do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-618/21, AR and Others (Direct action against the insurer): Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie — Poland) — AR and Others v PK and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Directive 2009/103/EC — Article 3 — Compulsory insurance of vehicles — Article 18 — Direct right of action — Scope — Determination of the amount of compensation — Hypothetical costs — Possibility of making the payment of compensation subject to certain conditions — Sale of the vehicle)
Date: 2023-03-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: compulsory insurance, damages, insurance indemnity, motor vehicle, motor vehicle insurance, sale, third-party insurance, transport accident








C_2023179EN.01000601.xml










22.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/6






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie — Poland) — AR and Others v PK and Others
(Case C-618/21, (1) AR and Others (Direct action against the insurer))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles - Directive 2009/103/EC - Article 3 - Compulsory insurance of vehicles - Article 18 - Direct right of action - Scope - Determination of the amount of compensation - Hypothetical costs - Possibility of making the payment of compensation subject to certain conditions - Sale of the vehicle)
(2023/C 179/07)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: AR, BF, ZN, NK Sp. z o.o. s.k., KP, RD Sp. z o.o.

Defendants: PK S.A., CR, SI S.A., MB S.A., PK S.A., SI S.A., EZ S.A.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 18 of Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability, read in conjunction with Article 3 of that directive,
must be interpreted as






—


not precluding national legislation which, in the event of a direct action, by the person whose vehicle has suffered damage as a result of a road traffic accident, against the insurer of the person responsible for that accident, provides that the sole means of obtaining redress from that insurer is by way of monetary compensation,










—


precluding rules for the calculation of that compensation and conditions relating to its payment, in so far as they would have the effect, in the context of a direct action brought under Article 18, of excluding or limiting the insurer’s obligation, under Article 3, to cover all the compensation which the person responsible for the damage must provide to the injured party in respect of the damage suffered by that party.






(1)  OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.
Case C-5/22, Green Network (Order for repayment of costs): Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Green Network SpA v SF, YB, Autorità di Regolazione per Energia Reti e Ambiente (ARERA) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market in electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 37 — Annex I — Duties and powers of the national regulatory authority — Consumer protection — Administrative management costs — Power of the national regulatory authority to order the repayment of sums paid by final customers pursuant to contractual terms that have been penalised by that authority)
Date: 2023-03-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative sanction, consumer protection, contract terms, electricity supply, energy distribution, energy grid, energy market








C_2023179EN.01000701.xml










22.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/7






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Green Network SpA v SF, YB, Autorità di Regolazione per Energia Reti e Ambiente (ARERA)
(Case C-5/22, (1) Green Network (Order for repayment of costs))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Internal market in electricity - Directive 2009/72/EC - Article 37 - Annex I - Duties and powers of the national regulatory authority - Consumer protection - Administrative management costs - Power of the national regulatory authority to order the repayment of sums paid by final customers pursuant to contractual terms that have been penalised by that authority)
(2023/C 179/09)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Green Network SpA

Defendants: SF, YB, Autorità di Regolazione per Energia Reti e Ambiente (ARERA)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 37(1)(i) and (n) and Article 37(4)(d) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC, and Annex I to Directive 2009/72,
must be interpreted as not precluding a Member State from conferring on a national regulatory authority the power to order electricity undertakings to reimburse their final customers for the sums paid by those customers to cover ‘administrative management costs’ pursuant to a contractual term considered to be unlawful by that authority, including in cases where that order for repayment is based not on considerations of the quality of the relevant service provided by those undertakings, but on the breach of obligations relating to tariff transparency.


