do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/316 of 6 February 2023 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Goranski medun’ (PDO))
Date: 2023-02-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: County of Karlovac, County of Primorje-Gorski Kotar, Croatia, designation of origin, honey, labelling, product designation








L_2023043EN.01000701.xml










13.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 43/7








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/316
of 6 February 2023
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Goranski medun’ (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia’s application to register the name ‘Goranski medun’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Goranski medun’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Goranski medun’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.4. Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 6 February 2023.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 397, 17.10.2022, p. 15.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/317 of 6 February 2023 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Colline di Romagna’ (PDO))
Date: 2023-02-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Emilia-Romagna, Italy, designation of origin, labelling, olive oil, product designation








L_2023043EN.01000801.xml










13.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 43/8








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/317
of 6 February 2023
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Colline di Romagna’ (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 in conjunction with the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) thereof, the Commission has examined Italy’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Colline di Romagna’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1491/2003 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no reasoned statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Colline di Romagna’ (PDO) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 6 February 2023.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1491/2003 of 25 August 2003 supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 (Ficodindia dell'Etna, Monte Etna, Colline di Romagna, Pretuziano delle Colline Teramane, Torta del Casar, Manzana de Girona or Poma de Girona) (OJ L 214, 26.8.2003, p. 6).

(3)  
            OJ C 397, 17.10.2022, p. 20.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/257 of 6 February 2023 correcting Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1412 concerning the authorisation of ylang ylang essential oil from Cananga odorata (Lam) Hook f. & Thomson as a feed additive for all animal species (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2023-02-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, European Commission
Subjects: animal feedingstuffs, essential oil, flavouring, market approval




L_2023035EN.01001901.xml










7.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 35/19








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/257
of 6 February 2023
         
correcting Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1412 concerning the authorisation of ylang ylang essential oil from Cananga odorata (Lam) Hook f. & Thomson as a feed additive for all animal species
(Text with EEA relevance)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition (1), and in particular Article 9(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The use of ylang ylang essential oil as a feed additive was authorised for all animal species by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1412 (2) for a 10-year period.












(2)


In the transitional measure set out in Article 2(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1412, a wrong date was indicated for non-food-producing animals.












(3)


Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1412 should therefore be corrected accordingly.












(4)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
In Article 2 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1412, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:


‘3.   Compound feed and feed materials containing this substance as specified in the Annex which are produced and labelled before 11 September 2024 in accordance with the rules applicable before 11 September 2022 may continue to be placed on the market and used until the existing stocks are exhausted if they are intended for non-food-producing animals.’




Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.





This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 6 February 2023.


For the Commission


The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 29.

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1412 of 19 August 2022 concerning the authorisation of ylang ylang essential oil from Cananga odorata (Lam) Hook f. & Thomson as a feed additive for all animal species (OJ L 217, 22.8.2022, p. 1).
Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/259 of 6 February 2023 extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for Human Rights and amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/346
Date: 2023-02-06
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: diplomatic representation, human rights




L_2023035EN.01002301.xml










7.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 35/23








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2023/259
of 6 February 2023
         
extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for Human Rights and amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/346


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 33 and Article 31(2) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 25 July 2012, the Council agreed to appoint a European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for Human Rights.












(2)


On 28 February 2019, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/346 (1) appointing Mr Eamon GILMORE as the European Union Special Representative for Human Rights. The EUSR’s mandate is to expire on 28 February 2023.












(3)


The EUSR’s mandate should be extended for a further period of 12 months and a new financial reference amount for the period from 1 March 2023 to 29 February 2024 should be established.












(4)


The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Decision (CFSP) 2019/346 is amended as follows:






(1)


Article 1 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 1
European Union Special Representative
The mandate of Eamon GILMORE as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for Human Rights is extended until 29 February 2024. The Council may decide that the mandate of the EUSR be terminated earlier, based on an assessment by the Political and Security Committee (PSC) and a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR).’
;









(2)


in Article 5(1), the following subparagraph is added:

                              ‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the EUSR’s mandate for the period from 1 March 2023 to 29 February 2024 shall be EUR 1 567 461,56.’;










(3)


in Article 12, the second sentence is replaced by the following:

                              ‘The EUSR shall present the Council, the HR and the Commission with regular progress reports and a final comprehensive mandate implementation report by 30 November 2023.’.






Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 6 February 2023.


