do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-152/21, Ogres HES: Order of the President of the Court of 7 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘Ogres HES’, intervening parties: Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija, Ekonomikas ministrija, Finanšu ministrija
Date: 2023-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Latvia, State aid, damages, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy production, energy supply, liberalisation of the market, price of energy, renewable energy








C_2023164EN.01003301.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/33






Order of the President of the Court of 7 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘Ogres HES’, intervening parties: Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija, Ekonomikas ministrija, Finanšu ministrija
(Case C-152/21, (1) Ogres HES)
(2023/C 164/43)
Language of the case: Latvian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 242, 21.6.2021.
Case C-520/22, Horezza: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rada Úradu pre verejné obstarávanie — Slovakia) — HOREZZA a.s. v Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 267 TFEU — Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ — Appellate body of a national supervisory authority for public procurement procedures — Independence — Status of a third party in relation to the authority which adopted the contested decision — Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
Date: 2023-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, courts and tribunals, independence of the judiciary, public contract, public procurement








C_2023155EN.01002401.xml










2.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/24






Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rada Úradu pre verejné obstarávanie — Slovakia) — HOREZZA a.s. v Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie
(Case C-520/22, (1) Horezza)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 267 TFEU - Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ - Appellate body of a national supervisory authority for public procurement procedures - Independence - Status of a third party in relation to the authority which adopted the contested decision - Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
(2023/C 155/28)
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Rada Úradu pre verejné obstarávanie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: HOREZZA a.s.

Defendant: Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Rada Úradu pre verejné obstarávanie (Council of the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority, Slovakia), by decision of 3 August 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  Date lodged: 4.8.2022.
Case C-64/23 P: Appeal brought on 7 February 2023 by Neoperl AG against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 7 December 2022 in Case T-487/21, Neoperl AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office
Date: 2023-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, plumbing equipment, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023338EN.01000201.xml










25.9.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 338/2






Appeal brought on 7 February 2023 by Neoperl AG against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 7 December 2022 in Case T-487/21, Neoperl AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office
(Case C-64/23 P)
(2023/C 338/02)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Neoperl AG (represented by: U. Kaufmann, Rechtsanwältin)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 11 July 2023, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.
Case C-61/23, Еkostroy: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Аdministrativen sad Haskovo (Bulgaria) lodged on 7 February 2023 — ‘Ekostroy’ EOOD v Agentsia ‘Patna infrastruktura’
Date: 2023-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative sanction, carriage of goods, fine, large vehicle, road transport, road transport tariff, toll, traffic offence, traffic regulations, transport infrastructure








C_2023189EN.01001001.xml










30.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/10






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Аdministrativen sad Haskovo (Bulgaria) lodged on 7 February 2023 — ‘Ekostroy’ EOOD v Agentsia ‘Patna infrastruktura’
(Case C-61/23, Еkostroy)
(2023/C 189/14)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Аdministrativen sad Haskovo

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant:‘Ekostroy’ EOOD

Respondent: Agentsia ‘Patna infrastruktura’

Question referred

Must Article 9a of Directive 1999/62/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1999 on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures be interpreted as meaning that the requirement laid down in that article that penalties for infringements of the national provisions adopted pursuant to that directive must be proportionate precludes national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the imposition of a flat-rate fine (on natural or legal persons) for infringements of the provisions relating to the obligation to ascertain and pay in advance a toll for the use of the road infrastructure, irrespective of the nature and gravity of the infringement, with the option of being exempted from liability to pay an administrative penalty through payment of a so-called ‘redress charge’?


(1)  OJ 1999 L 187, p. 42.
Case T-51/23: Action brought on 7 February 2023 — OSR Entreprises v EUIPO — Möckel and Gramann (evolver)
Date: 2023-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Internet, business management, electronic commerce, electronic publishing, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023104EN.01004201.xml










20.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/42






Action brought on 7 February 2023 — OSR Entreprises v EUIPO — Möckel and Gramann (evolver)
(Case T-51/23)
(2023/C 104/63)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: OSR Entreprises AG (Cham, Switzerland) (represented by: U. Lüken, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mathias Möckel (Chemnitz, Germany), Torsten Gramann (Chemnitz)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietors of the trade mark at issue: Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark evolver — EU trade mark No 3 313 335

