do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Public holidays 2023 2023/C 39/07
Date: 2023-02-01
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: EU Member State, public holiday








C_2023039EN.01002001.xml










1.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 39/20






Public holidays 2023
(2023/C 39/07)






Belgique.België


1.1, 10.4, 1.5, 18.5, 19.5, 29.5, 21.7, 15.8, 1.11, 2.11, 25.12




България


1.1, 2.1, 3.3, 14.4, 15.4, 16.4, 17.4, 1.5, 6.5, 8.5, 24.5, 6.9, 22.9, 1.11, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12, 27.12




Česká republika


1.1, 15.4, 18.4, 1.5, 8.5, 5.7, 6.7, 28.9, 28.10, 17.11, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12




Danmark


1.1, 6.4, 7.4, 9.4, 10.4, 5.5, 18.5, 28.5, 29.5, 25.12, 26.12




Deutschland


1.1, 7.4, 10.4, 1.5, 18.5, 29.5, 3.10, 25.12, 26.12




Eesti


1.1, 24.2, 7.4, 9.4, 1.5, 28.5, 23.6, 24.6, 20.8, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12




Éire.Ireland


1.1, 6.2, 17.3, 10.4, 1.5, 5.6, 7.8, 30.10, 25.12, 26.12




Ελλάδα


1.1, 6.1, 27.2, 25.3, 14.4, 17.4, 1.5, 5.6, 15.8, 28.10, 25.12, 26.12




España


6.1, 7.4, 1.5, 15.8, 12.10, 1.11, 6.12, 8.12, 25.12




France


1.1, 10.4, 1.5, 8.5, 18.5, 29.5, 14.7, 15.8, 1.11, 11.11, 25.12




Hrvatska


1.1, 6.1, 9.4, 10.4, 1.5, 30.5, 8.6, 22.6, 5.8, 15.8, 1.11, 18.11, 25.12, 26.12




Italia


1.1, 6.1, 10.4, 25.4, 1.5, 2.6, 15.8, 1.11, 8.12, 25.12, 26.12




Κύπρος.Kıbrıs


1.1, 25.3, 7.4, 10.4, 14.4, 17.4, 1.5, 9.5, 18.5, 29.5, 1.10, 1.11, 2.11, 25.12, 26.12




Latvija


1.1, 7.4, 9.4, 10.4, 1.5, 4.5, 23.6, 24.6, 20.11, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12, 31.12




Lietuva


1.1, 16.2, 11.3, 9.4, 10.4, 1.5, 7.5, 4.6, 24.6, 6.7, 15.8, 1.11, 2.11, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12




Luxembourg


1.1, 10.4, 1.5, 9.5, 18.5, 29.5, 23.6, 15.8, 1.11, 25.12, 26.12




Magyarország


1.1, 15.3, 7.4, 10.4, 1.5, 29.5, 20.8, 23.10, 1.11, 25.12, 26.12




Malta


1.1, 10.2, 19.3, 31.3, 7.4, 1.5, 7.6, 29.6, 15.8, 8.9, 21.9, 8.12, 13.12, 25.12




Nederland


1.1, 7.4, 10.4, 27.4, 28.4, 5.5, 18.5, 19.5, 29.5, 25.12, 26.12




Österreich


1.1, 6.1, 10.4, 1.5, 18.5, 29.5, 8.6, 15.8, 26.10, 1.11, 8.12, 25.12, 26.12




Polska


6.1, 10.4, 1.5, 3.5, 8.6, 15.8, 1.11, 11.11, 25.12, 26.12




Portugal


1.1, 7.4, 9.4, 25.4, 1.5, 8.6, 10.6, 15.8, 5.10, 1.11, 1.12, 8.12, 25.12




România


1.1, 2.1, 24.1, 14.4, 16.4, 17.4, 1.5, 1.6, 4.6, 5.6, 15.8, 30.11, 1.12, 25.12, 26.12




Slovenija


2.1, 6.4, 7.4, 10.4, 1.5, 29.5, 21.7, 31.10, 1.11, 25.12, 26.12




Slovensko


1.1, 6.1, 7.4, 10.4, 1.5, 8.5, 5.7, 29.8, 1.9, 15.9, 1.11, 17.11, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12




Suomi.Finland


1.1, 6.1, 7.4, 9.4, 10.4, 1.5, 18.5, 28.5, 23.6, 24.6, 4.11, 6.12, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12




Sverige


1.1, 6.1, 7.4, 9.4, 1.5, 28.5, 6.6, 24.6, 4.11, 25.12, 26.12
Case T-354/21: Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — ClientEarth v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy — Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 — Documents concerning the implementation of fisheries control in Denmark and France — Partial refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — General presumption of confidentiality — Overriding public interest — Aarhus Convention — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006)
Date: 2023-02-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Denmark, France, access to EU information, common fisheries policy, confidentiality, disclosure of information, fishing controls








