COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Sustainable fishing in the EU: state of play and orientations for 2024
Date: 2023-06-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Russia, Ukraine, catch of fish, catch quota, common fisheries policy, fishery management, fishing area, fishing rights, sustainable fisheries, territorial dispute

EN 

  EN 

   EUROPEAN COMMISSION  Brussels, 14.6.2023  SWD(2023) 172 final  COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT                                                         Accompanying the document COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Sustainable fishing in the EU: state of play and orientations for 2024 {COM(2023) 303 final}  
 
 
This staff working document accompanies the Communication ‘Sustainable fishing in the EU: 
state of play and orientations for 2024’. It looks in greater depth at: 

1.  the state of stocks; 
2.  the balance between fleet capacity and fishing opportunities; 
3.  the socio-economic analysis of the EU fishing fleets; 
4.  progress in implementing the landing obligation; 
5.  the functioning and the role of Advisory Councils in EU decision-making;  
6.  action taken under the EU’s international ocean governance agenda. 

1.  THE STATE OF STOCKS 

Monitoring results of the common fisheries policy progress report 

Each  year,  the  Commission  requests  the  Scientific,  Technical  and  Economic  Committee  for 
Fisheries (STECF) to assess the progress in achieving the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) 
exploitation rate in line with the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy Regulation (CFP 
Regulation)1. Article 50 of the CFP Regulation sets out that: 

The Commission shall report annually to the European Parliament and to the 
Council  on  the  progress  on  achieving  maximum  sustainable  yield  and  on  the 
situation of fish stocks, as early as possible following the adoption of the yearly 
Council Regulation  fixing the fishing opportunities  available in  Union waters 
and, in certain non-Union waters, to Union vessels. 

The  current  and  historic  fishing  mortality  rates  (FY,  F  in  each  year)  relative  to  the  fishing 
mortality rate that would produce the highest long-term yield (FMSY) have been calculated by 
two scientific bodies: the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) and the 
General  Fisheries  Commission  for  the  Mediterranean  (GFCM).  The  rates  have  then  been 
compiled and tabulated by STECF in their report  72nd Plenary Report (STECF-23-01)2. The 
corresponding biomass  value, BMSY, is  the average biomass  of fish in the sea that would be 
expected when a stock is fished at FMSY for an extended period. 

Following STECF practice, values of historic and current fishing mortality have been expressed 
as a ratio of the FMSY value for each stock. This normalisation calculation makes it possible to 
compare all stocks at the same scale where the fishing mortality ratio is equal to 1 for all stocks 
fished at FMSY. 

Therefore,  this  section  focuses  on  the  fishing  mortality  ratio  indicator  and  the  biomass3 
indicator. More information on other indicators, such as safe biological limits, can be found in 

1 Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the 
Common Fisheries Policy. 
2 https://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/43805/55639782/STECF+PLEN+23-01.pdf/bb78d95d-735e-429c-
b639-5d2b1a060600 
3 Quantity of adult fish in a stock that can reproduce. 

1 

 
 
 
 
                                                 
the  STECF  23-01  ad  hoc  report  ‘Monitoring  of  the  performance  of  the  Common  Fisheries 
Policy’4. 

Regarding the progress made in the achievement of FMSY in line with the CFP, the latest results 
indicate a reduction in overall fishing mortality and a general increase in stock biomass in the 
NE Atlantic (both EU and non-EU waters) over the period 2003-2021. Among the stocks which 
are fully assessed, the proportion of overexploited stocks (i.e., F> FMSY) has decreased from 
around  74%  (2003-2008)  to  26%  in  2021.  The  situation  with  regards  to  stocks  in  the 
Mediterranean  and  Black  Sea  remains  challenging  but  is  improving,  with  annual  fishing 
mortality estimates around two times above F FMSY over the 2003-2020 period., ending below 
2.0 in the last assessment. Fishing pressure has decreased since 2013 while biomass has shown 
a slight improvement since 2011. 

In  this  section  ‘Northeast  Atlantic’  refers  to  stocks  in  area  27  of  the  Food  and  Agriculture 
Organization (FAO), and ‘Mediterranean & Black Seas’ refers to stocks in FAO area 37. 

1.1 

Trends in fishing pressure (ratio of F/FMSY) 

Trends in the median values for F/FMSY are summarised in Figure 1 below over the time series 
for the Northeast Atlantic (inside and outside EU waters), and the Mediterranean and the Black 
Seas. 

Figure 1: Trends in fishing pressure 2003-2021. Three model-based indicators (F/FMSY) are 
presented (all referring to the median value of the model): one for 57 stocks with appropriate 

4 
+CFP+Monitoring.pdf/791ff920-33a6-42a9-9e61-820a29886062. 

https://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/43805/1035398/STECF+23-01+adhoc+-

2 

 
 
 
 
                                                 
information in the Northeast Atlantic EU waters (red line), one for an additional set of 16 stocks 
also located in the Northeast Atlantic but outside EU waters (green line), and one for the 57 
stocks5 in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea (black line). 

1.1.1 Stocks of EU interest in the Northeast Atlantic, the North Sea and adjacent 

waters, including the Baltic Sea. 

In 2003, most stocks (73%) were overfished, and the average (median) rate of fishing was 68% 
above the sustainable rate. This situation improved rapidly thanks to the introduction of effort 
restrictions, improved control and the improved setting of total allowable catches (TACs) in 
line with scientific advice. By 2021, the average rate of fishing was well inside the sustainable 
rate and only 36% of stocks were overfished. The reduction in fishing pressure in 2020 and 
2021 coincides with the start of COVID-19 restrictions (Figure 2). 

There are differences in trends between areas. Progress has been fastest in the Bay of Biscay 
where no stocks were overfished in 2021, which is the first time for any EU sea area. 

As fishing pressure has reduced, stocks have been able to rebuild (Figure 3). This rebuilding 
has  been  very  fast  in  the  Bay  of  Biscay  but  slower  in  other  areas.  In  the  Baltic  Sea,  where 
unfavourable environmental conditions6 have weakened the stocks’ resilience to fishing, there 
has been no significant recovery yet. 

5  For STECF-Adhoc-23-01, there were 58 Mediterranean and Black Sea stocks available of which one (sardine in 
GSA 7) had no F estimates. Therefore, that stock was used for the B/B2003 indicator (N=58 stocks) but not for 
the F/FMSY indicator (N= 57 stocks). 
6  More  information  on  the  key  signals  within  the  Baltic  Sea  environment  and  the  ecosystem:  https://ices-
library.figshare.com/articles/report/Baltic_Sea_Ecoregion_Ecosystem_overview/21725438/1 

3 

 
 
 
 
                                                 
Figure 2: Numbers of stocks assessed as having been exploited in excess of the maximum yield 
fishing mortality rate (dark shading indicates overexploited) or exploited equal to or less than 
that rate (light shading indicates exploited sustainably). Upper-left panel: overview of stocks 
of EU interest in the Northeast Atlantic, the North Sea and nearby waters, including the Baltic 
Sea.  Lower  panel:  detail  by  hydrographical  area.  Upper-right  panel:  trend  in  the  average 
(median) F/FMSY values over time. 

4 

 
 
 
 
 
Figure 3: Trends in fish stock biomass (only fish of reproductive age) relative to 2003 (2003= 
1.0). Upper panel: average (median) values for stocks of EU interest in the Northeast Atlantic, 
North Sea and nearby waters, including the Baltic Sea. Lower panel: trends by area. 

1.1.2 Stocks in the Mediterranean and the Black Seas 

In 2022, the number of fish stocks assessed in scientific committees rose to 58 from 39 in 2021. 
The quality of information has increased significantly. The latest estimates show that fishing 
pressure increased slightly from 2003 until 2010 and then declined gradually until 2019. This 
was followed by a sharp drop in 2020 coinciding with COVID-19 restrictions (Figure 4). The 
value for 2020 is the lowest ever but is still 71% above the FMSY value. 

There are different trends in each region, with an irregular trend in the Black Sea, a flat trend 
in the central Mediterranean, a sharp decline in the eastern Mediterranean since 2008, and a 
smaller decline in the western Mediterranean. All areas show a sharp drop in 2020. 

Changes in fish stock biomasses generally reflect trends in fishing mortality. Fishing mortality 
has fallen most in the eastern Mediterranean, and stock biomasses have increased to 75% above 
their 2003 levels. There was a smaller increase in the western Mediterranean (Figure 5). 

5 

 
 
 
 
Figure 4: Upper panel: trend in average (median) F/FMSY values over time for all stocks in the 
Mediterranean Basin and Black Sea. Lower panel: trends in each hydrographical area. The 
sustainable level of F/FMSY = 1. 

6 

 
 
 
 
 
Figure 5: Trends in fish stock biomass (only fish of reproductive age) relative to 2003 (2003= 
1.0).  Upper  panel:  average  (median)  values  for  stocks  of  EU  interest  in  the  Mediterranean 
basin, including the Black Sea. Lower panel: trends by area. 

Regarding European eel, the Council, building upon a 2022 decision adopted by the GFCM, 
has adopted certain measures including a ban on recreational fishing and an extension of the 
closure period from 3 to 6 months with two options, either 6 consecutive months or ‘3+3’7. . 
The closure period needs to be set consistently with the temporal migration periods of European 
eel at its different life stages. 

2.  REPORTING  ON  THE  BALANCE  BETWEEN  FISHING  CAPACITY  AND  FISHING 

OPPORTUNITIES 

In line with Article 22(4) of the CFP Regulation, the Commission must report annually to the 
European  Parliament  and  the  Council  on  the  balance  between  fishing  capacity  and  fishing 
opportunities8. 

Coastal  Member  States  report  annually  on  potential  imbalances,  following  Commission 
guidelines9. For the fleet segments for which overcapacity has been identified, they are required  
to put forward an action plan with adjustment targets, tools and a clear implementation time 
frame, in line with Article 22 of the CFP Regulation. 

A detailed analysis of the biological sustainability, economic parameters, vessel usage and the 
national  fleet  reports  is  provided  below.  The  Annex  shows  those  fleets  where  there  is  an 

7 Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2023/195. 
8 See: https://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reports/balance. 
9  Guidelines  for  the  analysis  of  the  balance  between  fishing  capacity  and  fishing  opportunities  according  to 
Article 22  of  Regulation  (EU)  No 1380/2013  of  the  European  Parliament  and  the  Council  on  the  Common 
Fisheries Policy (COM(2014) 545 final). 

7 

 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
imbalance between the fisheries resources and the fleet’s fishing capacity. It also shows where 
inadequate monitoring and data collection prevented obtaining conclusive results. 

2.1 Member States’ annual reports and action plans and STECF’s assessment 

All 22 coastal Member States submitted their 2021 reports to the Commission10. These reports, 
together with the available information on the sustainability of fisheries resources, economic 
parameters and vessel activity, have been examined comprehensively by STECF in a report11 
according to the Commission guidelines mentioned above. For details and analysis, reference 
should be made to that report. 

A summary of indicators calculated for each fleet segment is given in the Annex. It also indicates 
the  Member  States  that  have  submitted  action  plans  and  the  fleet  segments  that  have  been 
identified by Member States as being in overcapacity. The calculation of the indicators and the 
corresponding thresholds signalling potential overcapacity presented here are further described 
in full detail in the Commission guidelines and the STECF report. 

Information is provided for each fleet segment separately. A fleet segment is a group of vessels 
of a defined length class (e.g. 6 to 12 metres), operating in a set area (e.g. Northeast Atlantic) 
and using the same principal type of gear (e.g. beam trawl). In the Annex, the area code NAO 
means North Atlantic Ocean, including the North Sea, Celtic Sea and Baltic Sea, MBS means 
the Mediterranean and Black Sea, and OFR means other fishing regions. Gear codes are as set 
out in Annex XI to the relevant Commission Implementing Regulation12. 

Two biological indicators (stocks at risk (SAR) and sustainable harvest indicator (SHI)) have 
been set. The SAR shows whether a fleet segment is catching significant quantities of stocks 
that are at high biological risk due to being depleted to a low level. In the Annex, a SAR coloured 
in  red  means  that at  least  10% of the  catches of  the segment  are taken from  a stock  at high 
biological risk. 

The SHI measures whether a fleet depends on stocks that are overfished with respect to MSY 
(see Annex) for a significant part of its income. A SHI in red means that a fleet segment is, on 
average, relying on stocks that are fished above MSY rates for its income. 

The following three economic indicators are used. 

1)  If the return on investment is less than zero and less than the best available long-term 
risk-free  interest  rate,  this  would  be  flagged  in  red  to  indicate  long-term  economic 

10 Reports and action plans: https://ec.europa.eu/oceans-and-fisheries/fisheries/rules/fishing-fleet-capacities_en. 
11 STECF – Assessment of balance indicators for key fleet segments and review of national reports on Member 
States efforts to achieve balance between fleet capacity and fishing opportunities (STECF-22-15). Publications 
Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2022. 
12 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011 of 8 April 2011 laying down detailed rules for the 
implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring 
compliance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy. 

8 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
inefficiency. If data on intangible costs (e.g. quota leasing) are not available, return on 
fixed and tangible assets can be used instead. 

2)  If the current revenue is less than break-even revenue, this would be flagged in red to 

indicate a short-term economic inefficiency. 

3)  Vessel-use  indicators  are  flagged  in  red  if  more  than  20%  of  the  fleet  segment  is 
recurrently less than 70% of their potential workable activity, which could indicate an 
imbalance  in  capacity.  Other  reasons  could  also  affect  this  parameter,  such  as 
unexpected events and emergencies. 

In many cases, biological information (such as the state of the exploited resource) or economic 
information was not available for certain fleet segments. These are listed in Table 1. 

Table 1: Instances of fleet segments where a lack of biological or economic information 
has  prevented  the  calculation  of  biological  or  economic  indicators  and  instances  where 
more than 50 vessels are affected by a lack of data reporting are highlighted in bold 

Fleet  segments  with 
no 
biological 
indicators 

Fleet  segments  with 
no 
economic 
indicators 

Number of vessels within the fleet 
segments 
that  do  not  have 
biological indicators 

Number of vessels within the fleet 
segments 
that  do  not  have 
economic indicators 

5 
BEL 
BGR  0 
CYP  0 
DEU  8 
DNK  0 
0 
ESP 
1 
EST 
FIN 
3 
FRA  7 
GRC  6 
HRV  1 
0 
IRL 
0 
ITA 
LTU  0 
LVA  0 
MLT  9 
NLD  15 
5 
POL 
PRT 
11 
ROU  0 
SVN  10 
SWE  0 

5 
7 
1 
9 
0 
29 
3 
3 
56 
6 
8 
11 
7 
4 
0 
9 
13 
8 
11 
2 
10 
0 

13 
0 
0 
13 
0 
0 
5 
13 
14 
23 
1 
0 
0 
0 
0 
59 
35 
23 
6 
0 
20 
16 

9 

13 
16 
1 
17 
0 
97 
12 
13 
212 
71 
23 
43 
109 
6 
0 
58 
35 
26 
15 
26 
20 
405 

 
 
 
 
 
 
2.2 The EU fishing fleet’s capacity 

The number, capacity and power of vessels in the EU fleet have all followed a declining trend 
in recent  years (latest data 2022) (Figures 6 and 7). In December 2022, the EU fleet register 
(including the outermost regions) listed 72 472 vessels with 1 321 454 gross tonnes (GT) and 
5 264 658 kilowatts (kW) of installed power13. 

