do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-259/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 June 2023 — Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission, Taminco BVBA (Appeal — Plant protection products — Active substance — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Article 4(5) — Article 14(1) — Article 20(1) — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 — Article 12(3) — Article 14(1) — Non-renewal of the approval of the active substance thiram for the purpose of placing it on the market — Rights of the defence — Precautionary principle — Equal treatment)
Date: 2023-06-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: equal treatment, market approval, plant health product, precautionary principle, rights of the defence








C_2023278EN.01001101.xml










7.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/11






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 June 2023 — Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission, Taminco BVBA
(Case C-259/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - Plant protection products - Active substance - Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Article 4(5) - Article 14(1) - Article 20(1) - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 - Article 12(3) - Article 14(1) - Non-renewal of the approval of the active substance thiram for the purpose of placing it on the market - Rights of the defence - Precautionary principle - Equal treatment)
(2023/C 278/15)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd (represented by: C. Mereu, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, (represented by G. Koleva and M. ter Haar, acting as Agents), Taminco BVBA (represented by: C. Mereu, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 222, 7.6.2022.
Joined Cases C-711/21 and C-712/21, État belge (Circumstances subsequent to a return decision) and Others: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 June 2023 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — XXX (C-711/21), XXX (C-712/21) v État belge, represented by the Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Admissibility — Continued interest in bringing proceedings in the dispute in the main proceedings — Obligation of the referring court to verify)
Date: 2023-06-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: appeal, foreign national, illegal migration, protection of privacy, removal, residence permit, return migration, right of asylum, right to justice








C_2023278EN.01000602.xml










7.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/6






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 June 2023 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — XXX (C-711/21), XXX (C-712/21) v État belge, represented by the Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration
(Joined Cases C-711/21 and C-712/21, (1) État belge (Circumstances subsequent to a return decision) and Others)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 267 TFEU - Admissibility - Continued interest in bringing proceedings in the dispute in the main proceedings - Obligation of the referring court to verify)
(2023/C 278/08)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: XXX (C-711/21), XXX (C-712/21)

Defendant: État belge, represented by the Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration

Operative part of the judgment

The requests for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Council of State, Belgium), made by decisions of 4 November 2021, are inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway dated 22 June 2023 in criminal proceedings against MH (Case E-6/23)
Date: 2023-06-22
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, family, foreign national, free movement of persons, freedom of movement, married person, removal, residence permit








C_202301317EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/1317


30.11.2023






Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway dated 22 June 2023 in criminal proceedings against MH
(Case E-6/23)
(C/2023/1317)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 22 June 2023 from the Supreme Court of Norway (Norges Høyesterett), which was received at the Court Registry on 22 June 2023, for an Advisory Opinion in criminal proceedings against MH, on the following questions:






1.


Must Article 5(1) and/or Article 6(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) be interpreted as meaning that a third country national, who is married to an EEA national who has exercised his or her right of free movement by moving together with the third country national to another EEA State than the EEA State of which the spouse is a national, has a right of entry and residence in the spouse’s home State for up to three months, even where the third country national, in the time before the marriage was entered into, was permanently expelled from the spouse’s home State in accordance with national rules applicable to third country nationals?










2.


If question 1 is answered in the affirmative: does Article 32 of Directive 2004/38/EC apply, potentially by analogy, in a situation as described in question 1, with the result that the national authorities in the State of entry may require that the third country national files an application to have the exclusion order lifted before the person in question enters that State?










3.


Does Article 36 of Directive 2004/38/EC or other EEA law obligations restrict the EEA States’ possibility to sanction violations of national decisions on exclusion orders in a situation as described in question 1 and, if so, in what manner?






