do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-114/23, Sapira: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 27 February 2023 — Criminal proceedings against KB
Date: 2023-02-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carrying out of sentence, criminal proceedings, enforcement of ruling, independence of the judiciary, judicial review, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, right to justice








C_2023338EN.01000202.xml










25.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 338/2






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 27 February 2023 — Criminal proceedings against KB
(Case C-114/23, (1) Sapira)
(2023/C 338/03)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Party to the main proceedings

KB

Questions referred







1.


Must the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and the general principles of European Union law: the principles of legal certainty, inviolability of final court judgments, proportionality, and procedural autonomy, be interpreted as precluding any national legislation which prevents a court, in proceedings for enforcement of a final criminal conviction, from examining whether an enforceable judgment was given by a court which satisfies the requirements relating to establishment by law and also independence and impartiality and, if it is established that those requirements have not been satisfied, in accordance with the previous case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, from drawing the necessary consequences from that fact, inter alia disregarding the judgment thus given and discontinuing the enforcement proceedings?










2.


If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, is the carrying out of such an examination contingent on the initiative being taken by the convicted person or other authorised body or, in the light of the principles of European Union law referred to above, is the court required, in proceedings for enforcement of a final conviction, to carry out such an examination of its own motion?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11014 – ABU DHABI PORTS COMPANY / NOATUM HOLDINGS) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 70/08
Date: 2023-02-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: carriage of goods, economic concentration, harbour installation, logistics, maritime transport, merger control








C_2023070EN.01001201.xml










27.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 70/12






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11014 – ABU DHABI PORTS COMPANY / NOATUM HOLDINGS)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 70/08)

1.   
On 17 February 2023, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Abu Dhabi Ports Company PJSC (‘ADP’, UAE), controlled by Abu Dhabi Developmental Holding Company (‘ADQ’, UAE),










—


Noatum Holdings S.L.U. (‘Noatum’, Spain).




ADP will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Noatum.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


ADP is active in trade, logistics and transport. It operates ten ports and terminals in the UAE, as well as port facilities in Egypt. ADP is currently not active in the EEA,










—


Noatum is primarily active in freight management and contract logistics; commercial representation, port agency and ship and crew services, and specialized logistics services; and in the provision of port terminal facilities.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11014 – ABU DHABI PORTS COMPANY / NOATUM HOLDINGS
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.