do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-201/23: Action brought on 17 April 2023 — CRA v Council
Date: 2023-04-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, principle of proportionality








C_2023189EN.01004102.xml










30.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/41






Action brought on 17 April 2023 — CRA v Council
(Case T-201/23)
(2023/C 189/55)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Communications Regulatory Authority (CRA) (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: T. Clay, T. Zahedi Vafa and K. Mehtiyeva, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Implementing Regulation 2023/152 (1) of 23 January 2023, as being contrary to EU law, in the part which included the applicant in Annex I to Regulation No 359/2011.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging misuse of powers by the Council of the European Union. The applicant submits that by including it on the list of entities subject to the restrictive measures, the Council exceeded its powers, on the ground that the decision was taken solely due to the existence of a statutory relationship between the applicant and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging failure to state reasons for the contested measure. According to the applicant, the reasons set out as the basis for the decision of the Council are merely factual presumptions whose erroneous nature vitiates the validity of the statement of reasons. That purely formal statement of reasons for the decision implies a reversal of the burden of proof, requiring the applicant to prove a negative fact in order to challenge its inclusion in the list of entities subject to the restrictive measures.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging error of assessment of the facts. The applicant submits that the Council, first, made a manifest error of assessment, and, second, that it was wrong to include the applicant in the list of entities subject to the restrictive measures.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality. The applicant submits that the sanctions imposed on Iran have resulted in the withholding of tools particularly useful for the applicant, one of which is used to prevent the overlap of Iranian frequencies with those of neighbouring States and the other, the Location Based System, for the precise location of connected devices. Furthermore, the disproportionate nature of the Council’s decision is demonstrated by the extent of the consequences of the measures taken against the applicant in that the applicant’s capacity to perform its public interest mission is seriously affected.






(1)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/152, of 23 January 2023, implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures against certain persons, entities and organisations regarding the situation in Iran (OJ 2023 L 20 I, p. 1).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/843 of 17 April 2023 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Rökt Vättersik’ (PDO))
Date: 2023-04-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Jönköping county, Sweden, Västra Götaland county, designation of origin, fish, labelling, product designation, smoked product, Örebro county, Östergötland county








L_2023109EN.01000601.xml










24.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 109/6








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/843
of 17 April 2023
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Rökt Vättersik’ (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Sweden’s application to register the name ‘Rökt Vättersik’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Rökt Vättersik’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Rökt Vättersik’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.7. – Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 17 April 2023.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 481, 19.12.2022, p. 8.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case C-250/23 P: Appeal brought on 17 April 2023 by LG Electronics, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) delivered on 15 February 2023 in Case T-741/21, LG Electronics v EUIPO — ZTE Deutschland (V10)
Date: 2023-04-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, clock and watch industry, computer equipment, electronic equipment, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, video surveillance








C_202300494EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/494


6.11.2023





Appeal brought on 17 April 2023 by LG Electronics, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) delivered on 15 February 2023 in Case T-741/21, LG Electronics v EUIPO — ZTE Deutschland (V10)
(Case C-250/23 P)
(C/2023/494)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: LG Electronics, Inc. (represented by: M. Bölling, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), ZTE Deutschland GmbH
By order of 27 September 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that LG Electronics should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/494/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-560/22, Ferriere Nord and Others: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria regionale per il Friuli Venezia Giulia — Italy) — Ferriere Nord SpA, SIAT — Società Italiana Acciai Trafilati SpA, Acciaierie di Verona SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM), Agenzia delle entrate — Riscossione (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — National competition authorities — Imposition of a contribution to finance those authorities — Lack of connection to EU law — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2023-04-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: competition law, competition policy, financing, free movement of capital, jurisdiction, operation of the Institutions, ownership, principle of proportionality, right of establishment, single market








C_2023286EN.01001302.xml










14.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 286/13






Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria regionale per il Friuli Venezia Giulia — Italy) — Ferriere Nord SpA, SIAT — Società Italiana Acciai Trafilati SpA, Acciaierie di Verona SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM), Agenzia delle entrate — Riscossione
(Case C-560/22, (1) Ferriere Nord and Others)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - National competition authorities - Imposition of a contribution to finance those authorities - Lack of connection to EU law - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2023/C 286/15)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria regionale per il Friuli Venezia Giulia

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: Ferriere Nord SpA, SIAT — Società Italiana Acciai Trafilati SpA, Acciaierie di Verona SpA

Respondents: Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM), Agenzia delle entrate — Riscossione

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria regionale per il Friuli Venezia Giulia (Regional Tax Court, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy), by decision of 30 June 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 441, 21.11.2022.