do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
P9_TA(2023)0265 – Management, conservation and control measures in the area covered under the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA) – European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 July 2023 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Area covered under the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA) (COM(2022)0563 – C9-0370/2022 – 2022/0348(COD)) (Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
Date: 2023-07-11
Institutions: Committee on Development, Committee on Fisheries, Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety, European Parliament
Subjects: Indian Ocean, conservation of fish stocks, fishing agreement, fishing area, fishing controls, fishing rights, multilateral agreement, sea fish, sea fishing








C_202404030EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4030


17.7.2024






P9_TA(2023)0265

Management, conservation and control measures in the area covered under the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA)


European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 July 2023 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Area covered under the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA) (COM(2022)0563 – C9-0370/2022 – 2022/0348(COD))


(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

(C/2024/4030)



The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2022)0563),










—


having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C9-0370/2022),










—


having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries (A9-0192/2023),













1.


Rejects the Commission proposal;












2.


Calls on the Commission to withdraw its proposal;












3.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4030/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-383/23: Action brought on 11 July 2023 — Essilor International v EUIPO — Carl Zeiss Vision (MYOLUX)
Date: 2023-07-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, optical industry, provision of services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023304EN.01002801.xml










28.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 304/28






Action brought on 11 July 2023 — Essilor International v EUIPO — Carl Zeiss Vision (MYOLUX)
(Case T-383/23)
(2023/C 304/35)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Essilor International (Charenton-le-Pont, France) (represented by: A. Parassina and A. Giovannardi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH (Aalen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark MYOLUX — Application for registration No 18 215 110

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 May 2023 in Case R 267/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


declare the registrability of the trade mark at issue;










—


order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings born by the applicant.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-431/23, Wibra België: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 11 July 2023 — AE. CO, DU and Others v BA, EP and RI, acting as insolvency administrators of Wibra België SA, Wibra België SRL
Date: 2023-07-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: financial solvency, judicial proceedings, labour law, liquidation, transfer of businesses, worker consultation, worker information








C_202300203EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/203


23.10.2023





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 11 July 2023 — AE. CO, DU and Others v BA, EP and RI, acting as insolvency administrators of Wibra België SA, Wibra België SRL
(Case C-431/23, Wibra België)
(C/2023/203)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal du travail de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: AE, CO, DU and Others

Defendants: BA, EP and RI, acting as insolvency administrators of Wibra België SA, Wibra België SRL

Other parties to the proceedings: VT, HL, MO and Others

Question referred

Must Article 5(1) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses (1) be interpreted as meaning that the condition which it lays down, according to which Articles 3 and 4 of that directive are not to apply to the transfer of an undertaking where the transferor is the subject of bankruptcy proceedings or any analogous insolvency proceedings instituted with a view to the liquidation of the assets of the transferor, is not satisfied where the transfer of all or part of an undertaking is prepared prior to the opening of insolvency proceedings with a view to the liquidation of the assets of the transferor, in the present case in the context of proceedings for judicial restructuring ending in a transfer agreement approval of which is refused by the competent court but which is then carried out immediately after the declaration of insolvency, outside the application of any statutory or regulatory provisions under national law?


(1)  
            OJ 2001 L 82, p. 16.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/203/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-425/23: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 11 July 2023 — Profi Credit Bulgaria EOOD, Agentsia za sabirane na vzemania EAD City Cash OOD
Date: 2023-07-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, case-law, claim, consumer credit, consumer protection, infringement of EU law, injunction, unfair terms of contract








C_202300118EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/118


16.10.2023





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 11 July 2023 — Profi Credit Bulgaria EOOD, Agentsia za sabirane na vzemania EAD City Cash OOD
(Case C-425/23)
(C/2023/118)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski rayonen sad

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants in the order for payment procedures: Profi Credit Bulgaria EOOD, Agentsia za sabirane na vzemania EAD City Cash OOD

Questions referred









1.


Do Articles 6(1) and Article 7 of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) on unfair terms in consumer contracts (Directive 93/13/EEC) permit national case-law such as that at issue in the main proceedings under which
the court issuing an order for payment in respect of only part of the claims arising from a credit agreement has no jurisdiction to demand that the creditor indicate the amount of the instalments which are demanded of the consumer and is obliged, even in the absence of such information, to issue an order for payment in respect of the part of the claims which the creditor is pursuing as a lump sum?












2.


Is Article 6(1) of Directive 93/12/EEC, read in conjunction with the principle of effectiveness of EU law and Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union, to be interpreted as meaning that
instructions to issue a decision on the substance which may infringe EU law and which require a lower court to comply with the will of the higher court — not by issuing a formal decision referring back to the decision of the higher court, but by a decision which is issued in the name of the formation of the lower court — are binding on the lower court and do not impinge on its independence as expressed in the lower court’s internal conviction as to whether a provision of EU law is applicable?






