do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11057 – DEKABANK / SC / LBBW / SWIAT JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 206/01
Date: 2023-06-08
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: bank, banking, economic concentration, merger control








C_2023206EN.01000101.xml










13.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 206/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11057 – DEKABANK / SC / LBBW / SWIAT JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 206/01)
On 8 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11057. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-360/23 P: Appeal brought on 8 June 2023 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2023 in Case T-588/21, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)
Date: 2023-06-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: designs and models, toy industry








C_202300949EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/949


27.11.2023





Appeal brought on 8 June 2023 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2023 in Case T-588/21, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)
(Case C-360/23 P)
(C/2023/949)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, H. Hartwig and T. Wuttke, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Koopman International BV
By order of 11 October 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Tinnus Enterprises LLC should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/949/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-567/21, BNP Paribas: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — BNP Paribas SA v TR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Articles 33 and 36 — Recognition of a judgment given in another Member State — Question raised incidentally before the courts of another Member State — Effects produced by that judgment in the State of origin — Admissibility of an action brought in the Member State addressed after that judgment — National procedural rules imposing the concentration of claims in a single set of proceedings)
Date: 2023-06-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: bonus payment, civil procedure, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, preliminary issue, severance pay, unfair dismissal, work contract








C_2023261EN.01002501.xml










24.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/25






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — BNP Paribas SA v TR
(Case C-567/21, (1) BNP Paribas)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Articles 33 and 36 - Recognition of a judgment given in another Member State - Question raised incidentally before the courts of another Member State - Effects produced by that judgment in the State of origin - Admissibility of an action brought in the Member State addressed after that judgment - National procedural rules imposing the concentration of claims in a single set of proceedings)
(2023/C 261/35)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: BNP Paribas SA

Defendant: TR

Operative part of the judgment

Article 33 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, read in conjunction with Article 36 thereof,
must be interpreted as precluding the recognition, in the Member State addressed, of a judgment concerning an employment contract, given in the Member State of origin, from resulting in the inadmissibility of claims brought before a court of the Member State addressed on the ground that the legislation of the Member State of origin lays down a procedural rule for the centralisation of all claims relating to that employment contract, without prejudice to the procedural rules of the Member State addressed which are liable to apply once that recognition has occurred.


(1)  OJ C 471, 22.11.2021.
Case C-355/23 P: Appeal brought on 8 June 2023 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2023 in Case T-576/21, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)
Date: 2023-06-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: designs and models, toy industry








C_202300944EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/944


27.11.2023





Appeal brought on 8 June 2023 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2023 in Case T-576/21, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)
(Case C-355/23 P)
(C/2023/944)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, H. Hartwig and T. Wuttke, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Koopman International BV
By order of 11 October 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Tinnus Enterprises LLC should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/944/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Joined Cases C-747/21 P and C-748/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 June 2023 — PAO Severstal (C-747/21 P), Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) (C-748/21 P) v European Commission, Eurofer, European Steel Association, ASBL (Appeal — Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1328 — Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 18(1) — Necessary information — Absence — Article 9(4) — ‘Lesser duty rule’ — Target price — Profit margin of the Union industry — Establishment — Selection of the most recent representative year — Article 2(9) — Construction of the export price — Injury to the Union industry — Application by analogy — Calculation of the underselling margin — Statement of reasons)
Date: 2023-06-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: China, Russia, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), originating product, plate, steel








C_2023261EN.01002901.xml










24.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/29






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 June 2023 — PAO Severstal (C-747/21 P), Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) (C-748/21 P) v European Commission, Eurofer, European Steel Association, ASBL
(Joined Cases C-747/21 P and C-748/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Dumping - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1328 - Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Article 18(1) - Necessary information - Absence - Article 9(4) - ‘Lesser duty rule’ - Target price - Profit margin of the Union industry - Establishment - Selection of the most recent representative year - Article 2(9) - Construction of the export price - Injury to the Union industry - Application by analogy - Calculation of the underselling margin - Statement of reasons)
(2023/C 261/40)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: PAO Severstal (C-747/21 P), Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK), (C-748/21 P) (represented by: M. Krestiyanova and N. Tuominen, avocată)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented initially by: K. Blanck and J.-F. Brakeland, and subsequently by J.-F. Brakeland, acting as Agents), Eurofer, European Steel Association, ASBL

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeals;










2.


Orders PAO Severstal to pay the costs in Case C-747/21 P;










3.


Orders Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) to pay the costs in Case C-748/21 P.






(1)  OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.
Case T-314/23: Action brought on 8 June 2023 — Tiendanimal v EUIPO (CRIADORES)
Date: 2023-06-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, animal feedingstuffs, dietary product, food supplement, non-alcoholic beverage, pet food, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, veterinary medicinal product








C_2023261EN.01004302.xml










24.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/43






Action brought on 8 June 2023 — Tiendanimal v EUIPO (CRIADORES)
(Case T-314/23)
(2023/C 261/59)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Tiendanimal Comercio Electronico de Articulos para Mascotas, SL (Malaga, Spain) (represented by: T. González Martínez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative trade mark ‘CRIADORES’ — Application No 18 186 334

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 March 2023 in Case R 798/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


allow the contested trade mark to proceed to registration in Classes 5 and 31.










