do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-740/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Itä-Suomen hovioikeus (Finland) lodged on 2 December 2022 — Endemol Shine Finland Oy
Date: 2022-12-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: criminal record, data protection, data-processing law, disclosure of information, legal person, natural person, personal data, protection of privacy








C_2023063EN.01002202.xml










20.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/22






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Itä-Suomen hovioikeus (Finland) lodged on 2 December 2022 — Endemol Shine Finland Oy
(Case C-740/22)
(2023/C 63/29)
Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Itä-Suomen hovioikeus

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Endemol Shine Finland Oy

Questions referred







1.


Does an oral transfer of personal data constitute processing of personal data within the meaning of Article 2(1) and Article 4(2) of the General Data Protection Regulation? (1)











2.


Can public access to official documents be reconciled with the right to protection of personal data pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation, in the manner referred to by Article 86 of the regulation, by allowing information on criminal convictions or offences of a natural person to be obtained from a court’s register of persons without restriction where a request is made to transfer the information orally to the applicant?










3.


Is it relevant for the answer to Question 2 whether the applicant is a company or a private individual?






(1)  Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).
Case C-229/22: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Cluj — Romania) — NC v Compania Naţională de Transporturi Aeriene Tarom SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(1)(c)(iii) — Compensation and assistance to passengers — Cancellation of a flight — Right to compensation in the case of an offer of re-routing — Conditions — Divergence between different language versions of a provision of EU law — Re-routing allowing passengers to depart no more than one hour before their scheduled time of departure)
Date: 2022-12-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carrier, consumer protection, indemnification, reservation, traveller, use of languages








C_2023035EN.01002101.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/21






Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Cluj — Romania) — NC v Compania Naţională de Transporturi Aeriene Tarom SA
(Case C-229/22) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 5(1)(c)(iii) - Compensation and assistance to passengers - Cancellation of a flight - Right to compensation in the case of an offer of re-routing - Conditions - Divergence between different language versions of a provision of EU law - Re-routing allowing passengers to depart no more than one hour before their scheduled time of departure)
(2023/C 35/24)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Specializat Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: NC

Defendant: Compania Naţională de Transporturi Aeriene Tarom SA

Operative part of the order

Article 5(1)(c)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91,
must be interpreted as meaning that in the event of cancellation of a flight, the passengers concerned have the right to compensation by the operating air carrier in accordance with Article 7 of that regulation, unless they are informed of the cancellation less than seven days before the scheduled time of departure, if that air carrier offers them re-routing, allowing them to depart no more than one hour before the scheduled time of departure and to reach their final destination less than two hours after the scheduled time of arrival.


(1)  Date of filing: 29.3.2022.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2105 of 29 July 2022 laying down rules on conformity checks of marketing standards for olive oil and methods of analysis of the characteristics of olive oil (Official Journal of the European Union L 284 of 4 November 2022)
Date: 2022-12-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EC conformity marking, common organisation of markets, international standard, marketing standard, olive oil, product quality, qualitative analysis, quality control of agricultural products








L_2022311EN.01019901.xml










2.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 311/199







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2105 of 29 July 2022 laying down rules on conformity checks of marketing standards for olive oil and methods of analysis of the characteristics of olive oil

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 284 of 4 November 2022
)


On page 36, Annex III, Table 3, rows 3, 5 and 8.
On page 37, Annex III, Table 4, rows 3, 5 and 9.
On page 40, Annex III, Table 7, rows 2 and 4.
On page 41, Annex III, Table 8, rows 2 and 4.
On page 44, Annex III, Table 11, rows 3 and 5.
for:


                  ‘Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) …/… [20220707-034]’,

read:


                  ‘Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/2104’.
Case T-754/22: Action brought on 2 December 2022 — Nieß v EUIPO — Terrasoverkapping-inkoop.nl (GARTENLÜX)
Date: 2022-12-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building materials, glass, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023024EN.01008201.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/82






Action brought on 2 December 2022 — Nieß v EUIPO — Terrasoverkapping-inkoop.nl (GARTENLÜX)
(Case T-754/22)
(2023/C 24/109)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Andrea Nieß (Kempen, Germany) (represented by: A. Erlenhardt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Terrasoverkapping-inkoop.nl BV (Venlo, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark GARTENLÜX — Application No 18 347 602

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 September 2022 in Case R 607/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and the decision of the Opposition Division of 9 February 2022;










—


order the intervener to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of the second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 27 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430;










