do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-789/22: Action brought on 16 December 2022 — PB v SRB
Date: 2022-12-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, access to EU information, confidentiality, harassment at work, indemnification, personnel administration, rights of the defence, staff regulations (EU)








C_2023045EN.01003001.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/30






Action brought on 16 December 2022 — PB v SRB
(Case T-789/22)
(2023/C 45/39)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: PB (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the decision of 15 February 2022;










—


annul, in so far as necessary, the decision of 6 September 2022 rejecting the applicant’s complaint;










—


order the defendant to pay the applicant compensation in the amount of EUR 50 000 in respect of the harm suffered as a result of the breach of his right to be heard and of his rights of defence;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action brought against the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) rejecting his request for assistance, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging breach of the applicant’s rights of defence, together with procedural defects. In the first part of the plea, the applicant complains of a breach of the principle of transparency, the impossibility of believing in the independence of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment (‘the AECE’), and the refusal to grant access to the essential information and documents in the case file. In the second part of the plea, the applicant complains of a breach of the principle of confidentiality in processing his request for assistance, the failure to observe procedural guarantees, the failure to implement a fair and objective procedure and, lastly, infringement of Articles 4.2 and 4.3 of the SRB Policy on preventing harassment. In the third part of the plea, the applicant complains of the lack of objective and subjective impartiality and of the presence of conflicts of interest which vitiated the examination of his request for assistance. In the fourth part of the plea, the applicant complains of a breach of his right to be heard in an effective manner by the AECE.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’), breach of the duty to provide assistance and have regard for the welfare of staff, and maladministration.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment and infringement of Article 12a of the Staff Regulations.
Case C-763/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille (France) lodged on 16 December 2022 — Procureur de la République v OP
Date: 2022-12-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, appeal, executive competence, extradition, third country








C_2023112EN.01002301.xml










27.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/23






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille (France) lodged on 16 December 2022 — Procureur de la République v OP
(Case C-763/22)
(2023/C 112/29)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Procureur de la République

Defendant: OP

Question referred

Does Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (1) preclude the legislation of a Member State from granting a governmental authority the power to decide, between a European arrest warrant and a concurrent extradition request issued by a third country, which of the two is to be executed, without any possibility of legal remedy?


(1)  OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10951 – BMF / UNIPER) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 4/06
Date: 2022-12-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, central bank, coal industry, economic concentration, electrical energy, energy industry, energy production, merger control, natural gas, sustainable finance








C_2023004EN.01000601.xml










6.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 4/6






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10951 – BMF / UNIPER)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 4/06)
On 16 December 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10951. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-785/22: Action brought on 16 December 2022 — France v Commission
Date: 2022-12-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Internet site, accounting, assistant, competition (EU), financial management, information technology profession, job vacancy, public procurement, recruitment, social media








C_2023045EN.01002901.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/29






Action brought on 16 December 2022 — France v Commission
(Case T-785/22)
(2023/C 45/38)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: French Republic (represented by: T. Stéhelin, B. Fodda and E. Leclerc, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the notice of Open Competition EPSO/AST/154/22 — assistants (AST 3) in the fields of financial management, accounting and treasury, public procurement, graphic design and visual content production, social and digital media, and webmaster, published 22 September 2022 in the Official Journal of the European Union;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-555/22, France v Commission.
Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2022/1663 2022/C 478/06
Date: 2022-12-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: ADN agreement, ADR agreement, common transport policy, international transport, revision of an agreement, scientific progress, technological change, transport of dangerous goods, transport safety








C_2022478EN.01001901.xml










16.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 478/19






Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2022/1663
(2022/C 478/06)
Pursuant to Article 3 of Council Decision (EU) 2022/1663 of 26 September 2022 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union on the amendments to the Annexes to the Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR) and to the Regulations annexed to the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Inland Waterways (ADN) (1), the Commission informs that the decisions taken at the respective bodies and applicable from 1 January 2023 are available at:
https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/2022/CN.350.2022-Eng.pdf and
https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/2022/CN.325.2022-Eng.pdf


(1)  OJ L 250, 28.9.2022, p. 19.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10963 – BMWK / SEFE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 57/01
Date: 2022-12-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, economic concentration, gas supply, merger control, natural gas, storage of hydrocarbons, supplier, wholesale trade








C_2023057EN.01000101.xml










16.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 57/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10963 – BMWK / SEFE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 57/01)
On 16 December 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10963. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2021 2022/C 478/08
Date: 2022-12-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers
Subjects: financial year, publication of accounts








