do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.106972Text with EEA relevance.
Date: 2023-06-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Bulgaria, State aid, Yugozapaden (Bulgaria), control of State aid








C_2023203EN.01000301.xml










9.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 203/3






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.106972
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 203/02)






Date of adoption of the decision


16.5.2023




Aid number


SA.106972




Member State


Bulgaria




Region


Yugozapaden




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Rescue aid to Bulgarian Posts Plc




Legal basis


Decree of the Council of Ministers — Draft




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case
Bulgarian Posts Plc




Objective


Rescuing undertakings in difficulty




Form of aid


Soft loan




Budget


Overall budget: 50 000 000  BGN
Annual budget: 50 000 000  BGN




Intensity


 




Duration


From 15.5.2023




Economic sectors


Postal and courier activities, Postal activities under universal service obligation, Other postal and courier activities




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministry of Transport and Communications




Republic of Bulgaria, Sofia, 9, Dyakon Ignatiy Str.








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm
Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union
Date: 2023-06-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Brazil, GATT, United Kingdom, agreement (EU), revision of an agreement, tariff preference, tariff quota, withdrawal from the EU








L_2023149EN.01000101.xml










9.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 149/1







Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union

The Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (1), signed in Brussels on 1 February 2023, entered into force on 26 May 2023.


(1)  
            OJ L 142, 1.6.2023, p. 3.
Case T-327/23: Action brought on 9 June 2023 — Biogen Netherlands v Commission
Date: 2023-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: drug surveillance, generic drug, market approval








C_2023286EN.01003201.xml










14.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 286/32






Action brought on 9 June 2023 — Biogen Netherlands v Commission
(Case T-327/23)
(2023/C 286/43)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Biogen Netherlands BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek and B. Jong, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the European Commission, the Defendant, of 15 February 2023 (C(2023)1211 (final)) granting marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (1) for ‘Dimethyl Fumarate Accord — dimethyl fumarate’, a medicinal product for human use; and,










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Plea in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging incorrect interpretation of the concept of the global marketing authorisation as laid down in Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of the Directive (2) and application of this concept to the medicinal products Tecfidera and Fumaderm leading to the incorrect conclusion in the Contested Decision that, at the relevant time, regulatory data protection for Tecfidera had already expired.


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency (OJ 2004, L 136, p. 1).

(2)  Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2001, L 311, p. 67).
Case C-367/23, Artemis security: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 9 June 2023 — EA v Artemis security
Date: 2023-06-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: direct applicability, indemnification, labour dispute, labour law, medical report, night work, occupational health








C_2023321EN.01002401.xml










11.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 321/24






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 9 June 2023 — EA v Artemis security
(Case C-367/23, Artemis security)
(2023/C 321/29)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: EA

Defendant: Artemis security SAS

Questions referred







1.


Does Article 9(1)(a) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time fulfil the conditions for it to have direct effect and be relied on by a worker in a dispute concerning that worker?










2.


Must Article 9(1)(a) of Directive 2003/88/EC be interpreted as precluding domestic legislation or practices under which, in the event of a failure to comply with the provisions adopted to implement the measures necessary for the free assessment of a worker’s health, the worker’s right to compensation is subject to proof of the damage which would have resulted from that breach?
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 202/09
Date: 2023-06-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2023202EN.01004701.xml










9.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 202/47






Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 202/09)






Member State


France




Route concerned


La Rochelle (Ile de Ré) - Lyon (Saint Exupéry)




Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations


1 November 2005




Date of entry into force of the changes


1 November 2023




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


Order of 30 January 2023 imposing public service obligations on air services between La Rochelle and Lyon
NOR No: TREA2302709A
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
For further information please contact:





Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile




DTA/SDS1




50 rue Henry Farman




75720 Paris CEDEX 15




FRANCE




Tel. +33 158094321
Case T-179/23 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 9 June 2023 — FFPE section Conseil v Council (Interim relief — Law governing the institutions — Trade union or professional associations (OSPs) — Agreement concluded between the Council and the OSPs of the General Secretariat of the Council — Procedure for verifying the criteria for the recognition and the representativeness of the OSPs — Suspension of rights flowing from the agreement of an OSP not reaching the threshold of representativeness — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)
Date: 2023-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European civil service, damages, freedom of association, indemnification, trade union, trade union freedom








C_2023252EN.01005201.xml










17.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/52






Order of the President of the General Court of 9 June 2023 — FFPE section Conseil v Council
(Case T-179/23 R)
(Interim relief - Law governing the institutions - Trade union or professional associations (OSPs) - Agreement concluded between the Council and the OSPs of the General Secretariat of the Council - Procedure for verifying the criteria for the recognition and the representativeness of the OSPs - Suspension of rights flowing from the agreement of an OSP not reaching the threshold of representativeness - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)
(2023/C 252/63)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Fédération de la fonction publique européenne section Conseil (FFPE section Conseil) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Champetier and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and I. Demoulin, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of operation of the Council of the European Union’s note of 3 April 2023 (ORG.1.F/7053/23) on the outcome of the second verification procedure of the FFPE.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Case C-369/23, Vivacom Bulgaria: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 9 June 2023 — ‘Vivacom Bulgaria’ EAD v Varhoven administrativen sad, Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite
Date: 2023-06-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative court, civil liability, civil liability proceedings, damages, higher court, infringement of EU law, right to justice








C_2023314EN.01000601.xml










4.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 314/6






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 9 June 2023 — ‘Vivacom Bulgaria’ EAD v Varhoven administrativen sad, Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite
(Case C-369/23, Vivacom Bulgaria)
(2023/C 314/08)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven administrativen sad

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant and appellant in cassation:‘Vivacom Bulgaria’ EAD

Defendants and respondents in cassation: Varhoven administrativen sad, Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite

Question referred

Do the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union preclude national legislation such as Article 2c(1)(1) of the Zakon za otgovornostta na darzhavata i obshtinite za vredi (Bulgarian Law on Liability of the State and of Municipalities for Damage), read in conjunction with Article 203(3) and Article 128(1)(6) of the Administrativnoprotsesualen kodeks (Bulgarian Code of Administrative Procedure), under which an action for compensation for damage caused by an infringement of EU law by the Varhoven administrativen sad (Supreme Administrative Court, Bulgaria), in which the Supreme Administrative Court is the defendant, must be examined by that court at last instance?