do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 12 July 2023 2023/C 246/03
Date: 2023-07-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023246EN.01000601.xml










13.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/6






Euro exchange rates (1)

12 July 2023
(2023/C 246/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1022 




JPY


Japanese yen


153,84 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4524 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85378 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,6800 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9683 




ISK


Iceland króna


146,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,3310 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,828 




HUF


Hungarian forint


376,48 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4473 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9495 




TRY


Turkish lira


28,8159 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6479 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4574 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6268 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7818 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4751 




KRW


South Korean won


1 420,80 




ZAR


South African rand


20,3368 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9274 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 608,80 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1263 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,463 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,434 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,3477 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,7485 




INR


Indian rupee


90,7173 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-134/22, G GmbH: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — MO v SM as liquidator of G GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Collective redundancies — Directive 98/59/EC — Information and consultation — Second subparagraph of Article 2(3) — Obligation of employer contemplating a collective redundancy to forward to the competent public authority a copy of the information communicated to the workers’ representatives — Objective — Consequences of a failure to comply with that obligation)
Date: 2023-07-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: approximation of laws, collective dismissal, disclosure of information, employer, labour law, public authorities, worker information, workers' representation








C_2023321EN.01001102.xml










11.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 321/11






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — MO v SM as liquidator of G GmbH
(Case C-134/22, (1) G GmbH)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Collective redundancies - Directive 98/59/EC - Information and consultation - Second subparagraph of Article 2(3) - Obligation of employer contemplating a collective redundancy to forward to the competent public authority a copy of the information communicated to the workers’ representatives - Objective - Consequences of a failure to comply with that obligation)
(2023/C 321/13)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: MO

Defendant: SM as liquidator of G GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

The second subparagraph of Article 2(3) of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies
must be interpreted as meaning that the employer’s obligation to forward to the competent public authority a copy of, at least, the elements of the written communication which are provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 2(3), point (b), subpoints (i) to (v) of that directive is not intended to confer individual protection on the workers affected by collective redundancies.


(1)  
            OJ C 222, 7.6.2022
Case C-142/23 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 13 July 2023 — Hecht Pharma GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
Date: 2023-07-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, medicinal product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023329EN.01000502.xml










18.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/5






Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 13 July 2023 — Hecht Pharma GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
(Case C-142/23 P) (1)

(Appeal - EU trade mark - Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed - Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law - Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
(2023/C 329/07)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Hecht Pharma GmbH (represented by: C. Sachs and J. Sachs, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Gufic BioSciences Ltd.

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is not allowed to proceed.










2.


Hecht Pharma GmbH shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 179, 22.5.2023.
Case T-393/23: Action brought on 13 July 2023 — Teva v Commission
Date: 2023-07-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: drug surveillance, generic drug, market approval








C_2023321EN.01005501.xml










11.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 321/55






Action brought on 13 July 2023 — Teva v Commission
(Case T-393/23)
(2023/C 321/61)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Teva GmbH (Ulm, Germany) (represented by: Z. West, S. Love and G. Morgan, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the applicant’s request for annulment admissible and well- founded;










—


annul the Contested Decision of 2 May 2023 (published on May 2023) amending the marketing authorisation granted by Decision C(2014)601(final) for ‘Tecfidera — Dimethyl fumarate’, a medicinal product for human use, as well as any later decision, to the extent that they perpetuate and/or replace that decision including any follow-up regulatory actions, in so far as they relate to the applicant;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law alleging that the European Commission failed to observe the simple time limit for meeting the substantive requirement that is necessary to obtain an extension of market protection as required by Article 14(11) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council: (1)







—


An extension of the marketing protection to eleven years may only be granted if an authorisation for a new therapeutic indication is obtained within the first eight years of the marketing authorisation being granted;










—


Biogen was required to obtain an authorisation for the new indication during the first eight years following the grant of Tecfidera’s marketing authorisation;










—


The marketing authorisation for Tecfidera was granted on 30 January 2014 and took effect on 3 February 2014. However, the Commission decision to grant an authorisation for the new therapeutic indication was not issued until 13 May 2022 (over three months after the end of the initial eight year period);










—


Tecfidera therefore should not be granted an additional year of market exclusivity since Biogen failed to meet the statutory requirements of Article 14(11).






