do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-499/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2023 — Joshua David Silver, Leona Catherine Bashow, Charles Nicholas Hilary Marquand, JY, JZ, Anthony Styles Clayton, Gillian Margaret Clayton v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Action for annulment — Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community — Decision (EU) 2020/135 — Nationals of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — Consequences of that agreement on the status of citizen of the European Union and the rights attaching to that status for those nationals — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Locus standi — Conditions — Interest in bringing proceedings)
Date: 2023-06-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European citizenship, United Kingdom, right of action, withdrawal from the EU








C_2023271EN.01000201.xml










31.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/2






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2023 — Joshua David Silver, Leona Catherine Bashow, Charles Nicholas Hilary Marquand, JY, JZ, Anthony Styles Clayton, Gillian Margaret Clayton v Council of the European Union
(Case C-499/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Action for annulment - Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community - Decision (EU) 2020/135 - Nationals of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland - Consequences of that agreement on the status of citizen of the European Union and the rights attaching to that status for those nationals - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Locus standi - Conditions - Interest in bringing proceedings)
(2023/C 271/02)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Joshua David Silver, Leona Catherine Bashow, Charles Nicholas Hilary Marquand, JY, JZ, Anthony Styles Clayton, Gillian Margaret Clayton (represented by: P. Tridimas, dikigoros, D. Harrison and A. von Westernhagen, Solicitors)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, (represented by M. Bauer, J. Ciantar and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Joshua David Silver, Ms Leona Catherine Bashow, Mr Charles Nicholas Hilary Marquand, JY, JZ, Mr Anthony Styles Clayton and Ms Gillian Margaret Clayton to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 490, 6.12.2021.
Corrigendum to Council Decision of 28 March 2023 appointing members and alternate members of the Management Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (Official Journal of the European Union C 116 of 31 March 2023) 2023/C 208/13
Date: 2023-06-15
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Cedefop, EU Member State, appointment of members, decision-making body (EU)








C_2023208EN.01009001.xml










15.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 208/90






Corrigendum to Council Decision of 28 March 2023 appointing members and alternate members of the Management Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop)

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 116 of 31 March 2023
)

(2023/C 208/13)
On page 18, Article 1, Table III ‘Representatives of employers’ organisations’, in the entry corresponding to Romania, second cell:
for:

‘Ms Adriana RADA’,

read:

‘Mr Adrian RADA’.
Case C-502/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2023 — David Price v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Action for annulment — Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community — Decision (EU) 2020/135 — Nationals of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — Consequences of that agreement on the status of citizen of the European Union and the rights attaching to that status for those nationals — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Locus standi — Conditions — Interest in bringing proceedings)
Date: 2023-06-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European citizenship, United Kingdom, right of action, withdrawal from the EU








C_2023271EN.01000302.xml










31.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/3






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2023 — David Price v Council of the European Union
(Case C-502/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Action for annulment - Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community - Decision (EU) 2020/135 - Nationals of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland - Consequences of that agreement on the status of citizen of the European Union and the rights attaching to that status for those nationals - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Locus standi - Conditions - Interest in bringing proceedings)
(2023/C 271/04)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: David Price (represented by: J. Fouchet, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, J. Ciantar and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr David Price to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 452, 8.11.2021.
EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 March 2023 (Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004 (OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and EEA Supplement to the OJ No. 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1.)) 2023/C 208/07
Date: 2023-06-15
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, State aid, interest, reimbursement of aid








C_2023208EN.01006201.xml










15.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 208/62






EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 March 2023


(Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004 (1))

(2023/C 208/07)
Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines as amended by ESA’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To obtain the applicable reference rates, appropriate margins shall be added to the base rate in accordance with the State Aid Guidelines.
Base rates have been determined as follows:








 


Iceland


Liechtenstein


Norway




1.3.2023 –


6,37 


-0,12 


3,15 






(1)  OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and EEA Supplement to the OJ No. 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1.
Case C-287/22, Getin Noble Bank (Suspension or performance of a credit agreement): Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — YQ, RJ v Getin Noble Bank S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Mortgage loan indexed to a foreign currency — Article 6(1) — Article 7(1) — Application for interim measures — Suspension of performance of the loan agreement — Ensuring full effectiveness of the restitutory effect)
Date: 2023-06-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer credit, consumer protection, foreign currency, real estate credit, redemption, termination of a contract, unfair terms of contract