(1)  
            OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1317/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to the publication of an application for registration of a name pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (Official Journal of the European Union C 123 of 5 April 2023) 2023/C 220/12
Date: 2023-06-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Bulgaria, consumer information, designation of origin, labelling, milk product, product designation, quality control of agricultural products








C_2023220EN.01008101.xml










22.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 220/81






Corrigendum to the publication of an application for registration of a name pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 123 of 5 April 2023
)

(2023/C 220/12)
On page 33, point 3.2 ‘Description of the product to which the name in (1) applies’, third subparagraph:
for:
“The finished product contains live lactic acid bacteria:






—



Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus – 1,0×107 CfU/g (tolerance – 1,0×106 CfU/g);










—



Streptococcus thermophilus – 1,0×108 CfU/g (tolerance – 1,0×107 CfU/g).”,




read:
“The finished product contains live lactic acid bacteria:






—



Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus – 1,0×107 CfU/g (tolerance – 1,0×106 CfU/g);










—



Streptococcus thermophilus – 1,0×108 CfU/g (tolerance – 1,0×107 CfU/g).”.
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.)) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 220/03
Date: 2023-06-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical product, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, medical diagnosis, pharmaceutical industry








C_2023220EN.01002201.xml










22.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 220/22






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1)
)


(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 220/03)

Decision granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2023) 3793


15 Jun 2023


4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated (‘4-tert-OPnEO’)
EC No.-; CAS No.-


LFB Biomedicaments, 3 avenue des Tropiques, ZA de Courtaboeuf, 91940, Les Ulis, France


REACH/23/19/0


Virus inactivation into the manufacture process of plasma-derived immunoglobulins


4 January 2028


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.






(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 21 June 2023 2023/C 220/02
Date: 2023-06-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023220EN.01002101.xml










22.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 220/21






Euro exchange rates (1)

21 June 2023
(2023/C 220/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0923 




JPY


Japanese yen


154,89 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4479 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85828 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,7563 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9803 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7470 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,763 




HUF


Hungarian forint


369,90 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4328 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9625 




TRY


Turkish lira


25,7343 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6154 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4435 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5510 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7697 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4678 




KRW


South Korean won


1 413,88 




ZAR


South African rand


20,0783 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8519 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 330,80 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0737 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,747 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,056 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,2273 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,7393 




INR


Indian rupee


89,5765 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-163/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2023 — Gmina Miasto Gdynia, Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. w likwidacji v European Commission, Republic of Poland (Appeal — State aid — Airport infrastructure — Public funding granted to the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport — Decision declaring the aid measure incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Identification of the advantage and determination of the amount of the aid to be repaid — Principles of the protection of legitimate expectations, legal certainty, effective judicial protection, sound administration and sincere cooperation — Procedural rights of the appellants)
Date: 2023-06-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Poland, Pomerania, State aid, airport, control of State aid, principle of legal certainty, public financing, reimbursement of aid, right to justice








C_2023278EN.01000902.xml










7.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/9






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2023 — Gmina Miasto Gdynia, Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. w likwidacji v European Commission, Republic of Poland
(Case C-163/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Airport infrastructure - Public funding granted to the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport - Decision declaring the aid measure incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Identification of the advantage and determination of the amount of the aid to be repaid - Principles of the protection of legitimate expectations, legal certainty, effective judicial protection, sound administration and sincere cooperation - Procedural rights of the appellants)
(2023/C 278/13)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Appellants: Gmina Miasto Gdynia, Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. w likwidacji (represented by: K. Gruszecka-Spychała and P.K. Rosiak, radcowie prawni)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann, S. Noë and J. Zieliński, acting as Agents), Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. w likwidacji to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.
Case C-513/21 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2023 — DI v European Central Bank (Appeal — Civil service — Staff of the European Central Bank (ECB) — Conditions of employment — Disciplinary proceedings — Competent authority — Delegation — Legal certainty — Time-barred disciplinary proceedings — Presumption of innocence — Criminal proceedings — Distortion — Absence)
Date: 2023-06-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European official, criminal proceedings, disciplinary proceedings, dismissal, principle of legal certainty, rights of the defence








C_2023278EN.01000401.xml










7.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/4






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2023 — DI v European Central Bank
(Case C-513/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Staff of the European Central Bank (ECB) - Conditions of employment - Disciplinary proceedings - Competent authority - Delegation - Legal certainty - Time-barred disciplinary proceedings - Presumption of innocence - Criminal proceedings - Distortion - Absence)
(2023/C 278/05)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: DI (represented by: L. Levi, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European Central Bank (represented by: F. von Lindeiner, F. Malfrère and M. Van Hoecke, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders DI to pay, in addition to his own costs, those incurred by the European Central Bank.






