do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries 2023/C 227/10
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Portugal, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing








C_2023227EN.01001301.xml










29.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 227/13






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2023/C 227/10)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


30.5.2023




Duration


30.5.2023 - 31.12.2023




Member State


Portugal




Stock or Group of stocks


BET/ATLANT (including BET/*ATLLL and BET/*ATLPS)




Species


Bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus)




Zone


Atlantic Ocean




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


02/TQ194






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case C-398/23, PT II: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 29 June 2023 — Criminal proceedings against PT
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: alternative sentence, charge, criminal proceedings, drug traffic, fight against crime, organised crime, right to information, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_202300116EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/116


16.10.2023





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 29 June 2023 — Criminal proceedings against PT
(Case C-398/23, PT II)
(C/2023/116)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad

Defendant

PT

Questions referred

Is a national law which stipulates that the co-defendants and their defence counsel must give their consent in order for an agreement discontinuing criminal proceedings against a defendant to receive approval when those proceedings are at the trial stage, but under which such consent is not required when those proceedings are at the pre-trial stage, compatible with Article 4(1) and Article 5 of Framework Decision 2004/757 (1) and Article 4 of Framework Decision 2008/841, (2) read in conjunction with Article 20 of the Charter?
Is a national law that limits the possibility for a defendant to have the court examine the substance of an agreement he or she has entered into (under which he or she is to receive a more lenient penalty) — that limitation consisting of a requirement for the consent of the co-defendants to be obtained — compatible with Article 4(1) of Framework Decision 2004/757, read in conjunction with Articles 48(2) and 52(1) of the Charter?
Is a national law that provides for that limitation also as a consequence of providing the defendant with detailed information on the accusation compatible with Article 6(3), read in conjunction with Article 6(1) of Directive 2012/13 (3) and in conjunction with Articles 47(1) and 52(1) of the Charter?


(1)  Council Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA of 25 October 2004 laying down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking (OJ 2004 L 335, p. 8)

(2)  Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime (OJ 2008 L 300, p. 42).

(3)  Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings (OJ 2012 L 142, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/116/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Special report 18/2023: ‘EU climate and energy targets – 2020 targets achieved, but little indication that actions to reach the 2030 targets will be sufficient’ 2023/C 227/09
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU Member State, EU energy policy, EU environmental policy, adaptation to climate change, climate change, financing method, greenhouse gas, investment, reduction of gas emissions








C_2023227EN.01001201.xml










29.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 227/12






Special report 18/2023:
‘EU climate and energy targets – 2020 targets achieved, but little indication that actions to reach the 2030 targets will be sufficient’
(2023/C 227/09)
The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 18/2023: ‘EU climate and energy targets – 2020 targets achieved, but little indication that actions to reach the 2030 targets will be sufficient’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/sr-2023-18
Case T-719/22: Order of the General Court of 29 June 2023 — Puma v EUIPO — Herno (HERZO) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark HERZO — Earlier EU figurative mark HERNO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, packaging product, personal effects, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_2023296EN.01003202.xml










21.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 296/32






Order of the General Court of 29 June 2023 — Puma v EUIPO — Herno (HERZO)
(Case T-719/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark HERZO - Earlier EU figurative mark HERNO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2023/C 296/36)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Herno SpA (Lesa, Italy)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 July 2022 (Case R 297/2022-1).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 15, 16.1.2023.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10984 – MESSER / TOYOTA TSUSHO EUROPE / JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 245/02
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, electronics industry, energy industry, food industry, gas industry, machinery, merger control, metals, motor vehicle industry, subsidiary








C_2023245EN.01000201.xml










12.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10984 – MESSER / TOYOTA TSUSHO EUROPE / JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 245/02)
On 29 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10984. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2022/2400 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 November 2022 amending Annexes IV and V to Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 on persistent organic pollutants (Official Journal of the European Union L 317 of 9 December 2022)
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: dangerous substance, environmental protection, international convention, market approval, organic chemical, organic pollution, pollution control measures, protocol to an agreement, public health, waste management








L_2023163EN.01010401.xml










29.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 163/104







Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2022/2400 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 November 2022 amending Annexes IV and V to Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 on persistent organic pollutants

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 317 of 9 December 2022
)








1.


