do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10970 – FORTRESS INVESTMENT GROUP / AIR INVESTMENT VALENCIA / JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 226/02
Date: 2023-03-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Community of Valencia, Spain, United States, air transport, economic concentration, holding company, investment company, merger control, provision of services








C_2023226EN.01000201.xml










28.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 226/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10970 – FORTRESS INVESTMENT GROUP / AIR INVESTMENT VALENCIA / JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 226/02)
On 1 March 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10970. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-37/22: Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2023 — Romedor Pharma v EUIPO — Perfect Care Distribution (Cerviron) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Cerviron — Non-registered earlier national trade mark CERVIRON — Relative ground for invalidity — Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2023-03-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, medical device, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023134EN.01001202.xml










17.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 134/12






Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2023 — Romedor Pharma v EUIPO — Perfect Care Distribution (Cerviron)
(Case T-37/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark Cerviron - Non-registered earlier national trade mark CERVIRON - Relative ground for invalidity - Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 134/16)
Language of the case: Romanian

Parties


Applicant: Romedor Pharma SRL (Focşani, Romania) (represented by: E.-M. Dicu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Manea and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Perfect Care Distribution SRL (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: R. Pop, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 November 2021 (Case R 520/2021-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Romedor Pharma SRL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);










3.


Orders Perfect Care Distribution SRL to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 138, 28.3.2022.
Case C-122/23, Legafact: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 1 March 2023 — Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite v Legafact EOOD
Date: 2023-03-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, administrative sanction, debt, equal treatment, tax collection, tax exemption, tax law, taxpayer, turnover








C_2023173EN.01002301.xml










15.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 173/23






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 1 March 2023 — Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite v Legafact EOOD
(Case C-122/23, Legafact)
(2023/C 173/31)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven administrativen sad

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite

Respondent on a point of law: Legafact EOOD

Questions referred







1.


Is a national provision which treats taxable persons differently in respect of the tax exemption provided for under Title XII, Chapter 1, of Council Directive 2006/112 (1) on the common system of value added tax depending on the rapidity with which they reach the turnover threshold for compulsory VAT registration in breach of the principles of the common system of value added tax in the European Union?










2.


Does Council Directive 2006/112 preclude a national provision under which the tax exemption of a supply under Title XII, Chapter 1, of Council Directive 2006/112 depends on the supplier fulfilling the obligation to apply for compulsory VAT registration in due time?










3.


What criteria arising from the interpretation of the VAT Directive must be used to assess whether the aforementioned national provision, which provides for the incurrence of a tax debt in the event of late submission of the application for compulsory VAT registration, is a penalty provision?






(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 28 February 2023 2023/C 77/01
Date: 2023-03-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023077EN.01000101.xml










1.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 77/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

28 February 2023
(2023/C 77/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0619 




JPY


Japanese yen


145,23 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4443 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87701 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0780 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9947 




ISK


Iceland króna


152,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,9713 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,497 




HUF


Hungarian forint


377,68 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7125 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9200 




TRY


Turkish lira


20,0556 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5760 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4411 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,3351 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7216 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4314 




KRW


South Korean won


1 401,84 




ZAR


South African rand


19,5518 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3663 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 193,42 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7653 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,760 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,485 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5280 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,4480 




INR


Indian rupee


87,7205 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-92/22, Edison Next: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Edison Next SpA, formerly Fenice — Qualità per l’ambiente SpA v Ministero della Transizione Ecologica (formerly Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare), Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Comitato nazionale per la gestione della Direttiva 2003/87/CE e per il supporto nella gestione delle attività di progetto del protocollo di Kyoto (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirements to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2023-03-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Emissions Trading Scheme, EU emission allowance, Kyoto Protocol, electrical energy, energy production, tradeable emission permit








C_2023252EN.01001201.xml










17.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/12






Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Edison Next SpA, formerly Fenice — Qualità per l’ambiente SpA v Ministero della Transizione Ecologica (formerly Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare), Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Comitato nazionale per la gestione della Direttiva 2003/87/CE e per il supporto nella gestione delle attività di progetto del protocollo di Kyoto
(Case C-92/22, (1) Edison Next)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirements to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2023/C 252/12)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Edison Next SpA, formerly Fenice — Qualità per l’ambiente SpA

Defendants: Ministero della Transizione Ecologica (formerly Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare), Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Comitato nazionale per la gestione della Direttiva 2003/87/CE e per il supporto nella gestione delle attività di progetto del protocollo di Kyoto

Other parties: Hera SpA, Iveco SpA, FPT Industrial SpA

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio (Regional Administrative Court, Lazio, Italy) by decision of 25 January 2022 is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11002 – BDT CAPITAL PARTNERS / M+W GROUP / EXYTE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 96/01
Date: 2023-03-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: building industry, economic concentration, energy industry, investment, investment bank, merger control, product design, public procurement








C_2023096EN.01000101.xml










15.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 96/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11002 – BDT CAPITAL PARTNERS / M+W GROUP / EXYTE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 96/01)
On 1 March 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11002. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.