do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-772/22, Air Berlín: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Palma de Mallorca (Spain) lodged on 19 December 2022 — Victoriano and Others v Air Berlín PLC & CO Luftverkehrs KG, Sucursal en España, Air Berlín PLC & CO Luftverkehrs KG
Date: 2022-12-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, claim, financial solvency, judicial proceedings, liquidation, right of action, seizure of goods, work contract








C_2023121EN.01000502.xml










3.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 121/5






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Palma de Mallorca (Spain) lodged on 19 December 2022 — Victoriano and Others v Air Berlín PLC & CO Luftverkehrs KG, Sucursal en España, Air Berlín PLC & CO Luftverkehrs KG
(Case C-772/22, Air Berlín)
(2023/C 121/08)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Palma de Mallorca

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Victoriano, Bernabé, Jacinta, Sandra, Patricia, Juan Antonio, Verónica

Defendants: Air Berlín PLC & CO Luftverkehrs KG, Sucursal en España, Air Berlín PLC & CO Luftverkehrs KG

Questions referred

In the main qualified universal proceedings outlined by Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings, (1) in which it is permissible to open secondary proceedings that apply exclusively to assets situated in the State where the proceedings are opened:






(1)


May Article 3(2) and Article 34 of the Regulation be interpreted as meaning that the assets situated in the State of the opening of secondary proceedings, to which the effects of the proceedings are restricted, are only the assets existing at the time the secondary proceedings are opened and not those that existed when the main proceedings were opened?










(2)


May Article 21(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/848 be interpreted as meaning that the decision of the insolvency practitioner in the main insolvency proceedings to remove assets, without requesting the opening of secondary proceedings or avoiding the opening of such proceedings by offering a unilateral undertaking under Articles 36 and 37, is in conformity with the power to remove the debtor’s assets from the territory of the Member State in which they are situated where it is apparent to that practitioner that there are local creditors with claims arising from employment contracts that have been recognised by judgments and a protective attachment of assets ordered by an employment court of that Member State?










(3)


May Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/848 be interpreted as meaning that the power to bring actions to set aside in the interests of creditors conferred on the insolvency practitioner in the secondary insolvency proceedings applies to a situation such as that described, in which it is sought to revoke an act performed by the insolvency practitioner appointed in the main insolvency proceedings?






(1)  
            OJ 2015 L 141, p. 19.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/1002 of 21 June 2021 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (Official Journal of the European Union L 219 I of 21 June 2021)
Date: 2022-12-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, air safety, arrest, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, legal person, natural person








L_2022323EN.01010601.xml










19.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 323/106







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/1002 of 21 June 2021 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 219 I of 21 June 2021
)


On page 84, in the Annex, entry 125, under the heading ‘Identifying Information’:
for:


                  ‘DOB: 09.05.1958
                  ’,

read:


                  ‘DOB: 09.03.1958
                  ’.
Case T-522/21: Order of the General Court of 19 December 2022 — XH v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2020 promotion exercise — Decision refusing to amend the applicant’s Sysper 2 file — Decision not to promote the applicant — Time limits for lodging an appeal — Public policy nature — Starting point — Application for legal aid — Suspension of time limits — Computation of time limits — Lateness — Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure — Excusable error — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2022-12-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, indemnification, promotion, staff regulations (EU)








C_2023063EN.01004702.xml










20.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/47






Order of the General Court of 19 December 2022 — XH v Commission
(Case T-522/21) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Promotion - 2020 promotion exercise - Decision refusing to amend the applicant’s Sysper 2 file - Decision not to promote the applicant - Time limits for lodging an appeal - Public policy nature - Starting point - Application for legal aid - Suspension of time limits - Computation of time limits - Lateness - Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure - Excusable error - Inadmissibility)
(2023/C 63/61)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: XH (represented by: K. Górny-Salwarowska, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff, L. Hohenecker and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 24 November 2020 refusing to amend her Sysper 2 file, confirmed by decision of 16 June 2021 rejecting her complaint, secondly, annulment of the decision of the Commission of 12 November 2020 not to include her name on the list of officials promoted in 2020, confirmed by decision of 8 June 2021 rejecting her complaint, and, thirdly, compensation for the damage suffered.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


