do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-439/23: Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Marcandita/EUIPO — Euronext (bnext)
Date: 2023-07-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, consultancy, financial services, financial transaction, market research, registered trade mark, search engine, software, trade-mark law








C_2023321EN.01006701.xml










11.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 321/67






Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Marcandita/EUIPO — Euronext (bnext)
(Case T-439/23)
(2023/C 321/76)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Marcandita, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Gracia Albero and E. Cebollero González, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Euronext NV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark bnext — Application for registration No 18 309 107

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 April 2023 in Case R 2111/2022-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings before the General Court and order the intervener to pay the costs deriving from the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Forth Board of Appeal EUIPO.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-444/23: Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Certinvest v EUIPO — Kiddinx Studios (Tina)
Date: 2023-07-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, hairdressing and beauty care, polishing and scouring preparations, registered trade mark, toiletries, trade-mark law








C_2023321EN.01006901.xml










11.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 321/69






Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Certinvest v EUIPO — Kiddinx Studios (Tina)
(Case T-444/23)
(2023/C 321/78)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Certinvest SRL (Păntăşeşti, Romania) (represented by: I. Speciac, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kiddinx Studios GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Tina — Application for registration No 18 271 155

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 May 2023 in Case R 1979/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in the sense of allowing the appeal filed by the applicant against the decision of the Opposition Division and, consequently, oblige EUIPO to continue the registration proceedings for the trade mark at issue for all goods and services.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-438/23: Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Lotum one v EUIPO — Playtika Santa Monica (WORDBLITZ)
Date: 2023-07-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, audiovisual production, computer equipment, electronic publishing, film production, mobile phone, online game, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2023321EN.01006602.xml










11.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 321/66






Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Lotum one v EUIPO — Playtika Santa Monica (WORDBLITZ)
(Case T-438/23)
(2023/C 321/75)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Lotum one GmbH (Bad Nauheim, Germany) (represented by: T. Hogh Holub, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Playtika Santa Monica, LLC (Henderson, Nevada, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark WORDBLITZ — Application No 18 024 980

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 March 2023 in Case R 1682/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-488/23: Action brought on 31 July 2023 — BHW Bausparkasse v SRB
Date: 2023-07-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, financing method, financing plan, judicial review, official language, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2023338EN.01004002.xml










25.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 338/40






Action brought on 31 July 2023 — BHW Bausparkasse v SRB
(Case T-488/23)
(2023/C 338/52)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: BHW Bausparkasse (Hameln, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger, M. Weber and D. Schoo, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2023/23) together with annexes, at least in so far as the contested decision together with Annexes I, II and III concern the applicant’s contribution,










—


order the SRB to pay the costs.




In the alternative, in the event that the Court takes the view that the contested decision is legally non-existent as a result of the use of the incorrect official language by the SRB and the action for annulment would therefore be inadmissible on the ground that it would be devoid of purpose, the applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that the contested decision is legally non-existent;










—


order the SRB to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law which are identical to those relied on in Case T-483/23, Deutsche Kreditbank v SRB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11202 – FORTUM MARKETS / TELGE ENERGI) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 275/02
Date: 2023-07-31
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, energy production, merger control, renewable energy, retail selling








C_2023275EN.01001301.xml










4.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 275/13






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11202 – FORTUM MARKETS / TELGE ENERGI)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 275/02)
On 31 July 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11202. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-442/23: Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Giuliani v EUIPO — H&H (Swisse)
Date: 2023-07-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, food supplement, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vitamin








C_2023329EN.01003001.xml










18.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/30






Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Giuliani v EUIPO — H&H (Swisse)
(Case T-442/23)
(2023/C 329/42)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Giuliani SpA (Milano, Italy) (represented by: S. de Bosio, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Health and Happiness (H&H) Hong Kong Ltd (Hong Kong, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Swisse (Colours red, black and white) — European Union trade mark No 3 252 152

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 May 2023 in Case R 2185/2019-1 RENV

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


uphold the application for declaration of invalidity of the trade mark at issue;










—


order that defendant and the EUTM Proprietor to jointly and severally pay all costs.





Pleas in law







—


The contested decision is held ultra petita and in disregard of the res judicata on the factual assessments of the Cancellation Division and of the first Board of Appeal decision;










—


Infringements of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, of Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, of Article 32(i) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 and of Articles 71(1) and 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(g) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94;










—


Infringement of Article 51(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94.
Case T-458/23: Action brought on 31 July 2023 — BPCE and Others v SRB
Date: 2023-07-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financial institution, financing method, financing plan








C_202300055EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/55


9.10.2023





Action brought on 31 July 2023 — BPCE and Others v SRB
(Case T-458/23)
(C/2023/55)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: BPCE (Paris, France) and the 44 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville and M. Trabucchi, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Decision SRB/ES/2023/23 of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicants;










—


pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the SRM Regulation, (1) the Implementing Regulation (2) and the Delegated Regulation (3) inapplicable;










—


Articles 69(1), 69(2), 70(1) and 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation;










—


Articles 4(2), 5, 6, 7 and 20 of the Delegated Regulation, and Annex I thereto;










—


Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants put forward eight pleas in law which are, for the most part, identical or similar to those put forward in Case T-456/23, Crédit agricole and Others v SRB.