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 November 2022 in Case R 1302/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and declare EU trade mark No 3 313 335 invalid in respect of all services;










—


in the alternative, annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Failure to have regard for indicative value in the assessment of the evidence.
Case T-47/23: Action brought on 7 February 2023 — Vinet Miłosz Jeleń v EUIPO — The Animal Store, Food and Accessories (WILD INSPIRED)
Date: 2023-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, animal feedingstuffs, beverage industry, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law, wholesale trade








C_2023112EN.01004001.xml










27.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/40






Action brought on 7 February 2023 — Vinet Miłosz Jeleń v EUIPO — The Animal Store, Food and Accessories (WILD INSPIRED)
(Case T-47/23)
(2023/C 112/51)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Vinet Miłosz Jeleń (Mszalnica, Poland) (represented by: M. Bac-Matuszewska, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The Animal Store, Food and Accessories, SL (Valencia, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark WILD INSPIRED — Application for registration No 18 334 973

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 December 2022 in Case R 1299/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-81/22: Order of the General Court of 7 February 2023 — Euranimi v Commission (Action for annulment — Dumping — Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in India and Indonesia — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Act not of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2023-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: India, Indonesia, admissibility, anti-dumping duty, flat product, import (EU), originating product, steel








C_2023112EN.01003501.xml










27.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/35






Order of the General Court of 7 February 2023 — Euranimi v Commission
(Case T-81/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in India and Indonesia - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Act not of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility)
(2023/C 112/45)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Campa, D. Rovetta, P. Gjørtler and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, an association representing the interests of European importers, distributors, traders and processors of unintegrated steel, stainless steel and metal products, seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2012 of 17 November 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in India and Indonesia (OJ 2021 L 410, p. 153).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the European Steel Association (Eurofer)’s application to intervene.










3.


European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) shall pay the costs.










4.


Euranimi, the European Commission and Eurofer shall each bear their own costs relating to Eurofer’s application to intervene.






(1)  OJ C 148, 4.4.2022.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 6 February 2023 2023/C 46/01
Date: 2023-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023046EN.01000101.xml










7.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

6 February 2023
(2023/C 46/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0776 




JPY


Japanese yen


142,41 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4432 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89278 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,3652 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9964 




ISK


Iceland króna


152,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,0428 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


23,843 




HUF


Hungarian forint


390,83 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7228 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9055 




TRY


Turkish lira


20,2917 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5596 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4459 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4539 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7075 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4266 




KRW


South Korean won


1 353,65 




ZAR


South African rand


18,9013 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3090 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 338,36 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5884 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,686 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,207 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5625 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,4882 




INR


Indian rupee


89,0922 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-521/22, Konštrukta — Defence: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rada Úradu pre verejné obstarávanie — Slovakia) — KONŠTRUKTA — Defence a.s. v Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 267 TFEU — Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ — Appellate body of a national supervisory authority for public procurement procedures — Independence — Status of a third party in relation to the authority which adopted the contested decision — Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
Date: 2023-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: appeal, courts and tribunals, independence of the judiciary, public contract, public procurement, supervisory body








C_2023155EN.01002402.xml










2.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/24






Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rada Úradu pre verejné obstarávanie — Slovakia) — KONŠTRUKTA — Defence a.s. v Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie
(Case C-521/22, (1) Konštrukta — Defence)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 267 TFEU - Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ - Appellate body of a national supervisory authority for public procurement procedures - Independence - Status of a third party in relation to the authority which adopted the contested decision - Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
(2023/C 155/29)
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Rada Úradu pre verejné obstarávanie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: KONŠTRUKTA — Defence a.s.

