do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1426 of 3 July 2023 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Sebadas / Seadas / Sabadas / Seattas / Savadas / Sevadas di Sardegna’ (PGI))
Date: 2023-07-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, Sardinia, confectionery product, designation of origin, labelling, pasta, product designation








L_2023175EN.01000101.xml










10.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 175/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1426
of 3 July 2023
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Sebadas / Seadas / Sabadas / Seattas / Savadas / Sevadas di Sardegna’ (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Sebadas / Seadas / Sabadas / Seattas / Savadas / Sevadas di Sardegna’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no reasoned statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Sebadas / Seadas / Sabadas / Seattas / Savadas / Sevadas di Sardegna’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Sebadas / Seadas / Sabadas / Seattas / Savadas / Sevadas di Sardegna’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 2.3. – Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker’s wares and Class 2.5. – Pasta, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 3 July 2023.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 103, 20.3.2023, p. 17.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case C-405/23, Touristic Aviation Services: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 3 July 2023 — Touristic Aviation Services Limited v flightright GmbH
Date: 2023-07-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: airport, carriage of passengers, carrier, civil aviation, crew, indemnification








C_2023329EN.01001301.xml










18.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/13






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 3 July 2023 — Touristic Aviation Services Limited v flightright GmbH
(Case C-405/23, Touristic Aviation Services)
(2023/C 329/16)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings


Defendant and appellant: Touristic Aviation Services Limited

Applicant and respondent: flightright GmbH

Question referred

Is Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a shortage of staff at the airport operator, or at a company commissioned by the airport operator, responsible for handling the baggage loading operations to be provided by that airport operator, constitutes an extraordinary circumstance, within the meaning of that provision, that has an external and uncontrollable effect on the normal activity of the air carrier using that service of the airport operator / company commissioned by that airport operator, or is the loading of baggage by the airport operator / a company commissioned by that airport operator and a shortage of loading staff at that airport operator / company commissioned by that airport operator to be classified as part of the normal exercise of the activity of that air carrier, such that an exculpation as provided for under Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 can be considered only if the reason for the shortage of staff constitutes an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of that provision?


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).
Case C-404/23, Gi One: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 3 July 2023 — Gi One SpA v Consip SpA
Date: 2023-07-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, competition, freedom to provide services, general legal principle, penalty, principle of proportionality, public procurement, right of establishment, tendering








C_202300311EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/311


30.10.2023





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 3 July 2023 — Gi One SpA v Consip SpA
(Case C-404/23, Gi One)
(C/2023/311)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Gi One SpA

Respondent: Consip SpA

Questions referred







1.


Do Directive 2004/18/EC, (1) Articles 16 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principles of proportionality, competition, freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services laid down in Articles 49, 50, 54 and 56 of the TFEU preclude national rules (Articles 11(6), 37(8), (9), (10), (18) and (19), and 38(1)(f) of Legislative Decree No 163 of 2006) which exclude, in the event of the expiry of the validity period of the tender originally submitted by an RTI to be established, the possibility of reducing the original membership of the RTI when the validity period of that tender is extended? In particular, are those national provisions compatible with the general principles of EU law of freedom of economic initiative and effectiveness, and with Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?










2.


Do Directive 2004/18/EC, Articles 16, 49, 50 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), Article 6 TEU, and the principles of proportionality, competition, freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services laid down in Articles 49, 50, 54 and 56 TFEU preclude national rules (Articles 38(1)(f), 48 and 75 of Legislative Decree No 163 of 2006) which provide for the application of the penalty of forfeiture of the provisional security, as an automatic consequence of the exclusion of an economic operator from a procedure for the award of a public service contract, irrespective of whether or not that economic operator has been awarded the contract?






(1)  Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/311/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-406/23 P: Appeal brought on 3 July 2023 by Arkadiusz Kaminski against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 26 April 2023 in Case T-35/22, Kaminski v EUIPO — Polfarmex (SYRENA)
Date: 2023-07-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202301124EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/1124


4.12.2023





Appeal brought on 3 July 2023 by Arkadiusz Kaminski against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 26 April 2023 in Case T-35/22, Kaminski v EUIPO — Polfarmex (SYRENA)
(Case C-406/23 P)
(C/2023/1124)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Arkadiusz Kaminski (represented by: W. Trybowski, M. Mazurek and E. Pijewska, radcowie prawni)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 17 October 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Arkadiusz Kaminski should bear his own costs


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1124/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-411/23, D.: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 3 July 2023 — D. SA v P. SA
Date: 2023-07-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: aircraft, carriage of passengers, civil aviation, defective product, engine, indemnification, traveller








C_202300043EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/43


9.10.2023





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 3 July 2023 — D. SA v P. SA
(Case C-411/23, D.)
(C/2023/43)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: D. SA

Defendant: P. SA

Questions referred







1.


