do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-317/21, G-Finance: Order of the President of the Court of 28 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg — Luxembourg) — G-Finance SARL, DV v Luxembourg Business Registers
Date: 2022-12-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: amendment of a law, confidentiality, entrepreneur, equal treatment, money laundering, principle of proportionality, terrorism financing








C_2023164EN.01003302.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/33






Order of the President of the Court of 28 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg — Luxembourg) — G-Finance SARL, DV v Luxembourg Business Registers
(Case C-317/21, (1) G-Finance)
(2023/C 164/44)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 297, 26.7.2021.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 27 December 2022 2022/C 494/04
Date: 2022-12-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022494EN.01001201.xml










28.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 494/12







Euro exchange rates (1)


            27 December 2022
         
(2022/C 494/04)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0624 




JPY


Japanese yen


141,68 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4366 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88333 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,1285 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9885 




ISK


Iceland króna


152,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,4895 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,260 




HUF


Hungarian forint


401,65 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6683 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9270 




TRY


Turkish lira


19,8799 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5770 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4384 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2874 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6916 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4300 




KRW


South Korean won


1 349,85 




ZAR


South African rand


18,3181 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3994 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5375 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 620,58 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6990 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,356 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,775 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,6035 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,5515 




INR


Indian rupee


88,0808 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-791/22, Hauptzollamt Braunschweig: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 28 December 2022 — G.A. v Hauptzollamt Braunschweig
Date: 2022-12-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, customs debt, import (EU)








C_2023155EN.01002602.xml










2.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/26






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 28 December 2022 — G.A. v Hauptzollamt Braunschweig
(Case C-791/22, Hauptzollamt Braunschweig)
(2023/C 155/32)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: G.A.

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Braunschweig

Question referred

Is Directive 2006/112/EC (1) and, in particular, Articles 30 and 60 thereof, infringed where Article 215(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (2) is declared under a national provision to be applicable mutatis mutandis to import VAT?


(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

(2)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1).
Case C-790/22, Bürgermeister der Landeshauptstadt Innsbruck: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 28 December 2022 — R GmbH v Bürgermeister der Landeshauptstadt Innsbruck
Date: 2022-12-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Food Safety Authority, food additive, food consumption, food safety, foodstuffs legislation








C_2023094EN.01002501.xml










13.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/25






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 28 December 2022 — R GmbH v Bürgermeister der Landeshauptstadt Innsbruck
(Case C-790/22, Bürgermeister der Landeshauptstadt Innsbruck)
(2023/C 94/28)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: R GmbH

Respondent authority: Bürgermeister der Landeshauptstadt Innsbruck

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 14(2)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, (1) read in conjunction with Article 14(5) thereof, be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State or an interpretation of that legislation whereby a food is to be regarded as unfit for human consumption if its usability in accordance with its intended purpose is not guaranteed, without any of the reasons set out in Article 14(5) of Regulation No 178/2002 for food being unacceptable for human consumption (contamination by extraneous matter or otherwise, or putrefaction, deterioration or decay) having to be present?
If the first question is answered in the negative:










2.


Must Article 14(2)(b) of Regulation No 178/2002, read in conjunction with Article 14(5) thereof, be interpreted as meaning that a food must be considered to be unfit for human consumption if, when consumed as intended, it significantly exceeds (fivefold, in the case of an average adult with a body weight of 70 kg) a level regarded by the European Food Safety Authority, in its evaluation of a food additive (contained in the food), as the acceptable daily intake (ADI)?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (OJ 2002 L 31, p. 1).
Case C-304/22, PM: Order of the President of the Court of 28 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin — Germany) — PM v Senatsverwaltung für Justiz, Vielfalt und Antidiskriminierung, interested party: CM
Date: 2022-12-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil code, divorce, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, official document








C_2023112EN.01002901.xml










27.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/29






Order of the President of the Court of 28 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin — Germany) — PM v Senatsverwaltung für Justiz, Vielfalt und Antidiskriminierung, interested party: CM
(Case C-304/22, (1) PM)
(2023/C 112/37)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 318, 22.8.2022.
Networking of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority's (EFSA’s) mission 2022/C 494/02
Date: 2022-12-28
Institutions: European Food Safety Authority
Subjects: EU Member State, consumer protection, food inspection, food safety, institutional cooperation








C_2022494EN.01000801.xml










28.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 494/8







Networking of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority's (EFSA’s) mission
(2022/C 494/02)

Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 (1), Article 36(2), provides that the European Food Safety Authority's ‘Management Board, acting on a proposal from the Executive Director, shall draw up a list to be made public of competent organisations designated by the Member States which may assist the Authority, either individually or in networks, with its mission.’
      
The list was first drawn up by EFSA’s Management Board on 19 December 2006, and since then is:






i.


updated regularly, on the basis of proposals from EFSA’s Executive Director, taking account of reviews or new designation proposals from the Member States (in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 2230/2004, Article 2(4) (2)), and










ii.


made public on EFSA’s website, where the latest updated list of competent organisations is published.




This respective information is available on the EFSA website, at the following locations:






i.


the latest amendment to the list of competent organisations by EFSA’s Management Board on 15 December 2022 –
https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/events/93rd-management-board-web-meeting, and










ii.


the updated list of competent organisations – http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/partnersnetworks/scorg.




EFSA will keep this Notice updated, specifically regarding the provided website links.
For more information please contact Cooperation.Article36@efsa.europa.eu.


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1).

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2230/2004 of 23 December 2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 with regard to the network of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority’s mission (OJ L 379, 24.12.2004, p. 64), as last amended.
Case C-788/22 P: Appeal brought on 28 December 2022 by Louis Vuitton Malletier against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 19 October 2022 in Case T-275/21, Louis Vuitton Malletier v EUIPO — Wisniewski
Date: 2022-12-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, leather, personal effects, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023164EN.01002701.xml










8.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/27






Appeal brought on 28 December 2022 by Louis Vuitton Malletier against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 19 October 2022 in Case T-275/21, Louis Vuitton Malletier v EUIPO — Wisniewski
(Case C-788/22 P)
(2023/C 164/34)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Louis Vuitton Malletier SAS (represented by: P. Roncaglia and N. Parrotta, avvocati, and P.-Y. Gautier, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 21 March 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Louis Vuitton Malletier SAS should bear its own costs.