C_2022478EN.01002101.xml










16.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 478/21






Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2021
(2022/C 478/08)
The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:
https://hadea.ec.europa.eu/about/legal-base-and-key-documents_en
Case T-751/21: Order of the General Court of 16 December 2022 — EMS v EUIPO (AIRFLOW) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark AIRFLOW — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2022-12-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dental medicine, household electrical appliance, medical device, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023063EN.01005001.xml










20.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/50






Order of the General Court of 16 December 2022 — EMS v EUIPO (AIRFLOW)
(Case T-751/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark AIRFLOW - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2023/C 63/65)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: EMS Electro Medical Systems GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: K. Scheib and C. Schulte, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee and E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 September 2021 (Case R 546/2021-4).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


EMS Electro Medical Systems GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.
Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.10859 – TRAFIGURA / ECOBAT RESOURCES STOLBERG) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 478/02
Date: 2022-12-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, North Rhine-Westphalia, by-product, commodities market, economic concentration, lead, merger control, metalwork, mineral resources, petroleum, precious metal








C_2022478EN.01000201.xml










16.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 478/2






Withdrawal of notification of a concentration
(Case M.10859 – TRAFIGURA / ECOBAT RESOURCES STOLBERG)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 478/02)
On 3 November 2022, the European Commission received notification (1) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) (‘Merger Regulation’).
On 30 November 2022, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.


(1)  OJ C 431, 14.11.2022, p. 24.

(2)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-765/22, Air Berlín: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Palma de Mallorca (Spain) lodged on 16 December 2022 — Luis Carlos and Others v Air Berlín PLC & CO Luftverkehrs KG, Sucursal en España
Date: 2022-12-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, claim, financial solvency, judicial proceedings, liquidation








C_2023121EN.01000402.xml










3.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 121/4






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Palma de Mallorca (Spain) lodged on 16 December 2022 — Luis Carlos and Others v Air Berlín PLC & CO Luftverkehrs KG, Sucursal en España
(Case C-765/22, Air Berlín)
(2023/C 121/06)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Palma de Mallorca

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Luis Carlos, Severino, Isidora, Angélica, Paula, Luis Francisco, Delfina

Defendant: Air Berlín PLC & CO Luftverkehrs KG, Sucursal en España

Question referred

In the qualified universal proceedings outlined by Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings, (1) in which it is permissible to open secondary proceedings that apply exclusively to assets situated in the State where the proceedings are opened, can Article 35 and Article 7(1) [and] (2)(g) and (h) in conjunction with recital 72 be interpreted as meaning that application of the law of the State of the opening of the secondary proceedings ‘to the treatment of claims arising after the opening of insolvency proceedings’ relates to claims arising after the opening of the main proceedings rather than of the secondary proceedings?


(1)  
            OJ 2015 L 141, p. 19.
Case C-766/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht München (Germany) lodged on 16 December 2022 — WD v Allane SE
Date: 2022-12-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, distance selling, financial services, termination of a contract, vehicle rental








C_2023112EN.01002302.xml










27.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/23






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht München (Germany) lodged on 16 December 2022 — WD v Allane SE
(Case C-766/22)
(2023/C 112/30)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht München

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: WD

Defendant: Allane SE

Questions referred







1.


Do mileage-dependent leasing contracts entered into with a consumer in respect of a motor vehicle for a term of 24 months constitute ‘car rental services’, meaning that they fall within the scope of the exception from the right of withdrawal under distance marketing law as set out in Article 16(l) of Directive 2011/83/EU? (1)











2.


If Question 1 is answered in the negative:
Do mileage-dependent leasing contracts entered into with a consumer in respect of a motor vehicle constitute contracts for financial services within the meaning of Article 2(b) of Directive 2002/65/EC, (2) which was reproduced by Article 2(12) of Directive 2011/83?






(1)  Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64).

(2)  Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC (OJ 2002 L 271, p. 16).
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 15 December 2022 2022/C 478/07
Date: 2022-12-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022478EN.01002001.xml










16.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 478/20






Euro exchange rates (1)

15 December 2022
(2022/C 478/07)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0621 




JPY


Japanese yen


145,07 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4387 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86194 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,8980 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9862 




ISK


Iceland króna


150,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,4013 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,270 




HUF


Hungarian forint


406,40 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6890 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9220 




TRY


Turkish lira


19,8060 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5695 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4443 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2551 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6628 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4406 




KRW


South Korean won


1 393,97 




ZAR


South African rand


18,3599 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,4007 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5395 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 591,40 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6918 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,297 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,120 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,6247 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,9431 




INR


Indian rupee


87,9355 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.