do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-765/22: Action brought on 8 December 2022 — Azalee Cosmetics v EUIPO — L’Oréal (UK) (LA CRÈME LIBRE)
Date: 2022-12-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, cosmetic product, food supplement, hairdressing and beauty care, registered trade mark, retail selling, trade-mark law








C_2023045EN.01002101.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/21






Action brought on 8 December 2022 — Azalee Cosmetics v EUIPO — L’Oréal (UK) (LA CRÈME LIBRE)
(Case T-765/22)
(2023/C 45/29)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Azalee Cosmetics (Paris, France) (represented by: I. Tribouillet, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: L’Oréal (UK) Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative trade mark LA CREME LIBRE — Application for registration No 18 252 904

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 October 2022 in Case R 229/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the other party to the proceeding before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs and reimburse the applicant for all the costs incurred for the purposes of the opposition and appeal proceedings, including the costs of the appeal.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-764/22: Action brought on 8 December 2022 — bet365 Group/EUIPO (bet365)
Date: 2022-12-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Internet, advertising, business management, consultancy, financial services, gaming, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2023035EN.01007901.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/79






Action brought on 8 December 2022 — bet365 Group/EUIPO (bet365)
(Case T-764/22)
(2023/C 35/99)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: bet365 Group Ltd (Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. van Manen and E. van Gelderen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘bet365’ — Application for registration No 18 479 799

Contested decision: Decision of the Forth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 September 2022 in Case R 622/2022-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-543/22: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court — Ireland) — Save Roscam Peninsula CLG, SC-F, MF, PH, Abbey Park and District Residents Association Baldoyle v An Bord Pleanála, Galway City Council, the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Ireland, the Attorney General and Fingal County Council (Aarhus Convention — Access to justice — Requirement for a procedure which is not prohibitively expensive — Scope — Obligation to interpret in accordance with the national procedural law)
Date: 2022-12-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: UN convention, access to information, disclosure of information, environmental monitoring, environmental protection, legal expenses, national law, right to justice








C_2023063EN.01001201.xml










20.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/12






Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court — Ireland) — Save Roscam Peninsula CLG, SC-F, MF, PH, Abbey Park and District Residents Association Baldoyle v An Bord Pleanála, Galway City Council, the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Ireland, the Attorney General and Fingal County Council
(Case C-543/22) (1)

(Aarhus Convention - Access to justice - Requirement for a procedure which is not prohibitively expensive - Scope - Obligation to interpret in accordance with the national procedural law)
(2023/C 63/16)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court (Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Save Roscam Peninsula CLG, SC-F, MF, PH, Abbey Park and District Residents Association Baldoyle

Defendants: An Bord Pleanála, Galway City Council, the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Ireland, the Attorney General and Fingal County Council

Operative part of the order

By Order of 8 December 2022, the President of the Ninth Chamber ordered the removal of Case C-543/22 from the register.


(1)  Date lodged: 11.8.2022.
Case C-769/21: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — AAS ‘BTA Baltic Insurance Company’ v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs, Tieslietu ministrija (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 18(1) — Principles of equal treatment, transparency and proportionality — Decision to withdraw an invitation to tender — Tenders submitted separately by two tenderers belonging to the same economic operator and constituting the two most economically advantageous tenders — Refusal of the successful tenderer to sign the contract — Decision of the contracting authority to refuse the tender of the next tenderer, terminate the procedure and issue a new call for tenders)
Date: 2022-12-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, equal treatment, invitation to tender, principle of proportionality, public procurement, tendering








C_2023035EN.01001801.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/18






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — AAS ‘BTA Baltic Insurance Company’ v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs, Tieslietu ministrija
(Case C-769/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public procurement - Directive 2014/24/EU - Article 18(1) - Principles of equal treatment, transparency and proportionality - Decision to withdraw an invitation to tender - Tenders submitted separately by two tenderers belonging to the same economic operator and constituting the two most economically advantageous tenders - Refusal of the successful tenderer to sign the contract - Decision of the contracting authority to refuse the tender of the next tenderer, terminate the procedure and issue a new call for tenders)
(2023/C 35/20)
Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Administratīvā rajona tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: AAS ‘BTA Baltic Insurance Company’

Defendants: Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs, Tieslietu ministrija

Operative part of the judgment

The principle of proportionality, within the meaning of Article 18(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC,
must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which requires the contracting authority to terminate a public procurement procedure where, in the event of withdrawal of the tenderer originally selected for having submitted the most economically advantageous tender, the tenderer which submitted the next most economically advantageous tender constitutes with the tenderer originally selected a single economic operator.


