do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-723/21, Stadt Frankfurt (Oder) and FWA: Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the General Court of 16 March 2023 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Cottbus — Germany) — Stadt Frankfurt (Oder), FWA Frankfurter Wasser- und Abwassergesellschaft mbH v Landesamt für Bergbau, Geologie und Rohstoffe
Date: 2023-03-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: drinking water, environmental impact, groundwater, investment project, water protection, water quality, water treatment








C_2023271EN.01002002.xml










31.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/20






Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the General Court of 16 March 2023 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Cottbus — Germany) — Stadt Frankfurt (Oder), FWA Frankfurter Wasser- und Abwassergesellschaft mbH v Landesamt für Bergbau, Geologie und Rohstoffe
(Case T-723/21, (1) Stadt Frankfurt (Oder) and FWA)
(2023/C 271/28)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.
Case C-517/20, OL (Extension of Italian licences): Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Ascoli Piceno, Italy) — Criminal proceedings against OL (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU — Betting and gaming — Licences for the collection of bets — Extension of licences already granted — Regularisation of data transmission centres carrying out that activity in the absence of a licence and police authorisation — Extension of the rights derived from that regularisation — Limited period)
Date: 2023-03-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: freedom to provide services, game of chance, gaming establishment, right of establishment, trade licence








C_2023164EN.01000301.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/3






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Ascoli Piceno, Italy) — Criminal proceedings against OL
(Case C-517/20, (1) OL (Extension of Italian licences))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 49 and 56 TFEU - Betting and gaming - Licences for the collection of bets - Extension of licences already granted - Regularisation of data transmission centres carrying out that activity in the absence of a licence and police authorisation - Extension of the rights derived from that regularisation - Limited period)
(2023/C 164/03)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Ascoli Piceno

Party in the main criminal proceedings

OL

intervener: Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Ascoli Piceno

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 49 and 56 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding an extension of the licences in the betting and gaming sector and of the rights deriving from the regularisation of the situation of data transmission centres which were already carrying out, on a specific date, activities of bet collection in favour of foreign bookmakers not in possession of a licence and police authorisation, in so far as such an extension, which may be justified in particular by overriding reasons in the public interest such as the objective of ensuring the continuity of an inspection of the operators of that sector in order to guarantee consumer protection, is not appropriate for attaining that objective or goes beyond what is necessary to achieve it.


(1)  OJ C 257, 4.7.2022.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 15 March 2023 2023/C 98/03
Date: 2023-03-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023098EN.01000301.xml










16.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

15 March 2023
(2023/C 98/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0549 




JPY


Japanese yen


139,51 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4446 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87243 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,2020 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9727 




ISK


Iceland króna


150,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,3400 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,942 




HUF


Hungarian forint


397,50 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7000 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9218 




TRY


Turkish lira


20,0269 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5888 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4504 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2796 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7006 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4245 




KRW


South Korean won


1 393,75 




ZAR


South African rand


19,4190 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,2865 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 352,53 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7296 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,051 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,552 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5672 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,9704 




INR


Indian rupee


87,3125 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-696/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 March 2023 — GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG v European Commission (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Sixth and seventh framework programmes for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006 and 2007-2013) — ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) — Eligible costs — Set-off of claims — Claim for reimbursement — Admissibility of the application — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union — Requirement of clarity and precision)
Date: 2023-03-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Framework Programme for Research and Development, admissibility, claim, expenditure, financial aid, redemption, reimbursement of aid








C_2023164EN.01001101.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/11






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 March 2023 — GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG v European Commission
(Case C-696/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Arbitration clause - Sixth and seventh framework programmes for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006 and 2007-2013) - ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) - Eligible costs - Set-off of claims - Claim for reimbursement - Admissibility of the application - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union - Requirement of clarity and precision)
(2023/C 164/14)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG (represented by: C. Mayer, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. André, M. Ilkova and L. Mantl, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10933 – ORLEN / SGE / OSGE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 111/01
Date: 2023-03-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: clean technology, economic concentration, energy industry, merger control, oil refining, petrol, renewable energy, retail trade