Does an engine design defect revealed by the manufacturer constitute an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ and does it come within the scope of ‘unexpected [flight safety] shortcomings’ within the meaning of recitals 14 and 15 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, (1) if the carrier knew about the potential design defect several months before the flight?










2.


If the defect in the design of the engine referred to in [Question] 1 constitutes an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ within the meaning of recitals 14 and 15 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, do ‘all reasonable measures’ as mentioned in recital 14 and in Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 refer to the expectation that the air carrier should take into account the likely revelation of a design defect in the aircraft engine and take preventive steps in order to have back-up aircraft at the ready for the purpose of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 in order to relieve it of the obligation to pay the compensation provided for in Article 5(1)(c) and Article 7(1) of that regulation?






(1)  
            OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/43/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 30 June 2023 2023/C 234/01
Date: 2023-07-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023234EN.01000101.xml










3.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 234/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

30 June 2023
(2023/C 234/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0866 




JPY


Japanese yen


157,16 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4474 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85828 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,8055 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9788 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7040 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,742 




HUF


Hungarian forint


371,93 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4388 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9635 




TRY


Turkish lira


28,3193 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6398 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4415 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5157 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7858 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4732 




KRW


South Korean won


1 435,88 




ZAR


South African rand


20,5785 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8983 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 384,54 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0717 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,082 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,482 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,2788 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,5614 




INR


Indian rupee


89,2065 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11137 – EMIL FREY FRANCE / SACAPUCE / JAM PROD / GROUPE KERTRUCKS FINANCE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 275/03
Date: 2023-07-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, economic concentration, hire purchase, holding company, industrial equipment, investment company, merger control, motor vehicle, provision of services, retail selling, used goods








C_2023275EN.01001401.xml










4.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 275/14






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11137 – EMIL FREY FRANCE / SACAPUCE / JAM PROD / GROUPE KERTRUCKS FINANCE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 275/03)
On 3 July 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11137. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-410/23, Pielatak: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 3 July 2023 – I. SA v S.J.
Date: 2023-07-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: agricultural holding, consumer protection, electrical energy, electricity supply, farmer, household, provision of services, purchase, termination of a contract, unfair terms of contract








C_202402911EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2911


6.5.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 3 July 2023 – I. SA v S.J.


(Case C-410/23, Pielatak)
                (1)

(C/2024/2911)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: I. SA

Defendant: S.J.

Questions referred







1.


Do Article 2(b) and (c) of Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts and the definition of consumer (2) contained therein, and recital 17 of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, (3) also cover a farmer who concludes a contract for the purchase of electricity both for an agricultural holding and for private purposes for a household?










2.


Must Article 3(5) and (7) of and recital 51 and Annex I(1)(a) and (e) to Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC, (4) which requires that no charge be levied on consumers in the event of withdrawal from a contract for the provision of electricity services, be interpreted as precluding the possibility of imposing a contractual penalty on an energy consumer customer for the termination of a fixed-term contract for the provision of electricity (Article 4j(3a) of the Polish Law on energy of 10 April 1997)?






(1)  This case has been given a fictitious name which does not correspond to the real name of any of the parties to the proceedings.

(2)  
            OJ. 1993 L 95, p. 29; Polish Special Edition: Chapter 15 Volume 002 P. 288 – 293.

(3)  
            OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64.

(4)  
            OJ 2009 L 211, p. 55.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2911/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Prior notification of a concentration (Case M. 11115 – ADNOC / ÖBAG / OMV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (Official Journal of the European Union C 226 of 28 June 2023) 2023/C 234/06
Date: 2023-07-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, fuel, gas industry, holding company, investment company, merger control, oil industry, petrochemicals, wholesale selling








C_2023234EN.01001001.xml










3.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 234/10






Corrigendum to Prior notification of a concentration (Case M. 11115 – ADNOC / ÖBAG / OMV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 226 of 28 June 2023
)

(2023/C 234/06)
On page 10, point 2, third indent:
for:

‘OMV, currently a solely controlled subsidiary of ÖBAG, is a global energy and petrochemicals group active in upstream and downstream oil and gas activities, as well as in the production and commercialisation of polyolefins and base chemicals.’,

read:

‘OMV is a global energy and petrochemicals group active in upstream and downstream oil and gas activities, as well as in the production and commercialisation of polyolefins and base chemicals.’.