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency (OJ 2004 L 136, p. 1).
Case C-439/23, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Civile di Padova (Italy) lodged on 13 July 2023 — KV v Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
Date: 2023-07-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: equal treatment, framework agreement, national implementing measure, temporary employment, termination of employment, work contract








C_202300496EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/496


6.11.2023





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Civile di Padova (Italy) lodged on 13 July 2023 — KV v Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
(Case C-439/23, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche)
(C/2023/496)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Civile di Padova

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: KV

Defendant: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche

Questions referred

Should clause 4(1) of Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP be applied: (1)







—



ratione temporis to fixed-term employment relationships established and concluded as a result of the expiry of the contractual term prior to the entry into force of Directive 1999/70/EC (10 July 1999);










—



ratione temporis to fixed-term employment relationships established on the basis of an individual employment contract entered into before the entry into force of Directive 1999/70/EC (10 July 1999) and concluded as a result of the expiry of the contractual term on a date between the entry into force of the directive and the expiry of the deadline given to the Member States for its transposition (10 July 2001); or










—



ratione temporis to fixed-term employment relationships established on the basis of an individual employment contract entered into in the period between the entry into force of Directive 1999/70/EC (10 July 1999) and the expiry of the deadline given to Member States for its transposition (10 July 2001), and concluded as a result of the expiry of the contractual term after that latter date?






(1)  
            OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/496/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11172 – PLD / NBIM / VEGHEL) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 246/07
Date: 2023-07-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Netherlands, economic concentration, investment company, logistics, merger control, real estate business, real property








C_2023246EN.01001001.xml










13.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/10






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11172 – PLD / NBIM / VEGHEL)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 246/07)

1.   
On 6 July 2023, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Prologis, L.P. (‘PLD’, United States of America),










—


Norges Bank Investment Management (‘NBIM’, Norway),










—


one real estate property located in Veghel (‘Veghel Asset’, Netherlands).




PLD and NBIM will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of the Veghel Asset.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of assets.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


PLD owns, operates and develops real estate properties, mainly for industrial purposes, in the Americas, Europe and Asia;










—


NBIM provides institutional investment for the Government Pension Fund Global on behalf of the Norwegian Ministry of Finance, focusing on worldwide investments including real estate investments in North America, Europe and Japan;










—


The Veghel Asset is a single real estate property located in Veghel, Netherlands, which is used as a logistics facility.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11172 – PLD / NBIM / VEGHEL
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case C-443/23 P: Appeal brought on 13 July 2023 by Consulta GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) delivered on 17 May 2023 in Case T-267/22, Consulta GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office
Date: 2023-07-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, catering industry, hotel industry, provision of services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202401077EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1077


5.2.2024





Appeal brought on 13 July 2023 by Consulta GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) delivered on 17 May 2023 in Case T-267/22, Consulta GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office
(Case C-443/23 P)
(C/2024/1077)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Consulta GmbH (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, S. Clotten and S. Brandstätter, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 9 November 2023, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal is not allowed to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1077/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-407/23: Action brought on 13 July 2023 — Salzburger Sparkasse Bank v SRB
Date: 2023-07-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan, principle of proportionality








C_2023314EN.01002401.xml










4.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 314/24






Action brought on 13 July 2023 — Salzburger Sparkasse Bank v SRB
(Case T-407/23)
(2023/C 314/29)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Salzburger Sparkasse Bank (Salzburg, Austria) (represented by: G. Eisenberger, A. Brenneis and J. Holzmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2023/23) together with annexes, at least in so far as it concerns the applicant, and










—


order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs.