C_2023111EN.01000101.xml










27.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 111/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10933 – ORLEN / SGE / OSGE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 111/01)
On 16 March 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10933. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/666 of 16 March 2023 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Olio Campania’ (PGI))
Date: 2023-03-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Campania, Italy, designation of origin, labelling, olive oil, product designation








L_2023084EN.01000101.xml










23.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 84/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/666
of 16 March 2023
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Olio Campania’ (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Olio Campania’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Olio Campania’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Olio Campania’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.5. Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oil, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 March 2023.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 448, 25.11.2022, p. 39.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case C-449/21, Towercast: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d’appel de Paris — France) — Towercast v Autorité de la concurrence, Ministre chargé de l’économie (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Control of concentrations between undertakings — Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Article 21(1) — Exclusive application of that regulation to operations covered by the concept of ‘concentration’ — Scope — Concentration operation which has no Community dimension, is below the thresholds for mandatory ex ante control laid down in the law of a Member State and has not been referred to the European Commission — Control of such an operation by the competition authorities of that Member State in the light of Article 102 TFEU — Whether permissible)
Date: 2023-03-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: control of restrictive practices, dominant position, economic concentration, merger control








C_2023164EN.01000801.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/8






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d’appel de Paris — France) — Towercast v Autorité de la concurrence, Ministre chargé de l’économie
(Case C-449/21, (1) Towercast)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Competition - Control of concentrations between undertakings - Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Article 21(1) - Exclusive application of that regulation to operations covered by the concept of ‘concentration’ - Scope - Concentration operation which has no Community dimension, is below the thresholds for mandatory ex ante control laid down in the law of a Member State and has not been referred to the European Commission - Control of such an operation by the competition authorities of that Member State in the light of Article 102 TFEU - Whether permissible)
(2023/C 164/10)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Towercast SASU

Defendants: Autorité de la concurrence, Ministre chargé de l’économie

Other parties: Tivana Topco SA, Tivana Midco SARL, TDF Infrastructure Holding SAS, TDF Infrastructure SAS, Tivana France Holdings SAS

Operative part of the judgment

Article 21(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings
must be interpreted as not precluding the competition authority of a Member State from regarding a concentration of undertakings which has no Community dimension within the meaning of Article 1 thereof, is below the thresholds for mandatory ex ante control laid down in national law, and has not been referred to the European Commission under Article 22 of that regulation, as constituting an abuse of a dominant position prohibited under Article 102 TFEU, in the light of the structure of competition on a market which is national in scope.


(1)  OJ C 452, 8.11.2021.
Case C-511/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2023 — European Commission v Ana Calhau Correia de Paiva (Appeal — Rules on languages — Open Competition EPSO/AD/293/14 — Notice of competition — Limitation of the choice of the second language of the competition to English, French or German — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Plea of illegality of the notice of competition — Admissibility)
Date: 2023-03-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), language skills, linguistic discrimination, official language








C_2023164EN.01000901.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/9






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2023 — European Commission v Ana Calhau Correia de Paiva
(Case C-511/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Rules on languages - Open Competition EPSO/AD/293/14 - Notice of competition - Limitation of the choice of the second language of the competition to English, French or German - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Plea of illegality of the notice of competition - Admissibility)
(2023/C 164/11)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: I. Melo Sampaio, B. Schima and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Ana Calhau Correia de Paiva (represented by: D. Rovetta and V. Villante, avvocati)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by Ms Ana Calhau Correia de Paiva in the present appeal proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 2, 3.1.2022.
Case C-493/22, ARMAPROCURE: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 March 2023 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — Armaprocure SRL v Ministerul Apărării Naţionale, BlueSpace Technology SRL (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Public Procurement — Directive 2009/81/EC — Article 55(4) — Article 57(2) — Interest in bringing proceedings — Access to the review procedures — Tenderer excluded from a public procurement procedure by a decision of the contracting authority that has become final — National regulation depriving such a tenderer of access to a means of appeal — No interest in bringing proceedings)
Date: 2023-03-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, public procurement, tendering








