do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 11 January 2023 2023/C 10/03
Date: 2023-01-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2023010EN.01000301.xml










12.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 10/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

11 January 2023
(2023/C 10/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0747 




JPY


Japanese yen


142,61 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4375 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88673 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,2783 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9967 




ISK


Iceland króna


154,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,7380 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,027 




HUF


Hungarian forint


399,10 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6819 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9335 




TRY


Turkish lira


20,1793 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5588 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4429 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,3974 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6912 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4316 




KRW


South Korean won


1 341,01 




ZAR


South African rand


18,2827 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,2807 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 612,34 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6975 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,013 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


35,895 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5840 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,4957 




INR


Indian rupee


87,8120 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-132/21: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Articles 77 to 79 — Remedies — Parallel exercise — Relationship — Procedural autonomy — Effectiveness of the protection rules established by that regulation — Consistent and homogeneous application of those rules throughout the European Union — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
Date: 2023-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: data protection, data-processing law, judicial review, personal data, protection of privacy, right to justice








C_2023071EN.01000601.xml










27.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 71/6






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság
(Case C-132/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Articles 77 to 79 - Remedies - Parallel exercise - Relationship - Procedural autonomy - Effectiveness of the protection rules established by that regulation - Consistent and homogeneous application of those rules throughout the European Union - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
(2023/C 71/06)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: BE

Defendant: Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság

Interested party: Budapesti Elektromos Művek Zrt

Operative part of the judgment

Article 77(1), Article 78(1) and Article 79(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), read in the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
must be interpreted as permitting the remedies provided for in Article 77(1) and Article 78(1) of that regulation, on the one hand, and Article 79(1) thereof, on the other, to be exercised concurrently with and independently of each other. It is for the Member States, in accordance with the principle of procedural autonomy, to lay down detailed rules as regards the relationship between those remedies in order to ensure the effective protection of the rights guaranteed by that regulation and the consistent and homogeneous application of its provisions, as well as the right to an effective remedy before a court or tribunal as referred to in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.


(1)  OJ C 206, 31.5.2021.
Case C-356/21: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie — Poland) — J.K. v TP S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Directive 2000/78/EC — Article 3(1)(a) and (c) — Conditions for access to self-employment — Employment and working conditions — Prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation — Self-employed person working on the basis of a contract for specific work — Termination and non-renewal of contract — Freedom to choose a contracting party)
Date: 2023-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, equal treatment, self-employed person, termination of a contract








C_2023071EN.01000901.xml










27.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 71/9






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie — Poland) — J.K. v TP S.A.
(Case C-356/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Directive 2000/78/EC - Article 3(1)(a) and (c) - Conditions for access to self-employment - Employment and working conditions - Prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation - Self-employed person working on the basis of a contract for specific work - Termination and non-renewal of contract - Freedom to choose a contracting party)
(2023/C 71/10)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: J.K.

Defendant: TP S.A.

Intervening party: PTPA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1)(a) and (c) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation
must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which has the effect of excluding, on the basis of the freedom of choice of contracting parties, from the protection against discrimination to be conferred by that directive, the refusal, based on the sexual orientation of a person, to conclude or renew with that person a contract concerning the performance of specific work by that person in the context of the pursuit of a self-employed activity.


(1)  OJ C 391, 27.9.2021.
Case C-359/21: Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — ‘MS Konsultanti’ SIA v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (Removal from the Register)
Date: 2023-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: commercial transaction, money laundering, terrorism financing








C_2023071EN.01001301.xml










27.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 71/13






Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — ‘MS Konsultanti’ SIA v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
(Case C-359/21) (1)

(Removal from the Register)
(2023/C 71/15)
Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Administratīvā rajona tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant:‘MS Konsultanti’ SIA

Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Operative part of the order

Case C-359/21 is removed from the Register of the Court.


