Case C-252/21, Meta Platforms and Others (General terms of use of a social network): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Meta Platforms Inc., formerly Facebook Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, formerly Facebook Ireland Ltd, Facebook Deutschland GmbH v Bundeskartellamt (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Online social networks — Abuse of a dominant position by the operator of such a network — Abuse which entails the processing of the personal data of the users of that network as provided for in its general terms of use — Powers of a competition authority of a Member State to find that processing is not consistent with that regulation — Reconciliation with the powers of the national data protection supervisory authorities — Article 4(3) TEU — Principle of sincere cooperation — Points (a) to (f) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of Regulation 2016/679 — Whether the processing is lawful — Article 9(1) and (2) — Processing of special categories of personal data — Article 4(11) — Concept of ‘consent’)
Date: 2023-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: branch, control of restrictive practices, data collection, data protection, data-processing law, dominant position, personal data, protection of privacy, social media, supervisory body








C_2023296EN.01000301.xml










21.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 296/3






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Meta Platforms Inc., formerly Facebook Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, formerly Facebook Ireland Ltd, Facebook Deutschland GmbH v Bundeskartellamt
(Case C-252/21, (1) Meta Platforms and Others (General terms of use of a social network))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Online social networks - Abuse of a dominant position by the operator of such a network - Abuse which entails the processing of the personal data of the users of that network as provided for in its general terms of use - Powers of a competition authority of a Member State to find that processing is not consistent with that regulation - Reconciliation with the powers of the national data protection supervisory authorities - Article 4(3) TEU - Principle of sincere cooperation - Points (a) to (f) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of Regulation 2016/679 - Whether the processing is lawful - Article 9(1) and (2) - Processing of special categories of personal data - Article 4(11) - Concept of ‘consent’)
(2023/C 296/03)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Meta Platforms Inc., formerly Facebook Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, formerly Facebook Ireland Ltd, Facebook Deutschland GmbH

Defendant: Bundeskartellamt

Intervener: Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 51 et seq. of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), as well as Article 4(3) TEU
must be interpreted as meaning that, subject to compliance with its duty of sincere cooperation with the supervisory authorities, a competition authority of a Member State can find, in the context of the examination of an abuse of a dominant position by an undertaking within the meaning of Article 102 TFEU, that that undertaking’s general terms of use relating to the processing of personal data and the implementation thereof are not consistent with that regulation, where that finding is necessary to establish the existence of such an abuse.
In view of this duty of sincere cooperation, the national competition authority cannot depart from a decision by the competent national supervisory authority or the competent lead supervisory authority concerning those general terms or similar general terms. Where it has doubts as to the scope of such a decision, where those terms or similar terms are, simultaneously, under examination by those authorities, or where, in the absence of an investigation or decision by those authorities, the competition authority takes the view that the terms in question are not consistent with Regulation 2016/679, it must consult and seek the cooperation of those supervisory authorities in order to dispel its doubts or to determine whether it must wait for them to take a decision before starting its own assessment. In the absence of any objection on their part or of any reply within a reasonable time, the national competition authority may continue its own investigation;










2.


Article 9(1) of Regulation 2016/679
must be interpreted as meaning that, where the user of an online social network visits websites or apps to which one or more of the categories referred to in that provision relate and, as the case may be, enters information into them when registering or when placing online orders, the processing of personal data by the operator of that online social network, which entails the collection — by means of integrated interfaces, cookies or similar storage technologies — of data from visits to those sites and apps and of the information entered by the user, the linking of all those data with the user’s social network account and the use of those data by that operator, must be regarded as ‘processing of special categories of personal data’ within the meaning of that provision, which is in principle prohibited, subject to the derogations provided for in Article 9(2), where that data processing allows information falling within one of those categories to be revealed, irrespective of whether that information concerns a user of that network or any other natural person;










3.


Article 9(2)(e) of Regulation 2016/679
must be interpreted as meaning that, where the user of an online social network visits websites or apps to which one or more of the categories set out in Article 9(1) of that regulation relate, the user does not manifestly make public, within the meaning of the first of those provisions, the data relating to those visits collected by the operator of that online social network via cookies or similar storage technologies;
Where he or she enters information into such websites or apps or where he or she clicks or taps on buttons integrated into those sites and apps, such as the ‘Like’ or ‘Share’ buttons or buttons enabling the user to identify himself or herself on those sites or apps using login credentials linked to his or her social network user account, his or her telephone number or email address, that user manifestly makes public, within the meaning of Article 9(2)(e), the data thus entered or resulting from the clicking or tapping on those buttons only in the circumstance where he or she has explicitly made the choice beforehand, as the case may be on the basis of individual settings selected with full knowledge of the facts, to make the data relating to him or her publicly accessible to an unlimited number of persons;










4.


Point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of Regulation 2016/679
must be interpreted as meaning that the processing of personal data by the operator of an online social network, which entails the collection of data of the users of such a network from other services of the group to which that operator belongs or from visits by those users to third-party websites or apps, the linking of those data with the social network account of those users and the use of those data, can be regarded as necessary for the performance of a contract to which the data subjects are party, within the meaning of that provision, only on condition that the processing is objectively indispensable for a purpose that is integral to the contractual obligation intended for those users, such that the main subject matter of the contract cannot be achieved if that processing does not occur;










5.


Point (f) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of Regulation 2016/679
must be interpreted as meaning that the processing of personal data by the operator of an online social network, which entails the collection of data of the users of such a network from other services of the group to which that operator belongs or from visits by those users to third-party websites or apps, the linking of those data with the social network account of those users and the use of those data, can be regarded as necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by a third party, within the meaning of that provision, only on condition that the operator has informed the users from whom the data have been collected of a legitimate interest that is pursued by the data processing, that such processing is carried out only in so far as is strictly necessary for the purposes of that legitimate interest and that it is apparent from a balancing of the opposing interests, having regard to all the relevant circumstances, that the interests or fundamental freedoms and rights of those users do not override that legitimate interest of the controller or of a third party;










6.


Point (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of Regulation 2016/679
must be interpreted as meaning that the processing of personal data by the operator of an online social network, which entails the collection of data of the users of such a network from other services of the group to which that operator belongs or from visits by those users to third-party websites or apps, the linking of those data with the social network account of those users and the use of those data, is justified, under that provision, where it is actually necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject, pursuant to a provision of EU law or the law of the Member State concerned, where that legal basis meets an objective of public interest and is proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued and where that processing is carried out only in so far as is strictly necessary;










7.


Points (d) and (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of Regulation 2016/679
must be interpreted as meaning that the processing of personal data by the operator of an online social network, which entails the collection of data of the users of such a network from other services of the group to which that operator belongs or from visits by those users to third-party websites or apps, the linking of those data with the social network account of those users and the use of those data, cannot, in principle and subject to verification by the referring court, be regarded as necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the data subject or of another natural person, within the meaning of point (d), or for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the controller, within the meaning of point (e);










8.


Point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) and Article 9(2)(a) of Regulation 2016/679
must be interpreted as meaning that the fact that the operator of an online social network holds a dominant position on the market for online social networks does not, as such, preclude the users of such a network from being able validly to consent, within the meaning of Article 4(11) of that regulation, to the processing of their personal data by that operator. This is nevertheless an important factor in determining whether the consent was in fact validly and, in particular, freely given, which it is for that operator to prove.






(1)  OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.