(1)  OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.
Case C-750/22 P: Appeal brought on 8 December 2022 by WV against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 5 October 2022 in Case T-618/21, WV v CdT
Date: 2022-12-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: absenteeism, damages, full-time employment, servant (EU), sick leave, staff regulations (EU), termination of employment








C_2023261EN.01000202.xml










24.7.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/2






Appeal brought on 8 December 2022 by WV against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 5 October 2022 in Case T-618/21, WV v CdT

(Case C-750/22 P)
(2023/C 261/03)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: WV (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT)
By order of 13 June 2023, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellant to bear his own costs.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 7 December 2022 2022/C 467/03
Date: 2022-12-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022467EN.01003301.xml










8.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 467/33






Euro exchange rates (1)

7 December 2022
(2022/C 467/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0529 




JPY


Japanese yen


144,44 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4382 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86408 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,9190 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9893 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,5255 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,322 




HUF


Hungarian forint


410,63 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7003 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9180 




TRY


Turkish lira


19,6256 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5728 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4387 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,1997 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6573 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4286 




KRW


South Korean won


1 390,87 




ZAR


South African rand


18,1353 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3476 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5525 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 465,17 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6301 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,432 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,904 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5023 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,7534 




INR


Indian rupee


86,6920 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-731/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg — Luxembourg) — GV v Caisse nationale d’assurance pension (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of persons — Article 45 TFEU — Workers — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(1) and (2) — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Survivor’s pension — Members of a civil partnership — National legislation making the grant of a survivor’s pension conditional upon the entry in the national register of a partnership that was validly concluded and registered in another Member State)
Date: 2022-12-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil union, equal treatment, free movement of workers, social security legislation, survivor's benefit








C_2023035EN.01001702.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/17






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg — Luxembourg) — GV v Caisse nationale d’assurance pension
(Case C-731/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of persons - Article 45 TFEU - Workers - Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 - Article 7(1) and (2) - Equal treatment - Social advantages - Survivor’s pension - Members of a civil partnership - National legislation making the grant of a survivor’s pension conditional upon the entry in the national register of a partnership that was validly concluded and registered in another Member State)
(2023/C 35/19)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: GV

Defendant: Caisse nationale d’assurance pension

Operative part of the judgment

Article 45 TFEU and Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2016/589 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2016,
must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a host Member State which provides that the grant, to the surviving partner of a partnership that was validly entered into and registered in another Member State, of a survivor’s pension due on account of the exercise, in the first Member State, of a professional activity by the deceased partner, is subject to the condition that the partnership was first recorded in the register kept by that State.


(1)  OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.
Case T-234/20: Order of the General Court of 8 December 2022 — HB v EIB (Civil service — Applicant who has ceased to reply to the Court’s requests — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2022-12-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, harassment at work, indemnification, psychological harassment, staff assessment








C_2023071EN.01002701.xml










27.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 71/27






Order of the General Court of 8 December 2022 — HB v EIB
(Case T-234/20) (1)

(Civil service - Applicant who has ceased to reply to the Court’s requests - No need to adjudicate)
(2023/C 71/35)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: HB (represented by: A. Guillerme, T. Bontinck and L. Burguin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: G. Faedo and K. Carr, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, HB, seeks annulment, first, of her 2017 performance appraisal and, second, of the decision of the Adjudication Panel of 21 October 2019, rejecting her appeal against her 2017 performance appraisal.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 215, 29.6.2020.
Case C-464/22: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland)) — Enniskerry Alliance, Enniskerry Demesne Management Company CLG and Protect East Meath Limited v An Bord Pleanála, the Attorney General, Ireland and Louth County Council (Environment — Aarhus Convention — Access to justice — Requirement for a procedure which is not prohibitively expensive — Scope — Obligation to interpret in accordance with the national procedural law)
Date: 2022-12-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: UN convention, access to information, disclosure of information, environmental monitoring, environmental protection, legal expenses, national law, right to justice