C_2023164EN.01002502.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/25






Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 March 2023 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — Armaprocure SRL v Ministerul Apărării Naţionale, BlueSpace Technology SRL
(Case C-493/22, (1) ARMAPROCURE)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Public Procurement - Directive 2009/81/EC - Article 55(4) - Article 57(2) - Interest in bringing proceedings - Access to the review procedures - Tenderer excluded from a public procurement procedure by a decision of the contracting authority that has become final - National regulation depriving such a tenderer of access to a means of appeal - No interest in bringing proceedings)
(2023/C 164/31)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Bucureşti

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant at first instance and appellant: Armaprocure SRL

Defendants at first instance and respondents: Ministerul Apărării Naţionale, BlueSpace Technology SRL

Operative part of the order

Article 55(4) and Article 57(2) of Directive 2009/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of procedures for the award of certain works contracts, supply contracts and service contracts by contracting authorities or entities in the fields of defence and security, and amending Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC,
must be interpreted as precluding a tenderer, that has been excluded from a public procurement procedure by a decision of the contracting authority that has become final, from having access to a means of appeal against, or review of the contract concluded with the successful tenderer.


(1)  Date lodged: 22.7.2022.
Case C-351/21, Beobank: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Justice de paix du canton de Forest — Belgium) — ZG v Beobank SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of laws — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Article 47(1)(a) — Information for the payer after receipt of the payment order — Articles 58, 60 and 61 — Payment service provider’s liability for unauthorised transactions — Obligation of that service provider to refund unauthorised transactions to the payer — Framework contracts — Obligation of that service provider to provide that payer with information relating to the payee concerned)
Date: 2023-03-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: approximation of laws, disclosure of information, electronic money, intra-EU payment, payment, payment system, provision of services








C_2023164EN.01000602.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/6






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Justice de paix du canton de Forest — Belgium) — ZG v Beobank SA
(Case C-351/21, (1) Beobank)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Harmonisation of laws - Payment services in the internal market - Directive 2007/64/EC - Article 47(1)(a) - Information for the payer after receipt of the payment order - Articles 58, 60 and 61 - Payment service provider’s liability for unauthorised transactions - Obligation of that service provider to refund unauthorised transactions to the payer - Framework contracts - Obligation of that service provider to provide that payer with information relating to the payee concerned)
(2023/C 164/08)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Justice de paix du canton de Forest

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: ZG

Defendant: Beobank SA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 47(1)(a) of Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2002/65/EC, 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 97/5/EC
must be interpreted as meaning that a payer’s payment service provider is required to provide that payer with information enabling the natural or legal person who benefited from a payment transaction debited from that payer’s account to be identified and not only the information which that provider, after making its best efforts, has available with regard to that payment transaction.


(1)  OJ C 338, 23.8.2021.
Case C-127/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 March 2023 — American Airlines Inc. v European Commission, Delta Air Lines Inc. (Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Concentrations between undertakings — Air transport market — Concentration declared compatible with the internal market — Commitments entered into by the parties to the concentration — Decision granting grandfathering rights — Concept of ‘appropriate use’)
Date: 2023-03-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, economic concentration, merger control








C_2023164EN.01000501.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/5






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 March 2023 — American Airlines Inc. v European Commission, Delta Air Lines Inc.
(Case C-127/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Concentrations between undertakings - Air transport market - Concentration declared compatible with the internal market - Commitments entered into by the parties to the concentration - Decision granting grandfathering rights - Concept of ‘appropriate use’)
(2023/C 164/05)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: American Airlines Inc. (represented by: J.-P. Poitras, avocat, J. Ruiz Calzado, abogado, and J. Wileur, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: T. Franchoo, H. Leupold and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents), Delta Air Lines Inc. (represented by: C. Angeli, avocate, M. Demetriou, Barrister-at-Law, and I. Giles, advocaat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders American Airlines Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and Delta Air Lines Inc. in the present proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 163, 3.5.2021.
Case T-97/22: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2023 — Ilunga Luyoyo v Council
Date: 2023-03-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, EU restrictive measure, arms control, arms trade, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person, right to justice








C_2023173EN.01004203.xml










15.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 173/42






Order of the General Court of 16 March 2023 — Ilunga Luyoyo v Council
(Case T-97/22) (1)

(2023/C 173/57)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 148, 4.4.2022.