—


Infringement of Article 109 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-753/22: Action brought on 2 December 2022 — Nieß v EUIPO — Thema Products (Gartenlux)
Date: 2022-12-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building materials, glass, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023024EN.01008101.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/81






Action brought on 2 December 2022 — Nieß v EUIPO — Thema Products (Gartenlux)
(Case T-753/22)
(2023/C 24/108)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Andrea Nieß (Kempen, Germany) (represented by: A. Erlenhardt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Thema Products BV (Venlo, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark Gartenlux — Application No 18 391 572

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2022 in Case R 608/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and the decision of the Opposition Division of 11 February 2022;










—


order the intervener to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of the second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 27 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430;










—


Infringement of Article 109 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-745/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (Greece) lodged on 2 December 2022 — Micreos Food Safety BV v Eniaios Foreas Elegchou Trofimon (EFET)
Date: 2022-12-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: animal product, food additive, food contamination, food processing, food safety, foodstuffs legislation, market approval








C_2023104EN.01001401.xml










20.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/14






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (Greece) lodged on 2 December 2022 — Micreos Food Safety BV v Eniaios Foreas Elegchou Trofimon (EFET)
(Case C-745/22)
(2023/C 104/17)
Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Symvoulio tis Epikrateias

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Micreos Food Safety BV

Defendant: Eniaios Foreas Elegchou Trofimon (EFET)

Questions referred







1.


Must Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 (1) be interpreted as meaning that a product such as Listex™ Ρ100 manufactured by the applicant, which has the characteristics described in the opinion of 7 July 2016 of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and, moreover, according to the applicant’s submissions, is applied outside of slaughterhouses during the final stages of the production process and is intended to prevent rather than to remove surface contamination on products of animal origin, comes within the scope of Article 3(2) of the regulation (and its distribution on the European market is therefore subject to prior approval by the Commission in accordance with Article 11a of the regulation)?
If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative:










2.


Must Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 (2) be interpreted as meaning that the applicant’s product referred to above is a food additive or a processing aid (Article 3(2)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008)?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin (OJ 2004 L 139, p. 55).

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on food additives (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ 2008 L 354, p. 16).
Notice pursuant to Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director for General Affairs (AD 14) in Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO) (Brussels) COM/2022/10421 2022/C 459/05
Date: 2022-12-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security, European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, Brussels region, administrator, civil defence, competition (EU), humanitarian aid, job vacancy, managing director, recruitment








C_2022459EN.01000501.xml










2.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 459/5






NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS
Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director for General Affairs (AD 14) in Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO) (Brussels)
COM/2022/10421
(2022/C 459/05)
The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2022/10421) for the function of Director for General Affairs (AD 14) in Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO).
To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website: https://europa.eu/!B8fV6v
Case C-362/22, Ryanair: Order of the President of the Court of 2 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti — Romania) — VS, TU, RW v Ryanair DAC
Date: 2022-12-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carriage of passengers, civil aviation, indemnification, traveller








C_2023104EN.01002201.xml










20.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/22






Order of the President of the Court of 2 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti — Romania) — VS, TU, RW v Ryanair DAC
(Case C-362/22, (1) Ryanair)
(2023/C 104/32)
Language of the case: Romanian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 368, 26.9.2022.
Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.): 2,00 % on 1 December 2022 Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 1 December 2022 2022/C 459/03
Date: 2022-12-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Central Bank, euro, exchange rate, financing, interest, money








C_2022459EN.01000301.xml










2.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 459/3






Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):
2,00 % on 1 December 2022
Euro exchange rates (2)

1 December 2022
(2022/C 459/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0454 




JPY


Japanese yen


142,48 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4373 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85715 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,8984 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9868 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,2495 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,361 




HUF


Hungarian forint


413,50 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6998 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9303 




TRY


Turkish lira


19,4778 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5377 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4059 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,1371 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6446 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4195 




KRW


South Korean won


1 363,81 




ZAR


South African rand


18,5393 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3965 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5500 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 160,84 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6050 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,793 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,526 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,4508 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,1472 




INR


Indian rupee


84,9330 






(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10941 – ENI / SONATRACH / EQUINOR / IN SALAH JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 193/01
Date: 2022-12-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, energy production, extraction of oil, gas industry, gas supply, merger control, renewable energy








C_2023193EN.01000101.xml










1.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 193/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10941 – ENI / SONATRACH / EQUINOR / IN SALAH JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 193/01)
On 2 December 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10941. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.