XH is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 237, 20.6.2022.
Case C-770/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova (Italy) lodged on 19 December 2022 — OSTP Italy Srl v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ufficio delle Dogane di Genova 1, Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ufficio delle dogane di Genova 2 and Agenzia delle Entrate — Riscossione — Genova
Date: 2022-12-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: customs regulations, enforcement of ruling, injunction, own resources, tax








C_2023121EN.01000501.xml










3.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 121/5






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova (Italy) lodged on 19 December 2022 — OSTP Italy Srl v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ufficio delle Dogane di Genova 1, Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ufficio delle dogane di Genova 2 and Agenzia delle Entrate — Riscossione — Genova
(Case C-770/22)
(2023/C 121/07)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: OSTP Italy Srl

Defendants: Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ufficio delle Dogane di Genova 1, Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ufficio delle dogane di Genova 2, Agenzia delle Entrate — Riscossione — Genova

Question referred

May Articles 43, 44 and 45 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 (1) be interpreted as precluding the compatibility with EU law of national legislation which provides for the immediate enforceability of judgments delivered at first instance by national courts, which have the effect of annulling, in whole or in part, tax payment orders relating to the European Union’s own resources?


(1)  Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (recast) (OJ 2013 L 269, p. 1).
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/997 of 21 June 2021 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (Official Journal of the European Union L 219 I of 21 June 2021)
Date: 2022-12-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, air safety, arrest, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, legal person, natural person








L_2022323EN.01010701.xml










19.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 323/107







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/997 of 21 June 2021 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 219 I of 21 June 2021
)


On page 20, in the Annex, entry 125, under the heading ‘Identifying Information’:
for:


                  ‘DOB: 09.05.1958
                  ’,

read:


                  ‘DOB: 09.03.1958
                  ’.
Case T-76/22: Order of the General Court of 19 December 2022 — Schwa-Medico v EUIPO — Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte (STIWELL)
Date: 2022-12-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, medical device, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023063EN.01006802.xml










20.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/68






Order of the General Court of 19 December 2022 — Schwa-Medico v EUIPO — Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte (STIWELL)
(Case T-76/22) (1)

(2023/C 63/87)
Language of the case: French
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 148, 4.4.2022.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 16 December 2022 2022/C 481/02
Date: 2022-12-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022481EN.01000401.xml










19.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 481/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

16 December 2022
(2022/C 481/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0619 




JPY


Japanese yen


145,53 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4379 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87233 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0153 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9879 




ISK


Iceland króna


150,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,4833 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,262 




HUF


Hungarian forint


407,10 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6925 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9213 




TRY


Turkish lira


19,8039 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5866 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4506 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2632 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6687 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4413 




KRW


South Korean won


1 389,70 




ZAR


South African rand


18,6708 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,4037 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5385 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 575,47 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6984 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,967 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,145 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,6233 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,0634 




INR


Indian rupee


87,8240 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-788/22: Action brought on 19 December 2022 — PT v Commission
Date: 2022-12-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: claim, seniority, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU), transfer of pension rights








C_2023063EN.01006001.xml










20.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/60






Action brought on 19 December 2022 — PT v Commission
(Case T-788/22)
(2023/C 63/77)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: PT (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:
Declare and adjudge that






—


the European Commission is ordered to refund to the applicant the updated capital representing her pension rights that she transferred to the Pension Scheme of the European Union Institutions under Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;










—


the European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law.
The applicant relies on unjust enrichment, in so far as she transferred her pension rights into the Pension Scheme of the European Union Institutions (‘PSEUI’), which gave rise to a ‘crediting’ of additional pensionable years recognised in the PSEUI. However, that ‘crediting’ did not give rise to any increase in the amount of pension paid to her under the fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’), the calculation of which is based exclusively on years of service (to the exclusion of additional pensionable years to be credited in respect of the transfer of pension rights).
The refusal to repay the pension rights transferred having no effect where the mechanism of the minimum subsistence figure referred to in the fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations applies, gives rise, according to the applicant, to the unjust enrichment of the European Union.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10944 – MITSUBISHI / HERE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 2/02
Date: 2022-12-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: atlas, consumer, economic concentration, food industry, hydrocarbon, industrial infrastructure, merger control, mineral resources, motor vehicle industry, navigation aid, town planning