Figure 6 Tonnage capacity evolution (GT) of EU fishing fleet between 2014 and 2022 

13 EU fleet register. Data extracted in February 2023. 

10 

 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
Figure 7 Capacity evolution (kW) of EU fishing fleet between 2014 and 2022 

A study14 was initiated in January 2018 to assess the engine power control systems implemented 
in  coastal  Member  States.  It  was  completed  in  June  2019,  and  the  results  of  the  physical 
verifications  that  were  carried  out  during  the  study  revealed  a  widespread  non-compliance 
across coastal Member States, areas and vessel types involved in the study. According to the 
study, such non-compliance indicated a systematic lack of a culture of compliance with engine 
power limitations at operators’ level across the fishing sector. The study also indicated that there 
were significant differences among coastal Member States in the state of progress and quality 
of implementing the sampling plan to verify engine power and the systems in place to certify 
and  effectively  control  engine  power  through  physical  verifications.  In  addition,  the  study 
indicated  that  certification  systems  do  not  always  generate  reliable  engine  power  figures  for 
registration purposes and that certification does not guarantee that certified engine power is not 
exceeded. 

The Commission  has initiated various follow-up  actions  to  resolve  this non-compliance  and 
ensure  that  coastal  Member  States  improve  their  engine  power  verification  and  certification 
systems. Although the Member States concerned have taken a number of actions to resolve the 
issue, they have informed the Commission that the whole process will take time to complete.  

14 Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (European Commission), Roos Diesel Analysis B.V., 
Study  on  engine  power  verification  by  Member  States,  final  report,  ISBN  978-92-76-08327-6,  DOI 
10.2771/945320, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union, 2019. 

11 

 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
This is mainly due to the highly technical and complex nature of the subject and the physical 
verifications to perform.  

In  December  2022,  all  coastal  Member  State  fleets  complied  with  their  respective  capacity 
ceilings (Figure 8). However, the Commission’s attention has been drawn to the fact that the 
declarations  on  engine  power  are  increasingly  subject  to  complaints,  allegations  or  similar 
correspondence.  This  raises  concerns  about  the  accuracy  and  reliability  of  coastal  Member 
States’ declarations. 

Figure  8:  Effective  capacity  as  a  percentage  of  the  capacity  ceiling  by  Member  State  in 
December 2022: mainland fleets only 

The  fleet  in  the  outermost  regions  has  seen  a  reduction  in  the  number  of  vessels  and  gross 
tonnage capacity (Figures 9 and 10). Between December 2020 and December 2021, the number 
of vessels decreased by 13 to a total of 3 937. The capacity in GT decreased by 1 167 GT to 
55 647 GT. The capacity in kW increased marginally by 2 125 kW to 394 363 kW. 

12 

 
 
 
 
 
Figure 9: Vessel tonnage vs its capacity ceiling in the EU outermost regions (2022) 

Figure 10: Vessel power vs its capacity ceiling in the EU outermost regions (situation in 2022) 

13 

 
 
 
 
 
2.3 Main conclusions by coastal Member State15 

Each year, STECF issues an advice both as regards the balance between the fleet capacity and 
the  fishing  opportunities  for  the  different  fleet  segments  and  on  the  quality  of  the  coastal 
Member States’ assessments provided in their national fleet reports and, where relevant, action 
plans submitted in 2022. Therefore, the STECF conclusions sometimes differ from those of the 
coastal  Member  States,  as  summarised  in  the  comparisons  below,  based  on  the  indicators 
calculated  by  STECF.  In  these  comparisons,  the  Commission  has  drawn  conclusions  and 
inferences from the STECF calculations. 

Belgium had two fleet segments (numbering 42 vessels) have “red” biological indicators and, 
for another one (7 vessels), the economic indicators are also “red”, which are an indication of 
imbalance. Belgium considers that its fleets are in balance with the fishing opportunities and 
has not submitted an action plan.  

Bulgaria had fleet segments with at least one biological indicator ‘red’. Bulgaria has reported 
that  16  fleet  segments  containing  627  vessels  (out  of  1830)  are  out  of  balance.  Of  these  16 
segments, 6 are exploiting stocks at risk and 2 are operating unprofitably. Three fleet segments 
are out of balance and six are in balance for all economic indicators. Economic information was 
missing for 11 segments and information about sustainable harvesting was missing for all the 
fleet except for one vessel. Bulgaria has submitted an action plan B to address overcapacity in 
15  fleet  segments.  which 
investments,  marketing, 
compensation) rather than withdrawal of fleet capacity. 

includes  support  measures  (e.g. 

Cyprus had five fleet segments with “red” economic indicators and one segment has a “red” 
biological indicator. Cyprus has submitted an action plan concerning overcapacity in one of 
these fleet segments containing 5 vessels (out of 864) to be addressed by 2025. This will be 
addressed by permanent cessation of two vessels or by fishing gear modifications.  

Germany had ten fleet segments with at least one “red” biological indicator and eight have at 
least  one  “red”  economic  indicator.  Germany  has  submitted  an  updated  action  plan 
concerning 10 fleet segments which contain 715 vessels. The report shows that seven segments 
have  “red”  biological  indicators  and  two  have  “red”  economic  indicators.  For  two  other 
segments, indicators are not available.  

Denmark had 14 fleet segments with at least one “red” biological indicator and 14 segments 
with  at  least  one  “red”  economic  indicator.  408  out  of  1618  vessels  are  inactive.  In  2022, 
Denmark  has  submitted  an  action  plan  indicating  that  there  is  a  need  for  carrying  out  a 
scrapping scheme for the Baltic Sea in order to reduce the capacity for the smaller vessel length-
class segments. 

15 ‘red’ or ‘green’ indicators are references to the Annex and mean that the indicators as assessed in STECF-20-16 
possibly indicate an imbalance (‘red’) or no imbalance (‘green’).  A further explanation is given in the STECF 
report. If Member States have not submitted an action plan, this means that it considers its fleet is in balance. 

14 

 
 
 
                                                 
Spain had 45 fleet segments with at least one “red” biological indicator and 13 fleet segments 
with at least one “red” economic indicator. Spain submitted an updated action plan for the 
fleet  segments  not  being  in  balance  with  their  fishing  opportunities,  including  those  in  the 
Outermost Regions. The updated plan proposes a number of measures to contribute towards 
improvements in the imbalanced fleet segments. with a target date of 2023 concerning segments 
in the northeast Atlantic and other areas and 2024 for segments in the Mediterranean. 43 out of 
86 active segments had at least one “red” biological indicator. The updated plan focuses on a 
wide  variety  of  technical  measures  and  quota  management  measures  rather  than  capacity 
withdrawal. 

Estonia had four fleet segments with at least one “red” biological indicator and one segment 
with  three  “red”  economic  indicators.  Estonia  has  a  fleet  of  1896  vessels  of  which  574  are 
inactive. Estonia has not submitted an action plan, despite these indications of overcapacity.  

Finland  had  four  fleet  segments  with  at  least  one  “red”  biological  indicator  and  has  one 
segment  which  has  three  “red”  economic  indicators.  For  three  segments  all  biological  and 
economic  indicators  are  missing.  Finland  has  not  submitted  an  action  plan,  despite  these 
indications of overcapacity. It expects capacity reduction to take place systemically after the 
introduction  of  transferable  quotas  in  2017.  Finland  has  not  fixed  objectives  and  targets  for 
forthcoming capacity reductions. 

France had 48 fleet segments with at least one “red” biological indicator and 20 fleet segments 
with at least one “red” economic indicator. France submitted an action plan concerning 10 
fleet segments. None concerns overcapacity in its Outermost Regions. In its action plan, France 
includes technical measures including temporary closures and capacity reduction.  In general, 
the majority of the technical indicators for France showed imbalance (red), about half of the 
available  biological  indicators  were  in  balance  (green)  but  most  of  the  economic  indicators 
showed profitable fisheries (green). 

Greece  had  22  fleet  segments,  of  which  five  segments  have  at  least  one  “red”  biological 
indicator, but such indicators are only available for 16 segments. Nine segments had at least 
one  “red”  economic  indicator.  Greece  has  not  presented  an  action  plan  despite  these 
indications of overcapacity. 

Croatia had 20 fleet segments with at least one “red” biological indicator and seven with at 
least one “red” economic indicator. Croatia submitted an action plan to address overcapacity. 
Croatia’s majority of fleet segments appear to be out of balance with the fishing opportunities. 
Measures  proposed  by  Croatia  include  capacity  reductions,  effort  limits,  closed  areas  and 
decommissioning of certain types of fishing gear. 

Ireland had seven fleet segments with at least one “red” biological indicator and at least seven 
segments with at least one “red” economic indicator. 11 segments have no available economic 
indicator. Ireland has not presented an action plan despite these indications of overcapacity. 

Italy had 20 fleet segments with at least one “red” biological indicator and five fleet segments 
with  at  least  one  “red”  economic  indicator.  Italy  has  presented  an  action  plan  to  address 

15 

 
 
overcapacity in its fleet. Italy puts forward closed seasons and marine protected areas as means 
to  reduce  fishing  effort  to  achieve  biological  sustainability  but  does  not  address  structural 
overcapacity. However, the information presented in the Italian fleet report is insufficient to 
quantitatively assess whether the proposed measures in the action plan will result in a reduction 
in fishing mortality of relevant targeted species or the extent to which any potential imbalance 
between capacity and fishing opportunities for Italian fleet segments will be affected. 

Latvia  had  two  fleet  segments  with  at  least  one  “red”  biological  indicator.  Latvia  has 
submitted an action plan concerning one fleet segment that covers 32 vessels out of a total of 
313 in the fleet. That segment had a “red” biological indicator. The other two segments which 
had “red” economic indicators but “green” biological indicators were not included in the plan. 
Overcapacity in these two segments is therefore not addressed in the action plan. 

Lithuania had five fleet segments with at least one “red” biological indicator and three fleet 
segments with at least one “red” economic indicator. Lithuania has submitted an action plan 
with a target date of 2023. The Action Plan is covering 4 segments of the 8 segments, containing 
9 vessels out of a total of 141 in the fleet.  

Malta had 6 fleet segments with at least one ‘red” biological indicator and 6 with at least one 
“red”  economic  indicator.  Malta  has  submitted  an  action  plan  concerning  2  segments 
containing 422 vessels of its total fleet of 900 vessels. Both segments have “green” biological 
indicators but “red” economic indicators. Four other segments with “red” biological indicators 
were not included in the action plan.  

The Netherlands had four segments with biological indicators in ”red” and six segments with 
“red”  economic  indicators,  out  of  a  total  of  26  segments.  Despite  these  indications  of 
overcapacity,  the  Netherlands  did  not  submit  an  action  plan.  Biological  and  economic 
indicators were missing for 15 segments. 

Poland had 6 fleet segments with at least one “red” biological indicator and 5 fleet segments 
with  at  least one “red” economic indicator.  Poland  submitted an action plan concerning 7 
segments containing 767 vessels out of 825 in the fleet. All of these segments had at least one 
“red” biological indicator and four of them also had “red” economic indicators, both of which 
suggest overcapacity. However, no specific time-frame for its implementation was indicated, 
only that the plan is to be implemented over a 3-5 year time period.  

Portugal had 17 fleet segments with at least one “red” biological indicators and 12 segments 
with  at  least  one  “red”  economic  indicator.  Portugal  submitted  an  action  plan  due  to  the 
imbalance  observed  on  vessel  use  indicators  and  economic  indicators  for  the  fishing  fleet 
operating with hooks, particularly in the case of larger length-class vessels. In the action plan, 
a need for adjusting the fleet’s capacity is considered, the aim of implementing measures for 
the  permanent  cessation  of  activity  are  presented  and  a  timetable  defining  the  start  of  the 
implementation in the second half of 2022 and complete the decommissioning by the end 2023 
are defined. 

16 

 
 
Romania had five fleet segments with five “red” technical indicators and one fleet segment 
with  one  “red”  biological  indicator.  Romania  submitted  an  action  plan  concerning  six  fleet 
segments.  Romania  indicates  a  number  of  measures  that  have  been  selected  for  each  fleet 
segment. These measures are broad-ranging and their objectives and targets are unclear. The 
time frame for the implementation of the action plan extends to 2027. 

Slovenia had 13 fleet segments containing 136 vessels. For ten segments, neither economic nor 
biological indicators were available. Despite these indications of overcapacity,  Slovenia did 
not submit an action plan. 

Sweden had 12 segments with at least one “red” biological indicator. two segments had a “red” 
economic  indicator.  Sweden  submitted  an  action  plan  in  2021  covering  17  cod-directed 
fishing vessels across 5 segments which is still being implemented. 

There were significant gaps in the provision of biological and economic indicators. Bulgaria, 
Cyprus, Spain,  France,  Greece,  Ireland,  Italy, Malta, Portugal  and Sweden all had segments 
containing 50 or more vessels for which either biological or economic data were not available. 
For Cyprus, France, Ireland and Sweden the numbers exceeded 200 vessels. 

The Commission has written to these Member States about the need to improve data collection 
in order to comply with Article 22 of the CFP Regulation. 

2.4 Financial support from the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund 

for the structural adaptation of the fishing fleets 

Certain  segments  of  the  fishing  fleet  are  subject  to  overcapacity,  resulting  in  the 
overexploitation of marine biological resources. If there is structural overcapacity, profitability 
is low because too many vessels are chasing too few fish. To avoid this, a structural adaptation 
of the fishing fleets concerned is therefore necessary. 

The European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund16 (EMFAF) can grant, under specific 
conditions, financial compensation to fishers if they permanently cease fishing activities. The 
fishing capacity eliminated thanks to this support is then permanently removed from the fleet. 
Permanent  cessation  can  happen  by  scrapping  the  fishing  vessel  or  decommissioning  it  and 
retrofitting it for other activities. However, changing over to recreational fishing must not lead 
to increased pressure on the marine ecosystem. 

Member States have submitted their EMFAF programmes for 2021-2027. These programmes 
are  multiannual  strategic  roadmaps  for  public  investment,  underpinned  by  an  analysis  of 
strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. They set out tailor-made measures to respond 
to the specific challenges identified by Member States to the common EU priorities for marine 
biodiversity, maritime policy and sustainable fisheries and aquaculture. The Commission has 
adopted  the  programmes  after  an  in-depth  assessment  that  takes  into  account,  among  other 

16  Regulation  (EU)  2021/1139  of  the  European  Parliament  and  of  the  Council  of  7  July  2021  establishing  the 
European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund. 

