do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-441/23: Action brought on 27 July 2023 — Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB
Date: 2023-07-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, financing method, financing plan, infringement of EU law, judicial review, official language, principle of proportionality, right to justice








C_2023329EN.01002901.xml










18.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/29






Action brought on 27 July 2023 — Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB
(Case T-441/23)
(2023/C 329/41)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Landesbank Baden-Württemberg (represented by: H. Berger, M. Weber and D. Schoo, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2023/23) together with annexes, at least in so far as the contested decision together with Annexes I, II and III concern the applicant’s contribution,










—


order the SRB to pay the costs.




In the alternative, in the event that the Court takes the view that the contested decision is legally non-existent as a result of the use of the incorrect official language by the SRB and the action for annulment would therefore be inadmissible on the ground that it would be devoid of purpose, the applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that the contested decision is legally non-existent;










—


order the SRB to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on nine pleas in law which are identical to those relied on in Case T-440/23, Berlin Hyp v SRB.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 26 July 2023 2023/C 264/08
Date: 2023-07-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023264EN.01004201.xml










27.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 264/42






Euro exchange rates (1)

26 July 2023
(2023/C 264/08)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1059 




JPY


Japanese yen


155,30 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4517 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85695 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,5313 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9549 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,2000 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,050 




HUF


Hungarian forint


384,13 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4200 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9288 




TRY


Turkish lira


29,8020 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6401 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4620 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6308 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7814 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4682 




KRW


South Korean won


1 410,55 




ZAR


South African rand


19,5801 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9109 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 639,98 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0313 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,421 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,910 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,2401 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,6702 




INR


Indian rupee


90,7231 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1500 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1495 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses 2023/C 264/03
Date: 2023-07-27
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, legal person, natural person








C_2023264EN.01003401.xml










27.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 264/34






Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1500 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1495 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses
(2023/C 264/03)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in the Annex to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1500 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 (3) as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1495 (4), concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses.
The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons and entities should be included on the list of natural and legal persons, entities, and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 and Regulation (EU) 2020/1998. The grounds for designations of those persons and entities appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.
The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2020/1998, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).
The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 28 July 2023, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, pursuant to Article 10 of Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999.


(1)  OJ L 410 I, 7.12.2020, p. 13.

(2)  OJ L 183 I, 20.7.2023, p. 35.

(3)  OJ L 410 I, 7.12.2020, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 183 I, 20.7.2023, p. 1.
Case T-786/22: Order of the General Court of 27 July 2023 — Frajese v Commission (Action for annulment — Medicinal products for human use — Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Spikevax — Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Comirnaty — COVID-19 vaccine — No interest in bringing proceedings — No direct concern — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2023-07-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: admissibility, coronavirus disease, drug surveillance, epidemic, market approval, vaccine








C_2023329EN.01002602.xml










18.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/26






Order of the General Court of 27 July 2023 — Frajese v Commission
(Case T-786/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Spikevax - Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Comirnaty - COVID-19 vaccine - No interest in bringing proceedings - No direct concern - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)
(2023/C 329/38)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Giovanni Frajese (Rome, Italy) (represented by: O. Milanese and A. Montanari, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Commission Implementing Decision C(2022) 7163 final of 3 October 2022 granting marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council for ‘Spikevax — elasomeran’, a medicinal product for human use and repealing Decision C(2021) 94(final) and, second, of Commission Implementing Decision C(2022) 7342 final of 10 October 2022 granting marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council for ‘Comirnaty — tozinameran, COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (nucleoside-modified)’, a medicinal product for human use and repealing Decision C(2020) 9598(final).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Mr Giovanni Frajese shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 63, 20.2.2023.
Case T-449/23: Action brought on 27 July 2023 — Donner & Reuschel v SRB
Date: 2023-07-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, confidentiality, financing method, financing plan, judicial review, right to justice








C_2023329EN.01003202.xml










18.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/32






Action brought on 27 July 2023 — Donner & Reuschel v SRB
(Case T-449/23)
(2023/C 329/46)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Donner & Reuschel AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: F. Kruis and N. Bartmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2023/23) together with annexes, at least in so far as it concerns the applicant;










—


order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on eight pleas in law which are identical to those relied on in Case T-410/23, BAWAG PSK v SRB.
Corrigendum to Council Directive (EU) 2020/262 of 19 December 2019 laying down the general arrangements for excise duty (Official Journal of the European Union L 58 of 27 February 2020)
Date: 2023-07-27
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: alcoholic beverage, electrical energy, energy-generating product, excise duty, free movement of goods, import (EU), suspension of customs duties, tax harmonisation, tax system, tobacco








L_2023188EN.01006001.xml










27.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 188/60







Corrigendum to Council Directive (EU) 2020/262 of 19 December 2019 laying down the general arrangements for excise duty

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 58 of 27 February 2020
)


On page 33, Article 45(2):
for:


                  ‘… set out in accordance with Article 6(9), unless a Member State has reasonable cause to suspect fraud or irregularity.’,

read:


                  ‘… set out in accordance with Article 6(10), unless a Member State has reasonable cause to suspect fraud or irregularity.’.
Case T-467/23: Action brought on 27 July 2023 — Stadtsparkasse Düsseldorf v SRB
Date: 2023-07-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, confidentiality, financing method, financing plan, judicial review, right to justice








C_2023329EN.01003602.xml










18.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/36






Action brought on 27 July 2023 — Stadtsparkasse Düsseldorf v SRB
(Case T-467/23)
(2023/C 329/53)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Stadtsparkasse Düsseldorf (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: F. Kruis and N. Bartmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2023/23) together with annexes, at least in so far as it concerns the applicant;










—


order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on eight pleas in law which are identical to those relied on in Case T-410/23, BAWAG PSK v SRB.
Case T-457/23: Action brought on 27 July 2023 — Sparkasse Hannover v SRB
Date: 2023-07-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, confidentiality, financing method, financing plan, judicial review, right to justice








C_2023329EN.01003502.xml










18.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/35






Action brought on 27 July 2023 — Sparkasse Hannover v SRB
(Case T-457/23)
(2023/C 329/51)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Sparkasse Hannover (Hannover, Germany) (represented by: F. Kruis and N. Bartmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2023/23) together with annexes, at least in so far as it concerns the applicant;










—


order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on eight pleas in law which are identical to those relied on in Case T-410/23, BAWAG PSK v SRB.