(1)  
            OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/118/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 10 July 2023 2023/C 244/03
Date: 2023-07-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023244EN.01000501.xml










11.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/5






Euro exchange rates (1)

10 July 2023
(2023/C 244/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0956 




JPY


Japanese yen


155,73 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4512 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85733 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,8745 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9753 




ISK


Iceland króna


147,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,5635 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,843 




HUF


Hungarian forint


382,65 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4508 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9490 




TRY


Turkish lira


28,5900 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6488 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4552 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5783 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7707 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4773 




KRW


South Korean won


1 429,51 




ZAR


South African rand


20,6523 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9291 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 655,60 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1165 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,996 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,477 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,3246 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,7544 




INR


Indian rupee


90,4985 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11115 – ADNOC / ÖBAG /OMV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 251/01
Date: 2023-07-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, fuel, gas industry, holding company, investment company, merger control, oil industry, petrochemicals, wholesale selling








C_2023251EN.01000101.xml










17.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 251/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11115 – ADNOC / ÖBAG /OMV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 251/01)
On 11 July 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11115. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-428/23, ROGON and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 11 July 2023 — ROGON GmbH & Co. KG, MVI Management GmbH and DC v Deutscher Fußballbund e. V. (DFB)
Date: 2023-07-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: cartel, control of restrictive practices, professional sport, restriction on competition, sports body








C_202300119EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/119


16.10.2023





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 11 July 2023 — ROGON GmbH & Co. KG, MVI Management GmbH and DC v Deutscher Fußballbund e. V. (DFB)
(Case C-428/23, ROGON and Others)
(C/2023/119)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant, appellant on a point of law and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: ROGON GmbH & Co. KG, MVI Management GmbH, DC

Defendant, respondent in the appeal on a point of law and appellant on a point of law: Deutscher Fußballbund e. V. (DFB)

Questions referred

The questions referred for a preliminary ruling concern the interpretation of Article 101 TFEU:






1.


Do the principles developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the judgments in Wouters of 19 February 2002 (C-309/99) and Meca Medina of 18 July 2006 (C-519/04 P), according to which, when applying the rule prohibiting cartels,






—


account must be taken of the overall context in which the decision in question was taken or produces its effects and, more specifically, of its objectives,










—


and according to which it has then to be considered whether the decision’s consequential effects restrictive of competition are inherent in the pursuit of those objectives,










—


and whether they are proportionate to those objectives (‘the Meca Medina test’),




apply to the regulations of a sports association, which are addressed to members of the association and regulate the use of services of undertakings outside the association on a market upstream of the association’s activities?










2.


If question 1 is answered in the affirmative: in that case, must the Meca Medina test be applied to all the provisions of those regulations, or does its application depend on substantive criteria, such as the proximity or remoteness of the individual rule to the sporting activity of the association?






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/119/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine 2023/C 244/02
Date: 2023-07-11
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








C_2023244EN.01000401.xml










11.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/4






Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine
(2023/C 244/02)
The following information is brought to the attention of Valeriy Mikhailovich PAKHNITS (No. 1384) and Andrey Alexandrovich SPIVAK (No. 1420), persons appearing in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (2) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
The Council is considering maintaining the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons with new statements of reasons. Those persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for their designation, by 18 July 2023, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu


(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.
Case T-397/23: Action brought on 11 July 2023 — Ausnit, Olariu și Asociații v Commission
Date: 2023-07-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: eligibility criteria, legal basis, principle of proportionality, project funding








C_2023304EN.01003101.xml










28.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 304/31






Action brought on 11 July 2023 — Ausnit, Olariu și Asociații v Commission
(Case T-397/23)
(2023/C 304/38)
Language of the case: Romanian

Parties


Applicant: Ausnit, Olariu și Asociații SRL (Lugoj, Romania) (represented by: F. Irimia, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul European Commission Decision C(2023) 3232 final of 10 May 2023.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law:






1.


The decision has no legal basis, having been adopted on the basis of an erroneous interpretation and application of the provisions of Article II.19.1.(f) of the grant agreement, in conjunction with Article 30 of Regulation No 966/2012 applicable to the agreement in accordance with Article 279(3) of Regulation No 1046/2018.










2.


The contested decision was adopted in breach of the principle of proportionality enshrined in Article 135 of Regulation No 966/2012, following the provisions of Article II.27.6 of the grant agreement, in breach of Article II.25.4 of that agreement and in breach of Article 5 TFEU and the provisions of Additional Protocol No 2.










3.


The contested decision is contrary to the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.
P9_TA(2023)0257 – EU/Japan Agreement: air services – European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 July 2023 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan on certain provisions of agreements between Member States of the European Union and Japan for air services (07028/2023 – C9-0119/2023 – 2022/0419(NLE)) (Consent)
Date: 2023-07-11
Institutions: Committee on Transport and Tourism, European Parliament
Subjects: Japan, agreement (EU), air transport, ratification of an agreement








C_202404022EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4022


17.7.2024






P9_TA(2023)0257

EU/Japan Agreement: air services


European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 July 2023 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan on certain provisions of agreements between Member States of the European Union and Japan for air services (07028/2023 – C9-0119/2023 – 2022/0419(NLE))


(Consent)

(C/2024/4022)



The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the draft Council decision (07028/2023),










—


having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and Japan on certain aspects of air services (16232/2022),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100 (2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0119/2023),










—


having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A9-0221/2023),













1.


Gives its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Japan.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4022/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
P9_TA(2023)0256 – EU/Chile Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union – European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 July 2023 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Chile pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (6618/2023 – C9-0202/2023 – 2023/0036(NLE)) (Consent)
Date: 2023-07-11
Institutions: Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: Chile, GATT, United Kingdom, agreement (EU), revision of an agreement, tariff preference, tariff quota, withdrawal from the EU








C_202404021EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4021


17.7.2024






P9_TA(2023)0256

EU/Chile Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union


European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 July 2023 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Chile pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (6618/2023 – C9-0202/2023 – 2023/0036(NLE))


(Consent)

(C/2024/4021)



The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the draft Council decision (6618/2023),










—


having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Chile pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (6619/2023),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0202/2023),










—


having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A9-0222/2023),













1.


Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Chile.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4021/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)