For the Council


The President

J. ROSWALL
            





(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/346 of 28 February 2019 appointing the European Union Special Representative for Human Rights (OJ L 62, 1.3.2019, p. 12).
Case C-62/23, Pedro Francisco: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo n.° 5 de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 6 February 2023 — Pedro Francisco v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona
Date: 2023-02-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU national, criminal record, family relationship, freedom of movement, public safety, residence permit








C_2023173EN.01001601.xml










15.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 173/16






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo n.o 5 de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 6 February 2023 — Pedro Francisco v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona
(Case C-62/23, Pedro Francisco)
(2023/C 173/23)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo n.o 5 de Barcelona

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Pedro Francisco

Defendant: Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 27 of Directive 2004/38/EC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a police record may be the basis or foundation of the personal conduct of the individual concerned for the purposes of assessing whether a genuine threat exists when the purpose of a criminal trial is to prove whether that threat is genuine?










2.


If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, in the light of Article 27 of the directive, must the interpretation be that the governmental authority is required to set out expressly and in detail the facts on which that record is based and any judicial proceedings which have been brought and their outcome in order to confirm that we are not merely dealing with initial presumptions?






(1)  Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (OJ 2004 L 158, p. 77).
Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/261 of 6 February 2023 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine
Date: 2023-02-06
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








L_2023035EN.01002701.xml










7.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 35/27








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2023/261
of 6 February 2023
         
amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 17 March 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1).












(2)


Following the judgment of the General Court in Case T-714/20 (2), one entry should be deleted from the list of persons and entities and bodies set out in the Annex to Decision 2014/145/CFSP.












(3)


Decision 2014/145/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The Annex to Decision 2014/145/CFSP is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 6 February 2023.


For the Council


The President

J. ROSWALL
            





(1)  Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16).

(2)  Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 October 2022, Dmitry Vladimirovich Ovsyannikov v Council of the European Union, T-714/20, ECLI:EU:T:2022:674.




ANNEX
In the Annex to Decision 2014/145/CFSP, ‘List of persons, entities and bodies referred to in Articles 1 and 2’, under the heading ‘Persons’, the entry concerning the following person is deleted:






161.


Dmitry Vladimirovich OVSYANNIKOV.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11019 – PREMERENI / SUAS CLEAN ENERGY / JVs) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 55/01
Date: 2023-02-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, energy production, heating, merger control, renewable energy, solar energy, wind energy








C_2023055EN.01000101.xml










14.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11019 – PREMERENI / SUAS CLEAN ENERGY / JVs)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 55/01)
On 6 February 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11019. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-58/23, Abboudnam: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 6 February 2023 — Y.N. v Republika Slovenija
Date: 2023-02-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: action brought before an administrative court, international protection, limitation of legal proceedings, right of asylum








C_2023155EN.01003102.xml










2.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/31






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 6 February 2023 — Y.N. v Republika Slovenija
(Case C-58/23, Abboudnam (1))
(2023/C 155/41)
Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Y.N.

Defendant: Republika Slovenija

Question referred

Must Article 46(4) of Directive 2013/32/EU, (2) read in conjunction with Article 47 of the Charter, (3) be interpreted as precluding a national procedural rule, such as the second sentence of Article 70(1) of the ZMZ-1, which provides, for the lodging of an appeal against a decision by which the competent authority rejects an application as manifestly unfounded under an accelerated procedure, a time limit of three days from the notification of such a decision, including public holidays, which may expire at the end of the first working day thereafter?


(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast) (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).

(3)  Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (OJ 2012 C 326, p. 391).
Case T-45/23: Action brought on 6 February 2023 — UG v ERCEA
Date: 2023-02-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, coronavirus disease, epidemic, staff assessment, staff regulations (EU)








C_2023127EN.01004601.xml










11.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 127/46






Action brought on 6 February 2023 — UG v ERCEA
(Case T-45/23)
(2023/C 127/57)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: UG (represented by: N. Flandin, lawyer)

Defendant: European Research Council Executive Agency

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the present action admissible and well founded;




consequently,






—


annul the applicant’s 2021 appraisal report;










—


alternatively, annul the 2021 appraisal report in so far as it contains the contested comments;










—


as well as, and in so far as necessary, annul the ERCEA decision of 26 October 2022 in that it rejects the applicant’s complaint against her 2021 appraisal report;










—


order the defendant to pay all of the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the reasons for the contested decision are vitiated by a manifest error of assessment, a failure properly to take into account the previous appraisal reports, an infringement of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations of Officials the European Union and an infringement of the principle of the annual nature of the appraisal.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision and comments are vitiated by manifest errors of assessment, a breach of the principle of care, a failure to take into account the particular professional context, which was disrupted by the Covid pandemic in 2021 and the disproportionate nature of the comments as against the reality of the situation.