17 

 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
things, the balance between the  fleet  fishing  capacity  and available fishing opportunities, as 
reported annually by coastal Member States in line with Article 22(2) of the CFP Regulation. 

2.5 Conclusion 

In 2022, all coastal Member States complied with the obligation to report on the capacity and 
balance of their fleet  segments with  fishing opportunities. However, some of these Member 
States will need to adjust their reporting to better comply with the Commission’s guidelines  
and  address  discrepancies  between  their  national  reports  and  the  STECF’s  advice.  Twelve 
coastal  Member  States  have  presented  new  or  revised  action  plans  with  many  different 
measures to address overcapacity. However, more needs to be done to make the action plans 
more specific, time-bound and objective-driven. 

The overall capacity of the EU mainland fleet (excluding the outermost regions) has remained 
relatively stable with minor changes of -0.3%, -0.5% and -0.7% compared to the previous year 
in  the  number  of  vessels,  power  and  tonnage,  respectively.  In  December  2022,  the  fishing 
capacity of the whole EU fleet (including the outermost regions) was 32% below the capacity 
ceilings for gross tonnage and 27% below the engine power ceilings17. 

Nevertheless, particular attention needs to be paid to the fleets of some coastal Member States, 
especially in the Mediterranean and the Black Seas, where capacity is very close to the ceilings. 
Capacity  measures  can  be  of  a  particular  importance  for  countries  and  regions  where 
conservation and management measures are not  (yet) effective enough to regulate input and 
output measures, such as effort limits or TACs. 

3.  SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE EU FISHING FLEET 

This  section  provides  an  overview  of  the  trends  and  latest  results  on  the  EU  fleet’s  socio-
economic performance. Based on the official data submitted by Member States and the 2022 
Annual Economic Report of the EU fishing fleet produced by the STECF18, the recent trends 
on the EU fishing fleet can be divided into the two periods described below. 

1)  In 2008-2019, there was a general improvement – with some fluctuations – driven by 

the three following factors. 

a.  Progress  in  achieving  sustainable  fisheries.  This  was  generally  reflected  in 
higher landings per unit of effort and lower operational costs resulting from an 
increasing number of fishing stocks exploited at sustainable levels. Effort has 
decreased in the past years and stock biomass has become more abundant. As a 
result, landings per unit of effort have been rising and so have profits. 
b.  Higher average first sale prices of several commercially important species. 
c.  Relatively low fuel costs up to 2020. 

17 Engine power data refer to August 2022. 
18 
4f20-9bba-afc67dea695f 

https://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/43805/35330729/STECF+22-06+-+AER+2022.pdf/e9f061e5-cd7e-

18 

 
 
 
 
                                                 
As part of this general trend, fleets targeting stocks exploited sustainably over several 
years tended to see an improvement in their profitability and salaries. Conversely, fleets 
targeting overexploited stocks tended to have poorer economic performance. There is a 
social  dimension  too:  fleets  that  target  stocks  exploited  sustainably  are  likely  to 
experience salary increases and stable employment levels. 

2)  In  2020-2022,  the  long-term  positive  trend  in  the  EU  fishing  fleet’s  economic 
performance  was  interrupted.  The  economic  performance  of  the  EU  fleet  has 
significantly  deteriorated  due  to  the  combined  effects  of  external  shocks  such  as 
COVID-19, Brexit, environmental changes and the current energy and inflation crises. 

Despite these shocks, the EU fishing fleet still managed to remain profitable in 2020 and 2021, 
showing a certain degree of resilience. However, the high fuel prices in 2022 severely affected 
the fleet and offset the gains made in previous years. The EU fishing fleet, for the first time 
since 2008, ended up in a loss-making position in 2022. On a more positive note, energy prices 
eased in the first quarter of 2023. This relative improvement in the economic performance in 
2023  compared  to  2022  means  that  the  EU  fishing  fleet  is  expected  to  cover  its  overall 
operational costs in 2023. 

The  poor  performance  does  not  affect  all  fishing  fleet  segments  in  the  same  way.  Evidence 
suggests that fleet segments which depend on stocks exploited sustainably and that  are more 
energy efficient (or reduce their fuel use intensity) are still able to make a profit despite the 
current adverse economic conditions. 

Fuel use intensity overall decreased by 15% from 2008 to 2020 due to the improvement in a 
number of stocks (in particular in  the North Sea and the Northeast Atlantic), which brought 
more catches with less days at sea. Support from the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund19 
(EMFF) also contributed to this decrease with supporting changes in fishing behaviour by some 
fishing  vessels  intended  to  reduce  the  fuel  consumption  and  increased  energy  efficiency 
innovation and fishing gear. With an annual fuel consumption of almost 2 billion litres, there is 
room  for  substantial  improvement  in  the  EU  fishing  fleet’s  energy  efficiency  and  fuel 
consumption. 

The Communication on the Energy Transition  of the EU  Fisheries and Aquaculture sector20 
proposes measures to support the sector in accelerating its energy transition with the objective 
of  having  a  climate-neutral  fisheries  sector  by  2050.  The  Communication  identifies  current 
barriers and proposes action in four main areas focused on: 

1.  improving stakeholder cooperation by setting up the Energy Transition Partnership on 

EU Fisheries and Aquaculture; 

2.  knowledge and innovation; 
3.  skills; 

19  Regulation  (EU)  2021/1139  of  the  European  Parliament  and  of  the  Council  of  7  July  2021  establishing  the 
European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund 
20 COM(2023) 100 final. 

19 

 
 
 
                                                 
4.  financing.  

The Energy Transition  Partnership  for EU  Fisheries and  Aquaculture  will bring together  all 
stakeholders, to address the challenges of the sector’s energy transition together. Stakeholders 
include the fisheries, aquaculture, shipbuilding, ports, and energy sectors, NGOs, and national 
and regional authorities. 

The EU fleet employs a total of around 125 000 fishers. Employment decreased in 2008-2020: 
−2.1% in total employed and −10.8% in full time equivalents (FTE). The average wage per FTE 
increased by 23.8%. The Spanish fleet employed 25.1% of the total, followed by the Italian 
(17.1%) and Greek (15.0%) fleets. 

A synthetic analysis of the EU fishing fleet’s performance at different levels is presented below 
(Member State, fleet segment and regional levels). 

-  At Member State level, the Spanish fleet continued to generate the highest revenue by 
far  at  EUR 1.6 billion,  followed by  the  French fleet  at  EUR 1.1 billion.  No Member 
State  suffered  gross  losses,  while  four  (Finland,  Germany,  Estonia  and  Cyprus) 
generated  net  losses,  which  means  that  they  cover  all  operational  costs  with  the 
exception of depreciation costs. 

-  At fleet segment level, the EU distant-water fleet (DWF), the large-scale fleet (LSF) 
and  the  small-scale  coastal  fleet  (SSCF)  had  marked  differences  in  their  economic 
performance. The LSF and DWF showed strong resilience in 2020, mostly due to the 
exceptionally  low  marine  fuel  prices.  This  situation  changed  dramatically  in  2022, 
where these fleets (particularly the DWF) were among the most affected by high fuel 
prices. As for the SSCF, there are major differences in the economic performance and 
employment levels across Member States and regions. The SSCF in the Baltic region 
tends  to  perform  the  weakest  due  to  the  combined  effects  of  the  bad  state  of  key 
demersal stocks and climate change. 

-  At regional level (see below): 

North Sea and Eastern Arctic 
The 10 Member State fleets operating in this region in 2020 numbered 2 048 vessels with an 
estimated 3 539 FTEs. EUR 0.98 billion in revenue was generated, 76% of which came from 
three Member States: Denmark, the Netherlands and Germany. Compared to 2019, there were 
mixed  results  for  revenue  in  2020:  the  Netherlands  (EUR 288  million;  −1%),  Germany 
(EUR 88 million; +3%), Denmark (EUR 383 million; +1%), Ireland (EUR 11 million; +42%), 
and Belgium (EUR 25 million; −22%). The fleets made EUR 258 million in gross profit, a 15% 
increase  compared  to  2019.  By  fishing  activity,  the  SSCF  operating  in  the  North  Sea  and 
Eastern Arctic generated EUR 26 million in revenue with 249 FTEs. 

Baltic Sea 

20 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Eight Member States were actively involved in Baltic Sea fisheries in 2020 (Denmark, Estonia, 
Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Sweden), and the Estonian, Finnish, Latvian 
and  Polish  fisheries  were  fully  dependent  on  this  region.  The  fleet,  containing  5 231  active 
vessels, generated EUR 197 million in revenue, a decrease of 12% compared to 2019. Gross 
added  value  (GVA)  also  decreased  by  5%.  However,  overall,  the  EU  Baltic  Sea  fleet  was 
profitable  in  2020,  and  gross  profit  remained  stable  compared  to  2019  as  a  result  of  a  38% 
reduction  in  fuel  costs.  Member  States’  SSCFs  with  a  relatively  low  cod  dependency  (i.e. 
Finland and Latvia) made gross profits while the remaining Member States suffered losses. The 
revenue generated by the LSF fleet in 2020 was EUR 152.8 million, 12% less than in 2019. 
However,  gross  profit  and  net  profit  generated  by  the  LSF  increased  by  6%  and  2%, 
respectively.  Lower  energy  costs  and  labour  costs  contributed  the  most  to  the  improved 
profitability of the fleet. The number of people employed fell by 9% (FTEs and total jobs). 

North Western Waters and South Western Waters 
The main Member State fleets in the North Western Waters are the French and Irish. At 95%, 
Ireland had the highest total percentage of national landed value from the region, indicating its 
high dependency on this area. Overall, the fleets account for 2 486 active vessels with 6 382 
FTEs, a decrease of 9% compared to 2020. In 2020, the two main species landed in terms of 
weight were the small pelagic species blue whiting and Atlantic mackerel, but hake was also 
important in value. In general terms, total revenue remained stable between 2019 and 2020. 

The main Member States fishing in the South Western Waters are Spain, France and Portugal 
(generating 99% of the revenue in 2020). Overall, the fleet was profitable with similar results 
to  2019.  South  Western  Waters  fleets  generated  over  EUR 1.1 billion  in  revenue, 
EUR 685 million in GVA and EUR 155 million in gross profit. 

Mediterranean Sea 
The fishing fleet in this region accounted for 58% of all EU vessels and 46% of EU employment 
in fishing in 2020. The Greek fleet is the biggest contributor in terms of the number of vessels 
(35%) and days at sea (48%), while the Italian fleet is the biggest in terms of landings (37% in 
weight and 44% in value), revenue (43%), gross value added (43%) and gross profit (54%). 
The economic performance was mostly driven by the LSF, which contributed to 72% of the 
landings value from the Mediterranean and 84% of landings weight in 2020. By contrast, 81% 
of the vessels operating in the region belong to the SSCF. Employment in the Mediterranean 
fishing fleet in 2020 was estimated at 59 762 jobs, corresponding to 38 701 FTEs. Employment 
(measured in FTEs) decreased by about 12% compared to 2019. More than half the employment 
is created by the SSCF: 35 415 jobs corresponding to more than 59% of total jobs and 20 377 
FTEs corresponding to almost 53% of total FTEs. For the whole Mediterranean fleet (SSCF 
and LSF), all economic performance indicators have worsened compared to 2019. 

Black Sea 
Revenue in 2020 was estimated to be EUR 10.5 million. This is a decrease of 29% compared 
to 2019 but 22% more than the average in 2008-2019. GVA was EUR 5.1 million, an overall 
decrease of 36% compared to 2019 and 24% lower than the average in 2008-2019. Gross profit 

21 

 
 
 
 
 
 
was estimated to be EUR 3.2 million, a 46% decrease compared to 2019. The number of SSCF 
vessels in 2020 (1 240) increased by 10% compared to 2019. They make up 92% of the total 
fleet in number and 82% of the total employment (67% of FTEs). In 2020, 1 807 fishers were 
directly employed, corresponding to 452 FTEs. Most vessels are operated by the owner or a 
family member. 

4. 

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LANDING OBLIGATION 

The objective of the landing obligation is to avoid wasting resources through 
discards by encouraging fishers to fish more selectively and actively avoid 
unwanted catches. For that purpose, it requires all catches to be landed. 

The landing obligation has been in place since 2015 and fully applicable since 2019. Reporting 
is based on information sent by Member States, Advisory Councils and other relevant sources 
to the Commission. Reports on implementation of the landing obligation were first produced in 
2015. This reporting has been included since 2016 in the Commission’s annual communication 
on the CFP. This staff working document covers the implementation of the landing obligation 
in 2022. 

To  improve  reporting  and  facilitate  the  assessment  of  the  implementation  of  the  landing 
obligation, the Commission prepared a questionnaire in 2016 for Member States to complete. 
Completing this questionnaire was highly recommended, and most Member States voluntarily 
did  so.  This  has  significantly  facilitated  drafting  the  Commission  report  and  improved  the 
quality of the information provided and the annual reporting by the Commission. Therefore, all 
stakeholders deemed it appropriate to continue with the questionnaire. 

The questionnaire follows a similar approach each year to ensure the comparability of replies. 
Still, where relevant, questions were updated in view of available scientific advice and STECF 
recommendations  (STECF  20-03).  The  reports  provide  significant  information  and  data  in 
certain areas (e.g. pilot studies, number of infringement proceedings, discard quantities under 
exemptions). However, the STECF has noted in the past21 and in STECF 21-03 that the reports 
still contain mostly qualitative information and that there is a lot of repetition from one report 
to another. Feedback on progress at sea-basin level is critical for understanding how effective 
the implementation of the landing obligation has been and what adjustments are necessary. 

Since 2021, the legal obligation of the Commission to annually report on the implementation 
of the landing obligation no longer applies. However, as the landing obligation is key to the 
CFP objectives, the Commission decided to continue the annual exercise.  To avoid overload 
and  given  the  STECF  conclusions  on  possible  improvements,  the  Commission  did  not  ask 
Member States to fill out the usual questionnaire. As discussed in previous years, a coordinated 
approach  to  reporting  at regional level  would help  avoid  the large amount  of repetition that 
continues  to  appear  in  the  responses.  It  may  also  help  give  a  more  complete  picture  of  the 
effectiveness of the landing obligation at regional level. This has already been discussed in 2022 

21 PLEN 18-02, PLEN 19-02, PLEN 21-02. 

22 

 
 
                                                 
with  Member  States  Regional  Groups  and  can  be  a  focus  for  discussion  on  improving  the 
reporting for next year. For 2022, the reporting on the implementation of the landing obligation 
is built on: (i) the progress of the EMFF measures on the landing obligation and the EMFAF; 
(ii) discussions in the Advisory Councils; (iii) control and enforcement, including the annual 
reporting of the European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA); and (iv) the studies conducted in 
the  previous  years  as  extensively  described  in  Chapter  3.3.  of  the  Communication  on  the 
functioning of the CFP22. Looking ahead, efforts in 2023 and 2024 should focus on the follow-
up of this Communication. 

