do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-778/22, flightright: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 22 December 2022 — flightright GmbH v TAP Portugal
Date: 2022-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carriage of passengers, carrier, consumer protection, indemnification, low cost airline, traveller








C_2023112EN.01002502.xml










27.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/25






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 22 December 2022 — flightright GmbH v TAP Portugal
(Case C-778/22, flightright)
(2023/C 112/33)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: flightright GmbH

Defendant: TAP Portugal

Question referred

Is Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an air carrier must offer a passenger who has missed a connecting flight due to extraordinary circumstances the earliest possible re-routing option — a transfer connection without check-through — which allows the passengers to reach their destination 5 hours and 15 minutes earlier compared to a later direct flight the next day, although still 18 hours and 15 minutes late, and which requires the passenger to take three flights instead of one direct flight and to collect their baggage at both transfer airports, leave the secured area, and check in themselves and their baggage for each of the new flights two hours before the planned departure time, before proceeding once more through security, in which two of the flights concerned are operated by domestic Brazilian air carriers, one of which is a ‘low-cost’ airline?


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).
Case C-780/22 P: Appeal brought on 22 December 2022 by Zaun Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 19 October 2022 in Case T-231/21, Praesidiad v EUIPO — Zaun (Poteau)
Date: 2022-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: building materials, designs and models, product design








C_2023189EN.01000701.xml










30.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/7






Appeal brought on 22 December 2022 by Zaun Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 19 October 2022 in Case T-231/21, Praesidiad v EUIPO — Zaun (Poteau)
(Case C-780/22 P)
(2023/C 189/09)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Zaun Ltd (represented by: C. Weber, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Praesidiad Holding
By order of 17 April 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Zaun Ltd should bear its own costs.
Case C-68/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 December 2022 — European Investment Bank v KL (Appeal — Civil service — Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) — Concept of ‘invalidity’ — Declaration of fitness to work — Unjustified absence — Action for annulment and for damages)
Date: 2022-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European official, absenteeism, damages, disabled person, incapacity for work, worker with disabilities








C_2023063EN.01001001.xml










20.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/10






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 December 2022 — European Investment Bank v KL
(Case C-68/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) - Concept of ‘invalidity’ - Declaration of fitness to work - Unjustified absence - Action for annulment and for damages)
(2023/C 63/12)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo and I. Zanin, acting as Agents, and by A. Duron, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: KL (represented by: A. Champetier and L. Levi, avocates)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the European Investment Bank (EIB) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by KL.






(1)  OJ C 213, 30.5.2022.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 21 December 2022 2022/C 487/05
Date: 2022-12-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022487EN.01000701.xml










22.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 487/7






Euro exchange rates (1)

21 December 2022
(2022/C 487/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0636 




JPY


Japanese yen


140,29 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4380 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87651 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0623 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9836 




ISK


Iceland króna


152,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,4309 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,218 




HUF


Hungarian forint


402,93 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6665 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8937 




TRY


Turkish lira


19,8541 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5859 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4475 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2902 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6850 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4366 




KRW


South Korean won


1 367,63 




ZAR


South African rand


18,3529 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,4219 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5419 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 573,77 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7197 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,556 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,907 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,4913 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,9919 




INR


Indian rupee


88,1090 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-246/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 — European Parliament v Giulia Moi (Appeal — Law governing the institutions — Member of the European Parliament — Principle of ne ultra petita — Subject matter of the dispute — Rights of the defence — Article 232 TFEU — Operating arrangements of the Parliament — Sixth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Cross-appeal)
Date: 2022-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, administrative sanction, allowances and expenses, disciplinary proceedings, financial interests of members, harassment at work, psychological harassment, rights of the defence, servant (EU)








C_2023063EN.01000201.xml










20.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/2






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 — European Parliament v Giulia Moi
(Case C-246/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Law governing the institutions - Member of the European Parliament - Principle of ne ultra petita - Subject matter of the dispute - Rights of the defence - Article 232 TFEU - Operating arrangements of the Parliament - Sixth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Time limit for bringing proceedings - Cross-appeal)
(2023/C 63/02)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: European Parliament (represented by: T. Lazian, S. Seyr and M. Windisch, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Giulia Moi (represented by: M. Pisano and P. Setzu, avvocati)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal;










2.


Orders the European Parliament to pay the costs relating to the main appeal;










3.


Orders Ms Giulia Moi to pay the costs relating to the cross-appeal.






(1)  OJ C 228, 14.6.2021.
Case T-480/21: Order of the General Court of 22 December 2022 — British Airways v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Annulment by the General Court — Refusal of the Commission to pay default interest — Remedies — Limitation period — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Out of time — Act confirming a previous measure — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2022-12-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: air transport, carriage of goods, cartel, damages, interest, international cartel, limitation of legal proceedings








C_2023071EN.01002901.xml










27.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 71/29






Order of the General Court of 22 December 2022 — British Airways v Commission
(Case T-480/21) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for airfreight - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport - Annulment by the General Court - Refusal of the Commission to pay default interest - Remedies - Limitation period - Time limit for bringing proceedings - Out of time - Act confirming a previous measure - Inadmissibility)
(2023/C 71/38)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: British Airways plc (Harmondsworth, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Lyle-Smythe and R. O’Donoghue, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Khan, P. Rossi and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action, which it states is based on Article 263 TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 266 TFEU, Article 268 TFEU and the second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU, the applicant, British Airways plc, requests the Court, first, to order the European Commission to pay it the amount of default interest and compound interest allegedly due and, second, to annul the letter of 30 April 2021 and the letter of 2 July 2021, by which the Commission refused to pay it the said interest.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


British Airways plc shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 391, 27.9.2021.
Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2022 (Official Journal of the European Union C 141 of 29 March 2022) 2022/C 489/12
Date: 2022-12-22
Institutions: European Environment Agency
Subjects: EU expenditure, budgetary resources, financial year, general budget (EU), publication of accounts








C_2022489EN.01006301.xml










22.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 489/63






Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2022

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 141 of 29 March 2022
)

(2022/C 489/12)
On page 13, Revenue, Chapter 2.2
for:










Title
Chapter


Heading


Financial year 2022


Financial year 2021


Financial year 2020




‘2




MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE



 


 


 




…


 


 


 


 




2 2


CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER SPECIFIC AGREEMENTS – ASSIGNED REVENUE (1)


29 459 000 


13 449 000 


15 618 000 ,—




…


 


 


 


 




 



Title 2 – Total




29 459 000 




13 449 000 




15 618 000 ,—





 



GRAND TOTAL




85 296 021 




64 867 177 




63 229 067 ,—’





read:










Title
Chapter


Heading


Financial year 2022


Financial year 2021


Financial year 2020




‘2




MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE



 


 


 




…


 


 


 


 




2 2


CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER SPECIFIC AGREEMENTS – ASSIGNED REVENUE (1)


30 036 000 


13 449 000 


15 618 000 ,—




…


 


 


 


 




 



Title 2 – Total




30 036 000 




13 449 000 




15 618 000 ,—





 



GRAND TOTAL




85 873 021 




64 867 177 




63 229 067 ,—’