do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/265 of 9 February 2023 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye (Official Journal of the European Union L 41 of 10 February 2023)
Date: 2023-05-04
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: India, Türkiye, anti-dumping duty, building materials, ceramics, import (EU), originating product




L_2023116EN.01002701.xml










4.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 116/27







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/265 of 9 February 2023 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 41 of 10 February 2023
)


On page 67, in Article 1(2), the table, second column (‘Company’), second row:
for:


                  ‘Acecon Vitrified Pvt Ltd.; Avlon Ceramics Pvt Ltd.; Duracon Vitrified Pvt Ltd.; Eracon Vitrified Pvt Ltd.; Evershine Vitrified Pvt Ltd.; Icon Granito Pvt Ltd.; Venice Ceramics Pvt Ltd.’,

read:


                  ‘Acecon Vitrified Pvt Ltd; Avlon Ceramic Pvt Ltd; Duracon Vitrified Pvt Ltd; Eracon Vitrified Pvt Ltd; Evershine Cera Pvt Ltd; Icon Granito Pvt Ltd; Venice Ceramics’.

On page 67, in Article 1(3):
for:


‘3.   Anti-dumping duties are not applicable to the Indian exporting producer the Lavish Group, consisting of Lavish Granito Pvt Ltd., Lavish Ceramics Pvt Ltd., Lakme Vitrified Pvt Ltd. and Liva Ceramics Pvt Ltd. (TARIC additional code C903), and are not applicable to the Turkish exporting producer Vitra Karo Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. (TARIC additional code C902).’,


read:


‘3.   Anti-dumping duties are not applicable to the Indian exporting producer the Lavish Group, consisting of Lavish Granito Pvt Ltd, Lavish Ceramics, Lakme Vitrified LLP. and Liva Ceramics (TARIC additional code C903), and are not applicable to the Turkish exporting producer Vitra Karo Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. (TARIC additional code C902).’.


On page 73, in Annex I, second row:
for:








‘India


Millennium Granito India Private Limited
Lorenzo Vitrified Tiles Private Limited
Millenium Vitrified Tile Private Limited
Millenium Tile LLP
Clan Vitrified Private Limited
Millenium Ceramic LLP
Millenia Ceramica Private Limited
Millenium Cera Tiles Private Limited


C121’





read:








‘India


Millennium Granito India Private Limited
Lorenzo Vitrified Tiles Private Limited
Millennium Vitrified Tiles Private Limited
Millennium Tiles LLP
Clan Vitrified Private Limited
Millennium Ceramic LLP
Millennia Ceramica Private Limited
Millennium Cera Tiles Private Limited


C121’





On page 73, in Annex I, third row:
for:








‘India


Montana Tiles
Plazma Granito Private Limited
Raykas Ceramic LLP


C122’





read:








‘India


Montana Tiles Private Limited
Plazma Granito Private Limited
Raykas Ceramic LLP


C122’
Case C-389/21 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2023 — European Central Bank v Crédit lyonnais (Appeal — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Calculation of the leverage ratio — Exposure measure — Article 429(14) — Exclusion of exposures meeting certain conditions — Partial refusal of authorisation — Discretion of the European Central Bank (ECB) — Action for annulment — Manifest error of assessment — Judicial review)
Date: 2023-05-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU banking union, European Central Bank, banking supervision, credit institution, discretionary power, financial supervision, judicial review








C_2023216EN.01000801.xml










19.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 216/8






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2023 — European Central Bank v Crédit lyonnais
(Case C-389/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 - Calculation of the leverage ratio - Exposure measure - Article 429(14) - Exclusion of exposures meeting certain conditions - Partial refusal of authorisation - Discretion of the European Central Bank (ECB) - Action for annulment - Manifest error of assessment - Judicial review)
(2023/C 216/09)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: European Central Bank (represented by: F. Bonnard, M. Ioannidis, R. Ugena and C. Zilioli, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Crédit lyonnais (represented by: A. Champsaur and A. Delors, avocates)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 14 April 2021, Crédit lyonnais v ECB (T-504/19, EU:T:2021:185), in so far as it upholds the first part of the third plea in law and, in part, the third part of the first plea in law relied on at first instance and annuls Decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRCAG-39 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 3 May 2019, in so far as that decision refused to exclude from the calculation of the leverage ratio of Crédit lyonnais 34 % of its exposures on the Caisse des dépôts et consignations;










2.


Dismisses the action brought in Case T-504/19 by Crédit lyonnais at first instance;










3.