4.1 Implementation of measures at sea basin level 

Delegated regulations specifying the details of implementation of the landing obligation 

To ensure a successful and feasible implementation of the landing obligation, after consulting 
the advisory councils, Member States may develop joint recommendations and agree to submit 
them  to  the  Commission  with  specific  implementation  provisions  to  be  adopted  by  the 
Commission  as  delegated  acts.  Before  adopting  the  delegated  acts,  the  Commission  then 
submits  the  joint  recommendations  to  the  STECF  for  assessment  as  the  suggested 
implementation  provisions  should  take  into  account  the  best  available  scientific  advice  and 
include it as the basis for exemptions to the landing obligation. 

These  delegated  acts  provide  some  flexibility  where  unwanted  catches  are  very  difficult  to 
avoid, lead to disproportional costs, or species have a high survivability rate. Exemptions from 
the  landing  obligation  are  set  out  in  Article 15(4)  of  the  CFP  Regulation.  In  addition  to 
prohibited species and predator damage exemptions, the landing obligation does not apply to 
the following cases: 

(i)  High survivability  cases,  for which scientific  evidence demonstrates high survival 

rates. 

(ii) Cases for up to 5% of the total annual catches (de minimis) either because scientific 
evidence demonstrates that increases in selectivity are very difficult to achieve or to 
avoid disproportionate costs for handling unwanted catches. This flexibility has been 
put in place by the co-legislators to address the specific problems of (mostly) mixed 
fisheries23 in relation to the achievements of the objectives of the CFP Regulation 
and to avoid the phenomenon of choke species. 

22 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council The common fisheries policy 
today and tomorrow: a Fisheries and Oceans Pact towards sustainable, science-based, innovative and inclusive 
fisheries management (COM(2023) 103 final). 
23 ‘Mixed fisheries’  means fisheries in  which  more than one species is present and where different species are 
likely to be caught in the same fishing operation, Article 4(1)(36) of the CFP Regulation. 

23 

 
 
 
                                                 
The  Western  Waters24,  the  North  Sea25,  the  Baltic26  and  the  western  Mediterranean27 
multiannual  plans  allow  for  adopting  delegated  regulations  specifying  the  details  for 
implementing  the  landing  obligation  for  all  species,  including  the  de  minimis  and  high 
survivability exemptions and technical measures aimed at increasing gear selectivity, reducing 
unwanted catches and eliminating discards. The landing obligation has been legally fully in force 
since  2019  and  multiannual  plans  have  been  adopted  for  most  waters.  This  means  a  shift  from 
setting out exemptions from the landing obligation under the CFP via temporary discard plans28
 to 
a more stable approach with the multiannual plans as a legal basis. 

In 2022, the following delegated regulations specifying the details for implementing the landing 
obligation were in place: 

1.  Commission  Delegated  Regulation  (EU)  2020/2015  of  21 August  2020  specifying 
details of the implementation of the landing obligation for certain fisheries in Western 
Waters  for the period 2021-2023, as amended by Commission  Delegated  Regulation 
(EU) 2022/2290 of 19 August 2022; 

2.  Commission  Delegated  Regulation  (EU)  2020/2014  of  21 August  2020  specifying 
details of implementation of the landing obligation for certain fisheries in the North Sea 
for  the  period  2021-2023,  as  amended  by  Commission  Delegated  Regulation  (EU) 
2022/2289 of 18 August 2022; 

3.  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2065 of 25 August 2021 establishing a 
discard plan for turbot fisheries in the Black Sea, as amended by Commission Delegated 
Regulation (EU) 2022/2287 of 12 August 2022; 

4.  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2066 of 25 August 2021 supplementing 
Regulation (EU) 2019/1022 of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding 
details of implementation of the landing obligation for certain demersal stocks in the 
western  Mediterranean  Sea  for  the  period  2022-2024,  as  amended  by  Commission 
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/2288 of 16 August 2022; 

24  Article 13  of  Regulation  (EU)  2019/472  of  the  European  Parliament  and  of  the  Council  of  19 March  2019 
establishing  a  multiannual  plan  for  stocks  fished  in  the  Western  Waters  and  adjacent  waters,  and  for  fisheries 
exploiting  those  stocks,  amending  Regulations  (EU)  2016/1139  and  (EU)  2018/973,  and  repealing  Council 
Regulations  (EC)  No 811/2004,  (EC)  No 2166/2005,  (EC)  No 388/2006,  (EC)  No 509/2007  and  (EC) 
No 1300/2008. 
25  Article 11  of  Regulation  (EU)  2018/973  of  the  European  Parliament  and  of  the  Council  of  4 July  2018 
establishing a  multiannual plan  for demersal  stocks in the  North Sea  and the  fisheries exploiting those  stocks, 
specifying  details  of  the  implementation  of  the  landing  obligation  in  the  North  Sea  and  repealing  Council 
Regulations (EC) No 676/2007 and (EC) No 1342/2008. 
26  Article 7  of  Regulation  (EU)  2016/1139  of  the  European  Parliament  and  of  the  Council  of  6 July  2016 
establishing a multiannual plan for the stocks of cod, herring and sprat in the Baltic Sea and the fisheries exploiting 
those  stocks,  amending  Council  Regulation  (EC)  No 2187/2005  and  repealing  Council  Regulation  (EC) 
No 1098/2007. 
27  Article 14  of  Regulation  (EU)  2019/1022  of  the  European  Parliament  and  of  the  Council  of  20 June  2019 
establishing a multiannual plan for the fisheries exploiting demersal stocks in the western Mediterranean Sea and 
amending Regulation (EU) No 508/2014. 
28 Article 15(6) of the CFP Regulation.   

24 

 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
5.  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2064 of 25 August 2021 supplementing 
Regulation  (EU)  No 1380/2013  of  the  European  Parliament  and  of  the  Council  as 
regards the establishment of a de minimis exemption to the landing obligation for certain 
demersal fisheries in the Adriatic and south-eastern Mediterranean Sea, as amended by 
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/2564 of 16 August 2022; 

6.  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/161 of 23 October 2017 establishing a 
de minimis exemption to the landing obligation for certain small pelagic fisheries in the 
Mediterranean Sea, as amended by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/2012 
of 5 August 2020; 

7.  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/306 of 18 December 2017 laying down 
specifications for the implementation of the landing obligation as regards cod and plaice 
in Baltic Sea fisheries; 

8.  Commission  Delegated  Regulation  (EU)  2021/1417  of  22 June  2021  supplementing 
Regulation (EU) 2016/1139 concerning the specifications for the landing obligation as 
regards salmon in the Baltic Sea for the period 2021-2023. 

STECF observes that the impact of exemptions on fishing mortality is poorly understood given 
the limited reporting on catches that were discarded under exemptions. The STECF working 
group (EWG 20-04) previously advised that it would be appropriate and timely for Member 
States  Regional  Groups  and  the  Commission  to  review  existing  exemptions  to  the  landing 
obligation, which has been further prepared in STECF PLEN 22-03 and STECF 23-01. Member 
States and the Commission are working in 2023 with the STECF on this review with a focus 
on improving data (requirements). The Commission continues to monitor implementation of 
the  landing  obligation  by  updating  the  European  Climate,  Environment  and  Infrastructure 
Executive Agency (CINEA) study ‘Synthesis of the landing obligation measures and discard 
rates’29. 

Quota management 

In previous years, Member States reported that the most important management measures to 
prevent choke situations30 and successfully implement the landing obligation were quota swaps; 
inter-species and inter-annual flexibility provided for by the provisions of the CFP Regulation. 
These  tools  remain  important  mechanisms  although  no  significant  trend  can  be  detected  in 
quota  swapping  between  Member  States.  This  is  confirmed  by  the  Commission’s  QUOTA 
database  (Figures  11,  12,  13).  To  increase  transparency  and  facilitate  swapping,  the 

29 https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/89868cc6-015f-11ec-8f47-01aa75ed71a1. 
30 ‘a species for which the available quota is exhausted (long) before the quotas are exhausted of (some of) the 
other species that are caught together in a (mixed) fishery’ (Zimmermann et al. 2015). 

25 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
Commission  publishes  the  quota  swaps  list  per  year  on  a  public  website31.  Figures  for  the 
current year are updated weekly. 

Figure 11: Volume of quota swaps ‘in’ (t) 

31 After notifying the Commission, Member States may exchange all or part of the fishing opportunities allocated 
to them (Article 16(8) of the CFP Regulation). The quota swaps are published every year by the Commission at 
https://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs_en. 

26 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
Figure 12: Volume of quota swaps ‘in’ by Member State (t) 

Number of Quota swaps "in" per MS

180000

160000

140000

120000

100000

80000

60000

40000

20000

0

7
9
9
1

8
9
9
1

9
9
9
1

0
0
0
2

1
0
0
2

2
0
0
2

3
0
0
2

4
0
0
2

5
0
0
2

6
0
0
2

7
0
0
2

8
0
0
2

9
0
0
2

0
1
0
2

1
1
0
2

2
1
0
2

3
1
0
2

4
1
0
2

5
1
0
2

6
1
0
2

7
1
0
2

8
1
0
2

9
1
0
2

0
2
0
2

1
2
0
2

2
2
0
2

Figure 13: Number of quota swaps ‘in’ by Member State 

27 

BEL
CYP
DEU
DNK
ESP
EST
FIN
FRA
GBR
GRC
HRV
IRL
ITA
LTU
LVA
NLD
POL
PRT
SWE

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.2 Control and enforcement 

Member State action to monitor and enforce the landing obligation remains insufficient. The 
main risks associated with the landing obligation have not been mitigated sufficiently, such as 
illegal  and  undocumented  discarding  of  catches  during  fishing  activities  at  sea.  There  are 
incentives for non-compliance32, which need to  be prevented  and deterred  through effective 
control  and  enforcement.  The  controls  currently  employed  by  Member  States  are  mainly 
traditional ones. These include inspections at sea, inspections at landing, data analysis and aerial 
surveillance, which are not enough to mitigate ensure control and enforcement of the main risks. 
Traditional controls only provide a snapshot of compliance at the time of the monitoring and 
do not survey fishing activity before or after an inspection; aerial surveillance does not provide 
sufficient  evidence  of  compliance  or  non-compliance33.  For  Member  States  to  fulfil  their 
obligations under EU legislation to ensure control and enforcement of the landing obligation, 
some form of continuous monitoring is necessary. Remote electronic monitoring (REM) using 
closed-circuit television (CCTV) is widely recognised as the most practical way to do so (the 
use of control observers is not a viable option). This has been confirmed by several trials and 
applications in EU waters34 and fisheries around the world. 

The Commission has a responsibility to control and evaluate the application of the rules of the 
CFP by Member States (Article 96(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/200935). Following 
a  series  of  audits  launched  by  the  Commission  in  2020,  infringement  proceedings  were 
launched in 2021 against Spain, France, Belgium, Ireland and the Netherlands for failing to take 
appropriate measures to ensure control and enforcement of the landing obligation36. 

Indications  point  to  widespread  non-compliance  and  sizeable  illegal  and  undocumented 
discarding of catches due to the drivers of non-compliance and the failure by Member States to 
effectively control and enforce the landing obligation. This is supported by information from 
many sources, including several EFCA compliance evaluation reports37 and the 2021 CINEA 
report  Synthesis  of  the  landing  obligation  measures  and  discard  rates38,  which  stated  that 
discarding  rates  have  not  changed  since  the  landing  obligation  was  introduced.  This  study 
helped the Commission determine whether or not discarding patterns have changed (reduced) 
as a result of the landing obligation. The study concludes that discard rates did not show clear 
trends  or  patterns  as  a  result  of  the  full  implementation  of  the  landing  obligation  and  that 
undocumented discarding or misreporting occurs. This could be due to the short time series of 

32 The main risks include illegal and undocumented discarding to avoid ʻchokeʼ situations, maximise profit (ʻhigh-
gradingʼ) and reduce the costs associated with the handling and storage of low-value catches. 
33  This  is  compounded  by  the  significant  number  and  complexity  of  the  de  minimis  and  high  survivability 
exemptions.  Aerial  surveillance  cannot  reliably  identify  species,  size  and  condition,  so  it  cannot  confirm  non-
compliance; this is also greatly impaired by poor weather and bad visibility (including periods of darkness). 
34  Several  Member  States  have  agreed  to  participate  in  an  EFCA-coordinated  REM  pilot  project  to  learn  best 
practice  on  REM  controls  (one  or  two  vessels  per  Member  State).  Denmark  uses  REM  in  the  nephrops  fleet 
operating in the Kattegat and the Netherlands is conducting a fully documented fisheries scheme on a few vessels 
in the North Sea. Neither project is being used for control and enforcement purposes. 
35 OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1. 
36  For  France  and  Spain,  see  https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/inf_21_4681.  For  Ireland, 
Belgium and the Netherlands, see https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/inf_21_5342. 
37 https://www.efca.europa.eu/en/content/compliance-evaluation 
38 https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/89868cc6-015f-11ec-8f47-01aa75ed71a1. 

28 

 
 
                                                 
available information. The Commission keeps monitoring the discard trend by updating this 
study with the latest catch data to lengthen the time series. 

The  weak  compliance  of  the  landing  obligation  poses  a  significant  risk  to  achieving  the 
objectives of the CFP and weakens the accuracy of catch data (landings, unwanted catch, and 
discards)  and  reporting.  Data  and  accurate  reporting  are  crucial  for  the  quality  of  scientific 
advice and thus achieving the maximum sustainable yield. Member States and the Commission 
are working in 2023 with the STECF on a review of the exemptions to the landing obligation 
with a specific focus on improving data and data requirements. However, weaknesses in how 
Member States control the landing obligation does not help encourage fishers avoid and reduce 
unwanted catches in the first place, thus gradually eliminating discards. 

The Parliament and Council have recently agreed on a revised fisheries control system upon a 
Commission proposal, notably to mandate the use of remote electronic monitoring (REM) tools, 
which are the most effective, cost-efficient and scalable means to monitor compliance with the 
landing obligation. 

European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) last haul inspections 

In 2022, the EFCA continued to focus on assisting Member States and the Commission in the 
monitoring, control and enforcement of the implementation of the landing obligation. The risk 
assessment of non-compliance with the landing obligation was conducted, as in previous years, 
as part of the joint deployment plans39. 

Considering the estimates of illegal discards derived from last haul data40 and the perception of 
control  experts,  the  low  number  of  detected  suspected  infringements  may  indicate  that  the 
current control tools are inadequate in detecting the illegal practices carried out to comply with 
the landing obligation. 