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), and of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-654/21, LM (Counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity): Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — LM v KP (Reference for a preliminary ruling — EU trade mark — Dispute before the national court — Jurisdiction of EU trade mark courts — Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 124 — Action for infringement — Article 128 — Counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity — Subject matter of that counterclaim — Article 129(3) — Rules of procedure governing the same type of action relating to a national trade mark — Principle of procedural autonomy)
Date: 2023-06-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, jurisdiction, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023261EN.01002801.xml










24.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/28






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — LM v KP
(Case C-654/21, (1) LM (Counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - EU trade mark - Dispute before the national court - Jurisdiction of EU trade mark courts - Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 124 - Action for infringement - Article 128 - Counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity - Subject matter of that counterclaim - Article 129(3) - Rules of procedure governing the same type of action relating to a national trade mark - Principle of procedural autonomy)
(2023/C 261/39)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Claimant and counter-defendant: LM

Defendant and counter-claimant: KP

Operative part of the judgment

Article 124(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark, read in conjunction with Article 128(1) thereof,
must be interpreted as meaning that a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity of an EU trade mark may relate to all the rights which the proprietor of that mark derives from its registration and that the subject matter of that counterclaim is not restricted by the scope of the dispute as defined by the action for infringement.


(1)  OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.
Case C-363/23 P: Appeal brought on 8 June 2023 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2023 in Case T-535/21, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products (Fluid distribution equipment)
Date: 2023-06-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: designs and models, toy industry








C_202300952EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/952


27.11.2023





Appeal brought on 8 June 2023 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2023 in Case T-535/21, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products (Fluid distribution equipment)
(Case C-363/23 P)
(C/2023/952)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, H. Hartwig and T. Wuttke, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 11 October 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Tinnus Enterprises LLC should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/952/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-358/23 P: Appeal brought on 8 June 2023 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2023 in Case T-555/21, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products (Fluid distribution equipment)
Date: 2023-06-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: designs and models, toy industry








C_202300947EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/947


27.11.2023





Appeal brought on 8 June 2023 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2023 in Case T-555/21, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products (Fluid distribution equipment)
(Case C-358/23 P)
(C/2023/947)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, H. Hartwig and T. Wuttke, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 11 October 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Tinnus Enterprises LLC should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/947/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-362/23 P: Appeal brought on 8 June 2023 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2023 in Case T-578/21, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)
Date: 2023-06-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: designs and models, toy industry








C_202300951EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/951


27.11.2023





Appeal brought on 8 June 2023 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2023 in Case T-578/21, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)
(Case C-362/23 P)
(C/2023/951)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, H. Hartwig and T. Wuttke, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Koopman International BV
By order of 11 October 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Tinnus Enterprises LLC should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/951/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-359/23 P: Appeal brought on 8 June 2023 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2023 in Case T-545/21, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products (Fluid distribution equipment)
Date: 2023-06-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: designs and models, toy industry








C_202300948EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/948


27.11.2023





Appeal brought on 8 June 2023 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2023 in Case T-545/21, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products (Fluid distribution equipment)
(Case C-359/23 P)
(C/2023/948)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, H. Hartwig and T. Wuttke, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 11 October 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Tinnus Enterprises LLC should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/948/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-636/21, Regione Lombardia (Market support measures related to animal diseases): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — NN v Regione Lombardia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 — Article 220 — Market support measures related to animal diseases — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1323 — Exceptional market support measures for the eggs and poultrymeat sectors in Italy — National legislation — Condition for the granting of aid — Farmers operational on the market in question on the date of submission of the application — Discretion of the Member States)
Date: 2023-06-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, aid to agriculture, avian influenza, common organisation of markets, egg, eligibility criteria, farmer, market support, poultrymeat, veterinary inspection








C_2023261EN.01002701.xml










24.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/27






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — NN v Regione Lombardia
(Case C-636/21, (1) Regione Lombardia (Market support measures related to animal diseases))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Agriculture - Common organisation of the markets - Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 - Article 220 - Market support measures related to animal diseases - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1323 - Exceptional market support measures for the eggs and poultrymeat sectors in Italy - National legislation - Condition for the granting of aid - Farmers operational on the market in question on the date of submission of the application - Discretion of the Member States)
(2023/C 261/37)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: NN

Defendant: Regione Lombardia

Operative part of the judgment

Article 220 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007, read in combination with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1323 of 2 August 2019 on exceptional market support measures for the eggs and poultrymeat sectors in Italy
must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which is interpreted and applied so as to limit access to the support measures provided for by the latter regulation only to farmers who were still operational in the poultrymeat sector on the date of submission of the aid application.


(1)  OJ C 2, 3.1.2022.
Case T-678/22: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2023 — van der Linde v CEPD
Date: 2023-06-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Europol, access to EU information, data protection, indemnification, legal expenses, personal data, protection of privacy, right to justice








C_2023252EN.01008201.xml










17.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/82






Order of the General Court of 8 June 2023 — van der Linde v CEPD
(Case T-678/22) (1)

(2023/C 252/101)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 24, 23.1.2023.