do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-322/22: Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — UNSA Énergie v Commission (State aid — Regulated tariffs for the sale of electricity in France — Increase in the ceiling for regulated access to historical nuclear electricity — Rejection of a complaint — Article 1(h) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Trade union — Concept of ‘interested party’)
Date: 2023-06-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, electricity supply, nuclear energy, price of energy, sale, trade union








C_2023252EN.01004701.xml










17.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/47






Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — UNSA Énergie v Commission
(Case T-322/22) (1)

(State aid - Regulated tariffs for the sale of electricity in France - Increase in the ceiling for regulated access to historical nuclear electricity - Rejection of a complaint - Article 1(h) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Trade union - Concept of ‘interested party’)
(2023/C 252/55)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: UNSA Énergie (Bagnolet, France) (represented by: M.-P. Ogel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C.-M. Carrega and I. Georgiopoulos, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the European Commission, contained in its letter of 8 April 2022, rejecting its complaint against the increase, by France, of the maximum overall volume of electricity capable of being sold by Electricité de France (EDF) to alternative electricity suppliers under the regulated access to historical nuclear electricity and the price of additional volumes of electricity accordingly sold.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Unsa Énergie to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 284, 25.7.2022.
Case T-650/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — KD v EUIPO (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Members of Staff of EUIPO — Contract for a fixed period — Non-renewal — Competent authority — Principle of sound administration — Right to be heard — Liability — Non-material damage)
Date: 2023-06-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: indemnification, servant (EU), staff assessment, temporary employment, termination of employment








C_2023252EN.01003801.xml










17.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/38






Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — KD v EUIPO
(Case T-650/20) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Members of Staff of EUIPO - Contract for a fixed period - Non-renewal - Competent authority - Principle of sound administration - Right to be heard - Liability - Non-material damage)
(2023/C 252/41)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: KD (represented by: S. Pappas, D.-A. Pappa and A. Pappas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, K. Tóth and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 April 2020 not to renew her contract and, secondly, compensation in respect of the non-material damage she claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 April 2020 not to renew the contract of KD;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders EUIPO, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay three quarters of the costs incurred by KD;










4.


Orders KD to bear a quarter of her own costs.






(1)  OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.
Case T-339/22: Judgement of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — Chocolates Lacasa Internacional v EUIPO — Esquitino Madrid (Conguitos) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Conguitos — Earlier EU word mark Conguitos — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Relative ground for invalidity — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001))
Date: 2023-06-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clock and watch industry, cosmetic product, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, leather, polishing and scouring preparations, precious metal, precious stones, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023261EN.01003301.xml










24.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/33






Judgement of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — Chocolates Lacasa Internacional v EUIPO — Esquitino Madrid (Conguitos)
(Case T-339/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Conguitos - Earlier EU word mark Conguitos - Absolute ground for invalidity - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Relative ground for invalidity - Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001))
(2023/C 261/46)
Language of the procedure: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Chocolates Lacasa Internacional, SA (Utebo, Spain) (represented by: J.-B. Devaureix, J. Vicente Martínez and E. Seijo Veiguela, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Mariano Esquitino Madrid (Elche, Spain) (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros and F. Ortega Sánchez, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 March 2022 (Case R 601/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Chocolates Lacasa Internacional, SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 284, 25.7.2022.