Since 2015, last haul inspections by the EFCA have contributed to monitoring compliance with 
the  landing  obligation,  including  illegal  discards  and  reporting  obligations,  such  as  the 
recording of allowed discards due to exemptions. While these inspections are not effective in 
detecting  possible  infringements  related  to  illegal  discards41,  they  are  instrumental  for 
monitoring compliance levels with landing obligation rules (Article 15 of the CFP Regulation). 
Moreover, last haul inspections may also contribute to raising awareness among fishers about 
the rules on the landing obligation and its reporting obligations. 

The  EFCA,  in  cooperation  with  the  Member  States  Control  Expert  Group,  has  evaluated 
compliance in selected fisheries in the North Sea and North Western Waters. The evaluation 
was  carried  out  to  report  the  findings  for  mackerel  fisheries  for  2015-2017  and  significant 

39 https://www.efca.europa.eu/en/content/joint-deployment-plans-eu-waters. 
40 Last haul analysis is a method of estimating representative size  – and species distribution – of the catch of a 
fishing fleet based on the contents of trawls that are hauled in the presence of inspectors at sea. 
41 As it is unlikely that fishers discard fish subject to the landing obligation in the presence of an inspector. 

29 

 
 
 
                                                 
demersal  fisheries  for  2016-2017  in  these  areas.  The  findings  are  publicly  available42.  The 
EFCA continues to coordinate updates of the compliance evaluation reports for selected species 
in the North Sea and Western Waters for 2018-2020 and in the Baltic Sea for 2019-2021. 

Five last hauls were performed and reported to EFCA as part of the Black Sea joint deployment 
plans for the first time in 2022. A comparison of the number of last haul inspections conducted 
by  joint  deployment  plan  in  2019-2022  is  shown  in  Figure  14  and  the  number  of  last  haul 
inspections conducted by joint deployment plan in 2022 in Figure 15. 

Figure 14: Number of last haul inspections by joint deployment plan in 2019-2022 

42 https://www.efca.europa.eu/en/content/compliance-evaluation. 

30 

 
 
 
 
                                                 
Figure 15: Number of last haul inspections in 2022 by joint deployment plan 

4.3 Socio-economic impact of the landing obligation 

The  landing  obligation  and  its  challenges  were  also  the  topic  of  a  May  2021  European 
Parliament  report  with  a  focus  on  its  socio-economic  impact  on  the  fishing  industry43.  The 
Commission requested the STECF to study this in detail in STECF working group (EWG 22-
05)44.  Experts  provided  a  comprehensive  overview  of  current  scientific  information  and 
assessments  of  the  socio-economic  impact  of  the  landing  obligation.  The  majority  of  the 
reviewed literature provides an ex ante assessment of the possible socio-economic impact based 
on simulations using bioeconomic models, interviews and literature. One of the main concerns 
voiced by Member States and the fishing industry is the impact of choke species. Most of the 
ex  ante  modelling  exercises  that  assess  the  socio-economic  impact  assume  the  full 
implementation of and compliance with the landing obligation. This shows that choke effects 
are  the  main  problems  for  the  landing  obligation  in  these  analyses  and  the  accompanying 
literature. Current  studies based on practical  implementation  (instead of  modelling)  seem  to 
indicate that the socio-economic impact of the landing obligation is rather limited. 

Member States have provided very limited information on the social and economic impact of 
the landing obligation in previous reports on implementation. They report that it is still difficult 
to assess the landing obligation's impact, indicating that problems remain minimal across sea 
basins.  This  is  mainly  due  to  the  exemptions  in  place  that  mitigate  these  problems  and  the 
funding  available  of  EMFF  and  EMFAF,  which  is  also  highlighted  by  various  Advisory 

43 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0227_EN.html. 
44 
+Eval+JRs+Lo+and+TM.pdf/fedda422-cdab-4d25-a259-ea2d9dde3af9. 

https://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/43805/26710926/STECF+22-05+-

31 

 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
Councils in their recommendations on this topic. The STECF45 reviewed the data collection 
(e.g.  Data  Collection  Framework46  data  used  under  the  data  calls  for  the  Annual  Economic 
Report  and  the  Fisheries-Dependent  Information  database)  and  advised  that  no  conclusions 
could be drawn on the social and economic impacts of the landing obligation. This is consistent 
with the findings in the CINEA study that there are no clear trends in discard rates. These studies 
concur that there is no evidence of changes in discarding practices in fisheries, so this does not 
lead to any changes in economic indicators. 

4.5 Conclusion and way forward 

Since 2014, Member State regional groups have cooperated with scientific institutions and the 
advisory councils when submitting joint recommendations on exemptions based on scientific 
evidence. This has resulted in exemptions based in the delegated regulations linked to certain 
conditions pending the collation of more scientific evidence. With these conditions in mind and 
new research results gradually being released, annual amendments to the delegated regulations 
were necessary following the STECF's reassessment supported with new scientific evidence. 
Slowly  but  surely,  more  knowledge  is  acquired  to  underpin  the  exemptions  needed.  The 
roadmap  linked  to  the  exemption  due  to  the  high  survivability  rate  of  skate  and  ray  in  the 
Northeast  Atlantic  is  an  example  of  this  work  and  of  more  knowledge  in  this  field47.  The 
roadmap aims to build evidence of the discard survival rate of skate and ray and to increase 
selectivity and survival of these species. 

The  primary  focus  when  implementing  the  landing  obligation  should  be  to  avoid  unwanted 
catches  by  improving  selectivity  or  taking  other  conservation  and  management  measures. 
Although increasing selectivity can result in some reduction in revenue, these short-term losses 
should be offset by the broader medium-term gains in stocks expected as a result of increased 
selectivity, the reduced risk of choke events and better use of quotas to land a higher proportion 
of more valuable catch. The CFP aims at making fishing gear more selective so that unwanted 
catches do not happen in the first place. Thanks to fishers and Member States’ efforts48, there 
has been progress in developing innovative and more selective gear. However, 4 years after the 
full  entry  into  force  of  the  landing  obligation,  more  progress  is  needed.  There  are  many 
examples of gear innovation projects and trials. However, the uptake by fleets is often less than 
expected due to the regulatory measures limiting the scope of the landing obligation. 

https://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/43805/14840948/STECF+PLEN+21-03.pdf/0909ec89-4bf6-4eeb-

45 
bb94-e2cf5a19bc92. 
46 Regulation (EU) 2017/1004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on the establishment 
of  a  Union  framework  for  the  collection,  management  and  use  of  data  in  the  fisheries  sector  and  support  for 
scientific advice regarding the common fisheries policy 
47 By Scheveningen Group and North Western Waters Group – and the North Sea Advisory Council (NSAC) and 
the North Western Waters Advisory Council (NWWAC). 
48 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Towards more sustainable 
fishing in the EU: state of play and orientations for 2023 (COM/2022/253 final). 

32 

 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
As  outlined  in  the  marine  action  plan49,  the  actual  use  and  take-up  of  these  new  gears  and 
cutting-edge fishing techniques should be widened. Member States should improve the use of 
targeted EMFAF support for this purpose. In addition, they should promote the broader use of 
new  technologies  for  data  collection  and  optimise  fishing  to  minimise  unwanted  catches  by 
fishers. More measures are set out in the action plan that focus on improving gear selectivity 
and reducing the impact of fisheries on sensitive species. 

Cooperation between stakeholders and knowledge about the landing obligation has increased. 
Now, on the basis of all the knowledge gained, it is time for all stakeholders to work on a range 
of measures to put the findings into practice. First and foremost, Member States must ensure 
proper control and enforcement of the landing obligation, which is essential for developing a 
culture of compliance and cooperation among all operators and fishers. Second, the quality and 
consistency of catch data (to support exemptions) needs to improve. It is essential that control 
and enforcement improves to ensure the catch data are accurate because scientists use the data 
reported in the logbooks and collected under the data collection framework for their scientific 
advice. A commitment from Member States and industry is needed to achieve this objective 
with the support of the Commission. 

In  2023,  the  Commission  will  update  the  study  on  discard  trends,  which  concluded  that 
undocumented  discarding  continues  and  there  has  been  no  significant  change  in  discarding 
trends as a result of the landing obligation. The study is updated with catch data collected in the 
fisheries  dependent information  database50.  In the  Communication on the functioning of the 
CFP, the Commission has called on Member States,  the scientific community, the Advisory 
Councils and producer organisations to provide  it with the key data required to evaluate the 
landing obligation. In 2023, the Commission will facilitate this by providing guidance to ensure 
there is alignment on which indicators will be used in an evaluation (and for which having the 
data on these indicators is a pre-requisite).  

5.  THE FUNCTIONING AND THE ROLE OF ADVISORY COUNCILS IN 2022 

5.1  Advisory  councils'  recommendations  in  2022  and  how  these  were  taken  on 

board 

In  2022,  the  Advisory  Councils  (ACs)  submitted  126  recommendations  to  the  Commission, 
which was  very close to the 128  submitted  in  2021. As in  previous  years,  a broad  range of 
subjects was covered (Figure 16), showing how large the number of files is having an incidence 
on fisheries and aquaculture. 

The number of recommendations varied a lot between the ACs. There were more than 20 from 
the Market Advisory Council (MAC) and the Aquaculture Advisory Council (AAC) and only 
one  from  the  Black  Sea  Advisory  Council  (BSAC),  which  mainly  sent  recommendations  to 

49 EU Action Plan: Protecting and restoring marine ecosystems for sustainable and resilient fisheries 
(COM(2023) 102 final). 
50 https://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dd/fdi 

33 

 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
 
Member States and not to the Commission. As in previous years, joint recommendations were 
also submitted to the Commission by the Member States who consulted the relevant ACs. 

Figure 16: Number of recommendations received by the Commission on specific topics 

As described below, these recommendations were essential in shaping policy and were largely 
taken on board. 

1)  Recommendations on the Mediterranean and the Black Seas 

In 2022, the Commission received advice from the Mediterranean AC (MEDAC) on topics such 
as  fishing  opportunities,  the  implementation  of  the  EU  Western  Mediterranean  multiannual 
plan, a derogation from the Technical Measures Regulation and contributions to EU proposals 
to the GFCM. 

In the EU proposals  for GFCM recommendations, the Commission incorporated parts of all 
MEDAC advice on European eel, new multiannual plans, recreational fisheries, and the small-

34 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
scale fleet. The Commission initiated a proposal for a general ban on transhipment to better 
address the issue of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing and the need for a regional 
level playing field as requested by MEDAC. 

In preparation of the annual fishing opportunities proposal for the Mediterranean and the Black 
Sea, the Commission took into account parts of MEDAC advice, including the implementation 
of the compensation mechanism under the Western Mediterranean multiannual plan. 

Lastly, the Commission took into account the AC’s advice based on a joint recommendation 
submitted by Member States when in the process of adopting the derogation to the Technical 
Measures Regulation for Venus clams in Italian territorial waters. 

2)  Northeast Atlantic and North Sea – shared fish stock management 

The  North  Western  Waters  Advisory  Council  (NWWAC),  the  North  Sea  Advisory  Council 
(NSAC) and  the Pelagic Advisory  Council (PELAC) decided in  2021 to set  up an inter-AC 
forum to deal with the consequences of Brexit. The Commission met with this forum’s members 
on  six  occasions  in  2022  to  discuss  all  the  agenda  items  of  the  Specialised  Committee  on 
Fisheries (SCF) under the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement and debrief on annual 
consultation  outcomes.  For  the  SCF  in  particular,  this  has  helped  to  prepare  stakeholder 
involvement on a number of important files to be discussed with the UK. 

In addition, the joint advice of the NWWAC and the NSAC on skates and rays management 
has been followed up with a regular attendance of the Commission in dedicated focus group 
meetings to prepare a terms of reference for the STECF EWG in 2022 and work with the UK 
in the SCF. A dedicated NWWAC/NSAC stakeholder workshop was organised on the future 
management  of  skates  and  rays  in  Brussels  on  9 February  2023.  This  has  helped  steer  the 
scientific and management debate, in particular on the issue of how to manage group skates and 
rays TACs and assess possible alternatives. This has been a considerable and sensitive topic in 
the last three rounds of annual EU-UK consultations, and stakeholder input to the process has 
been of great value. 

NWWAC advice on the seabass tool was followed up with specific discussions between the 
Commission and the dedicated focus group on how to improve the current tool. This helped 
inform the EU position when drafting joint terms of reference for ICES, agreed by the EU-UK 
SCF. 

Other  NWWAC  advice  provided  feedback  on  technical  measures  for  Celtic  Sea  cod.  That 
feedback is taken into consideration during the ongoing discussions with the UK which aim to 
introduce co-agreed measures. The Commission will continue to engage with the NWWAC on 
this topic. 

35 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  PELAC  proposal  for  a  rebuilding  plan  for  Western  horse  mackerel  was  taken  into 
consideration during the annual consultation with the UK for 2023. This was instrumental in 
setting up fishing opportunities for this species for 2023. 

NWWAC  gave  advice  on  the  draft  joint  recommendation  for  the  delegated  regulation 
specifying the details for implementing the landing obligation and advice on choke situations 
after exemptions. This  advice  was  important  and helped ascertain  the main  priorities  of and 
concerns raised by Member State stakeholders about the extensive list of proposed de minimis 
and high survivability exemptions. In some cases, such information is helpful in the subsequent 
stages throughout this process, in particular during interaction and technical meetings with the 
STECF  experts  responsible  for  evaluating  the  exemptions  in  the  joint  recommendation.  On 
choke risks, the advice included a comprehensive list of key choke species, based on the ‘choke 
mitigation tool’, by sea basin, fishing area, species, and TACs. This useful information further 
confirms the high complexity of mixed fisheries and the importance of some de minimis and 
high survivability exemptions to help avoiding choke risks in those fisheries. 

The  NSAC  letter  on  the  technical  regulation  in  Norwegian  waters  pointed  out  the  lack  of 
consultation with and notification to the EU before the announcement and entry into force of 
the beam trawl ban in those waters. NSAC regretted that stakeholders affected by the measure 
did not have a chance to suggest alternatives to the prohibition. This position was conveyed by 
the Commission to Norway on several occasions. 

3)  South Western Waters 

The  South  Western  Waters  Advisory  Council  (SWWAC)  gave  advice  ion  limitation  of 
variations  in  fishing  opportunities  for  certain  stocks  across  the  years.  The  stocks  concerned 
were managed by the EU and shared. This advice was considered thoroughly but could not be 
incorporated in legislation in 2023 as the variations were not significant or limiting variations 
was not possible due to the provisions of the Western Waters multiannual plan. 

4)  Baltic Sea 

The Commission proposal on fishing opportunities for 2023 took into account the part of the 
Baltic Sea Advisory  Council (BSAC) recommendation on Riga herring and Gulf of Finland 
salmon. 

There was also a good example of AC and Member State cooperation when a dialogue between 
the BSAC and BaltFish (a Member State Regional Group for the Baltic) took place as part of 
the discussions on a joint recommendation on conservation measures for some areas in German 
waters. Germany (leading the joint recommendation) participated in several meetings with the 
industry  members of the BSAC,  which disagreed with  the envisaged measures arguing they 
were unnecessary. BaltFish and Member States took the time to respond to the BSAC comments 
and described the management measures in detail. 