C_2023271EN.01000701.xml










31.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/7






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — YQ, RJ v Getin Noble Bank S.A.
(Case C-287/22, (1) Getin Noble Bank (Suspension or performance of a credit agreement))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Directive 93/13/EEC - Mortgage loan indexed to a foreign currency - Article 6(1) - Article 7(1) - Application for interim measures - Suspension of performance of the loan agreement - Ensuring full effectiveness of the restitutory effect)
(2023/C 271/09)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: YQ, RJ

Defendant: Getin Noble Bank S.A.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, read in the light of the principle of effectiveness,
must be interpreted as precluding national case-law according to which a national court may dismiss an application for the grant of interim measures lodged by a consumer seeking the suspension, pending a final decision on the invalidity of the loan agreement concluded by that consumer on the ground that that loan agreement contains unfair terms, of the payment of the monthly instalments due under that loan agreement, where the grant of those interim measures is necessary to ensure the full effectiveness of that decision.


(1)  OJ C 318. 22.8.2022.
Case C-501/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2023 — Harry Shindler, Christopher David Randolph, Douglas Edward Watson, Michael Charles Strawson, Hilary Elizabeth Walker, Sarah Caroline Griffiths, James Graham Cherrill, Anita Ruddell Tuttell, Joséphine French, William John Tobbin v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Action for annulment — Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community — Decision (EU) 2020/135 — Nationals of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — Consequences of that agreement on the status of citizen of the European Union and the rights attaching to that status for those nationals — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Locus standi — Conditions — Interest in bringing proceedings)
Date: 2023-06-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European citizenship, United Kingdom, right of action, withdrawal from the EU








C_2023271EN.01000301.xml










31.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/3






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2023 — Harry Shindler, Christopher David Randolph, Douglas Edward Watson, Michael Charles Strawson, Hilary Elizabeth Walker, Sarah Caroline Griffiths, James Graham Cherrill, Anita Ruddell Tuttell, Joséphine French, William John Tobbin v Council of the European Union
(Case C-501/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Action for annulment - Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community - Decision (EU) 2020/135 - Nationals of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland - Consequences of that agreement on the status of citizen of the European Union and the rights attaching to that status for those nationals - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Locus standi - Conditions - Interest in bringing proceedings)
(2023/C 271/03)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellants: Harry Shindler, Christopher David Randolph, Douglas Edward Watson, Michael Charles Strawson, Hilary Elizabeth Walker, Sarah Caroline Griffiths, James Graham Cherrill, Anita Ruddell Tuttell, Joséphine French, William John Tobbin (represented by J. Fouchet, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, J. Ciantar and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Harry Shindler, Mr Christopher David Randolph, Mr Douglas Edward Watson, Mr Michael Charles Strawson, Ms Hilary Elizabeth Walker, Ms Sarah Caroline Griffiths, Mr James Graham Cherrill, Ms Anita Ruddell Tuttell, Ms Joséphine French and Mr William John Tobbin to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 452, 8.11.2021.
Case C-132/22, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (Special lists): Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — BM, NP v Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca — MIUR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for workers — Article 45 TFEU — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 3(1) — Obstacle — Equal treatment — Procedure for compiling lists for awarding posts in certain national public institutions — Requirement for admission linked to prior professional experience gained at those institutions — National legislation not allowing professional experience gained in other Member States to be taken into account — Whether justified — Objective of combating job insecurity)
Date: 2023-06-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to a profession, equal treatment, free movement of workers, job security, professional experience, recruitment, teacher








C_2023271EN.01000601.xml










31.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/6






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — BM, NP v Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca — MIUR
(Case C-132/22, (1) Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (Special lists))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of movement for workers - Article 45 TFEU - Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 - Article 3(1) - Obstacle - Equal treatment - Procedure for compiling lists for awarding posts in certain national public institutions - Requirement for admission linked to prior professional experience gained at those institutions - National legislation not allowing professional experience gained in other Member States to be taken into account - Whether justified - Objective of combating job insecurity)
(2023/C 271/07)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: BM, NP

Defendant: Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca — MIUR

Operative part of the judgment

Article 45 TFEU and Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union
must be interpreted as precluding national legislation that provides that only candidates who have gained a certain amount of professional experience at national public higher-education institutions for the fine arts, music and dance may be admitted to a procedure for inclusion on the lists compiled for the purpose of recruiting, on permanent or temporary employment contracts, staff in those institutions and that thus prevents professional experience gained in other Member States from being taken into consideration for the purpose of admission to that procedure.