C_2023104EN.01002401.xml










20.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/24






Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — ClientEarth v Commission
(Case T-354/21) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy - Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 - Documents concerning the implementation of fisheries control in Denmark and France - Partial refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - General presumption of confidentiality - Overriding public interest - Aarhus Convention - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006)
(2023/C 104/38)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ClientEarth AISBL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: O. Brouwer, T. Oeyen and T. van Helfteren, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar, G. Gattinara and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2021) 4348 final of 7 April 2021 refusing access to certain documents requested pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), and pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies (OJ 2006 L 264, p. 13).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders ClientEarth AISBL to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.
Case T-164/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — BG v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Psychological harassment — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Refusal of the request — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Advisory Committee dealing with harassment complaints between Accredited Parliamentary Assistants and Members of the Parliament and its prevention at the workplace — Right to be heard — Refusal to disclose the report of the Advisory Committee — Liability — Non-material harm)
Date: 2023-02-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, harassment at work, psychological harassment, rights of the defence, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU)








C_2023104EN.01002301.xml










20.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/23






Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — BG v Parliament
(Case T-164/20) (1)

(Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistants - Psychological harassment - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Refusal of the request - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Advisory Committee dealing with harassment complaints between Accredited Parliamentary Assistants and Members of the Parliament and its prevention at the workplace - Right to be heard - Refusal to disclose the report of the Advisory Committee - Liability - Non-material harm)
(2023/C 104/36)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: BG (represented by: A. Tymen, L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Windisch, C. González Argüelles and I. Lázaro Betancor, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Parliament of 20 May 2019 by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment refused her request for assistance and, second, compensation for the non-material harm she claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 20 May 2019 refusing the request for assistance lodged by BG;










2.


Orders the Parliament to pay BG, in respect of non-material harm suffered, an amount of EUR 2 500;










3.


Orders the Parliament to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
Case T-569/21: Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — Harbaoui v EUIPO — Google (GOOGLE CAR) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark GOOGLE CAR — Earlier EU word mark GOOGLE — Relative ground for refusal — Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2023-02-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, air-cushion vehicle, cable transport, drone, registered trade mark, road transport, space vehicle, trade-mark law, vehicle parts, vessel








C_2023104EN.01002901.xml










20.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/29






Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — Harbaoui v EUIPO — Google (GOOGLE CAR)
(Case T-569/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark GOOGLE CAR - Earlier EU word mark GOOGLE - Relative ground for refusal - Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 104/44)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Zoubier Harbaoui (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Bove, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Lapinskaite, M. Eberl and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Google LLC (Mountain View, California, United States) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey and C. Schmitt, lawyers)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 June 2021 (Case R 904/2020-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Zoubier Harbaoui to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 431, 25.10.2021.
Case C-48/23, Alajärven Sähkö and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Markkinaoikeus (Finland) lodged on 1 February 2023 — Alajärven Sähkö Oy and Others, Elenia Verkko Oyj v Energiavirasto
Date: 2023-02-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: amendment of a law, electrical energy, electricity supply, national law, price of energy, price regulations








C_2023127EN.01002102.xml










11.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 127/21






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Markkinaoikeus (Finland) lodged on 1 February 2023 — Alajärven Sähkö Oy and Others, Elenia Verkko Oyj v Energiavirasto
(Case C-48/23, Alajärven Sähkö and Others)
(2023/C 127/26)
Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Markkinaoikeus

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Alajärven Sähkö Oy and Others, Elenia Verkko Oyj

Defendant: Energiavirasto

Questions referred







1.


What factors must be taken into account and considered in assessing what constitutes interference with the core regulatory duties and powers of the national regulatory authority in a way that undermines the independence of the national regulatory authority in accordance with Article 57(4) and (5) of the Electricity Directive, (1) and what constitutes general guidelines not related to the regulatory duties and powers within the meaning of Article 59 of the Electricity Directive?










2.


Is an amendment to national legislation in the manner described above (paragraphs 13, 14, 16 and 17 and, in particular, paragraphs 36 to 41 of this request for a preliminary ruling), the purpose of which was to influence electricity distribution prices in the manner set out in the travaux préparatoires relating to the legislative amendment by making amendments to the national Law on the electricity market which affect the regulatory environment of system operators and which did not, in themselves, directly interfere with transmission or distribution tariffs or with the methods for calculating them, but as a consequence of which the national regulatory authority was forced to change its monitoring methods in the middle of the monitoring period, considered to be compatible with Article 57(4) and (5) of the Electricity Directive with regard to the requirement of independence of the regulatory authority?