36 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5)  Illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing 

On  IUU  fishing  and  the  implementation  of  the  IUU  Regulation51  in  2022,  the  ACs  made 
pertinent and important recommendations, some of which the Commission focused on. In 2022, 
the Commission published the Study on the legislative frameworks and enforcement systems of 
Member States regarding obligations and sanctions to nationals for infringements to the rules 
arising from the IUU Regulation52. The study addresses several of the recommendations in the 
joint letter from the Markets Advisory Council (MAC) and the Long Distance Advisory Council 
(LDAC) on ‘Fostering the European Union’s leadership in reducing the detrimental impact of 
flags of convenience in the fishing sector’. 

In 2022, the Commission also decided to launch a study on flags of convenience that will be 
carried  out  in  2023.  The  Commission  has  addressed  the  issue  of  a  level  playing  field  for 
importers that had been raised by ACs as part of the ongoing discussions on the revision of the 
Control Regulation and the mandatory use of the IT CATCH system. 

6)  Aquaculture 

In  2022,  the  Aquaculture  Advisory  Council  (AAC)  submitted  15  recommendations  on 
aquaculture.  As  in  the  previous  year,  most  of  these  recommendations  continued  to  address 
issues which had also been identified in the ‘Strategic guidelines for a more sustainable and 
competitive EU aquaculture for the period 2021 to  2030’, a Communication adopted by the 
Commission in 202153. The recommendations have been a valuable contribution to the ongoing 
work  to  implement  these  strategic  guidelines  and  their  associated  guidance  documents, 
especially  for  those  on  environmental  performance  of  aquaculture  and  on  climate  change 
adaptation and mitigation. 

The AAC input has also contributed to the discussions on the energy transition in aquaculture. 
In addition to the recommendations, exchanges with the AAC on the impact of Russia’s war of 
aggression  against  Ukraine  on  the  European  aquaculture  sector  have  also  been  taken  into 
account when drafting the communication on safeguarding food security and reinforcing  the 
resilience of food systems54 and subsequent follow-ups. 

7)  Market 

In  2021,  the  MAC  sent  a  recommendation  on  ‘Analysis  for  Dioxins  and  Dioxin-like 
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Fish Oil’ related to health issues. The Commission took 

51 Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 of 29 September 2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, 
deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. 
52 https://op.europa.eu/s/yCqu. 
53 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and 
Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Strategic guidelines for a more sustainable and competitive 
EU aquaculture for the period 2021 to 2030 (COM/2021/236 final). 
54  Communication  from  the  Commission  to  the  European  Parliament,  the  European  Council,  the  Council,  the 
European Economic and Social Committee  and the Committee of the Regions Safeguarding  food security and 
reinforcing the resilience of food systems (COM/2022/133 final). 

37 

 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
this advice on board and incorporated a correct interpretation of the legislation in a published 
meeting report55 from the  Standing Committee on  Plants, Animals,  Food  and Feed  (Animal 
Nutrition section). This makes it possible for official departments and operators to refer to the 
report for the correct interpretation of legislation in this area. 

In July 2022, the MAC requested a modification to the current regulatory maximum limits of 
sulphites in shrimp and Norway lobster, which are currently regulated by the Food Additives 
Regulation56. This is currently being assessed by the European Food and Safety Authority 

The MAC also made a recommendation on proposed EU targets for food waste reduction. Some 
measures had already been taken up by the Commission as part of the circular economy action 
plan57. The Commission is closely working on the integration of food loss and waste prevention 
in relevant policies, including fisheries and aquaculture. 

8)  Report on the functioning of the CFP 

Eight recommendations58 were received from the ACs on the report on the functioning of the 
CFP.  The  most  prevalent  themes  in  these  recommendations  were  seafood  consumption, 
Regional  Fisheries  Management  Organisations  (RFMOs),  bycatch  and  discards,  labour  and 
employment, and the lack of data collection. These contributions were integrated in a report 
analysing  stakeholder  contributions  in  an  online  questionnaire  as  part  of  the  stakeholder 
consultation in 202259. 

The  NWWAC  and  NSAC  were  also  involved  in  in-depth  discussions  with  Member  States 
Regional Groups as part of the second phase of the stakeholder consultation. 

All the recommendations received were thoroughly assessed as part of the preparations of the 
CFP  report.  Some  recommendations  were  directly  included,  such  as  getting  all  the  required 
knowledge on ecosystems or incorporating the impact of climate change into the management 
decisions  (as  recommended  by  BSAC)  or  giving  more  importance  to  social  aspects  (as 
recommended by NSAC and NWWAC). 

9)  Report on the functioning of the Common Market Organisation 

The  advice  received  from  MAC  in  March  2022  on  the  functioning  of  the  Common  Market 
Organisation  (CMO) Regulation60  was highly appreciated.  The MAC reported that the tools 
made available to producer organisations under the CMO Regulation (especially the production 

55 https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-12/reg-com_ani-nutrit_20210920_sum.pdf. 
56 Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on food 
additives. 
57 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and 
Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A new Circular Economy Action Plan For a cleaner and more 
competitive Europe (COM/2020/98 final). 
58 AAC, BSAC, CC SUD, MAC, NSAC, NWWAC, LDAC, PELAC. 
59 https://cfpreportevent2022.b2match.io/page-4771. 
60 Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products. 

38 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
and marketing plans) are well adapted to help them pursue their objectives. This particularly 
concerned the objectives to better organise structuring fish supplies, improve fisher and farmer 
incomes,  and  implement  the  CFP  on  the  ground.  However,  producers  highlighted  a  lack  of 
consistency in the level  of support, in particular financial support,  from national authorities. 
This  creates  significant  gaps  in  the  development  and  functioning  of  producer  organisations 
across Member States and makes ensuring a level playing field a challenge. To reduce these 
imbalances,  the  Commission  continuously  made  an  effort  to  improve  information  and  raise 
awareness to accompany all those involved in implementing this innovative tool of production 
and marketing plans. Throughout 2022, the Commission remained available to clarify concepts, 
remove uncertainties, and facilitate sharing of good practices. 

10) The marine action plan 

Five  recommendations61  were  received  on  the  preparation  of  the  action  plan  protecting  and 
restoring marine ecosystems for sustainable and resilient fisheries62. These recommendations 
were  thoroughly  considered  in  the  preparation  of  the  action  plan  and  a  summary  of  all 
contributions received is publicly available63. 

11) Energy transition of the EU fisheries and aquaculture sector64 

In  2022,  the  Commission  discussed  the  energy  transition  with  ACs.  The  NSAC  advice  on 
decarbonising the fishing fleet received in October 2022 was highly appreciated and discussed 
with  the  Commission  at  a  dedicated  lunchtime  conference.  The  advice  from  MEDAC  and 
SWWAC in the context of the preparation of the Communication on the energy transition were 
also very useful and thoroughly considered. 

12) Maritime spatial planning and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive 

In  2022,  SWWAC,  NWWAC  and  PELAC  made  three  recommendations  on  the  offshore 
renewable energy impact on fisheries, maritime spatial planning (MSP) and the Marine Strategy 
Framework Directive65 (MSFD). These recommendations were used to draw up research review 
papers66,  map  potential  environmental  effects  of  offshore  renewable  energy  and  steer 

61 CC RUP, CC SUD, BLSAC, MEDAC, PELAC. 
62 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and 
Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, EU Action Plan: Protecting and restoring marine ecosystems 
for sustainable and resilient fisheries (COM(2023) 102 final). 
63 https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/293c498e-b1bf-11ed-8912-01aa75ed71a1. 
64 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and 
Social  Committee  and  the  Committee  of  the  Regions  On  the  Energy  Transition  of  the  EU  Fisheries  and 
Aquaculture sector (COM(2023) 100 final). 
65 Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework 
for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). 
66 
potential-environmental-impacts-of-offshore-renewable-
energy/@@download/file/02_2022_ETC%20ICM%20Report_Mapping%20potential%20environmental%20imp
acts%20of%20offshore%20renewable%20energy.pdf. 

https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc.-icm/products/etc.-icm-reports/etc.-icm-report-2-2022-mapping-

39 

 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
discussions with Member States, particularly through the EU Member State expert group on 
MSP. 

5.2 Conclusion 

The ACs are the Commission stakeholders’ forum and a vital element for policymaking in the 
CFP. Their recommendations are of utmost importance to the Commission as they enable EU 
and national policymakers to benefit from knowledge and experience on the ground. They also 
build collaboration and trust between all those involved. 

Their advice is an important input for policymaking and the development and implementation 
of  measures,  even  though  not  every  recommendation  leads  to  a  change  in  legislation. 
Conservation measures need to be adopted taking into account the available scientific, technical 
and economic advice. This advice includes reports drawn up by the STECF and other scientific 
advisory  bodies,  recommendations  from  advisory  councils  and  joint  recommendations  from 
Member  States  under  Article 18  of  the  CFP  Regulation.  Recommendations  may  be  already 
addressed through EU legislation  and initiatives or are considered but still not  visible in the 
legislation. 

AC  recommendations  may  lead  to  different  outcomes,  such  as  contributing  to  research  and 
policy documents or to scientific advisory bodies’ terms of reference. They might also trigger 
the launch of a study on a specific issue. Above all, ACs meetings and recommendations make 
it  possible  to  discuss  and  get  a  better  understanding  of  the  issues  at  stake  and  involve 
stakeholders in policymaking. Dialogue with stakeholders is enshrined in the CFP Regulation, 
as  part  of  the  principles  of  good  governance  provided  for  in  Article 3.  It  has  proven  to  be 
essential to achieve the objectives of the CFP. Considering the diverse nature of EU waters and 
the increased regionalisation of the CFP, ACs help the CFP to benefit from the knowledge and 
experience of all stakeholders. The appropriate involvement of stakeholders, in particular ACs, 
at  all  stages  –  from  conception  to  implementation  of  the  measures  –  is  provided  for  as  a 
guideline for the CFP via Article 3. 

6)  INTERNATIONAL OCEAN GOVERNANCE 

With its revised agenda, the EU is committed to take an even more active role in international 
ocean governance and in implementing the UN 2030 Agenda and its Sustainable Development 
Goal (SDG) 14 ‘life below water’ by: 

1.  strengthening  the  international  ocean  governance  framework  at  global,  regional  and 

bilateral levels; 

2.  making  ocean  sustainability  a  reality  by  2030  by  taking  a  coordinated  and 

complementary approach to common challenges and cumulative impacts; 

3.  making the ocean a safe and secure space as competition in international waters and 

challenges to the rules-based multilateral order are growing; 

40 

 
 
 
 
 
4.  building  up  international  ocean  knowledge  for  evidence-based  decision-making  that 

results in action to protect and sustainably manage the ocean. 

The  Communication  on international  ocean  governance67  focuses  on  safe,  secure,  clean  and 
sustainably managed oceans. It contributes to the EU’s implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda 
for Sustainable Development, in particular SDG 14‘life below water’68 and delivers on the blue 
part of the European Green Deal69, demonstrating the EU’s strong engagement for the ocean. 

As  the  CFP  is  an  exclusive  competence  of  the  EU,  the  Commission  represents  the  EU  in 
international negotiations on issues falling under the CFP at multilateral, regional and bilateral 
levels. 

The  political  agreement  on  the  Marine  Biodiversity  of  Areas  Beyond  National  Jurisdiction 
Treaty70 opens the way to its ratification and implementation. Once in force, it will allow for 
marine protected areas to be designated, help set global guidelines and standards for conducting 
environmental  impact  assessments,  and  encourage  mutual  supportiveness  between  various 
international  frameworks  and  bodies  with  ocean-related  competence. The  World  Trade 
Organiation (WTO) negotiations on fisheries subsidies have also had a successful outcome in 
June 2022 with strong disciplines prohibiting subsidies, in particular in case of IUU fishing but 
also high seas and overfished stocks. The EU played a prominent role in this WTO negotiation 
to prohibit harmful  fisheries subsidies. Negotiations  on additional disciplines on overfishing 
and  overcapacity  as  well  as  specific  rules  for  the  poorest  nations  are  resuming,  and  the  EU 
intends to continue playing a leading role. In addition, the Commission actively contributed, on 
behalf of the EU, to the successful development and endorsement of the Food and Agriculture 
Organization  (FAO)  Voluntary  Guidelines  on  Transhipment.  Transhipment  operations,  if 
insufficiently  regulated,  monitored  and  controlled,  can  increase  the  risk  of  IUU-caught  fish 
entering the food supply chain, thus undermining sustainable and responsible fisheries. These 
guidelines aim to support relevant conservation and management measures and contribute to 
the improved implementation of international instruments to combat IUU fishing, such as the 
FAO Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate IUU Fishing. 

At regional level, the Commission always takes the opportunity of its participation to promote 
the EU  biodiversity  strategy and the objectives  and principles  of the CFP. The Commission 
insists  on  the  importance  of  science-based  management  measures  for  the  sustainable 
management  of  fish  stocks  and  their  ecosystem  and  takes  into  account  the  socio-economic 
impact.  The  EU  frequently  leads  the  discussions  and  tries  to  shape  the  work  of  RFMOs, 
including  by  submitting  a  substantial  number  of  proposals.  In  the  Indian  Ocean  Tuna 
Commission  (IOTC)  from  2012-2021,  almost  half  the  proposals  came  from  the  EU.  In  the 
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM), 99% of the proposals in the last 

67 Joint Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic 
and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Setting the course for a sustainable blue planet - Joint 
Communication on the EU’s International Ocean Governance agenda (JOIN(2022) 28 final). 
68 https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/oceans/. 
69 https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en. 
70 United Nations Conventions on the Law of the Sea implementing agreement on biodiversity beyond national 
jurisdiction). 

41 

 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
5 years have come from the EU. Furthermore, the EU plays a key role in the negotiations in 
many of these organisations, often taking up an active role in brokering agreements. 

In practical terms, in 2002, those principles have led to the adoption of conservation measures 
based  on  scientific  advice  from  all  RFMOs.  These  measures  were  complemented  by 
management procedures for bluefin tuna at the International Commission for the Conservation 
of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), bigeye tuna at the IOTC, and skipjack at the Western and Central 
Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC). This is an important step forward for well-informed 
science-based management decisions for managing these stocks in the future. The EU’s thrust 
was  essential  to  make  those  management  procedures  a  reality,  including  through  extensive 
research financed by its voluntary contributions. 

In  2022,  climate  change  was  high  on  the  agenda,  and  ICCAT,  IOTC  and  WCPFC  adopted 
resolutions  to  take  the  impact  of  climate  change  into  account  in  their  deliberations.  Marine 
protected  areas  (MPAs)  are  an  integral  part  of  the  EU’s  biodiversity  strategy.  Nevertheless, 
despite the EU’s continuous efforts, there was no consensus on adopting the EU’s two proposals 
at the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR). 
The EU’s determination was key to put pressure on the participants to agree to an extraordinary 
meeting on MPAs MPAs in 2023. 

