do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-397/23, Jobcenter Arbeitplus Bielefeld: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Detmold (Germany) lodged on 29 June 2023 — FL v Jobcenter Arbeitplus Bielefeld
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU national, custody, foreign national, nationality, residence permit








C_202300009EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/9


9.10.2023





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Detmold (Germany) lodged on 29 June 2023 — FL v Jobcenter Arbeitplus Bielefeld
(Case C-397/23, Jobcenter Arbeitplus Bielefeld)
(C/2023/9)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Sozialgericht Detmold

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: FL

Defendant: Jobcenter Arbeitplus Bielefeld

Joined party: Stadt Bielefeld

Question referred

Is EU law to be interpreted as precluding a national rule under which a residence permit for the purpose of care and custody may be granted only to the foreign parent of an unmarried minor child resident in national territory if the parent has his or her habitual residence in national territory, which means that Union citizens of a Member State do not have such entitlement to the grant of a residence permit for the purpose of care and custody of a Union citizen who is a minor and a national of a Member State other than the host country?


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/9/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11141 – WENDEL / TOPSCALE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 305/03
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: artificial intelligence, big data, business management, consultancy, economic concentration, information technology applications, investment company, merger control, project management








C_2023305EN.01000301.xml










29.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 305/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11141 – WENDEL / TOPSCALE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 305/03)
On 29 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11141. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-543/21, Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb (Containers on which a deposit is charged): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v famila-Handelsmarkt Kiel GmbH & Co. KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Indication of the prices of products — Directive 98/6/EC — Article 2(a) — Concept of ‘selling price’ — Products sold in returnable containers — National legislation requiring the amount of the deposit to be indicated separately from the selling price)
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer information, deposit on a polluting product, packaging product, publishing of prices, selling price








C_2023286EN.01000401.xml










14.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 286/4






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v famila-Handelsmarkt Kiel GmbH & Co. KG
(Case C-543/21, (1) Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb (Containers on which a deposit is charged))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Indication of the prices of products - Directive 98/6/EC - Article 2(a) - Concept of ‘selling price’ - Products sold in returnable containers - National legislation requiring the amount of the deposit to be indicated separately from the selling price)
(2023/C 286/04)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV

Defendant: famila-Handelsmarkt Kiel GmbH & Co. KG

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(a) of Directive 98/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 on consumer protection in the indication of the prices of products offered to consumers
must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘selling price’ laid down in that provision does not include the amount of the deposit payable by the consumer when purchasing goods in returnable containers.


(1)  OJ C 490, 6.12.2021.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1412 of 29 June 2023 approving amendments to the specification for a Protected Designation of Origin or a Protected Geographical Indication (‘Colli Asolani – Prosecco / Asolo – Prosecco’ (PDO))
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, Veneto, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, sparkling wine, white wine, wine of superior quality








L_2023171EN.01000101.xml










6.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 171/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1412
of 29 June 2023
         
approving amendments to the specification for a Protected Designation of Origin or a Protected Geographical Indication (‘Colli Asolani – Prosecco / Asolo – Prosecco’ (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Commission has examined the application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the Protected Designation of Origin ‘Colli Asolani – Prosecco / Asolo – Prosecco’, forwarded by Italy in accordance with Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. The changes include a change of name from ‘Colli Asolani – Prosecco / Asolo – Prosecco’ to ‘Asolo Prosecco / Asolo’.












(2)


The Commission has published the application for the approval of the amendments to the specification in the Official Journal of the European Union (2), as required by Article 97(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(3)


No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(4)


The amendments to the specification should therefore be approved in accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(5)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Colli Asolani – Prosecco / Asolo – Prosecco’ (PDO) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 June 2023.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(2)  
            OJ C 87, 9.3.2023, p. 47.
Case T-318/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2023 — KF v EIB (Civil service — EIB Staff — Invalidity Committee — Refusal to recognise incapacity — Rejection of a request for an administrative review — Lis pendens — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: appeal, disabled person, incapacity for work, indemnification, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU), worker with disabilities








C_2023304EN.01002202.xml










28.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 304/22






Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2023 — KF v EIB
(Case T-318/21) (1)

(Civil service - EIB Staff - Invalidity Committee - Refusal to recognise incapacity - Rejection of a request for an administrative review - Lis pendens - Inadmissibility)
(2023/C 304/26)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: KF (represented by L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: K. Carr, G. Faedo and J. Pawlowicz, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, primarily, annulment of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 13 October 2020 by which the EIB informed her that she was not incapacitated (‘the decision of 13 October 2020’) and of the EIB’s decision of 9 March 2021 rejecting her request for an administrative review of the decision of 13 October 2020 (‘the decision rejecting the request for administrative review’) and, in the alternative, compensation for the damage that she claims to have suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


The European Investment Bank (EIB) shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 297, 26.7.2021.
Case C-220/22: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 June 2023 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2008/50/EC — Ambient air quality — Systematic and persistent exceedance of the annual limit value for nitrogen dioxide (ΝΟ2) — Appropriate measures — As short an exceedance period as possible)
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air quality, atmospheric pollutant, environmental monitoring, environmental protection, infringement of EU law, national implementing measure, oxide, pollution control, prevention of pollution, regions of Portugal








C_2023286EN.01001001.xml










14.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 286/10






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 June 2023 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic
(Case C-220/22) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 2008/50/EC - Ambient air quality - Systematic and persistent exceedance of the annual limit value for nitrogen dioxide (ΝΟ2) - Appropriate measures - As short an exceedance period as possible)
(2023/C 286/10)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: I. Melo Sampaio and M. Noll-Ehlers, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: H. Almeida, P. Barros da Costa and J. Reis Silva, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that