Defendant: Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Rada Úradu pre verejné obstarávanie (Council of the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority, Slovakia), by decision of 3 August 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  Date lodged: 4.8.2022.
Case T-50/23: Action brought on 7 February 2023 — W.B. Studio v EUIPO — E.Land Italy (BELFE)
Date: 2023-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, animal skin, clothing, fancy leather goods and glove-making industry, footwear industry, leather, personal effects, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_2023104EN.01004102.xml










20.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/41






Action brought on 7 February 2023 — W.B. Studio v EUIPO — E.Land Italy (BELFE)
(Case T-50/23)
(2023/C 104/62)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. (Milano, Italy) (represented by: V. Piccarreta and G. Romanelli, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: E.Land Italy Srl (Milano, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark BELFE — European Union trade mark No 139 501

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 November 2022 in Case R 869/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Partially annul the contested decision to the extent it upheld the decision of the Cancellation Division and, consequently, declare the revocation of the trade mark at issue;










—


Order the defendant to bear the costs of the present proceedings, including the costs deriving from the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the First Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of article 58(1)(a) in conjunction with article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of article 19 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.
Decision of the Court of Justice of 7 February 2023 on official holidays and judicial vacations
Date: 2023-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: holiday, operation of the Institutions, public holiday








C_2023104EN.01000201.xml










20.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/2








            DECISION OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE
         
of 7 February 2023
         
on official holidays and judicial vacations
(2023/C 104/02)


THE COURT,

having regard to Article 24(2), (4) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure,


whereas it is necessary, in accordance with that provision, to establish the list of official holidays and to set the dates of the judicial vacations,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:




Article 1

The list of official holidays within the meaning of Article 24(4) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure is established as follows:






—


New Year’s Day,










—


Easter Monday,










—


1 May,










—


9 May,










—


Ascension,










—


Whit Monday,










—


23 June,










—


15 August,










—


1 November,










—


25 December,










—


26 December.







Article 2

For the period from 1 November 2023 to 31 October 2024, the dates of the judicial vacations within the meaning of Article 24(2) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure are set as follows:






—


Christmas 2023: from Monday 18 December 2023 to Sunday 7 January 2024 inclusive,










—


Easter 2024: from Monday 25 March 2024 to Sunday 7 April 2024 inclusive,










—


Summer 2024: from Tuesday 16 July 2024 to Saturday 31 August 2024 inclusive.







Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Luxembourg, 7 February 2023.


Registrar

A. CALOT ESCOBAR
            



President

K. LENAERTS
Corrigendum to UN Regulation No 154 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of light duty passenger and commercial vehicles with regards to criteria emissions, emissions of carbon dioxide and fuel consumption and/or the measurement of electric energy consumption and electric range (WLTP) [2022/2124] (Official Journal of the European Union L 290 of 10 November 2022)
Date: 2023-02-07
Institutions: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
Subjects: approval, commercial vehicle, electric vehicle, electrical energy, energy consumption, environmental standard, fuel, light-duty vehicle, motor vehicle pollution, technical specification, technical standard




L_2023035EN.01002901.xml










7.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 35/29







Corrigendum to UN Regulation No 154 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of light duty passenger and commercial vehicles with regards to criteria emissions, emissions of carbon dioxide and fuel consumption and/or the measurement of electric energy consumption and electric range (WLTP) [2022/2124]

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 290 of 10 November 2022
)


On page 67, Appendix 2, point 3.3.1 is replaced as follows:






‘3.3.1.


Evaluation of CO2 emissions and electric energy consumption
For Level 1A only:
For each total number of tests, one of the three following decisions can be reached, where the factor A shall be set at 1.01:






(i)

Pass the family if 














(ii)

Fail the family if 














(iii)


Take another measurement if:









where:
parameters tP1,i, tP2,i, tF1,i, and tF2 are taken from the Table A2/3.

Table A2/3


Pass/fail decision criteria for the sample size










 


PASS


FAIL




Tests (i)


tP1,i


tP2,i


tF1,i


tF2




3 


1.686


0.438


1.686


0.438




4 


1.125


0.425


1.177


0.438




5 


0.850


0.401


0.953


0.438




6 


0.673


0.370


0.823


0.438




7 


0.544


0.335


0.734


0.438




8 


0.443


0.299


0.670


0.438




9 


0.361


0.263


0.620


0.438




10 


0.292


0.226


0.580


0.438




11 


0.232


0.190


0.546


0.438




12 


0.178


0.153


0.518


0.438




13 


0.129


0.116


0.494


0.438




14 


0.083


0.078


0.473


0.438




15 


0.040


0.038


0.455


0.438




16 


0.000


0.000


0.438


0.438’