do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/429 of 25 February 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (Official Journal of the European Union L 59 I of 25 February 2023)
Date: 2023-04-13
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








L_2023100EN.01009901.xml










13.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 100/99







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/429 of 25 February 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine


(
Official Journal of the European Union L 59 I of 25 February 2023
)



On pages 373 to 422, in the Annex, in the table under the heading ‘Entities’, entries 175 to 208 are renumbered as entries 176 to 209.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/254 of 6 February 2023 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/761 as regards certain technical rules on the management of tariff rate quotas (Official Journal of the European Union L 35 of 7 February 2023)
Date: 2023-04-13
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: Canada, Iceland, common organisation of markets, export (EU), export licence, import (EU), import licence, meat, milk product, tariff quota








L_2023100EN.01010101.xml










13.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 100/101







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/254 of 6 February 2023 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/761 as regards certain technical rules on the management of tariff rate quotas

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 35 of 7 February 2023
)


On page 6, in Article 2, third paragraph, point (a):
for:






‘(a)


Article 1(2), points (3)(b)(i) and (ii), and (3)(c)(i) and (ii), and point (6) of the Annex shall apply as from the first day of 90-day period after the publication of this Regulation in the Official Journal of the European Union or, where applicable, to the first application period opening after that period;’,




read:






‘(a)


Article 1(2), points (3)(b)(i) and (ii), and (3)(c)(i) and (ii), and point (6) of the Annex shall apply as from the first day after the 90-day period that follows the publication of this Regulation in the Official Journal of the European Union or, where applicable, to the first application period opening after that period;’.
Case C-234/23, Astoria Management: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Nessebar (Bulgaria) lodged on 13 April 2023 — ‘Astoria Management’ OOD v CW
Date: 2023-04-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, contract, freedom of trade, limitation of legal proceedings, property market, transfer of property








C_2023252EN.01002402.xml










17.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/24






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Nessebar (Bulgaria) lodged on 13 April 2023 — ‘Astoria Management’ OOD v CW
(Case C-234/23, Astoria Management)
(2023/C 252/28)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Rayonen sad Nessebar

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant:‘Astoria Management’ OOD

Defendant: CW

Questions referred







1.


Is a limitation within the meaning of Article 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union of the right to ‘freedom of contract’ in the relationship between trader and consumer enshrined in Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as it results from Article 51 of the Zakon za upravlenie na etazhnata sobstvenost (Law on the management of co-owned property; ‘the ZUES’), as interpreted in accordance with the settled case-law of the Republic of Bulgaria — according to which a contract concluded by an individual owner of a property in a building in co-ownership, who in the present case is a consumer within the meaning of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) of 5 April 1993, on matters governed by Article 51 of the ZUES, irrespective of whether the contract also governs other matters which fall outside of the exclusive competence of the general assembly of apartment owners, is void under Article 26(1) variant 1 of the Zakon zu zadalzheniyata i dogovorite (Law on obligations and contracts; ‘the ZZD’) for breach of substantive law — permissible?










2.


Is a limitation within the meaning of Article 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union of the right to ‘freedom of contract’ in the relationship between trader and consumer guaranteed in Article 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and by Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993, as it results from Article 51 of the ZUES, as interpreted in accordance with the settled case-law of the Republic of Bulgaria — according to which a contract concluded by an individual owner of a property in a building in co-ownership, who in the present case is a consumer within the meaning of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993, on matters governed by Article 51 of the ZUES, irrespective of whether the contract also governs other matters which fall outside of the exclusive competence of the general assembly of apartment owners, is void under Article 26(1) variant 1 of the ZZD for breach of substantive law — permissible?






(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).
Case C-235/23, Paolo Beltrami: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 13 April 2023 — Paolo Beltrami S.p.A. v Comune di Milano
Date: 2023-04-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, competition policy, freedom to provide services, principle of proportionality, public procurement, right of establishment, tendering, works contract








C_2023235EN.01001501.xml










3.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 235/15






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 13 April 2023 — Paolo Beltrami S.p.A. v Comune di Milano
(Case C-235/23, Paolo Beltrami)
(2023/C 235/19)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Paolo Beltrami S.p.A.

Respondent: Comune di Milano

Question referred

Do Articles 16, 49, 50 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 4 of Protocol 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), Article 6 TEU, the principles of proportionality, competition, freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services laid down in Articles 49, 50, 54 and 56 TFEU preclude a national rule (as contained in Article 75 of decreto legislativo n. 163 del 2006 (Legislative Decree No 163 of 2006)) which provides for the application of the penalty of forfeiture of the provisional security, as an automatic consequence of the exclusion of an economic operator from a procedure for the award of a public service contract, irrespective of whether or not that economic operator has been awarded the contract?
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 12 April 2023 2023/C 129/02
Date: 2023-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023129EN.01000201.xml










13.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 129/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

12 April 2023
(2023/C 129/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0922 




JPY


Japanese yen


146,09 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4506 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88038 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,3480 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9853 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,4745 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,421 




HUF


Hungarian forint


376,23 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6631 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9385 




TRY


Turkish lira


21,0976 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6377 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4728 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5737 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7649 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4538 




KRW


South Korean won


1 448,10 




ZAR


South African rand


20,1330 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,5183 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 253,32 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8193 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,291 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,391 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,4635 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,7972 




INR


Indian rupee


89,6875 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-193/23: Action brought on 13 April 2023 — MegaFon v Council
Date: 2023-04-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, principle of proportionality, rights of the defence, territorial dispute, territorial law