(1)  Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on common rules for the internal market for electricity and amending Directive 2012/27/EU (OJ 2019 L 158, p. 125).
Case T-671/21: Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — NFL Properties Europe v EUIPO — Groupe Duval (DUUUVAL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark DUUUVAL — Earlier EU figurative mark GROUPE DUVAL — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2023-02-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, broadcasting, cultural event, professional sport, registered trade mark, sporting event, television, trade-mark law








C_2023104EN.01002902.xml










20.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/29






Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — NFL Properties Europe v EUIPO — Groupe Duval (DUUUVAL)
(Case T-671/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark DUUUVAL - Earlier EU figurative mark GROUPE DUVAL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 104/45)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: NFL Properties Europe GmbH (Eschborn, Germany) (represented by: M. Kloth, R. Briske, D. Habel and M. Tillwich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: I. Harrington, J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Groupe Duval (Boulogne-Billancourt, France)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 August 2021 (Case R 243/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders NFL Properties Europe GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 11, 10.1.2022.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries 2023/C 39/05
Date: 2023-02-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, EU waters, English Channel, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing








C_2023039EN.01001801.xml










1.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 39/18






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2023/C 39/05)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


13.12.2022




Duration


13.12.2022 - 31.12.2022




Member State


Belgium




Stock or Group of stocks


SRX/07D. (including special conditions: RJC/*2AC4C, RJC/*67AKD, RJC/07D., RJE/07D., RJH/*04-C., RJH/*67AKD, RJH/07D., RJM/*2AC4C, RJM/*67AKD, RJM/07D., RJN/*2AC4C, RJN/*67AKD, RJN/07D., SRX/*2AC4C and SRX/*67AKD)




Species


Skates and rays (Rajiformes)




Zone


7d




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


14/TQ109






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case T-117/22 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — Grodno Azot and Khimvolokno Plant v Council (Application for interim measures — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)
Date: 2023-02-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person








C_2023112EN.01003601.xml










27.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/36






Order of the President of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — Grodno Azot and Khimvolokno Plant v Council
(Case T-117/22 R)
(Application for interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)
(2023/C 112/46)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Grodno Azot AAT (Grodno, Belarus), Khimvolokno Plant (Grodno) (represented by: N. Tuominen and L. Engelen, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Boggio-Tomasaz and A. Antoniadis, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicants seek the suspension of operation of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/2125 of 2 December 2021 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (OJ 2021 L 430 I, p. 16), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2124 of 2 December 2021 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2021 L 430 I, p. 1), in so far as those measures concern the applicants.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Case T-565/21: Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (Papouis Halloumi) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Papouis Halloumi — Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2023-02-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cows’ milk cheese, goats’ milk cheese, registered trade mark, sheep's milk cheese, trade-mark law








C_2023104EN.01002702.xml










20.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/27






Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (Papouis Halloumi)
(Case T-565/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark Papouis Halloumi - Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2023/C 104/42)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: C. Milbradt, lawyer, and S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Papouis Dairies Ltd (Nicosia) (represented by: A. Pomares Caballero and M. Pomares Caballero, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 April 2021 (Case R 575/2019-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Papouis Dairies Ltd.






(1)  
            OJ C 452, 8.11.2021.
Case T-772/21: Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — Brobet v EUIPO — Efbet Partners (efbet) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark efbet — Genuine use of a mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use — Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
Date: 2023-02-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, automatic game, computer equipment, electronic game, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2023104EN.01003001.xml










20.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/30






Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — Brobet v EUIPO — Efbet Partners (efbet)
(Case T-772/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark efbet - Genuine use of a mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Proof of genuine use - Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
(2023/C 104/46)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Brobet ltd. (Ta’Xbiex, Malta) (represented by: F. Bojinova, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: N. Lamsters and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Efbet Partners OOD (Sofia, Bulgaria)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment in part of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 September 2021 (Case R 624/2021-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Brobet ltd. to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.
Case T-349/22: Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — Hacker-Pschorr Bräu v EUIPO — Vandělíková (HACKER SPACE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark HACKER SPACE — Earlier EU word mark HACKER-PSCHORR and earlier EU figurative mark Hacker Pschorr, as well as earlier national word marks HACKERBRÄU and HACKER — Relative ground for refusal — Identification of the ground on which the opposition is based — Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 2(2)(c) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
Date: 2023-02-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beverage, cosmetic product, dietary product, food substitute, milk product, pharmaceutical product, protein products, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023104EN.01003201.xml










20.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/32






Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — Hacker-Pschorr Bräu v EUIPO — Vandělíková (HACKER SPACE)
(Case T-349/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark HACKER SPACE - Earlier EU word mark HACKER-PSCHORR and earlier EU figurative mark Hacker Pschorr, as well as earlier national word marks HACKERBRÄU and HACKER - Relative ground for refusal - Identification of the ground on which the opposition is based - Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 2(2)(c) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
(2023/C 104/49)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Hacker-Pschorr Bräu GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: C. Tenkhoff and T. Herzog, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Jana Vandělíková (Prague, Czech Republic)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 April 2022 (Case R 1268/2021-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 284, 25.7.2022.