(1)  OJ C 128, 21.3.2022.
Case T-172/23: Action brought on 30 March 2023 — Dendiki v EUIPO — D-Market (hepsiburada)
Date: 2023-03-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, consumer goods, electronic commerce, household article, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law, wholesale trade








C_2023179EN.01006902.xml










22.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/69






Action brought on 30 March 2023 — Dendiki v EUIPO — D-Market (hepsiburada)
(Case T-172/23)
(2023/C 179/96)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Dendiki BV (Roosendaal, Netherlands) (represented by: N. Ruyters and A. Klomp, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi (Istanbul, Türkiye)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark hepsiburada — European Union trade mark No 17 151 796

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 January 2023 in Case R 639/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the other party, should the other party intervene, to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 29 March 2023 2023/C 115/03
Date: 2023-03-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023115EN.01000301.xml










30.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 115/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

29 March 2023
(2023/C 115/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0847 




JPY


Japanese yen


143,58 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4495 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87988 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,2955 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9973 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,3005 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,631 




HUF


Hungarian forint


379,80 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6870 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9500 




TRY


Turkish lira


20,7500 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6252 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4739 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5147 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7405 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4425 




KRW


South Korean won


1 411,29 




ZAR


South African rand


19,6494 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,4679 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 335,17 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7927 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,007 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,086 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5958 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,7327 




INR


Indian rupee


89,2985 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Special report 08/2023 ‘Intermodal freight transport – EU still far from getting freight off the road’ 2023/C 115/04
Date: 2023-03-30
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: air transport, carbon neutrality, carriage of goods, clean technology, combined transport, common transport policy, inland waterway transport, land transport, motor vehicle pollution, pollution control measures








C_2023115EN.01000401.xml










30.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 115/4






Special report 08/2023
‘Intermodal freight transport – EU still far from getting freight off the road’
(2023/C 115/04)
The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 08/2023: ‘Intermodal freight transport – EU still far from getting freight off the road’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=63659
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/723 of 30 March 2023 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq
Date: 2023-03-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union, European Commission
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iraq, economic sanctions, freezing of assets, international sanctions, natural person








L_2023094EN.01002001.xml










3.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 94/20








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/723
of 30 March 2023
         
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 of 7 July 2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2465/96 (1), and in particular Article 11(b) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists natural and legal persons, bodies or entities associated with the regime of former President Saddam Hussein covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources and by a prohibition to make funds or economic resources available.












(2)


On 27 March 2023, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one natural person from the list of persons and entities to whom the assets freeze should apply.












(3)


Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 30 March 2023.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,


Director-General


Directorate-General for Financial Stability,


Financial Services and Capital Markets Union






(1)  
            OJ L 169, 8.7.2003, p. 6.




ANNEX
In Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003, the following entry is deleted:


            ‘32. NAME: Amir Hamudi Hassan Al-Sa’di

DATE OF BIRTH/PLACE OF BIRTH: 5 April 1938, Baghdad
NATIONALITY: Iraq
UNSC RESOLUTION 1483 BASIS:
Presidential Scientific Advisor;
Senior Deputy, Organisation of Military Industrialisation, 1988 to 1991;
Former President, Technical Corps for Special Projects;
PASSPORTS:?No 33301/862
Issued: 17 October 1997
         
Expires: 1 October 2005
         
?M0003264580
Issued: Unknown
Expires: Unknown
?H0100009
Issued: May 2001
Expires: Unknown’
Case C-269/22, IP and Others (Establishment of the accuracy of the facts in the main proceedings — II): Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — IP, DD, ZI, SS, HYA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — The second paragraph of Article 47 and Article 48(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to a fair trial — Right to the presumption of innocence — Account of the factual context in a request for a preliminary ruling in criminal matters — Establishment of the accuracy of certain facts in order to be able to make an admissible request for a preliminary ruling to the Court — Compliance with the procedural safeguards provided for under national law for judgments on the merits)
Date: 2023-03-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: criminal proceedings, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2023179EN.01000801.xml










22.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/8






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — IP, DD, ZI, SS, HYA
(Case C-269/22, (1) IP and Others (Establishment of the accuracy of the facts in the main proceedings — II))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 267 TFEU - The second paragraph of Article 47 and Article 48(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to a fair trial - Right to the presumption of innocence - Account of the factual context in a request for a preliminary ruling in criminal matters - Establishment of the accuracy of certain facts in order to be able to make an admissible request for a preliminary ruling to the Court - Compliance with the procedural safeguards provided for under national law for judgments on the merits)
(2023/C 179/10)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: IP, DD, ZI, SS, HYA