Orders Crédit lyonnais to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 3 May 2023 2023/C 158/02
Date: 2023-05-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023158EN.01000701.xml










4.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 158/7






Euro exchange rates (1)

3 May 2023
(2023/C 158/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1043 




JPY


Japanese yen


149,66 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4514 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88265 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,3265 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9809 




ISK


Iceland króna


150,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,8860 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,559 




HUF


Hungarian forint


375,63 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5820 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9302 




TRY


Turkish lira


21,5057 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6564 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5045 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6687 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7717 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4704 




KRW


South Korean won


1 472,70 




ZAR


South African rand


20,1657 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6330 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 211,37 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9174 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,083 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,524 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5521 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,8311 




INR


Indian rupee


90,3465 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-487/21, Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde and CRIF: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Austria) — F.F. v Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Data subject’s right of access to his or her data undergoing processing — Article 15(3) — Provision of a copy of the data — Concept of ‘copy’ — Concept of ‘information’)
Date: 2023-05-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to information, data protection, data-processing law, personal data, reprography








C_2023216EN.01000802.xml










19.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 216/8






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Austria) — F.F. v Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde
(Case C-487/21, (1) Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde and CRIF)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Data subject’s right of access to his or her data undergoing processing - Article 15(3) - Provision of a copy of the data - Concept of ‘copy’ - Concept of ‘information’)
(2023/C 216/10)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: F.F.

Defendant: Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde

intervening party: CRIF GmbH

Operative part of the judgment







1.


The first sentence of Article 15(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation),
must be interpreted as meaning that the right to obtain from the controller a copy of the personal data undergoing processing means that the data subject must be given a faithful and intelligible reproduction of all those data. That right entails the right to obtain copies of extracts from documents or even entire documents or extracts from databases which contain, inter alia, those data, if the provision of such a copy is essential in order to enable the data subject to exercise effectively the rights conferred on him or her by that regulation, bearing in mind that account must be taken, in that regard, of the rights and freedoms of others.










2.


The third sentence of Article 15(3) of Regulation 2016/679
must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘information’ to which it refers relates exclusively to the personal data of which the controller must provide a copy pursuant to the first sentence of that paragraph.






(1)  OJ C 431, 25.10.2021.
Case C-78/22, ALD Automotive: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrchní soud v Praze — Czech Republic) — ALD Automotive s.r. o. v DY, acting as insolvency administrator of the debtor company GEDEM-STAV a.s. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2011/7/EU — Combating late payments in commercial transactions — Article 6 — Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 as compensation for the recovery costs incurred by the creditor — Late payment regarding contracts for successive performance — Fixed compensation due in respect of each late payment — Obligation to give full effect to EU law — Obligation of interpretation in compliance with EU law — General principles of national private law)
Date: 2023-05-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: claim, commercial transaction, contract, deadline for payment, general legal principle, private law








C_2023216EN.01001901.xml










19.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 216/19






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrchní soud v Praze — Czech Republic) — ALD Automotive s.r. o. v DY, acting as insolvency administrator of the debtor company GEDEM-STAV a.s.
(Case C-78/22, (1) ALD Automotive)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2011/7/EU - Combating late payments in commercial transactions - Article 6 - Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 as compensation for the recovery costs incurred by the creditor - Late payment regarding contracts for successive performance - Fixed compensation due in respect of each late payment - Obligation to give full effect to EU law - Obligation of interpretation in compliance with EU law - General principles of national private law)
(2023/C 216/25)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Vrchní soud v Praze

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: ALD Automotive s.r. o.

Defendant: DY, acting as insolvency administrator of the debtor company GEDEM-STAV a.s.

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 6(1) of Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions, read in conjunction with Article 3 of that directive,
must be interpreted as meaning that, where a single contract provides for periodic payments, each of which must be made within a specified period, the fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 provided for in Article 6(1) is payable, by way of compensation for the creditor’s recovery costs, in respect of each late payment.










2.


Article 6(1) of Directive 2011/7, read in conjunction with Article 6(3), and point (c) of the second subparagraph of Article 7(1) of that directive,
must be interpreted as precluding a national court from refusing or reducing the fixed sum provided for in the first provision, on the basis of the general principles of national private law, including where late payments which have arisen in the context of a single contract relate, inter alia, to amounts that are low or lower than that fixed sum.






(1)  OJ C 213, 30.5.2022.
Corrigendum to Council Decision of 21 March 2023 appointing an alternate member of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for Denmark (Official Journal of the European Union C 109 of 24 March 2023) 2023/C 158/09
Date: 2023-05-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Denmark, advisory committee (EU), appointment of members, occupational safety








C_2023158EN.01002501.xml










4.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 158/25






Corrigendum to Council Decision of 21 March 2023 appointing an alternate member of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for Denmark

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 109 of 24 March 2023
)

(2023/C 158/09)
On page 71, Article 1:
for:







‘I.


GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES’,





read:







‘II.


TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES’.