(1)  Date of filing: 8.6.2021
Case C-506/22, SNI: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Câmpina — Romania) — criminal proceedings against SNI (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court — Requirement to state the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation — Lack of sufficient details — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2023-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, corruption, criminal proceedings, judicial reform, limitation of legal proceedings, traffic offence








C_2023083EN.01000701.xml










6.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 83/7






Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Câmpina — Romania) — criminal proceedings against SNI
(Case C-506/22, (1) SNI)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court - Requirement to state the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation - Lack of sufficient details - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2023/C 83/08)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Judecătoria Câmpina

Party to the main criminal proceedings

SNI

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Judecătoria Câmpina (Court of First Instance, Câmpina, Romania) by decision of 1 July 2022 is manifestly inadmissible


(1)  Date lodged: 26.7.2022.
Case C-154/21: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — RW v Österreichische Post AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 15(1)(c) — Data subject’s right of access to his or her data — Information about the recipients or categories of recipient to whom the personal data have been or will be disclosed — Restrictions)
Date: 2023-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to information, data protection, data-processing law, personal data, protection of privacy








C_2023071EN.01000701.xml










27.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 71/7






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — RW v Österreichische Post AG
(Case C-154/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Article 15(1)(c) - Data subject’s right of access to his or her data - Information about the recipients or categories of recipient to whom the personal data have been or will be disclosed - Restrictions)
(2023/C 71/07)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: RW

Defendant: Österreichische Post AG

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation),
must be interpreted as meaning that the data subject’s right of access to the personal data concerning him or her, provided for by that provision, entails, where those data have been or will be disclosed to recipients, an obligation on the part of the controller to provide the data subject with the actual identity of those recipients, unless it is impossible to identify those recipients or the controller demonstrates that the data subject’s requests for access are manifestly unfounded or excessive within the meaning of Article 12(5) of Regulation 2016/679, in which cases the controller may indicate to the data subject only the categories of recipient in question.


(1)  OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.
Special report 01/2023: ‘Tools facilitating travel within the EU during the COVID-19 pandemic - Relevant initiatives with impact ranging from success to limited use’ 2023/C 10/05
Date: 2023-01-12
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU Member State, area of freedom, security and justice, coronavirus disease, disease prevention, epidemic, external border of the EU, free movement of persons, internal border of the EU, public health, travel








C_2023010EN.01000601.xml










12.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 10/6






Special report 01/2023:
‘Tools facilitating travel within the EU during the COVID-19 pandemic - Relevant initiatives with impact ranging from success to limited use’
(2023/C 10/05)
The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 01/2023: ‘Tools facilitating travel within the EU during the COVID-19 pandemic - Relevant initiatives with impact ranging from success to limited use’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=62947
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2581 of 20 June 2022 laying down implementing technical standards for the application of Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to provision of information in applications for authorisation of a credit institution (Official Journal of the European Union L 335 of 29 December 2022)
Date: 2023-01-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU banking union, banking supervision, credit institution, exchange of information, financial supervision, technical standard, trade information, trade licence








L_2023010EN.01011301.xml










12.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 10/113







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2581 of 20 June 2022 laying down implementing technical standards for the application of Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to provision of information in applications for authorisation of a credit institution

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 335 of 29 December 2022
)


On page 86, in footnote 2:
for:


                  ‘Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/2580 of 17 June 2022 supplementing Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the information to be provided in the application for the authorisation as a credit institution, and specifying the obstacles which may prevent the effective exercise of supervisory functions of competent authorities (OJ L 335, XX.XX.XXXX, p. 64).’,

read:


                  ‘Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/2580 of 17 June 2022 supplementing Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the information to be provided in the application for the authorisation as a credit institution, and specifying the obstacles which may prevent the effective exercise of supervisory functions of competent authorities (OJ L 335, 29.12.2022, p. 64).’.

On page 87, in Article 3:
for:


                  ‘This Regulation shall apply to applications for authorisation as a credit institution submitted on or after XX.XX.XXXX.’,

read:


                  ‘This Regulation shall apply to applications for authorisation as a credit institution submitted on or after 18 July 2023.’.

On page 87, in Article 4:
for:


                  ‘This Regulation shall apply from the XX.XX.XXXX.’,

read:


                  ‘This Regulation shall apply from 18 July 2023.’.

