do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-77/23 P: Appeal brought on 13 February 2023 by Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 14 December 2022 in Case T-526/20, Devin v EUIPO — Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Date: 2023-02-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023278EN.01001203.xml










7.8.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/12






Appeal brought on 13 February 2023 by Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 14 December 2022 in Case T-526/20, Devin v EUIPO — Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry
(Case C-77/23 P)
(2023/C 278/19)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry (represented by: D. Dimitrova, and I. Pakidanska, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Devin EAD
By order of 27 June 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry should bear its own costs.
Case C-76/23, Cobult: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 13 February 2023 — Cobult UG v TAP Air Portugal SA
Date: 2023-02-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: airline, carriage of passengers, carrier, civil aviation, indemnification, ticket, traveller








C_2023189EN.01001002.xml










30.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/10






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 13 February 2023 — Cobult UG v TAP Air Portugal SA
(Case C-76/23, Cobult)
(2023/C 189/15)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Frankfurt am Main

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Cobult UG

Defendant: TAP Air Portugal SA

Question referred

Must Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) be interpreted as meaning that a signed agreement of the passenger on the reimbursement of the cost of the ticket with a travel voucher within the meaning of the first indent of Article 8(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 exists where the passenger selects a voucher of this type on the website of the operating air carrier to the exclusion of a subsequent refund of the cost of the ticket in monetary form and receives it by email, while reimbursement of the cost of the ticket in monetary form is only possible after first contacting the operating air carrier?


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).
Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union
Date: 2023-02-13
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: GATT, New Zealand, United Kingdom, agreement (EU), tariff preference, tariff quota, withdrawal from the EU








L_2023043EN.01000101.xml










13.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 43/1







Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union

The Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (1), signed in Brussels on 20 July 2022, entered into force on 28 January 2023.


(1)  
            OJ L 328, 22.12.2022, p. 61.
Case C-423/21, Grand Production: Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 13 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Grand Production d.o.o. v GO4YU GmbH, DH, GO4YU d.o.o, MTEL Austria GmbH
Date: 2023-02-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: audiovisual programme, broadcasting, copyright, jurisdiction, private international law








C_2023164EN.01003401.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/34






Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 13 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Grand Production d.o.o. v GO4YU GmbH, DH, GO4YU d.o.o, MTEL Austria GmbH
(Case C-423/21, (1) Grand Production)
(2023/C 164/45)
Language of the case: German
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 422, 18.10.2021.
Case T-64/23: Action brought on 13 February 2023 — Aesculap v EUIPO — Aeneas (AESKUCARE Food Intolerance)
Date: 2023-02-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, chemical product, consultancy, medical diagnosis, medical research, registered trade mark, research body, scientific apparatus, trade-mark law, veterinary medicine








C_2023112EN.01004701.xml










27.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/47






Action brought on 13 February 2023 — Aesculap v EUIPO — Aeneas (AESKUCARE Food Intolerance)
(Case T-64/23)
(2023/C 112/61)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Aesculap AG (Tuttlingen, Germany) (represented by: N. Hebeis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aeneas GmbH & Co. KG (Wendelsheim, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark AESKUCARE Food Intolerance — Application No 17 918 102

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 November 2022 in Case R 21/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in so far as it annulled the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO of 30 November 2021 and rejected the opposition in respect of the claimed goods and services in Classes 5, 42 and 44;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before EUIPO.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Initiation of proceedings (Case M.10807 – VIASAT / INMARSAT) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 60/02
Date: 2023-02-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, provision of services, satellite, satellite communications, transmission network








C_2023060EN.01000301.xml










17.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 60/3






Initiation of proceedings
(Case M.10807 – VIASAT / INMARSAT)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 60/02)
On 13 February 2023, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.10807 – VIASAT / INMARSAT, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Case T-66/23: Action brought on 13 February 2023 — Aesculap v EUIPO — Aeneas (AESKUCARE Allergy)
Date: 2023-02-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, chemical product, consultancy, medical diagnosis, medical research, registered trade mark, research body, scientific apparatus, trade-mark law, veterinary medicine








C_2023112EN.01004802.xml










27.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/48






Action brought on 13 February 2023 — Aesculap v EUIPO — Aeneas (AESKUCARE Allergy)
(Case T-66/23)
(2023/C 112/63)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Aesculap AG (Tuttlingen, Germany) (represented by: N. Hebeis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aeneas GmbH & Co. KG (Wendelsheim, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark AESKUCARE Allergy — Application No 17 917 493

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 November 2022 in Case R 20/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in so far it annulled the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO of 30 November 2021 and rejected the opposition in respect of the claimed goods and services in Classes 5, 42 and 44;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before EUIPO.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/371 of 13 February 2023 approving amendments to the specification for a Protected Designation of Origin or a Protected Geographical Indication (‘Pannon’ (PDO))
Date: 2023-02-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Central Transdanubia, Hungary, Southern Transdanubia, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, red wine, rosé wine, sparkling wine, white wine








L_2023051EN.01003101.xml










20.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 51/31








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/371
of 13 February 2023
         
approving amendments to the specification for a Protected Designation of Origin or a Protected Geographical Indication (‘Pannon’ (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Commission has examined the application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the Protected Designation of Origin ‘Pannon’, forwarded by Hungary in accordance with Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(2)


The Commission has published the application for the approval of the amendments to the specification in the Official Journal of the European Union (2), as required by Article 97(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(3)


No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(4)


The amendments to the specification should therefore be approved in accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(5)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Pannon’ (PDO) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 13 February 2023.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(2)  
            OJ C 401, 18.10.2022, p. 10
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 10 February 2023 2023/C 53/03
Date: 2023-02-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023053EN.01000401.xml










13.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 53/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

10 February 2023
(2023/C 53/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0690 




JPY


Japanese yen


139,88 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4445 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88348 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,1630 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9872 




ISK


Iceland króna


152,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,8710 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,692 




HUF


Hungarian forint


389,78 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7810 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9020 




TRY


Turkish lira


20,1357 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5432 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4364 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,3916 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6904 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4199 




KRW


South Korean won


1 354,10 




ZAR


South African rand


19,0834 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,2837 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 233,33 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6314 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,207 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,057 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,6245 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,0540 




INR


Indian rupee


88,2475 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-65/23: Action brought on 13 February 2023 — Aesculap v EUIPO — Aeneas (AESKUCARE)
Date: 2023-02-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, chemical product, consultancy, medical diagnosis, medical research, registered trade mark, research body, scientific apparatus, trade-mark law, veterinary medicine








C_2023112EN.01004801.xml










27.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/48






Action brought on 13 February 2023 — Aesculap v EUIPO — Aeneas (AESKUCARE)
(Case T-65/23)
(2023/C 112/62)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Aesculap AG (Tuttlingen, Germany) (represented by: N. Hebeis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aeneas GmbH & Co. KG (Wendelsheim, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU word mark ‘AESKUCARE’ — Application No 17 789 025

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 November 2022 in Case R 18/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in so far as it annulled the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO of 30 November 2021 and rejected the opposition in respect of the claimed goods and services in Classes 5, 42 and 44;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before EUIPO.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.