(1)  Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 255, p. 1).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 of 19 December 2014 specifying uniform conditions of application of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (OJ 2015 L 15, p. 1).

(3)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 of 21 October 2014 supplementing Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ex ante contributions to resolution financing arrangements (OJ 2015 L 11, p. 44).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/55/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2021/2117 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021 amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products, (EU) No 1151/2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs, (EU) No 251/2014 on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of aromatised wine products and (EU) No 228/2013 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union (Official Journal of the European Union L 435 of 6 December 2021)
Date: 2023-07-31
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: agricultural product, agricultural production, aid to agriculture, common organisation of markets, consumer information, designation of origin, labelling, peripheral region, product designation, single payment scheme




L_2023192EN.01003401.xml










31.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 192/34







Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2021/2117 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021 amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products, (EU) No 1151/2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs, (EU) No 251/2014 on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of aromatised wine products and (EU) No 228/2013 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 435 of 6 December 2021
)


On page 313, Article 5(8):
for:


‘8.   Wine which meets the labelling requirements of Article 119 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 and aromatised wine products which meet the labelling rules of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 applicable in both cases before 8 December 2023 and which were produced and labelled before that date may continue to be placed on the market until stocks are exhausted.’

,read:


‘8.   Wine which meets the labelling requirements of Article 119 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 and aromatised wine products which meet the labelling rules of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 applicable in both cases before 8 December 2023 and which were produced before that date may continue to be placed on the market until stocks are exhausted.’.
Case T-459/23: Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Société générale and SG Option Europe v SRB
Date: 2023-07-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financial institution, financing method, financing plan








C_202300025EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/25


9.10.2023





Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Société générale and SG Option Europe v SRB
(Case T-459/23)
(C/2023/25)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Société générale (Paris, France) and SG Option Europe (Puteaux, France) (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville and M. Trabucchi, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Decision SRB/ES/2023/23 of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicants;










—


pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the SRM Regulation, (1) the Implementing Regulation (2) and the Delegated Regulation (3) inapplicable;






—


Articles 69(1), 69(2), 70(1) and 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation;










—


Articles 4(2), 5, 6, 7 and 20 of the Delegated Regulation, and Annex I thereto;










—


Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation;














—


order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants put forward eight pleas in law which are, for the most part, identical or similar to those put forward in Case T-456/23, Crédit agricole and Others v SRB.


(1)  Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 255, p. 1).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 of 19 December 2014 specifying uniform conditions of application of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (OJ 2015 L 15, p. 1).

(3)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 of 21 October 2014 supplementing Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ex ante contributions to resolution financing arrangements (OJ 2015 L 11, p. 44).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/25/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-487/23: Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale v SRB
Date: 2023-07-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, financing method, financing plan, infringement of EU law, judicial review, official language, principle of proportionality, right to justice








C_2023338EN.01004001.xml










25.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 338/40






Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale v SRB
(Case T-487/23)
(2023/C 338/51)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale (represented by: H. Berger, M. Weber and D. Schoo, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2023/23) together with annexes, at least in so far as the contested decision together with Annexes I, II and III concern the applicant’s contribution,










—


order the SRB to pay the costs.




In the alternative, in the event that the Court takes the view that the contested decision is legally non-existent as a result of the use of the incorrect official language by the SRB and the action for annulment would therefore be inadmissible on the ground that it would be devoid of purpose, the applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that the contested decision is legally non-existent;










—


order the SRB to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on nine pleas in law which are identical to those relied on in Case T-440/23, Berlin Hyp v SRB.
Case T-460/23: Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Banque postale v SRB
Date: 2023-07-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan








C_202300026EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/26


9.10.2023





Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Banque postale v SRB
(Case T-460/23)
(C/2023/26)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: La Banque postale (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville and M. Trabucchi, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Decision SRB/ES/2023/23 of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicant;










—


pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the SRM Regulation, (1) the Implementing Regulation (2) and the Delegated Regulation (3) inapplicable;






—


Articles 69(1), 69(2), 70(1) and 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation;










—


Articles 4(2), 5, 6, 7 and 20 of the Delegated Regulation, and Annex I thereto;










—


Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation;














—


order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant puts forward eight pleas in law which are, for the most part, identical or similar to those put forward in Case T-456/23, Crédit agricole and Others v SRB.


(1)  Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 255, p. 1).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 of 19 December 2014 specifying uniform conditions of application of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (OJ 2015 L 15, p. 1).

(3)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 of 21 October 2014 supplementing Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ex ante contributions to resolution financing arrangements (OJ 2015 L 11, p. 44).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/26/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)