On page 88, in Annex, in footnote 1:
for:


                  ‘OJ L 335, XX.XX.XXXX, p. 64.’,

read:


                  ‘
                  OJ L 335, 29.12.2022, p. 64.’.
Case C-719/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 January 2023 — Frédéric Jouvin v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 101 TFEU — Complaint submitted to the European Commission — Commission Decision rejecting the complaint — Action for annulment — Time limit for lodging a response)
Date: 2023-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU competition policy, administrative procedure, cartel, control of restrictive practices, logistics, patent, postal service, standardisation








C_2023071EN.01001201.xml










27.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 71/12






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 January 2023 — Frédéric Jouvin v European Commission
(Case C-719/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 101 TFEU - Complaint submitted to the European Commission - Commission Decision rejecting the complaint - Action for annulment - Time limit for lodging a response)
(2023/C 71/13)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Frédéric Jouvin (represented by: L. Bôle-Richard, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Boitos, B. Ernst and A. Keidel, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Frédéric Jouvin to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/2580 of 17 June 2022 supplementing Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the information to be provided in the application for the authorisation as a credit institution, and specifying the obstacles which may prevent the effective exercise of supervisory functions of competent authorities (Official Journal of the European Union L 335 of 29 December 2022)
Date: 2023-01-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU banking union, banking supervision, credit institution, exchange of information, financial supervision, technical standard, trade information, trade licence








L_2023010EN.01011201.xml










12.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 10/112







Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/2580 of 17 June 2022 supplementing Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the information to be provided in the application for the authorisation as a credit institution, and specifying the obstacles which may prevent the effective exercise of supervisory functions of competent authorities

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 335 of 29 December 2022
)


On page 66, in recital 14:
for:


                  ‘This Regulation should apply from XX.XX.XXXX in order to grant the competent authorities and applicant credit institutions sufficient time to comply with the requirements laid down in this Regulation.’,

read:


                  ‘This Regulation should apply from 18 July 2023 in order to grant the competent authorities and applicant credit institutions sufficient time to comply with the requirements laid down in this Regulation.’.

On page 75, in Article 13:
for:


                  ‘This Regulation shall apply from XX.XX.XXXX.’,

read:


                  ‘This Regulation shall apply from 18 July 2023.’.
Case C-698/22, TP and OF: Order of the President of the Court of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad — Varna — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against TP, OF
Date: 2023-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: customs formalities, drug traffic, illicit trade, import, psychotropic substance, surveillance concerning imports, trade intermediary








C_2023164EN.01003402.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/34






Order of the President of the Court of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad — Varna — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against TP, OF
(Case C-698/22, (1) TP and OF)
(2023/C 164/46)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 35, 30.1.2023.
Case C-8/23, Conseil national de l’ordre des médecins: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 12 January 2023 — FH v Conseil national de l’ordre des médecins
Date: 2023-01-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU national, medical specialisation, medical training, physician, professional qualifications, recognition of diplomas, recognition of vocational training qualifications, third country








C_2023127EN.01001801.xml










11.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 127/18






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 12 January 2023 — FH v Conseil national de l’ordre des médecins
(Case C-8/23, Conseil national de l’ordre des médecins)
(2023/C 127/21)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: FH

Defendant: Conseil national de l’ordre des médecins

Other parties to the proceedings: Ministère de la Santé et de la Prévention, Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique

Question referred

May a doctor who is a national of one of the Member States of the European Union and who holds evidence of a formal qualification as a specialised doctor issued in a Member State as referred to in point 5.1.2 of Annex V to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, (1) rely, in another Member State, on the basis of that qualification alone, on the system for the automatic recognition of formal qualifications set out in Article 21 of that directive, even though he or she holds evidence of a formal qualification in basic medical training issued by a third State which has been recognised only by the Member State in which he or she obtained the diploma as a specialised doctor and which is not among those referred to in point 5.1.1 of Annex V to that directive, and Article 25(4) of the directive makes the issuance of evidence of a formal qualification as a specialised doctor contingent on possession of evidence of one of those formal qualifications in basic medical training?


(1)  OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22.