C_2023002EN.01001701.xml










4.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 2/17






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10944 – MITSUBISHI / HERE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 2/02)
On 19 December 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10944. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Council Decision (EU) 2022/2540 of 19 December 2022 appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of Belgium, of the European Economic and Social Committee
Date: 2022-12-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Belgium, European Economic and Social Committee, appointment of members








L_2022328EN.01010101.xml










22.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 328/101








            COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2022/2540
of 19 December 2022
         
appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of Belgium, of the European Economic and Social Committee


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (EU) 2019/853 of 21 May 2019 determining the composition of the European Economic and Social Committee (1),


Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,


After consulting the European Commission,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 300(2) of the Treaty, the Economic and Social Committee is to consist of representatives of organisations of employers, of the employed, and of other parties representative of civil society, notably in socio-economic, civic, professional and cultural areas.












(2)


On 2 October 2020, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2020/1392 (2), appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025.












(3)


A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Dominique MICHEL.












(4)


The Belgian Government has proposed Mr Olivier JORIS, Executive Manager du Centre de compétence Europe et International de la Fédération des Entreprises de Belgique (FEB) (Executive Manager, European and International affairs Department, Federation of Enterprises in Belgium), as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2025,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Olivier JORIS, Executive Manager du Centre de compétence Europe et International de la Fédération des Entreprises de Belgique (FEB) (Executive Manager, European and International affairs Department, Federation of Enterprises in Belgium), is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2025.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 19 December 2022.


For the Council


The President

J. SÍKELA
            





(1)  
            OJ L 139, 27.5.2019, p. 15.

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2020/1392 of 2 October 2020 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025, and repealing and replacing the Council Decision appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025 adopted on 18 September 2020 (OJ L 322, 5.10.2020, p. 1).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10907 – REMONDIS / H&M / JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 4/04
Date: 2022-12-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: clothing industry, consumer goods, cosmetic product, economic concentration, merger control, provision of services, public service, textile product, used goods, waste recycling, water management








C_2023004EN.01000401.xml










6.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 4/4






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10907 – REMONDIS / H&M / JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 4/04)
On 19 December 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10907. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10919 – APOLLO / ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 481/04
Date: 2022-12-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: air transport, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, provision of services








C_2022481EN.01000701.xml










19.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 481/7






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10919 – APOLLO / ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 481/04)

1.   
On 9 December 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Apollo Management, L.P. (‘Apollo’, United States),










—


Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (‘Atlas Air’, United States).




Apollo will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Atlas Air.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


Apollo is a global asset manager active in portfolio investments,










—


Atlas Air provides outsourced aircraft and aviation operating services, mostly for cargo, and to a more limited extent, for passengers, and is active in Africa, Asia, Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10919 – APOLLO / ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Notice for the attention of NTV/NTV Mir, Rossiya 1, REN TV, Pervyi Kanal, regarding their inclusion in Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine 2022/C 481 I/04
Date: 2022-12-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, territorial dispute, territorial law








CI2022481EN.01000601.xml










19.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CI 481/6






Notice for the attention of NTV/NTV Mir, Rossiya 1, REN TV, Pervyi Kanal, regarding their inclusion in Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine
(2022/C 481 I/04)
The Council included the abovementioned entities in Annex IX to Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP (1) and in Annex XV to Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine with the view to applying these measures as from 1 February 2023 subject to a decision by the Council after examination of the relevant facts.
The entities concerned are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the information related to such inclusion to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu






(1)  OJ L 229, 31.7.2014, p. 13.

(2)  OJ L 229, 31.7.2014, p. 1.