Case C-404/21: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Asti — Italy) — WP v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale, Repubblica italiana (Reference for a preliminary ruling — European Central Bank (ECB) staff members — Transfer of pension rights acquired in a national pension scheme to the ECB pension scheme — Article 4(3) TEU — Principle of sincere cooperation — ECB Conditions of Employment — Article 8 of Annex IIIa — No provision of national law or agreement between the Member State concerned and the ECB)
Date: 2022-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Central Bank, servant (EU), social security legislation, staff regulations (EU), transfer of pension rights








C_2023063EN.01000602.xml










20.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/6






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Asti — Italy) — WP v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale, Repubblica italiana
(Case C-404/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - European Central Bank (ECB) staff members - Transfer of pension rights acquired in a national pension scheme to the ECB pension scheme - Article 4(3) TEU - Principle of sincere cooperation - ECB Conditions of Employment - Article 8 of Annex IIIa - No provision of national law or agreement between the Member State concerned and the ECB)
(2023/C 63/08)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Asti

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: WP

Defendants: Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale, Repubblica italiana

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Articles 45 and 48 TFEU, Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations and Article 8(a) of Annex IIIa to the Decision of the European Central Bank of 9 June 1998 on the adoption of the Conditions of Employment for Staff of the European Central Bank as amended on 31 March 1999,
must be interpreted as not precluding, in the absence of an agreement between the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Member State concerned, legislation or an administrative practice of that Member State which does not allow an ECB staff member to transfer, to the ECB pension scheme, an amount corresponding to the pension rights he or she has acquired under the pension scheme of that Member State. However, Article 4(3) TEU requires, in accordance with the principle of sincere cooperation enshrined in that provision, that a Member State to which the conclusion of an agreement is proposed by the ECB, pursuant to Article 8(a) of Annex IIIa, on the transfer, to the ECB pension scheme, of pension rights acquired by its staff members under the pension scheme of that Member State, must participate actively and in good faith in negotiations with the ECB with a view to entering into an agreement with the latter following the opening of negotiations.










2.


EU law must be interpreted as not authorising a court of a Member State seised by a European Central Bank (ECB) staff member to order the transfer to the ECB pension scheme of pension rights acquired by the person concerned under the pension scheme of that Member State, in the absence of a provision of national law or an agreement between the Member State concerned and the ECB providing for such a transfer. However, where, owing to the breach, by that Member State, of its obligation, arising from the principle of sincere cooperation enshrined in Article 4(3) TEU, to participate actively and in good faith in negotiations with the ECB with a view to concluding an agreement on the transfer of pension rights, that ECB staff member is unable to have the pension rights which he or she has acquired under the pension scheme of that Member State transferred to the ECB pension scheme, that provision requires that such a national court take all the measures provided by national procedural rules so as to ensure that that obligation is fulfilled by the competent national authority.






(1)  OJ C 357, 6.9.2021.