C_2023063EN.01001102.xml










20.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/11






Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland)) — Enniskerry Alliance, Enniskerry Demesne Management Company CLG and Protect East Meath Limited v An Bord Pleanála, the Attorney General, Ireland and Louth County Council
(Case C-464/22) (1)

(Environment - Aarhus Convention - Access to justice - Requirement for a procedure which is not prohibitively expensive - Scope - Obligation to interpret in accordance with the national procedural law)
(2023/C 63/15)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court (Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Enniskerry Alliance, Enniskerry Demesne Management Company CLG and Protect East Meath Limited

Defendants: An Bord Pleanála, the Attorney General, Ireland and Louth County Council

Operative part of the order

By Order of 8 December 2022, the President of the Ninth Chamber ordered the removal of Case C-464/22 from the register.


(1)  Date lodged: 11.7.2022.
Special report 24/2022: ‘e-Government actions targeting businesses – Commission’s actions implemented, but availability of e-services still varies across the EU’ 2022/C 467/04
Date: 2022-12-08
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: action programme, administrative formalities, business policy, data protection, data transmission, digital single market, digital transformation, electronic government, information technology applications, public service








C_2022467EN.01003401.xml










8.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 467/34






Special report 24/2022: ‘e-Government actions targeting businesses – Commission’s actions implemented, but availability of e-services still varies across the EU’
(2022/C 467/04)
The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 24/2022: ‘e-Government actions targeting businesses – Commission’s actions implemented, but availability of e-services still varies across the EU’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=62438
Calls for proposals and related activities under the EIC Work Programme 2023 under Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) 2022/C 467/05
Date: 2022-12-08
Institutions: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission
Subjects: EU programme, Framework Programme for Research and Development, action programme, innovation, invitation to tender, research and development








C_2022467EN.01003501.xml










8.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 467/35






Calls for proposals and related activities under the EIC Work Programme 2023 under Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027)
(2022/C 467/05)
Notice is hereby given of the launch of calls for proposals and related activities under the EIC Work Programme 2023 under Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027).
The Commission has adopted the EIC Work Programme 2023 by Decision C(2022)8600 of 7 December 2022.
Proposals are invited for these calls. The EIC Work Programme 2023, including deadlines and budgets, is available through the EU Funding and Tender Opportunities portal along with information on the modalities of the calls and related activities and the information for applicants on how to submit proposals:






 


https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/home
Case C-378/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht — Austria) — P GmbH v Finanzamt Österreich (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 203 — Adjustment of the VAT return — Recipients of services who are not entitled to make deductions — No risk of loss of tax revenue)
Date: 2022-12-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, consumer, invoicing, provision of services, tax collection, tax harmonisation, tax relief, tax return








C_2023035EN.01001001.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/10






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht — Austria) — P GmbH v Finanzamt Österreich
(Case C-378/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Harmonisation of fiscal legislation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 203 - Adjustment of the VAT return - Recipients of services who are not entitled to make deductions - No risk of loss of tax revenue)
(2023/C 35/11)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: P GmbH

Defendant: Finanzamt Österreich

Operative part of the judgment

Article 203 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive (EU) 2016/1065 of 27 June 2016
must be interpreted as meaning that a taxable person who has supplied a service and who has stated on the invoice an amount of value added tax (VAT) calculated on the basis of an incorrect rate is not liable, under that provision, for the part of the VAT invoiced incorrectly if there is no risk of loss of tax revenue on the ground that the recipients of that service are exclusively final consumers who do not have a right to deduct input VAT.


(1)  OJ C 349, 30.8.2021.
Case T-769/21: Order of the General Court of 8 December 2022 — Euranimi v Commission (Action for annulment — Dumping — Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in China and Taiwan — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Act not of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2022-12-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, Taiwan, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), originating product, plate, steel








C_2023071EN.01003101.xml










27.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 71/31






Order of the General Court of 8 December 2022 — Euranimi v Commission
(Case T-769/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in China and Taiwan - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Act not of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility)
(2023/C 71/41)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Campa, D. Rovetta, P. Gjørtler and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1483 of 15 September 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2021 L 327, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the European Steel Association (Eurofer)’s application to intervene.










3.


European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) shall pay the costs.










4.


Euranimi, the European Commission and Eurofer shall each bear their own costs relating to Eurofer’s application to intervene.






(1)  OJ C 51, 31.1.2022.