Other party to the proceedings: Spetsializirana prokuratura

Operative part of the judgment

Article 267 TFEU, read in the light of the second paragraph of Article 47 and of Article 48(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
must be interpreted as not precluding a national court or tribunal in criminal matters, before any judgment on the merits, from establishing, with due regard for the procedural safeguards provided for by national law, the accuracy of certain facts in order to be able to make an admissible request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice.


(1)  OJ C 303, 8.8.2022.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11023 – ADP / JCDECAUX / MEDIA AEROPORTS DE PARIS JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 130/02
Date: 2023-03-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, Ile-de-France, Jordan, Türkiye, advertising, airport, civil aviation, economic concentration, merger control








C_2023130EN.01000201.xml










14.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11023 – ADP / JCDECAUX / MEDIA AEROPORTS DE PARIS JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 130/02)
On 30 March 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11023. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Directive 2014/98/EU of 15 October 2014 implementing Council Directive 2008/90/EC as regards specific requirements for the genus and species of fruit plants referred to in Annex I thereto, specific requirements to be met by suppliers and detailed rules concerning official inspections (Official Journal of the European Union L 298 of 16 October 2014)
Date: 2023-03-30
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: fruit-growing, market supervision, plant health control, plant propagation, quality control of agricultural products, seedling








L_2023092EN.01002801.xml










30.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 92/28







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Directive 2014/98/EU of 15 October 2014 implementing Council Directive 2008/90/EC as regards specific requirements for the genus and species of fruit plants referred to in Annex I thereto, specific requirements to be met by suppliers and detailed rules concerning official inspections

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 298 of 16 October 2014
)


On page 61, in Annex V:
for:


                  ‘
                  
Prunus avium and P. cerasus

                  ’,

read:


                  ‘
                  
Prunus avium L. and Prunus cerasus L
                  ’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11031 – HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY / KIESEL / EAC) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 130/01
Date: 2023-03-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: carbon neutrality, construction equipment, economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle pollution, provision of services, spare part








C_2023130EN.01000101.xml










14.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11031 – HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY / KIESEL / EAC)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 130/01)
On 30 March 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11031. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-34/21, Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden — Germany) — Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer beim Hessischen Kultusministerium v Minister des Hessischen Kultusministeriums (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 88(1) and (2) — Processing of data in the employment context — Regional school system — Teaching by videoconference as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic — Implementation without the express consent of the teachers)
Date: 2023-03-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: coronavirus disease, data protection, data-processing law, epidemic, personal data, protection of privacy, staff, teacher, teaching, video communications








C_2023179EN.01000201.xml










22.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/2






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden — Germany) — Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer beim Hessischen Kultusministerium v Minister des Hessischen Kultusministeriums
(Case C-34/21, (1) Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Article 88(1) and (2) - Processing of data in the employment context - Regional school system - Teaching by videoconference as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic - Implementation without the express consent of the teachers)
(2023/C 179/02)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer beim Hessischen Kultusministerium

Defendant: Minister des Hessischen Kultusministeriums

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 88 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)
must be interpreted as meaning that national legislation cannot constitute a ‘more specific rule’, within the meaning of paragraph 1 of that article, where it does not satisfy the conditions laid down in paragraph 2 of that article.










2.


Article 88(1) and (2) of Regulation 2016/679
must be interpreted as meaning that the application of national provisions adopted to ensure the protection of employees’ rights and freedoms in respect of the processing of their personal data in the employment context must be disregarded where those provisions do not comply with the conditions and limits laid down in Article 88(1) and (2), unless those provisions constitute a legal basis referred to in Article 6(3) of that regulation, which complies with the requirements laid down by that regulation.






(1)  OJ C 98, 22.3.2021.