do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-752/21, Otdel ‘Mitnichesko razsledvane i razuznavane’: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Haskovo — Bulgaria) — JP EOOD v Otdel ‘Mitnichesko razsledvane i razuznavane’ /MRR/ v TD ‘Mitnitsa Burgas’ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 — Union Customs Code — Legal remedies — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA — Smuggled goods — Goods belonging to a third party seized in the course of administrative-offence proceedings — National legislation excluding that third party from the category of persons entitled to bring an action against the administrative penalty notice ordering the seizure)
Date: 2023-03-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative offence, administrative procedure, administrative sanction, appeal, customs regulations, illicit trade, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, offence, seizure of goods








C_2023164EN.01001201.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/12






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Haskovo — Bulgaria) — JP EOOD v Otdel ‘Mitnichesko razsledvane i razuznavane’ /MRR/ v TD ‘Mitnitsa Burgas’
(Case C-752/21, (1) Otdel ‘Mitnichesko razsledvane i razuznavane’)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 - Union Customs Code - Legal remedies - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA - Smuggled goods - Goods belonging to a third party seized in the course of administrative-offence proceedings - National legislation excluding that third party from the category of persons entitled to bring an action against the administrative penalty notice ordering the seizure)
(2023/C 164/16)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad — Haskovo

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: JP EOOD

Defendant: Otdel ‘Mitnichesko razsledvane i razuznavane’ /MRR/ v TD ‘Mitnitsa Burgas’

intervener: Okrazhna prokuratura — Haskovo

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 44 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code
must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which does not provide for a right of appeal against an administrative penalty notice for a person whose property has been seized on the basis of such a decision but who is not regarded, in that decision, as the person committing the administrative offence connected with the penalty imposed.










2.


Article 4 of Council Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005 on Confiscation of Crime-Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property
must be interpreted as not applying to a decision concerning an act which does not constitute a criminal offence.






(1)  OJ C 109, 7.3.2022.
Case T-485/20: Order of the General Court of 9 March 2023 — Junqueras i Vies v Parliament
Date: 2023-03-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European election, Member of the European Parliament, appointment of members, incompatibility, parliamentary immunity, remuneration of work








C_2023164EN.01005101.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/51






Order of the General Court of 9 March 2023 — Junqueras i Vies v Parliament
(Case T-485/20) (1)

(2023/C 164/67)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 304, 14.9.2020.
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/466 of 3 March 2023 amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for isoxaben, novaluron and tetraconazole in or on certain products (Official Journal of the European Union L 68 of 6 March 2023)
Date: 2023-03-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: consumer protection, crop production, food inspection, food safety, foodstuff, pesticide, pesticide residue








L_2023071EN.01004301.xml










9.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 71/43







Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/466 of 3 March 2023 amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for isoxaben, novaluron and tetraconazole in or on certain products

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 68 of 6 March 2023
)


On page 78, in the Annex, point (3), in the header of column (3) of the table:
for:


                  ‘(sum of constituent isomers) (F)’,

read:


                  ‘Novaluron (sum of constituent isomers) (F)’.
Case C-239/22, État belge and Promo 54: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 March 2023 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — Belgium) — État belge, Promo 54 v Promo 54, État belge (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 12(1) and (2) — Supply, before first occupation, of a building or parts of a building and of the land on which the building stands — No provisions in national law providing for detailed rules for applying the criterion relating to first occupation — Article 135(1)(j) — Exemptions — Supply, after conversion, of a building which was the subject of a first occupation before the conversion — National administrative legal commentary treating buildings which have undergone substantial conversions in the same way as new buildings)
Date: 2023-03-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, building, housing, improvement of housing, supply, tax exemption








C_2023164EN.01001701.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/17






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 March 2023 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — Belgium) — État belge, Promo 54 v Promo 54, État belge
(Case C-239/22, (1) État belge and Promo 54)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 12(1) and (2) - Supply, before first occupation, of a building or parts of a building and of the land on which the building stands - No provisions in national law providing for detailed rules for applying the criterion relating to first occupation - Article 135(1)(j) - Exemptions - Supply, after conversion, of a building which was the subject of a first occupation before the conversion - National administrative legal commentary treating buildings which have undergone substantial conversions in the same way as new buildings)
(2023/C 164/22)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: État belge, Promo 54

Defendants: Promo 54, État belge

Operative part of the judgment

Article 135(1)(j) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, read in conjunction with Article 12(1) and (2) thereof,
must be interpreted as meaning that the exemption provided for by that first provision for the supply of a building or a part of a building, and of the land on which the building stands, other than those which are supplied before their first occupation, also applies to the supply of a building which was first occupied before its conversion, even if the Member State concerned has not laid down, in national law, the detailed rules for applying the criterion of first occupation to conversions of buildings, as the second of those provisions authorised it to do.


(1)  OJ C 257, 4.7.2022.