do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-619/22: Order of the General Court of 23 May 2023 — CMB v Commission (Research, technological development and space — Grant agreement concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Withdrawal of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2023-05-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU programme, claim, interest, limitation of legal proceedings, research and development








C_2023252EN.01005001.xml










17.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/50






Order of the General Court of 23 May 2023 — CMB v Commission
(Case T-619/22) (1)

(Research, technological development and space - Grant agreement concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Withdrawal of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2023/C 252/60)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: CMB Colorex Master Batches BV (Helmond, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Wolf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Romoli, T. Van Noyen and O. Verheecke, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, which is the beneficiary of grant agreement No 232216 concluded for the purpose of carrying out the Brew-Pack project, seeks the annulment of the decision by which the European Commission requires it to pay into the beneficiary guarantee fund, established under Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 laying down the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in actions under the Seventh Framework Programme and for the dissemination of research results (2007-2013) (OJ 2006 L 391, p. 1), an amount of EUR 125 166,68, plus EUR 24 592,68 in default interest and to be increased by EUR 12 per additional day of delay.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 451, 28.11.2022.
Case T-764/21: Order of the General Court of 23 May 2023 — Atesos medical and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — Medical devices — Directive 93/42/EEC — Expiry of the validity of certificates for medical devices issued under the mutual recognition agreement by bodies established in Switzerland — Amendment of the entry in the online database of the NANDO information system corresponding to the conformity assessment body for medical devices which had issued the certificates — Act not open to challenge — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2023-05-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EC conformity marking, Switzerland, admissibility, agreement (EU), approval, medical device, mutual recognition principle








C_2023252EN.01004801.xml










17.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/48






Order of the General Court of 23 May 2023 — Atesos medical and Others v Commission
(Case T-764/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Medical devices - Directive 93/42/EEC - Expiry of the validity of certificates for medical devices issued under the mutual recognition agreement by bodies established in Switzerland - Amendment of the entry in the online database of the NANDO information system corresponding to the conformity assessment body for medical devices which had issued the certificates - Act not open to challenge - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2023/C 252/57)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Atesos medical AG (Aarau, Switzerland) and the 7 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: M. Meulenbelt and S. De Knop, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Sanfrutos Cano, C. Vollrath and C. Hödlmayr, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of a European Commission decision stating that the designation of ‘Schweizerische Vereinigung für Qualitäts- und Management Systeme’ as a conformity assessment body for medical devices under Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices (OJ 1993 L 169, p. 1) had expired, and amending SQS’s entry in the database of notified and designated bodies, with effect from 28 September 2021.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Atesos medical AG, Bonebridge AG, Heico-Switzerland AG, Keri Medical SA, Medcem GmbH, MPS Precimed SA, PX Dental SA and Stemcup Medical Products AG shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief.






(1)  OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1570 of 23 May 2023 correcting the Hungarian language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/689 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards rules for surveillance, eradication programmes, and disease-free status for certain listed and emerging diseases (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2023-05-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Translation, European Commission
Subjects: animal disease, disease prevention, epidemic, health risk, protection of animal life, veterinary inspection, veterinary medicine








L_2023192EN.01000901.xml










31.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 192/9








            COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2023/1570
of 23 May 2023
         
correcting the Hungarian language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/689 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards rules for surveillance, eradication programmes, and disease-free status for certain listed and emerging diseases
(Text with EEA relevance)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’) (1), and in particular Article 42(6) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Hungarian language version of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/689 (2) contains an error in Part I, Chapter 1, Section 3, point 1, introductory phrase, of Annex IV that alters the meaning of the provision.












(2)


The Hungarian language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/689 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

(Does not concern the English language.)



Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 23 May 2023.


For the Commission


The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 84, 31.3.2016, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/689 of 17 December 2019 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards rules for surveillance, eradication programmes, and disease-free status for certain listed and emerging diseases (OJ L 174, 3.6.2020, p. 211).
Case C-317/23 P: Appeal brought on 23 May 2023 by TO against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 15 March 2023 in Case T-727/21, TO v EUAA
Date: 2023-05-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, competition (EU), indemnification, job vacancy, recruitment, servant (EU), temporary employment








C_202400703EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/703


22.1.2024





Appeal brought on 23 May 2023 by TO against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 15 March 2023 in Case T-727/21, TO v EUAA
(Case C-317/23 P)
(C/2024/703)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: TO (represented by: É. Boigelot, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA)
By order of 7 December 2023, the Court (Ninth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible, and, in part, manifestly unfounded, and ordered TO to bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/703/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union
Date: 2023-05-23
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: GATT, United Kingdom, United States, agreement (EU), revision of an agreement, tariff preference, tariff quota, withdrawal from the EU








L_2023135EN.01005201.xml










23.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 135/52







Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union

The Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (1), signed in Brussels on 17 January 2023, entered into force on 2 May 2023.