C_2023189EN.01004001.xml










30.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/40






Action brought on 13 April 2023 — MegaFon v Council
(Case T-193/23)
(2023/C 189/53)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: MegaFon OAO (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: J. Grand d'Esnon, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Forms of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Council Regulation (EU) No 2023/427 (1) of 25 February 2023 as regards MegaFon;










—


annul Council Decision 2023/434/CFSP (2) of 25 February 2023 as regards MegaFon;










—


consequently, annul:






—


Annex IV of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 as regards MegaFon;










—


Annex IV of Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 as regards MegaFon;














—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs pursuant to Article 140(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection. The applicant submits that the Council did not communicate to it in advance the decision listing MegaFon in Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 and Decision 2014/512/CFSP (‘the measures of 31 July 2014’) and did not give the applicant the opportunity to submit observations, even though the Council was, in the applicant’s view, obliged to do so by virtue of the principles relating to respect for the rights of the defence.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging failure to state reasons for the decision to include MegaFon in Annex IV to the measures of 31 July 2014. The applicant submits that the Council did not communicate to it the reasons justifying the inclusion of the applicant in Annex IV to the measures of 31 July 2014.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the sanctions imposed on the applicant were unlawful, in that they were the result of an error of assessment, on the ground that the reasons for those sanctions were incorrect and, in any event, not established.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality by the measures of 25 February 2023.






(1)  Council Regulation (EU) 2023/427, of 25 February 2023, amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 59I, p. 6 ).

(2)  Council Decision 2023/434/CFSP, of 25 February 2023, amending Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2023, L 59I, p. 593 ).
Case T-189/23: Action brought on 13 April 2023 — The Mochi Ice Cream Company v EUIPO (my mochi)
Date: 2023-04-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, confectionery, confectionery product, dairy ice cream, frozen product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023189EN.01003802.xml










30.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/38






Action brought on 13 April 2023 — The Mochi Ice Cream Company v EUIPO (my mochi)
(Case T-189/23)
(2023/C 189/51)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: The Mochi Ice Cream Company LLC (Vernon, California, United States) (represented by: A. Zalewska-Orabona, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark my mochi — Application for registration No 1 598 762

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 January 2023 in Case R 1684/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Recommendation of the European Central Bank of 13 April 2023 to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique (ECB/2023/10) 2023/C 138/01
Date: 2023-04-13
Institutions: European Central Bank
Subjects: Belgium, European System of Central Banks, accountant, auditing, central bank, euro area








C_2023138EN.01000101.xml










21.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/1






RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
of 13 April 2023
to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique
(ECB/2023/10)
(2023/C 138/01)
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,
Whereas:






(1)


The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.










(2)


The mandate of the Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique’s current external auditors, Mazars Réviseurs d’Entreprises/Mazars Bedrijfsrevisoren SCRL/CVBA, ended following the audit for the financial year 2022. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2023.










(3)


The Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique has selected KPMG Bedrijfsrevisoren/KPMG Réviseurs d’Entreprises BV/SRL as its external auditors for the financial years 2023 to 2028,




HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that KPMG Bedrijfsrevisoren/KPMG Réviseurs d’Entreprises BV/SRL should be appointed as the external auditors of the Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique for the financial years 2023 to 2028.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 13 April 2023.


The President of the ECB

Christine LAGARDE
Case T-188/23: Action brought on 13 April 2023 — IU Internationale Hochschule v EUIPO (IU International University of Applied Science)
Date: 2023-04-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Internet, audiovisual production, distance learning, education, information system, publishing, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vocational training








C_2023189EN.01003801.xml










30.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/38






Action brought on 13 April 2023 — IU Internationale Hochschule v EUIPO (IU International University of Applied Science)
(Case T-188/23)
(2023/C 189/50)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: IU Internationale Hochschule GmbH (Erfurt, Germany) (represented by: A. Heise, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark IU International University of Applied Sciences — Application No 1 628 092

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 February 2023 in Case R 1951/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 72(2) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 72(2) in conjunction with Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/432 of 25 February 2023 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (Official Journal of the European Union L 59 I of 25 February 2023)
Date: 2023-04-13
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, freezing of assets, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








L_2023100EN.01009801.xml










13.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 100/98







Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/432 of 25 February 2023 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 59 I of 25 February 2023
)


On pages 533 to 582, in the Annex, in the table under the heading ‘Entities’, entries 175 to 208 are renumbered as entries 176 to 209.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/453 of 2 March 2023 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/141 on imports of certain stainless steel tube and pipe buttwelding fittings, whether or not finished, originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain stainless steel tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, whether or not finished, consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not (Official Journal of the European Union L 67 of 3 March 2023)
Date: 2023-04-13
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: China, Malaysia, Taiwan, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), metalworking, originating product, piping, steel, tube








L_2023100EN.01010001.xml










13.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 100/100







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/453 of 2 March 2023 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/141 on imports of certain stainless steel tube and pipe buttwelding fittings, whether or not finished, originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain stainless steel tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, whether or not finished, consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 67 of 3 March 2023
)


On page 35, in Article 1(2):
for:


                  ‘The extension of the duty mentioned in paragraph 1 does not apply to the companies listed below:







Country


Company


TARIC additional code




Malaysia


Pantech Stainless And Alloy Industries Sdn. Bhd


A021 




Malaysia


SPI United Sdn. Bhd


A022 ’





read:


                  ‘The extension of the duty mentioned in paragraph 1 does not apply to the companies listed below:







Country


Company


TARIC additional code




Malaysia


Pantech Stainless And Alloy Industries Sdn. Bhd.


A021 




Malaysia


SP United Industry Sdn. Bhd.


A022 ’