RFMOs, however, are international organisations where, with limited exceptions, decisions are 
normally taken by consensus. While the EU usually is a key player in RFMOs, there are limits 
to the EU’s leverage to influence the decisions taken. This was strongly felt at the IOTC, which 
confirmed  to  be  an  increasingly  challenging  negotiation  environment,  where  several  coastal 
states questioned the science-based approach to sustainability. This culminated with the recent 
vote at the IOTC during the special session on fish-aggregating devices in Kenya (3-5 February 
2023) that ended with the adoption of a resolution that lacks any scientific basis and will have 
damaging socio-economic effects in many coastal states and for food security in the region. 

The EU continued to promote a culture of compliance in RFMOs. It tabled proposals to improve 
monitoring and control,  fight  against  IUU fishing and  took  an active role in  the compliance 
committees of those organisations. 

In  line  with  the  Joint  Communication  on  International  Ocean  Governance,  the  Commission 
continued to push for the two regional fisheries bodies in the Atlantic to be upgraded to fully 
fledged RFMOs and secure EU membership in the Bering Sea Convention. Unfortunately, no 
tangible progress was achieved in 2022 on both these points. The Commission did manage to 
progress on the implementation of the Agreement to Prevent Unregulated High Seas Fisheries 
in the Central Arctic Ocean71 in 2022 and prepared the ground for future scientific cooperation 
under the Agreement. 

There was also progress in 2022 in implementation into EU law of RFMO conservation and 
management measures and decisions. 

71 https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/mul199323.pdf 

42 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
In 2022 and the first part of 2023, activities fighting IUU fishing continued. On 2 March 2023, 
at the Our Ocean Conference in Panama, the Commission, on behalf of the EU, joined the IUU 
Alliance,  supporting  the  objectives  of  the  Alliance  Pledge.  This  underlines  the  EU’s 
commitment  and active engagement in  making  the international  community  follow fisheries 
rules. 

The  Commission  continued  developing  the  IT  CATCH  system,  which  will  support 
implementing the IUU catch certification scheme, while waiting for the legal basis to make its 
use compulsory for stakeholders. Further investments were also made in the interoperability of 
IT CATCH with other systems. The Commission strengthened guidance and cooperation with 
Member States on controls of fishery product imports. It  also pursued its active international 
cooperation with and support to non-EU countries through visits on the spot, virtual dialogues 
and  IUU  working  groups.  At  regional  level,  particular  attention  was  devoted  to  compliance 
committees,  active  identification  of  vessels  conducting  IUU  fishing  and  their  possible  IUU 
listing.  In  addition,  regional  EU-funded  programmes  continued  to  be  implemented,  such  as 
PESCAO in West Africa, ECOFISH in the Indian Ocean and PEUMP in the Pacific. The EU 
has also supported ASEAN initiatives to fight IUU fishing and ensured cooperation with EU 
NAFVOR in the Indian Ocean. 

Sustainable fisheries partnership agreements (SFPAs) contribute to a regulated framework for 
the EU long-distance fishing fleet and supports its competitiveness. They also support a suitable 
exploitation  of the third countries’ relevant  fisheries resources.  In addition,  SFPAS  help  the 
Commission  maintain  a  political  dialogue  on  fisheries  policies  with  those  third  countries 
concerned, in  coherence with the CFP principles and commitments under other relevant  EU 
policies.  There  are  currently  13  SFPAs  in  force.  A  new  SFPA  protocol  was  negotiated  and 
signed in 2022 with Mauritius and entered into provisional application on 21 December 2022. 
The Commission has concluded negotiations with Madagascar and Kiribati, and the new SFPA 
protocols will enter into force once the respective legislative procedures have been completed. 

Joint committee meetings were held with partner countries throughout the year to monitor the 
implementation of the protocols, in particular the implementation of the sectoral support funds 
granted through the protocols. Overall, these agreements have contributed to economic activity 
and  job  creation  in  the  EU  and  the  partner  countries.  SFPAs  have  also  been  contributing 
positively  to  the  development  of  the  fisheries  sectors,  coastal  communities  and  sustainable 
fisheries management. 

A significant part of the total EU budget for SFPAs has been devoted to projects funded under 
sectoral  support,  which  are  related  mostly  to  scientific  research,  control  and  surveillance 
capacity, small port infrastructures, and support to small-scale fishers. They also contributed to 
eliminating IUU fishing and providing good framework conditions for local fishers, which leads 
to better food security. Financed projects include supplying fishing equipment for small-scale 
fishers (including localisation and safety kits), improving capacity for sanitary control in ports, 
landing facilities with storage and ice facilities, financing the acquisition of patrol boats and 
their maintenance, and training fisheries inspectors and observers. 

43 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Efforts will continue to ensure the timely renewal of SFPAs to ensure the continuity of fishing 
activities carried out under them and maintain or even extend, where relevant, the network of 
SFPAs in the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific Oceans. In 2023, the Commission will publish a staff 
working  document  following  an  independent  global  evaluation  of  the  SFPAs,  which  was 
launched in 2021. 

44 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Annex 1 Summary of indicators calculated for each fleet segment (situation in December 2022) 

The area code NAO means North Atlantic Ocean, including the North Sea, Celtic Sea and Baltic Sea, MBS means the Mediterranean and Black 
Seas, and OFR means other fishing regions. Gear codes are as set out in Annex XI to the relevant Commission Implementing Regulation72. 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

FPO 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

Current  Revenue 
as 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

0 

1 

8 

7 

1 

0 

1 

0 

0 

Is 
there 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

No 

72 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011 of 8 April 2011 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation  (EC) No 1224/2009 
establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy. 

45 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

TM 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL 

BEL Total 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

DFN 

DFN 

DFN 

DFN 

DFN 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

1 

0 

0 

2 

17 

25 

1 

2 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

67 

326 

515 

19 

3 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

46 

1 

1 

1 

2 

3 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

Yes 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PMP 

PMP 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0006 

VL0612 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

0 

0 

3 

34 

0 

15 

0 

24 

1 

0 

0 

8 

0 

0 

9 

1 

0 

68 

132 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

47 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

MBS 

PMP 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PS 

PS 

PS 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

TM 

TM 

TM 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1824 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

No. 
vessels 

0 

14 

3 

0 

0 

0 

0 

8 

3 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

3 

21 

11 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

48 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR 

BGR Total 

MBS 

TM 

VL2440 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0006 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0612 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

CYP 

CYP 

CYP 

CYP 

CYP 

CYP 

CYP 

CYP 

CYP 

CYP 

CYP 

CYP 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

DTS 

DTS 

PG 

PG 

PGO 

PGO 

PGP 

PGP 

PS 

PS 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0006 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0612 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

10 

255 

333 

8 

1 

0 

1830 

5 

0 

28 

299 

344 

73 

36 

0 

0 

1 

37 

38 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

49 

1 

2 

1 

3 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

Yes 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

CYP 

CYP 

CYP 

CYP Total 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

PG 

PG 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1218 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

VL0010 

VL1012 

2 

0 

1 

864 

5 

0 

5 

1 

1 

1 

0 

1 

7 

19 

11 

12 

5 

613 

44 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

50 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

Yes 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

VL40XX 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

4 

4 

99 

70 

6 

2 

0 

0 

0 

2 

1 

4 

NAO 

TBB 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

OFR 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

343 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

0 

22 

0 

10 

0 

4 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

51 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU 

DEU Total 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

1297 

3 

33 

5 

12 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

106 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

41 

35 

16 

VL0010 

689 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL0010 

VL1012 

45 

22 

98 

26 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

52 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

Yes 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

TBB 

TBB 

TM 

TM 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL40XX 

27 

12 

9 

15 

4 

12 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

DNK 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

391 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

0 

8 

0 

7 

0 

0 

0 

2 

0 

0 

0 

DNK Total 

1618 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

53 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

MBS 

DFN 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

DFN 

DFN 

DFN 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL0612 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL2440 

VL0612 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Yes 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

59 

48 

0 

0 

5 

24 

2 

0 

14 

0 

0 

142 

289 

123 

15 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

54 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

PGP 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

VL1218 

15 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0612 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL0006 

0 

3 

0 

1 

48 

2 

28 

0 

24 

0 

1 

17 

3 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

55 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

MBS 

PGP 

MBS 

MBS 

PMP 

PMP 

MBS 

PMP 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0612 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

100 

861 

0 

0 

36 

0 

0 

0 

0 

17 

0 

0 

68 

79 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

56 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

MBS 

MBS 

PS 

PS 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

VL2440 

22 

VL40XX 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL2440 

2 

0 

0 

1 

112 

151 

0 

0 

0 

0 

20 

4 

0 

NAO 

DRB 

VL0010 

1563 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL0010 

14 

87 

0 

0 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

57 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

VL40XX 

VL40XX 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

9 

59 

72 

94 

14 

0 

0 

1 

7 

5 

42 

33 

0 

9 

37 

0 

2 

73 

38 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

58 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

6 

3 

3 

0 

72 

0 

0 

31 

0 

0 

10 

15 

3 

5 

23 

27 

0 

0 

0 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

59 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

3 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

4 

55 

422 

7 

1 

0 

0 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

VL0010 

2068 

NAO 

PMP 

VL1012 

65 

NAO 

MGP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

VL1218 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

0 

0 

0 

0 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

60 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL2440 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

0 

0 

39 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2 

19 

1 

7 

94 

0 

99 

0 

76 

0 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

61 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

OFR 

DFN 

VL40XX 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

DTS 

DTS 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

35 

31 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

VL2440 

64 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL1218 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

62 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

PGP 

FPO 

PGP 

DFN 

FPO 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PMP 

FPO 

PGP 

PMP 

PGP 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

VL40XX 

VL40XX 

VL40XX 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL2440 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

11 

2 

27 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

63 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

PGP 

PGP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1218 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL1012 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

64 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

VL1218 

VL2440 

0 

0 

VL40XX 

27 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

VL1824 

VL40XX 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0006 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0612 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

0 

0 

60 

205 

42 

11 

7 

151 

507 

0 

10 

4 

1 

1 

16 

0 

65 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP 

0 

0 

0 

8 

7 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

32 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

17 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

3 

0 

0 

66 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

ESP 

ESP 

ESP Total 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

HOK 

VL2440 

No. 
vessels 

0 

0 

8937 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

No 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

NAO 

DTS 

VL40XX 

5 

VL0010 

1248 

VL1012 

42 

2 

1 

NAO 

NAO 

PG 

PG 

NAO 

TM 

NAO 

DTS 

NAO 

TM 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

TM 

TM 

TM 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

6 

20 

0 

1 

1 

1 

EST 

EST 

EST 

EST 

EST 

EST 

EST 

EST 

EST 

EST 

EST 

EST 

EST 

EST 

EST 

EST 

OFR 

DTS 

VL40XX 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

545 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

26 

3 

67 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

No 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

EST 

EST 

EST Total 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

HOK 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1218 

0 

0 

1896 

0 

0 

0 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

NAO 

PG 

VL0010 

1240 

2 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

FPO 

FPO 

PG 

PG 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

VL1218 

VL1012 

VL1218 

0 

0 

0 

VL1012 

46 

1 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

3 

0 

6 

14 

7 

16 

4 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

1901 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

68 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN 

FIN Total 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

DFN 

DFN 

DFN 

DFN 

DFN 

FPO 

PGP 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

MBS 

DTS 

DTS 

MBS 

MGP 

MBS 

TM 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL1824 

100 

12 

1 

2 

3352 

131 

524 

0 

4 

0 

0 

1 

8 

0 

0 

4 

27 

0 

0 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

69 

Yes 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

MBS 

MBS 

DTS 

DTS 

MBS 

MGP 

MBS 

TM 

MBS 

MBS 

FPO 

FPO 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

DTS 

MBS 

MGO 

MBS 

MGO 

MBS 

MGO 

MBS 

MGP 

MBS 

MGP 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL0612 

VL2440 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

0 

30 

0 

1 

69 

62 

11 

77 

0 

0 

0 

0 

4 

0 

0 

8 

0 

0 

0 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

70 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL0006 

21 

36 

31 

67 

0 

0 

1 

MBS 

PGO 

MBS 

PGO 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

MBS 

PMP 

MBS 

PMP 

VL0612 

14 

MBS 

PS 

MBS 

PMP 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

MBS 

PMP 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

0 

1 

6 

1 

3 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

71 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

TM 

TM 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

PGP 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

PGO 

NAO 

PGP 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

VL2440 

15 

VL40XX 

VL40XX 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL2440 

7 

0 

0 

0 

306 

138 

0 

0 

0 

60 

1 

1 

31 

0 

26 

0 

0 

59 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

72 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

NAO 

DFN 

VL40XX 

NAO 

PGP 

NAO 

DRB 

VL2440 

VL0010 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

NAO 

PS 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

NAO 

MGP 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

NAO 

MGP 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL2440 

NAO 

DTS 

VL40XX 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

84 

0 

82 

7 

1 

0 

0 

80 

0 

151 

3 

141 

0 

118 

13 

0 

53 

3 

9 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

73 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0010 

280 

88 

0 

0 

9 

11 

1 

221 

45 

0 

0 

0 

1 

2 

18 

0 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

MGO 

NAO 

MGO 

VL0010 

169 

NAO 

MGO 

NAO 

MGO 

VL1012 

VL1012 

8 

0 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

74 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

0 

0 

0 

12 

1 

0 

51 

2 

9 

49 

1 

0 

0 

0 

NAO 

MGO 

NAO 

MGO 

NAO 

MGP 

NAO 

MGP 

NAO 

TM 

NAO 

MGP 

NAO 

MGP 

NAO 

TBB 

NAO 

TM 

NAO 

MGP 

NAO 

TBB 

NAO 

MGP 

NAO 

MGP 

NAO 

MGP 

NAO 

PGO 

VL0010 

99 

NAO 

PGO 

NAO 

PGO 

NAO 

PGO 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL1012 

5 

0 

0 

NAO 

PGP 

VL0010 

66 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

75 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PS 

NAO 

TBB 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

TBB 

TBB 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL0010 

14 

0 

0 

55 

0 

54 

2 

0 

0 

0 

0 

VL1218 

26 

VL1824 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1218 

2 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

76 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

DFN 

FPO 

PGP 

HOK 

DFN 

DFN 

DFN 

DFN 

DFN 

DTS 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

0 

0 

9 

0 

VL1824 

14 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

2 

4 

0 

0 

VL0010 

38 

2 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL2440 

1 

0 

0 

86 

49 

0 

57 

0 

0 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

77 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

FPO 

PGP 

PGP 

HOK 

HOK 

DFN 

DFN 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

9 

0 

0 

93 

123 

0 

0 

0 

0 

101 

121 

0 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

78 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

DFN 

FPO 

PGO 

PGP 

PGP 

HOK 

HOK 

DFN 

PGP 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

PGP 

HOK 

HOK 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

1 

0 

3 

5 

0 

VL0010 

152 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL0010 

5 

6 

1 

VL0010 

92 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

1 

0 

0 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

VL1218 

14 

2 

1 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

VL1218 

VL1824 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

79 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

HOK 

PGO 

PGO 

PGP 

FPO 

FPO 

PGP 

PS 

HOK 

HOK 

DFN 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

PGO 

PGP 

PGP 

PS 

HOK 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL0010 

0 

0 

2 

VL0010 

174 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1012 

1 

0 

3 

0 

6 

0 

1 

0 

1 

1 

0 

VL0010 

168 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL1012 

0 

1 

11 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

80 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1218 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL40XX 