(1)  
            OJ L 119, 5.5.2023, p. 3.
Notice for the attention of the persons and entities to whom measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2023/987 and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/986 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply 2023/C 180/06
Date: 2023-05-23
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person








C_2023180EN.01001501.xml










23.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 180/15






Notice for the attention of the persons and entities to whom measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2023/987 and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/986 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply
(2023/C 180/06)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2023/987 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/986 (4) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran.
The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons and entities should be included on the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.
The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).
The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 1 January 2024, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.


(1)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 51.

(2)  OJ L 134 I, 22.5.2023, p. 6.

(3)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 134 I, 22.5.2023, p. 1.
Case T-281/23: Action brought on 23 May 2023 — Dana Astra v Council
Date: 2023-05-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, Russia, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, military intervention








C_2023252EN.01006801.xml










17.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/68






Action brought on 23 May 2023 — Dana Astra v Council
(Case T-281/23)
(2023/C 252/81)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Dana Astra IOOO (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: M. Lester, Barrister-at-Law, and P. Sellar, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/421 of 24 February 2023 (1) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/419 of 24 February 2023 (2) (‘contested measures’) insofar as they apply to the applicant;










—


order the Council to pay the applicant’s costs.





Plea in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, being that the contested measures are vitiated by a manifest error of assessment.


(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/421 of 24 February 2023 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 61, p. 41).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/419 of 24 February 2023 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 61, p. 20).
Case C-52/23, flightright: Order of the President of the Court of 23 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — flightright GmbH v TAP Portugal
Date: 2023-05-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: atmospheric conditions, carriage of passengers, carrier, civil aviation, indemnification, traveller








C_2023321EN.01005004.xml










11.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 321/50






Order of the President of the Court of 23 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — flightright GmbH v TAP Portugal
(Case C-52/23, (1) flightright)
(2023/C 321/55)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 164. 8.5.2023.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 22 May 2023 2023/C 180/05
Date: 2023-05-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023180EN.01001401.xml










23.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 180/14






Euro exchange rates (1)

22 May 2023
(2023/C 180/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0822 




JPY


Japanese yen


149,64 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4478 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86846 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,3765 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9700 




ISK


Iceland króna


151,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7765 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,676 




HUF


Hungarian forint


374,73 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5133 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9737 




TRY


Turkish lira


21,4629 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6294 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4618 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4696 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7232 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4554 




KRW


South Korean won


1 423,76 




ZAR


South African rand


20,9137 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6067 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 100,33 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9218 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,353 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,282 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,4056 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,3742 




INR


Indian rupee


89,6710 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-305/23: Action brought on 23 May 2023 — Fest v Parliament
Date: 2023-05-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, criminal procedure, parliamentary immunity








C_2023286EN.01002902.xml










14.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 286/29






Action brought on 23 May 2023 — Fest v Parliament
(Case T-305/23)
(2023/C 286/40)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Nicolaus Fest (Zagreb, Croatia) (represented by: G. Seidel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that the decision of the European Parliament of 14 March 2023 (P9_TA(2023) 0061) on the request for waiver of the immunity of Nicolaus Fest [2022/2056 (IMM)] approving the report (A9-0055/2023) drafted by Ilana Cicurel is void.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


Infringement of Article 8 of the Protocol on the Immunities and Privileges of Members of Parliament (1)

The applicant submits that the statements of which he is accused form part of a parliamentary debate on the protection of children which took place in the plenary session of the European Parliament and fall within the general interest and freedom of expression enjoyed by Members of the European Parliament. The tweet of which he is accused was a response to a tweet by a former member of the Deutscher Bundestag (Lower House of the German Federal Parliament), whose tweet directly addressed an accusation made by the applicant in a parliamentary debate. The applicant considers that the European Parliament should not waive his immunity on those grounds.










2.


Existence of a fumus persecutionis

The applicant suspects that the Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office, through which the prosecution is being conducted, is taking action in this case only in order to harm a political opponent or to take revenge for an embarrassment in earlier proceedings.






(1)  Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union (OJ 2012 C 326, p. 266).
Case C-56/23, Riaman: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Bistriţa — Romania) — LO v Ministerul Public — Parchetul de pe lângă Judecătoria Bistriţa, RS, TU and VW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2023-05-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, barring of penalties by limitation, criminal liability, criminal proceedings, preliminary ruling procedure








C_2023261EN.01001601.xml










24.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/16






Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Bistriţa — Romania) — LO v Ministerul Public — Parchetul de pe lângă Judecătoria Bistriţa, RS, TU and VW
(Case C-56/23, (1) Riaman) (2)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2023/C 261/23)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Judecătoria Bistriţa

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: LO

Interveners: Ministerul Public — Parchetul de pe lângă Judecătoria Bistriţa, RS, TU and VW

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Judecătoria Bistriţa (Court of First Instance, Bistriţa, Romania), by decision of 7 December 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  Date lodged: 3.2.2023.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.