(1)  OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 14 June 2023 2023/C 208/03
Date: 2023-06-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023208EN.01000401.xml










15.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 208/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

14 June 2023
(2023/C 208/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0809 




JPY


Japanese yen


151,21 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4529 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85455 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,5605 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9751 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,4760 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,796 




HUF


Hungarian forint


370,80 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4553 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9560 




TRY


Turkish lira


25,4895 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5915 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4378 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4645 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7501 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4499 




KRW


South Korean won


1 380,92 




ZAR


South African rand


19,9120 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7363 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 100,20 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9954 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,437 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,518 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,2489 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,6113 




INR


Indian rupee


88,6945 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-292/22, Nova Targovska Kompania 2004: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna — Bulgaria) — Teritorialna direktsia Mitnitsa Varna v ‘NOVA TARGOVSKA KOMPANIA 2004’ AD (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Classification of goods — Combined Nomenclature — Headings 1511 and 1517 — Refined palm oil, bleached and deodorised — No method laid down for analysing the consistency of a product)
Date: 2023-06-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, agro-industry, common customs tariff, production technique, specification of tariff heading, vegetable oil








C_2023271EN.01000801.xml










31.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/8






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna — Bulgaria) — Teritorialna direktsia Mitnitsa Varna v ‘NOVA TARGOVSKA KOMPANIA 2004’ AD
(Case C-292/22, (1) Nova Targovska Kompania 2004)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Classification of goods - Combined Nomenclature - Headings 1511 and 1517 - Refined palm oil, bleached and deodorised - No method laid down for analysing the consistency of a product)
(2023/C 271/10)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad — Varna

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Teritorialna direktsia Mitnitsa Varna

Defendant:‘NOVA TARGOVSKA KOMPANIA 2004’ AD

Intervener: Okrazhna prokuratura — Varna

Operative part of the judgment







1.


The Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the versions resulting from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1602 of 11 October 2018 and from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1776 of 9 October 2019, must be interpreted as meaning that a food preparation of palm oil which is not covered by heading 1516 of that nomenclature and which has undergone treatment other than refining falls under heading 1517 of that nomenclature, the question whether that preparation has been chemically modified as a result of that processing being irrelevant in that regard..










2.


The Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Regulation No 2658/87, in the versions resulting from Implementing Regulation 2018/1602 and from Implementing Regulation 2019/1776, must be interpreted as meaning that, in the absence of methods and criteria defined in that nomenclature for the purposes of determining whether such a preparation has undergone treatment other than refining, the customs authorities may choose the appropriate method for that purpose, provided that it is capable of producing results consistent with that nomenclature, which it is for the national court to verify..






(1)  OJ C 266, 11.7.2022.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11126 – TOWERBROOK / LOV GROUP / ELOCGA / THE INDEPENDENTS) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 305/02
Date: 2023-06-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: audiovisual industry, consumer goods, culture industry, economic concentration, game of chance, holding company, hotel industry, investment company, marketing, merger control, online game








C_2023305EN.01000201.xml










29.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 305/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11126 – TOWERBROOK / LOV GROUP / ELOCGA / THE INDEPENDENTS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 305/02)
On 15 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11126. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-379/23, Guldbrev: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 15 June 2023 — Guldbrev AB v Konsumentombudsmannen
Date: 2023-06-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, economic value, gold, purchase, restriction on competition








C_2023296EN.01002401.xml










21.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 296/24






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 15 June 2023 — Guldbrev AB v Konsumentombudsmannen
(Case C-379/23, Guldbrev)
(2023/C 296/25)
Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Guldbrev AB

Respondent: Konsumentombudsmannen

Questions referred







1.


Does the valuation and purchase of gold from consumers constitute a product (combined product) within the meaning of Article 2(c), (d) and (i) and Article 3(1) of Directive 2005/29 (1) concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market in a situation such as that at issue before the national court?










2.


If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, does the valuation of gold in the situation at issue before the national court constitute a product within the meaning of the directive?






(1)  OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22.