(1)  OJ C 37, 24.1.2022.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11103 – PUBLIC POWER CORPORATION / ENEL ROMANIA) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 344/09
Date: 2023-06-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Greece, Romania, economic concentration, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy production, gas supply, merger control








C_2023344EN.01012001.xml










29.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 344/120







Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11103 – PUBLIC POWER CORPORATION / ENEL ROMANIA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 344/09)

On 22 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain.It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11103. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/591 of 16 March 2023 accepting a request for new exporting producer treatment with regard to the definitive anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of electric bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China and amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/73 (Official Journal of the European Union L 79 of 17 March 2023)
Date: 2023-06-22
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, electric vehicle, import (EU), originating product, two-wheeled vehicle








L_2023159EN.01015101.xml










22.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 159/151







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/591 of 16 March 2023 accepting a request for new exporting producer treatment with regard to the definitive anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of electric bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China and amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/73

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 79 of 17 March 2023
)


On page 51, in Article 1:
for:







‘Company


TARIC additional code




Zhejiang Jollo Technology Co., Ltd


899A’





read:








‘Company


Province


TARIC additional code




Zhejiang Jollo Technology Co., Ltd


Zhejiang


899A’
Case C-258/22, H Lebensversicherung: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt Hannover-Nord v H Lebensversicherung (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of capital — Article 63 TFEU — Business tax — Calculation of the basis of assessment for that tax — Rules for calculation — Dividends from holdings of less than 10 % in the capital of resident and non-resident capital companies — Inclusion in the basis of assessment for business tax — Time of the inclusion — Difference in treatment — Restriction — None)
Date: 2023-06-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: basis of tax assessment, business tax, company with share capital, equal treatment, free movement of capital, shareholder, tax relief








C_2023278EN.01001001.xml










7.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/10






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt Hannover-Nord v H Lebensversicherung
(Case C-258/22, (1) H Lebensversicherung)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of capital - Article 63 TFEU - Business tax - Calculation of the basis of assessment for that tax - Rules for calculation - Dividends from holdings of less than 10 % in the capital of resident and non-resident capital companies - Inclusion in the basis of assessment for business tax - Time of the inclusion - Difference in treatment - Restriction - None)
(2023/C 278/14)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Finanzamt Hannover-Nord

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: H Lebensversicherung

Operative part of the judgment

Article 63 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State under which, when calculating the basis of assessment for a company’s business tax, dividends from holdings of less than 10 % in non-resident capital companies are to be added back to that basis of assessment, if and to the extent that those dividends were deducted from that basis of assessment at a previous stage of that calculation, whereas dividends from comparable holdings in resident capital companies are included from the outset in the abovementioned basis of assessment, without being deducted from or, consequently, added back to that basis of assessment.


(1)  OJ C 284, 25.7.2022.
Case C-833/21, Endesa Generación: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional — Spain) — Endesa Generación SAU v Tribunal Económico Administrativo Central (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Directive 2003/96/EC — Article 14(1)(a) — Exemption of energy products used to produce electricity — Derogation — Taxation of energy products for ‘reasons of environmental policy’ — Scope)
Date: 2023-06-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: coal, electrical energy, energy production, environmental protection, environmental tax, tax exemption








C_2023278EN.01000801.xml










7.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/8






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional — Spain) — Endesa Generación SAU v Tribunal Económico Administrativo Central
(Case C-833/21, (1) Endesa Generación)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation of energy products and electricity - Directive 2003/96/EC - Article 14(1)(a) - Exemption of energy products used to produce electricity - Derogation - Taxation of energy products for ‘reasons of environmental policy’ - Scope)
(2023/C 278/11)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Audiencia Nacional

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Endesa Generación SAU

Defendant: Tribunal Económico Administrativo Central

Operative part of the judgment

The second sentence of Article 14(1)(a) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity
must be interpreted as meaning that national legislation providing for the taxation of coal used for the production of electricity meets the condition, set out in that provision, that the tax must be introduced ‘for reasons of environmental policy’, where there is a direct link between the use of the revenue and the purpose of the tax in question or where that tax, without pursuing a purely budgetary purpose, in terms of its structure, including in particular the taxable item or the tax rate, is designed in such a way that it influences the behaviour of taxpayers in a manner that facilitates ensuring better protection of the environment.


(1)  OJ C 138, 28.3.2022.