The applicant further claims that, on account of the connection between and same subject matter of the following cases, they should be joined for the purposes of the written or oral part of the procedure and decision, pursuant to Article 68 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court: T-400/23, Erste Group Bank v SRB, T-401/23, Erste Bank der österreichischen Sparkassen v SRB, T-402/23, Steiermärkische Bank und Sparkasse v SRB, T-403/23, Dornbirner Sparkasse Bank v SRB, T-404/23, Kärntner Sparkasse v SRB, T-405/23, Sparkasse Niederösterreich Mitte West v SRB, T-406/23, Tiroler Sparkasse v SRB, T-407/23, Salzburger Sparkasse Bank v SRB, T-408/23, Sparkasse Oberösterreich Bank v SRB.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law which is identical to that relied on in Case T-400/23, Erste Group Bank v SRB.
Case T-403/23: Action brought on 13 July 2023 — Dornbirner Sparkasse Bank v SRB
Date: 2023-07-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, discretionary power, financing method, financing plan, legal basis, principle of proportionality, rights of the defence








C_2023314EN.01002101.xml










4.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 314/21






Action brought on 13 July 2023 — Dornbirner Sparkasse Bank v SRB
(Case T-403/23)
(2023/C 314/25)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Dornbirner Sparkasse Bank AG (Dornbirn, Austria) (represented by: G. Eisenberger, A. Brenneis and J. Holzmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2023/23) together with annexes, at least in so far as it concerns the applicant, and










—


order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs.




The applicant further claims that, on account of the connection between and same subject matter of the following cases, they should be joined for the purposes of the written or oral part of the procedure and decision, pursuant to Article 68 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court: T-400/23, Erste Group Bank v SRB, T-401/23, Erste Bank der österreichischen Sparkassen v SRB, T-402/23, Steiermärkische Bank und Sparkasse v SRB, T-403/23, Dornbirner Sparkasse Bank v SRB, T-404/23, Kärntner Sparkasse v SRB, T-405/23, Sparkasse Niederösterreich Mitte West v SRB, T-406/23, Tiroler Sparkasse v SRB, T-407/23, Salzburger Sparkasse Bank v SRB, T-408/23, Sparkasse Oberösterreich Bank v SRB.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law which are identical to those relied on in Case T-402/23, Steiermärkische Bank und Sparkasse v SRB.
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures 2023/C 246/06
Date: 2023-07-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: Malaysia, Russia, South Korea, Türkiye, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), iron, originating product, piping, steel, tube








C_2023246EN.01000901.xml










13.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/9






Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(2023/C 246/06)








1.


As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.




2.   Procedure

Union producers may submit a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.








4.


This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Certain tube and pipe fittings


The Russian Federation
The Republic of Korea
Malaysia


Anti-dumping duty


COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/566 of 9 April 2019 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain tube and pipe fittings originating in the Russian Federation, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council and terminating the investigation concerning the imports of the same product originating in the Republic of Turkey (OJ L 99, 10.04.2019, p. 9)


11.4.2024










(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column.
Case T-395/23: Action brought on 13 July 2023 — Eckes-Granini Group and International Beer Breweries v EUIPO — Capri Sun (PRISUN)
Date: 2023-07-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beer, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023304EN.01003001.xml










28.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 304/30






Action brought on 13 July 2023 — Eckes-Granini Group and International Beer Breweries v EUIPO — Capri Sun (PRISUN)
(Case T-395/23)
(2023/C 304/37)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicants: Eckes-Granini Group GmbH (Nieder-Olm, Germany), International Beer Breweries Ltd (Ashkelon, Israel) (represented by: J. Wachsmuth, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Capri Sun AG (Zug, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicants for the trade mark at issue: Applicants

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘PRISUN’ — Application No 18 228 012

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 April 2023 in Case R 1057/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


reject the opposition of Capri Sun AG;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.