On page 28, Annex, point 1, which amends Annex IV, point (a), entry for Perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), its salts and PFHxS-related compounds:




for:









‘Perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), its salts and PFHxS-related compounds


355-46-4 and others


355-46-4 and others


1 mg/kg
(PFHxS and its salts), 40 mg/kg
(sum of PFHxS-related compounds)
The Commission shall review that concentration limit and shall, where appropriate, adopt a legislative proposal to lower that value, where such lowering is feasible in accordance with scientific and technical progress, no later than 30 December 2027.’’





read:









‘Perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), its salts and PFHxS-related compounds


355-46-4 and others


206-587-1 and others


1 mg/kg
(PFHxS and its salts), 40 mg/kg
(sum of PFHxS-related compounds)
The Commission shall review that concentration limit and shall, where appropriate, adopt a legislative proposal to lower that value, where such lowering is feasible in accordance with scientific and technical progress, no later than 30 December 2027.’











2.


On page 29, Annex, point 1, which amends Annex IV, point (e), third column:




for:


                  ‘247-148-4 221-69-5-9’,

read:


                  ‘247-148-4
221-695-9’.
Case C-763/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2023 — TUIfly GmbH v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Measures put into effect by the Republic of Austria for Klagenfurt airport, Ryanair and other airlines using that airport — Decision declaring the aid measures partially incompatible with the internal market — Article 107(1) TFEU — Private investor in a market economy — Ex ante incremental profitability analysis — Long-term profitability of the airport — Applicability — Article 107(3)(c) TFEU — Aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas — Relevant assessment criterion for determining compatibility with the internal market — Profitability of the new air routes)
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Austria, Carinthia, State aid, aid to undertakings, airport, control of State aid, low cost airline, profitability, reimbursement of aid








C_2023286EN.01000601.xml










14.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 286/6






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2023 — TUIfly GmbH v European Commission
(Case C-763/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Measures put into effect by the Republic of Austria for Klagenfurt airport, Ryanair and other airlines using that airport - Decision declaring the aid measures partially incompatible with the internal market - Article 107(1) TFEU - Private investor in a market economy - Ex ante incremental profitability analysis - Long-term profitability of the airport - Applicability - Article 107(3)(c) TFEU - Aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas - Relevant assessment criterion for determining compatibility with the internal market - Profitability of the new air routes)
(2023/C 286/06)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: TUIfly GmbH (represented by: L. Giesberts, D and J. Westarp, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck, A. Bouchagiar and J. Ringborg, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment







1.


The appeal is dismissed;










2.


TUIfly GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.
Case C-108/22, Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej (VAT — Hotel services consolidator): Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej v C. sp. z o.o., in liquidation (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Special scheme for travel agents — Scope — Consolidator of accommodation services which purchases such services on its own behalf and resells them to other professionals without ancillary services)
Date: 2023-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, hotel industry, provision of services, tax law, trade intermediary, travel agency








C_2023286EN.01000801.xml










14.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 286/8






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej v C. sp. z o.o., in liquidation
(Case C-108/22, (1) Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej (VAT — Hotel services consolidator))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Special scheme for travel agents - Scope - Consolidator of accommodation services which purchases such services on its own behalf and resells them to other professionals without ancillary services)
(2023/C 286/08)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej

Defendant: C. sp. z o.o., in liquidation

Operative part of the judgment

Article 306 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax
must be interpreted as meaning that the service provided by a taxable person, which consists in purchasing accommodation services from other taxable persons and reselling them to other economic operators, is covered by the special value added tax scheme applicable to travel agents, even though those services are not accompanied by ancillary services.


(1)  OJ C 284, 25.7.2022.