—


by systematically and persistently exceeding the annual limit value for nitrogen dioxide (ΝΟ2) from 1 January 2010 to the year 2020 inclusive in the zones of Lisboa Norte (PT 3001), Porto Litoral (PT 1004) and Entre Douro e Minho (PT 1009), the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13(1) of Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe, read in conjunction with Section B of Annex XI to that directive;










—


in respect of all of those zones, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 23(1) of Directive 2008/50, read individually and in conjunction with Section A of Annex XV to that directive, and in particular its obligation under the second subparagraph of Article 23(1) of that directive to take appropriate measures so that the exceedance period can be kept as short as possible;














2.


Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 257, 4.7.2022.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1298 of 26 June 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran (Official Journal of the European Union L 160 I of 26 June 2023)
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








L_2023163EN.01010501.xml










29.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 163/105







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/… of 26 June 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 160 I of 26 June 2023
)


On page 1, the title should read:


                  ‘Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1298 of 26 June 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran’.
Commission statement on the occasion of the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council 2023/C 227/08
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: EC conformity marking, European standard, machinery, market approval, product design, product safety, safety standard, technical standard








C_2023227EN.01001101.xml










29.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 227/11






Commission statement on the occasion of the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(2023/C 227/08)
When assessing the criteria in Article 6(4) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) the Commission will pay particular attention to categories of products for which a significant number of accidents and fatalities occurs.


(1)  Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2023 on machinery and repealing Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 73/361/EEC (OJ L 165, 29.6.2023, p. 1).
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 28 June 2023 2023/C 227/06
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023227EN.01000901.xml










29.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 227/9






Euro exchange rates (1)

28 June 2023
(2023/C 227/06)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0938 




JPY


Japanese yen


157,82 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4469 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86420 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,7950 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9822 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,8395 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,683 




HUF


Hungarian forint


371,73 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4763 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9604 




TRY


Turkish lira


28,5166 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6525 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4491 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5667 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7992 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4799 




KRW


South Korean won


1 434,33 




ZAR


South African rand


20,4828 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9262 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 398,98 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1097 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,400 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,950 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,2940 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,6835 




INR


Indian rupee


89,7465 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1414 of 29 June 2023 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Powidła śliwkowe z Doliny Dolnej Wisły’ (PGI))
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Kuyavia-Pomerania province, Poland, designation of origin, fruit product, labelling, product designation, stone fruit








L_2023171EN.01000501.xml










6.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 171/5








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1414
of 29 June 2023
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Powidła śliwkowe z Doliny Dolnej Wisły’ (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Powidła śliwkowe z Doliny Dolnej Wisły’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Powidła śliwkowe z Doliny Dolnej Wisły’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Powidła śliwkowe z Doliny Dolnej Wisły’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 June 2023.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 96, 15.3.2023, p. 30.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case C-467/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 June 2023 — Airoldi Metalli SpA v European Commission (Appeal — Dumping — Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Action for annulment — Locus standi — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Condition that the measure must be of individual concern to the applicant — Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures)
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: China, aluminium, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), non-flat product, originating product








C_2023286EN.01001101.xml










14.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 286/11






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 June 2023 — Airoldi Metalli SpA v European Commission
(Case C-467/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - Dumping - Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Action for annulment - Locus standi - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Condition that the measure must be of individual concern to the applicant - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures)
(2023/C 286/12)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Airoldi Metalli SpA (represented by: M. Campa, M. Pirovano, D. Rovetta, V. Villante, avvocati, and P. Gjørtler, advokat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Airoldi Metalli SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 326, 29.8.2022.
Case C-395/23, Anikovi: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 29 June 2023 — E. M. A., E. M. A., M. I. A.
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Bulgaria, Russia, USSR, bilateral agreement, child, derogation from EU law, jurisdiction, real property, transfer of property








C_202400529EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/529


8.1.2024





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 29 June 2023 — E. M. A., E. M. A., M. I. A.
(Case C-395/23, Anikovi) (1)

(C/2024/529)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski rayonen sad

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants in non-contentious proceedings: E. M. A., E.M.A., M. I. A.

Questions referred







1.


Does the scope of Article 1(e) of Council Regulation (EU) 2019/1111 (2) of 25 June 2019 on jurisdiction, the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, and on international child abduction, cover non-contentious proceedings concerning the granting of permission by a court for the disposal, e.g. a sale, of immovable property or co-ownership shares in immovable property belonging to a child?










2.


Which regulation determines the international jurisdiction of a court of a Member State of the European Union in non-contentious proceedings concerning the granting of permission by a court for the disposal, e.g. a sale, of immovable property or co-ownership shares in immovable property belonging to a child: (i) Article 7(1) of Regulation 2019/1111 — the court for the place where the child is habitually resident — or (ii) Article 4(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (3) or Article 24(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (4) — the court for the place where the immovable property is situated?










3.


Are the rules of Regulation 2019/1111 on international jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility derogated from by a bilateral international agreement between a Member State (Bulgaria) and a third country (the Soviet Union or the Russian Federation) which was concluded before the Member State’s accession to the European Union, if that international agreement is not listed in Chapter VIII of Regulation 2019/1111?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  
            OJ 2019 L 178, p. 1.

(3)  Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) (OJ 2008 L 177, p. 6).

(4)  Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/529/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)