do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 11 April 2023 2023/C 128/04
Date: 2023-04-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023128EN.01000401.xml










12.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 128/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

11 April 2023
(2023/C 128/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0905 




JPY


Japanese yen


145,28 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4505 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87738 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,4255 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9868 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,5435 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,469 




HUF


Hungarian forint


375,23 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6690 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9375 




TRY


Turkish lira


21,0333 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6387 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4732 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5603 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7566 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4526 




KRW


South Korean won


1 441,82 




ZAR


South African rand


19,9013 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,5080 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 263,25 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8184 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,996 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,361 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5072 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,7901 




INR


Indian rupee


89,5205 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-228/23, AFAÏA: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 12 April 2023 — AFAÏA v Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité (INAO)
Date: 2023-04-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: agricultural holding, agricultural land, livestock farming, organic product








C_2023252EN.01002201.xml










17.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/22






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 12 April 2023 — AFAÏA v Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité (INAO)
(Case C-228/23, AFAÏA)
(2023/C 252/25)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: AFAÏA

Defendant: Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité (INAO)

Party to the proceedings: Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation

Questions referred







1.


Is Annex II to Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1165 of 15 July 2021, (1) which was adopted to implement Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018, (2) to be interpreted as meaning that the concept of factory farming contained therein is equivalent to that of landless livestock production?










2.


If the concept of factory farming is distinct from the concept of landless livestock production, what criteria must be used to determine whether a livestock holding must be categorised as factory farming within the meaning of Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2021/1165?






(1)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1165 of 15 July 2021 authorising certain products and substances for use in organic production and establishing their lists (OJ 2021 L 253, p. 13).

(2)  Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 (OJ 2018 L 150, p. 1).
Case C-231/23, Eurobank Bulgaria: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 12 April 2023 — ‘Eurobank Bulgaria’ AD
Date: 2023-04-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: case-law, claim, consumer credit, consumer protection, unfair terms of contract








C_2023252EN.01002401.xml










17.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/24






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 12 April 2023 — ‘Eurobank Bulgaria’ AD
(Case C-231/23, Eurobank Bulgaria)
(2023/C 252/27)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski rayonen sad

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant:‘Eurobank Bulgaria’ AD

Questions referred







1.


Under Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, is national case-law permissible under which, where only part of a claim arising from a consumer contract which may contain unfair terms has been the subject matter of a judgment which has become final and acquired the force of res judicata, the conclusion of the court which delivered it, according to which the contractual terms are binding on the consumer and not unfair, is to bind the courts hearing subsequent applications for orders requiring the consumer to pay the balance of his or her debt with regard to whether that balance is due?










2.


If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative (that is, if that national case-law is permissible under EU law), is it compatible with Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC if, although the judgment finding that there are no unfair terms does contain a statement of reasons on that point, that statement of reasons is nevertheless [not] sufficiently clear or related to the specific contractual terms? On the basis of what criterion should the national court assess the completeness of the statement of reasons in the second set of proceedings?






(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.