402/23 – Administrators (AD 6) in the following fields: 1. Microeconomics/macroeconomics, 2. Financial economics, 3. Industrial economics (OJ C 220 A, 22.6.2023)
Date: 2023-08-09
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), economics, economics profession, industrial economy, job vacancy, macroeconomics, microeconomics, recruitment








CA2023280EN.01000101.xml










9.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 280/1






Notice amending the notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/402/23 – Administrators (AD 6) in the following fields: 1. Microeconomics/macroeconomics, 2. Financial economics, 3. Industrial economics
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 220A of 22 June 2023
)
(2023/C 280 A/01)
On page 1:







for:




‘Deadline for application: 25 July 2023 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time’,












read:



‘Deadline for application: 26 July 2023 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time’.





On page 5:







for:



‘The candidates must apply online on the
EPSO website (2)
by 25 July 2023 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time.’,












read:



‘The candidates must apply online on the
EPSO website (2) by 26 July 2023 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time.’.







(2)  https://epso.europa.eu/en/job-opportunities/open-for-application.
Case C-513/23, Obshtina Pleven: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Pleven (Bulgaria) lodged on 9 August 2023 — Obshtina Pleven v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa ‘Regioni v rastezh’ 2014–2020
Date: 2023-08-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European standard, award of contract, building materials, building technique, harmonisation of standards, invitation to tender, technical rule, technical standard, tendering, works contract








C_202300313EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/313


30.10.2023





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Pleven (Bulgaria) lodged on 9 August 2023 — Obshtina Pleven v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa ‘Regioni v rastezh’ 2014–2020
(Case C-513/23, Obshtina Pleven)
(C/2023/313)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad Pleven

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Obshtina Pleven

Defendant: Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa ‘Regioni v rastezh’ 2014–2020

Question referred

Is Article 42(3)(b) of Directive 2014/24/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, together with point 2 of Annex VII thereto, to be interpreted as meaning that national legislation and case-law, according to which the contracting authority is always obliged to include with each reference made in the contract notice to a standard to be complied with the words ‘or equivalent’, even in the case where compliance is required with a harmonised standard which was adopted on the basis of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing Council Directive 89/106/EEC, or on the basis of Directive 89/106/EEC, is admissible?


(1)  
            OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65.

(2)  
            OJ 2011 L 88, p. 5.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/313/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-489/23: Action brought on 9 August 2023 — Mironovich Shor v Council
Date: 2023-08-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Moldova, economic sanctions, indemnification, international sanctions, natural person








C_202300056EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/56


9.10.2023





Action brought on 9 August 2023 — Mironovich Shor v Council
(Case T-489/23)
(C/2023/56)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Ilan Mironovich Shor (Caesarea, Israel) (represented by: T. Bontinck, L. Marchal and C. Zatschler, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare Decision (CFSP) 2023/891 and Regulation (EU) 2023/888 to be unlawful;










—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1047 of 30 May 2023 in so far as it lists the applicant under No 1 of the annex to that decision;










—


annul Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1045 of 30 May 2023 in so far as it lists the applicant under No 1 of Annex I to that regulation;










—


order the Council to make a provisional payment of EUR 100 000 in respect of the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-493/23, Tauber v Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/56/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11144 – COLT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES GROUP / LUMEN EMEA BUSINESS) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 290/02
Date: 2023-08-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, multinational enterprise, provision of services, telecommunications








C_2023290EN.01001601.xml










18.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 290/16






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11144 – COLT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES GROUP / LUMEN EMEA BUSINESS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 290/02)
On 9 August 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11144. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-480/23: Action brought on 9 August 2023 — Plahotniuc v Council
Date: 2023-08-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Moldova, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2023338EN.01003501.xml










25.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 338/35






Action brought on 9 August 2023 — Plahotniuc v Council
(Case T-480/23)
(2023/C 338/45)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Vladimir Gheorghe Plahotniuc (Chisinau, Moldova) (represented by: J. Pobjoy, Barrister-at-Law)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1047 of 30 May 2023 amending Decision (CFSP) 2023/891 concerning restrictive measures in view of actions destabilising the Republic of Moldova (1) insofar as it applies to the applicant; and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1045 of 30 May 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/888 concerning restrictive measures in view of actions destabilising the Republic of Moldova, (2) insofar as it applies to the applicant;










—


order that the defendant pays the applicant’s costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment in considering that there was a sufficiently solid factual basis for determining that the criteria for listing the applicant in Article 1 of the contested Decision and Article 2 of the contested Regulation were satisfied.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging the violation of the applicant’s rights under Article 6, read with Article 2 and 3 of the Treaty on European Union, and Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU.






(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1047 of 30 May 2023 amending Decision (CFSP) 2023/891 concerning restrictive measures in view of actions destabilising the Republic of Moldova (OJ 2023 L140I, p. 9).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1045 of 30 May 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/888 concerning restrictive measures in view of actions destabilising the Republic of Moldova (OJ 2023 L 140I, p. 1).
Case T-479/23: Action brought on 9 August 2023 — Nosio v EUIPO — Terre di Venezia (VENTESSA)
Date: 2023-08-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023329EN.01004301.xml










18.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/43






Action brought on 9 August 2023 — Nosio v EUIPO — Terre di Venezia (VENTESSA)
(Case T-479/23)
(2023/C 329/61)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Nosio SpA (Mezzocorona, Italy) (represented by: J. Graffer, G. Locurto and A. Ottolini, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Terre di Venezia Srl (Venice, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark VENTESSA — Application No 18 238 494

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 June 2023 in Case R 1457/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11080 – SAVVY / TENCENT / YING / VSPN) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 288/01
Date: 2023-08-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: audiovisual industry, broadcasting, economic concentration, merger control, online game, software, sporting event








C_2023288EN.01000101.xml










17.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11080 – SAVVY / TENCENT / YING / VSPN)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 288/01)
On 9 August 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11080. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 8 August 2023 2023/C 280/01
Date: 2023-08-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023280EN.01000101.xml










9.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 280/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

8 August 2023
(2023/C 280/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0944 




JPY


Japanese yen


156,55 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4515 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86158 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,7440 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9600 




ISK


Iceland króna


144,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,2950 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,240 




HUF


Hungarian forint


388,50 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4500 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9498 




TRY


Turkish lira


29,5716 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6827 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4755 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5491 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8116 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4766 




KRW


South Korean won


1 444,82 




ZAR


South African rand


20,6870 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8950 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 665,11 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0151 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,747 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,348 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,3970 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,8176 




INR


Indian rupee


90,6614 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-338/23 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 9 August 2023 — Next Media Project v EFCA (Interim relief — Public supply contracts — Communication and event organisation services — Application for interim measures — No prima facie case)
Date: 2023-08-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: communications profession, invitation to tender, provision of services, services contract, tendering








C_202300660EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/660


13.11.2023





Order of the President of the General Court of 9 August 2023 — Next Media Project v EFCA
(Case T-338/23 R)
(Interim relief - Public supply contracts - Communication and event organisation services - Application for interim measures - No prima facie case)
(C/2023/660)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Next Media Project, SLU (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by R. Simar and L. Trefon, lawyers)

Defendant: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) (represented by: S. Steele, acting as Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, a stay of execution of the decision of the European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) of 8 June 2023 by which the latter declared the applicant’s tender for Lot 1 of the call for tenders EFCA/2022/OP/0004 ‘Communication Services’ (Lot 1) and ‘Event Organisation Services’ (Lot 2) to be irregular (‘the contested decision’) and, secondly, that the EFCA be ordered not to enter into a framework contract with the successful tenderer.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is rejected.










2.


The costs are reserved.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/660/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)