do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-343/22: Order of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Mozelsio v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Retirement pensions — Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the EU — Transfer to the EU scheme — Additional years of pensionable service — Action for annulment — Claim for repayment of part of the capital transferred — Unjust enrichment — Time limit for complaints — Manifest inadmissibility — Application for an order — Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
Date: 2023-03-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: contract staff, seniority, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU), transfer of pension rights, working time








C_2023179EN.01004701.xml










22.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/47






Order of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Mozelsio v Commission
(Case T-343/22) (1)

(Civil service - Contract staff - Retirement pensions - Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the EU - Transfer to the EU scheme - Additional years of pensionable service - Action for annulment - Claim for repayment of part of the capital transferred - Unjust enrichment - Time limit for complaints - Manifest inadmissibility - Application for an order - Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
(2023/C 179/69)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Muriel Mozelsio (Enghien, Belgium) (represented by: D. Grisay and A. Ansay, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Interveners, in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Van Pottelberge and M. Windisch, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and X. Chamodraka, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, principally, (i) to have set aside the decision of the European Commission of 11 March 2022 rejecting her complaint which sought annulment of the opinion of 16 June 2020 determining her rights to a retirement pension, and (ii) to have her file referred to the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment in order to determine the amount to be returned to her, and in the alternative, to have the Commission be ordered to pay the sum of EUR 15 051,38, in respect of unjust enrichment, and, in the further alternative, to request the Commission to clarify its calculation method and to apply it in the present case.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Ms. Muriel Mozelsio shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.










3.


The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union shall each bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 284, 25.7.2022.
Case T-535/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products (Fluid distribution equipment) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment — Ground for invalidity — Non-compliance with requirements for protection — Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)
Date: 2023-03-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, toy industry








C_2023179EN.01003002.xml










22.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/30






Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products (Fluid distribution equipment)
(Case T-535/21) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment - Ground for invalidity - Non-compliance with requirements for protection - Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function - Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)
(2023/C 179/43)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by: T. Wuttke and J. Lewandowski, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 June 2021 (Case R 1004/2018-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Tinnus Enterprises LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 431, 25.10.2021.
Case T-577/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment — Ground for invalidity — Non-compliance with requirements for protection — Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)
Date: 2023-03-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, toy industry








C_2023179EN.01003401.xml










22.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/34






Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)
(Case T-577/21) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment - Ground for invalidity - Non-compliance with requirements for protection - Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function - Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)
(2023/C 179/48)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by: T. Wuttke and J. Lewandowski, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Koopman International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: G. van den Bergh, A. van Hoek and B. Brouwer, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Tinnus Enterprises LLC, seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 July 2021 (Case R 1010/2018-3) (‘the contested decision’).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Tinnus Enterprises LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Koopman International BV.






(1)  OJ C 462, 15.11.2021.
Case T-199/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Perfetti Van Melle v EUIPO (Representation of a cylindrical container with a wavy outline) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a cylindrical container with a wavy outline — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2023-03-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, dental medicine, dietary product, pharmaceutical product, polishing and scouring preparations, registered trade mark, toiletries, trade-mark law








C_2023179EN.01004001.xml










22.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/40






Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Perfetti Van Melle v EUIPO (Representation of a cylindrical container with a wavy outline)
(Case T-199/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a cylindrical container with a wavy outline - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons)
(2023/C 179/58)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Perfetti Van Melle SpA (Lainate, Italy) (represented by: P. Testa and C. Pappalardo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 February 2022 (Case R 1530/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Perfetti Van Melle SpA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 222, 7.6.2022.
Case T-500/17 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube v Commission (Dumping — Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron (excluding cast iron) or steel (excluding stainless steel), of circular cross-section and of an external diameter exceeding 406,4 mm, originating in China — Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty — Causal link — Article 3(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2023-03-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), iron, originating product, piping, steel, tube








C_2023179EN.01002401.xml










22.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/24






Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube v Commission
(Case T-500/17 RENV) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron (excluding cast iron) or steel (excluding stainless steel), of circular cross-section and of an external diameter exceeding 406,4 mm, originating in China - Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty - Causal link - Article 3(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Manifest error of assessment)
(2023/C 179/33)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube Co. Ltd (Huangshi, China) (represented by: E. Vermulst and J. Cornelis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Roman SA (Roman, Romania), Válcovny trub Chomutov a.s. (Chomutov, Czech Republic), Vallourec Deutschland GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: G. Berrisch, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/804 of 11 May 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron (other than cast iron) or steel (other than stainless steel), of circular cross-section, of an external diameter exceeding 406,4 mm, originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2017 L 121, p. 3), in so far as it concerns it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube Co. Ltd to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the European Commission, ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Roman SA, Válcovny trub Chomutov a.s. and Vallourec Deutschland GmbH in the proceedings before the Court of Justice in Case C-891/19 P and in the proceedings before the General Court in Cases T-500/17 and T-500/17 RENV.






(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.
Case T-169/23: Action brought on 29 March 2023 — RT France v Council
Date: 2023-03-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, equal treatment, freedom of expression, international sanctions, legal person








C_2023173EN.01004002.xml










15.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 173/40






Action brought on 29 March 2023 — RT France v Council
(Case T-169/23)
(2023/C 173/53)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: RT France (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: E. Piwnica, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/191 of 27 January 2023 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the entirety of the costs;




with all the legal consequences that entails.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed the freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed the freedom to conduct a business protected by Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed the principle of non-discrimination under Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.