do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-669/22, Rozhlas a televízia Slovenska: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov — Slovakia) — Rozhlas a televízia Slovenska v CI (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Scope — Statement of the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice and of the relationship between those provisions and the national legislation applicable — Insufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2023-06-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, consumer protection, preliminary ruling procedure, unfair terms of contract








C_2023271EN.01001201.xml










31.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/12






Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov — Slovakia) — Rozhlas a televízia Slovenska v CI
(Case C-669/22, (1) Rozhlas a televízia Slovenska)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Scope - Statement of the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice and of the relationship between those provisions and the national legislation applicable - Insufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2023/C 271/15)
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Okresný súd Prešov

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Rozhlas a televízia Slovenska

Defendant: CI

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Okresný súd Prešov (District Court, Prešov, Slovakia), by decision of 8 September 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  Date lodged: 24.10.2022.
Case C-349/23, Zetschek: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Karlsruhe (Germany) lodged on 6 June 2023 — HB v Federal Republic of Germany
Date: 2023-06-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Baden-Württemberg, Germany, equal treatment, judge, pension scheme, public service employee, retirement conditions








C_2023338EN.01000702.xml










25.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 338/7






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Karlsruhe (Germany) lodged on 6 June 2023 — HB v Federal Republic of Germany
(Case C-349/23, Zetschek (1))
(2023/C 338/11)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Karlsruhe

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: HB

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Questions referred







1.


Does it constitute direct discrimination on grounds of age within the meaning of Article 2(2)(a) of Directive 2000/78/EC, (2) when, under Paragraph 48(2) of the German Law on Judges (Deutsches Richtergesetz, ‘the DRiG’), federal judges cannot postpone the start of their retirement, even though federal civil servants and, for example, judges in the service of Land Baden-Württemberg are allowed to do so?










2.


In the context of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of Directive 2000/78/EC, do elements derived from the general context of the measure at issue also include aspects that are not mentioned at all in the legislative material or in the course of the entire parliamentary legislative process, but are presented only during the judicial proceedings?










3.


How are the terms ‘objectively’ and ‘reasonably’ in the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of Directive 2000/78/EC to be interpreted and what is their point of reference? Does the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of the Directive require a twofold examination of reasonableness?










4.


Is the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of Directive 2000/78/EC to be interpreted as precluding, from the point of view of coherence, national legislation which precludes federal judges from postponing their retirement whereas federal public servants and, for example, judges in the service of Land Baden-Württemberg are allowed to do so?






(1)  The present case is designated by a fictitious name which does not correspond to the actual name of a party to the proceedings.

(2)  Council Directive of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1151 of 6 June 2023 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Çağlayancerit Cevizi’ (PDO))
Date: 2023-06-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Türkiye, designation of origin, dried product, labelling, nut, product designation








L_2023152EN.01000401.xml










13.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 152/4








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1151
of 6 June 2023
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Çağlayancerit Cevizi’ (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


In accordance with Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Türkiye’s application to register the name ‘Çağlayancerit Cevizi’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Çağlayancerit Cevizi’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Çağlayancerit Cevizi’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 6 June 2023.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 65, 22.2.2023, p. 12.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.): 3,75 % on 1 June 2023 Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 5 June 2023 2023/C 198/06
Date: 2023-06-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Central Bank, euro, exchange rate, financing, interest, money








C_2023198EN.01000701.xml










6.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/7






Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):
3,75 % on 1 June 2023
Euro exchange rates (2)

5 June 2023
(2023/C 198/06)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0690 




JPY


Japanese yen


149,96 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4484 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86323 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,6420 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9732 




ISK


Iceland króna


150,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,8275 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,573 




HUF


Hungarian forint


369,28 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4735 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9653 




TRY


Turkish lira


22,6964 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6219 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4367 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,3787 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7662 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4451 




KRW


South Korean won


1 396,49 




ZAR


South African rand


20,6855 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6062 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 896,16 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8933 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,067 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,287 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,2959 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,7675 




INR


Indian rupee


88,3255 






(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1150 of 6 June 2023 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Pimentón de Murcia’ (PDO))
Date: 2023-06-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Andalusia, Community of Valencia, Region of Murcia, Spain, condiment, designation of origin, fruit vegetable, labelling, product designation








L_2023152EN.01000301.xml










13.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 152/3








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1150
of 6 June 2023
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Pimentón de Murcia’ (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Spain’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Pimentón de Murcia’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 464/2001 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Pimentón de Murcia’ (PDO) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 6 June 2023.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 464/2001 of 7 March 2001 supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 on the entry of certain names in the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’ provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 66, 8.3.2001, p. 29).

(3)  
            OJ C 68, 24.2.2023, p. 44.
Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1099 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1098 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses 2023/C 198/04
Date: 2023-06-06
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, freezing of assets, human rights, international sanctions, natural person








C_2023198EN.01000401.xml










6.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/4






Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1099 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1098 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses
(2023/C 198/04)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1099 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 (3) as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1098 (4), concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses.
The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons should be included on the list of natural and legal persons, entities, and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 and Regulation (EU) 2020/1998. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.
The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).
The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 July 2023, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, pursuant to Article 10 of Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999.


(1)  OJ L 410 I , 7.12.2020, p. 13.

(2)  OJ L 145, 5.6.2023, p. 12.

(3)  OJ L 410 I , 7.12.2020, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 145, 5.6. 2023, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11046 – IBV / ACEN / ACRI / SINGAPORE JV / TAIWAN JV / PHILIPPINES JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 204/02
Date: 2023-06-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, energy production, merger control, power plant, renewable energy, solar collector








C_2023204EN.01000201.xml










12.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 204/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11046 – IBV / ACEN / ACRI / SINGAPORE JV / TAIWAN JV / PHILIPPINES JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 204/02)
On 6 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11046. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-28/23: Order of the General Court of 14 June 2023 — D&G Laboratoires v EUIPO Holpindus (aleva NATURALS)
Date: 2023-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, consumer information, cosmetic product, electronic commerce, registered trade mark, toiletries, trade-mark law








C_2023271EN.01003701.xml










31.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/37






Order of the General Court of 14 June 2023 — D&G Laboratoires v EUIPO Holpindus (aleva NATURALS)
(Case T-28/23) (1)

(2023/C 271/52)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 104, 20.3.2023
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures 2023/C 198/08
Date: 2023-06-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), leather, originating product








C_2023198EN.01001801.xml










6.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 198/18






Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(2023/C 198/08)

1.   

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.


2.   Procedure

Union producers may submit a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Chamois leather


The People’s Republic of China


Anti-dumping duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/297 of 20 February 2019 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of chamois leather originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(OJ L 50, 21.02.2019, p. 5)


22.2.2024






(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column.
Case T-433/22: Order of the General Court of 6 June 2023 — Spreewood Distillers v EUIPO — Radgonske gorice (STORK) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark STORK — Earlier national word mark GOLDEN STORK — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2023-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, alcoholic beverage, business management, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023271EN.01003001.xml










31.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/30






Order of the General Court of 6 June 2023 — Spreewood Distillers v EUIPO — Radgonske gorice (STORK)
(Case T-433/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark STORK - Earlier national word mark GOLDEN STORK - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2023/C 271/43)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Spreewood Distillers GmbH (Schlepzig, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker and D. Mienert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: N. Lamsters and T. Frydendahl, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Radgonske gorice d.o.o. (Gornja Radgona, Slovenia)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 May 2022 (Case R 1782/2021-5).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 326, 29.8.2022.