VL0010 

VL40XX 

VL40XX 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

HOK 

PGP 

PGO 

PGP 

DFN 

FPO 

PGP 

HOK 

PGP 

PGP 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0006 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0612 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3 

3 

2 

7 

0 

0 

1 

1 

1 

1 

0 

0 

0 

59 

110 

4 

2 

1 

VL0010 

17 

1 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

81 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

0 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

145 

27 

8 

6 

3 

2 

20 

142 

6 

297 

0 

34 

43 

18 

11 

0 

1 

0 

82 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA 

FRA Total 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

PGO 

HOK 

PS 

HOK 

VL0010 

VL1824 

VL40XX 

VL2440 

2 

0 

1 

0 

3 

5 

1 

0 

2 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

26 

3 

19 

1 

6223 

1 

2 

1 

GRC 

MBS 

DFN 

VL0006 

2530 

1 

2 

2 

83 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

No 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

MBS 

DFN 

VL0612 

5003 

2 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

DFN 

DFN 

DFN 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

VL1218 

0 

VL1218 

138 

1 

VL1824 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL0612 

VL0006 

2 

2 

7 

1 

0 

2 

VL0612 

116 

VL1218 

VL1824 

34 

85 

VL2440 

140 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

0 

0 

48 

261 

8 

0 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

84 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

GRC 

MBS 

FPO 

VL1218 

0 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

VL0006 

VL0612 

1058 

1696 

MBS 

HOK 

VL1218 

73 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

VL1824 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0006 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0612 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

7 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

61 

100 

27 

1219 

1207 

75 

46 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

85 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

GRC 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

5 

GRC Total 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

DFN 

DFN 

DFN 

MBS 

TBB 

MBS 

DFN 

MBS 

MBS 

DFN 

DFN 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

MGP 

MBS 

DRB 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL2440 

VL0612 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL1218 

13952 

337 

681 

0 

0 

19 

0 

0 

0 

0 

7 

1 

0 

MBS 

DRB 

VL1218 

14 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

MGP 

MBS 

DTS 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1218 

VL0612 

0 

1 

0 

0 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

86 

2 

2 

2 

2 

Yes 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

MBS 

MBS 

DTS 

DTS 

MBS 

MGP 

MBS 

MBS 

DTS 

DTS 

MBS 

MGP 

MBS 

TM 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

MBS 

MGP 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

MGO 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

5 

142 

0 

159 

0 

0 

0 

VL1824 

29 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL0006 

9 

0 

0 

46 

113 

0 

0 

99 

254 

7 

272 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

87 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

MBS 

MGO 

MBS 

MGO 

VL0612 

VL1218 

55 

2 

MBS 

PGP 

VL0006 

2945 

1 

1 

2 

MBS 

PGO 

MBS 

MBS 

PGP 

PGP 

MBS 

PGO 

VL0006 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0612 

0 

0 

0 

0 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PGP 

PGP 

PMP 

PGO 

PMP 

PMP 

PGO 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PS 

PS 

VL0612 

821 

2 

VL1218 

VL0006 

VL0006 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL2440 

VL0612 

VL0006 

1 

0 

4 

32 

0 

1 

26 

2 

0 

31 

0 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

88 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

HRV 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0006 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0612 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

HRV Total 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL1012 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

0 

34 

39 

63 

0 

0 

666 

712 

105 

35 

39 

7808 

192 

10 

7 

7 

1 

130 

31 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

89 

1 

1 

3 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

No 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

NAO 

PGP 

PGP 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

6 

2 

5 

45 

12 

31 

58 

44 

0 

VL0010 

577 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

80 

21 

1 

2 

57 

0 

0 

10 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

90 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL2440 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

5 

9 

0 

0 

5 

5 

3 

14 

20 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

PS 

PS 

PS 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

431 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

91 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL 

IRL Total 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

DRB 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1218 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

91 

18 

4 

3 

0 

1938 

0 

95 

532 

1 

118 

1048 

553 

181 

172 

0 

0 

45 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

Yes 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

92 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

2021 

4751 

0 

235 

6 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

152 

82 

0 

0 

0 

41 

32 

12 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

93 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1218 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0612 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1218 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

VL40XX 

0 

3 

11 

23 

0 

0 

20 

31 

0 

0 

22 

37 

0 

5 

0 

0 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

TBB 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

PS 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0006 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0612 

375 

1040 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

94 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA 

ITA Total 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

253 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

OFR 

OFR 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

VL1012 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL2440 

27 

19 

1 

1 

2 

11951 

3 

1 

0 

0 

1 

2 

NAO 

PG 

VL0010 

55 

1 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

OFR 

OFR 

DTS 

DTS 

TM 

TM 

TM 

DTS 

DTS 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1824 

0 

0 

2 

VL2440 

11 

VL40XX 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

1 

0 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

95 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

Yes 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

FPO 

TM 

TM 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

0 

0 

4 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL40XX 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU 

LTU Total 

LVA 

LVA 

LVA 

LVA 

LVA 

LVA 

LVA 

LVA Total 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

41 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

OFR 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

PGP 

NAO 

NAO 

TM 

TM 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL1218 

VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

MLT 

MBS 

DFN 

VL0006 

6 

1 

2 

12 

0 

141 

0 

190 

9 

32 

82 

0 

0 

313 

0 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

96 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

No 

Yes 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MBS 

DFN 

MBS 

DFN 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

FPO 

FPO 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

MGO 

MBS 

MGO 

MBS 

MGO 

MBS 

MGO 

MBS 

MGO 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1218 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

0 

0 

0 

0 

5 

4 

0 

0 

0 

0 

10 

0 

15 

0 

0 

10 

0 

0 

4 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

97 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

MBS 

MGO 

MBS 

PMP 

MBS 

PGP 

MBS 

DFN 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

1 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL0006 

VL0006 

No. 
vessels 

1 

1 

0 

4 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MBS 

PGP 

VL0006 

253 

1 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

PGP 

MBS 

DFN 

MBS 

PGP 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

MBS 

PGP 

PGP 

MBS 

PMP 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PMP 

PS 

PS 

2 

2 

2 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0612 

VL1218 

4 

0 

1 

108 

39 

0 

0 

24 

128 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

98 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

MLT 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL2440 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

MBS 

TM 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0006 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0612 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

MLT Total 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

NAO 

FPO 

PGP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

HOK 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

165 

101 

6 

12 

4 

0 

900 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

99 

No 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL2440 

VL2440 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

NAO 

MGO 

NAO 

MGP 

NAO 

PGP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

TM 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

VL40XX 

NAO 

MGO 

VL2440 

NAO 

MGO 

VL40XX 

NAO 

MGP 

NAO 

TM 

NAO 

DTS 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL0010 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

3 

2 

1 

5 

0 

1 

0 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

100 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

NAO 

PG 

VL0010 

169 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

10 

33 

1 

2 

20 

8 

1 

0 

6 

0 

0 

0 

3 

4 

1 

0 

1 

10 

1 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PG 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

NAO 

PS 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

TBB 

TBB 

TM 

TM 

NAO 

DRB 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL2440 

NAO 

DRB 

VL40XX 

NAO 

DTS 

NAO 

PS 

NAO 

TBB 

NAO 

TM 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

101 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NLD 

NAO 

TBB 

VL1824 

154 

NAO 

NAO 

TBB 

TBB 

NAO 

TM 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

VL40XX 

28 

59 

6 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

120 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

NLD Total 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

DTS 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0010 

13 

19 

18 

14 

5 

720 

0 

12 

4 

0 

0 

4 

0 

0 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

102 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

Yes 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

TM 

NAO 

DTS 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

NAO 

MGP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

FPO 

NAO 

HOK 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

VL2440 

VL1218 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

0 

0 

0 

10 

20 

4 

0 

0 

0 

0 

8 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

0 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

103 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

PG 

NAO 

DTS 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

PG 

PG 

PG 

TM 

TM 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

OFR 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

TM 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1824 

0 

0 

0 

0 

519 

120 

0 

11 

44 

0 

0 

0 

2 

1 

1 

1 

VL2440 

43 

1 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

VL40XX 

VL40XX 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

104 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL 

POL Total 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

13 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

MBS 

FPO 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

DTS 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

1 

2 

4 

2 

825 

1 

269 

34 

18 

73 

30 

37 

20 

16 

3 

5 

8 

8 

1 

2 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

105 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

Yes 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

1 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

FPO 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

58 

10 

VL0010 

270 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

45 

0 

42 

1 

0 

NAO 

HOK 

VL0010 

113 

1 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

FPO 

HOK 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL1012 

0 

0 

0 

48 

6 

NAO 

HOK 

VL0010 

313 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

OFR 

HOK 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1218 

5 

64 

21 

0 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

106 

3 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

OFR 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

OFR 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

MGO 

NAO 

MGO 

OFR 

MGP 

NAO 

MGP 

OFR 

MGP 

NAO 

MGP 

OFR 

OFR 

MGP 

MGP 

NAO 

MGP 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

15 

32 

19 

0 

3 

19 

0 

4 

4 

20 

31 

9 

0 

7 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

107 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

NAO 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

TBB 

TBB 

VL0010 

1573 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL0010 

VL1012 

17 

1 

2 

14 

19 

2 

27 

23 

21 

31 

8 

0 

40 

4 

51 

21 

14 

0 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

108 

1 

1 

1 

3 

3 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

3 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

1 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL2440 

VL2440 

VL2440 

No. 
vessels 

7 

0 

0 

0 

0 

VL2440 

12 

2 

VL2440 

VL40XX 

VL40XX 

VL40XX 

0 

0 

1 

4 

2 

NAO 

TBB 

NAO 

TBB 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

OFR 

DTS 

HOK 

DTS 

HOK 

HOK 

HOK 

DTS 

HOK 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

3453 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

OFR 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL0010 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

0 

0 

306 

0 

140 

0 

52 

0 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

1 

2 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

109 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

OFR 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1012 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

OFR 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

OFR 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

0 

0 

0 

22 

0 

71 

0 

0 

5 

0 

42 

0 

25 

0 

0 

6 

0 

4 

0 

110 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

PRT 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

10 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

OFR 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

NONE 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

NAO 

INACTIVE  VL40XX 

PRT Total 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

MBS 

PG 

MBS 

PMP 

MBS 

PG 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

PMP 

PGO 

PGP 

PGP 

PGP 

VL0006 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1218 

VL1824 

0 

0 

6 

0 

7 

0 

1 

0 

0 

7726 

11 

0 

68 

25 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

111 

1 

1 

1 

1 

Yes 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

ROU 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

MBS 

PMP 

MBS 

MBS 

PMP 

PMP 

MBS 

PGP 

MBS 

PMP 

MBS 

TM 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0006 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL2440 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0006 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0006 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0612 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0612 

38 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL2440 

ROU Total 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

MBS 

DFN 

MBS 

MBS 

FPO 

PGP 

MBS 

PMP 

VL0006 

VL0006 

VL0006 

VL0006 

0 

21 

1 

0 

4 

0 

0 

7 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

175 

19 

2 

1 

1 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

3 

1 

3 

1 

1 

112 

2 

2 

2 

No 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

0 

25 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

0 

1 

1 

1 

7 

0 

3 

6 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL0612 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL0006 

VL0612 

VL1218 

VL2440 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

DFN 

DFN 

FPO 

FPO 

PGP 

MBS 

PMP 

MBS 

PMP 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

HOK 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

MBS 

DTS 

DTS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

PS 

MBS 

TM 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0006 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL0612 

34 

25 

113 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

SVN 

SVN 

SVN Total 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1218 

MBS 

INACTIVE  VL1824 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

FPO 

NAO 

PGO 

NAO 

PGP 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

DFN 

NAO 

NAO 

FPO 

FPO 

NAO 

PGO 

NAO 

PGO 

NAO 

PGP 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

HOK 

NAO 

DRB 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL0010 

6 

1 

136 

192 

280 

6 

18 

15 

60 

4 

36 

1 

0 

0 

1 

1 

0 

0 

0 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

114 

2 

2 

2 

Yes 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL0010 

VL1012 

VL1012 

0 

18 

48 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

4 

NAO 

DRB 

NAO 

NAO 

DTS 

DTS 

NAO 

MGP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

NAO 

PS 

PS 

NAO 

TM 

NAO 

DTS 

VL1218 

66 

NAO 

PMP 

NAO 

NAO 

PS 

TM 

NAO 

DTS 

NAO 

TM 

NAO 

DTS 

NAO 

MGP 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1218 

VL1824 

VL1824 

VL2440 

VL2440 

NAO 

MGP 

VL40XX 

NAO 

PS 

VL2440 

0 

1 

1 

33 

2 

12 

0 

0 

0 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

SWE 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

115 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Status 2020 according to thresholds and criteria in the 2014 COM Guidelines 

Member 
State 

Sea 
Region 

Gear 

Vessel 
Length 
Range 

No. 
vessels 

Stocks-at-
Risk 
Indicator  
(SAR) 

Sustainable 
Harvest  Indicator 
(SHI) 

as 
Current  Revenue 
proportion  of  Break-
Even 
Revenue  
(CR/BER) 

Return on Fixed and 
Tangible 
Assets 
(RoFTA) 

Return 
Investment 
(RoI) 

on 

VUR  VUR220 

there 
Is 
an  Action 
Plan 
in 
force? 

1 
2 

2 
2 

2 
2 

SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE 
SWE Total 

NAO 
NAO 
NAO 
NAO 
NAO 
NAO 
NAO 
NAO 
NAO 
NAO 
NAO 
NAO 
NAO 
NAO 
NAO 
NAO 
NAO 

VL40XX 
PS 
VL2440 
TM 
TM 
VL40XX 
INACTIVE  VL0010 
INACTIVE  VL1012 
INACTIVE  VL1218 
INACTIVE  VL1824 
INACTIVE  VL2440 
INACTIVE  VL1012 
INACTIVE  VL1218 
INACTIVE  VL1824 
INACTIVE  VL2440 
INACTIVE  VL1012 
INACTIVE  VL1218 
INACTIVE  VL1824 
INACTIVE  VL2440 
INACTIVE  VL40XX 

0 
8 
9 
182 
0 
0 
0 
0 
24 
10 
6 
3 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
1041 

116