do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2021/1134 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 amending Regulations (EC) No 767/2008, (EC) No 810/2009, (EU) 2016/399, (EU) 2017/2226, (EU) 2018/1240, (EU) 2018/1860, (EU) 2018/1861, (EU) 2019/817 and (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decisions 2004/512/EC and 2008/633/JHA, for the purpose of reforming the Visa Information System (Official Journal of the European Union L 248 of 13 July 2021)
Date: 2022-12-01
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: EU migration policy, EU visa policy, Schengen Agreement, data protection, exchange of information, external border of the EU, foreign national, information system, personal data, residence permit




L_2022310EN.01001601.xml










1.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 310/16







Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2021/1134 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 amending Regulations (EC) No 767/2008, (EC) No 810/2009, (EU) 2016/399, (EU) 2017/2226, (EU) 2018/1240, (EU) 2018/1860, (EU) 2018/1861, (EU) 2019/817 and (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decisions 2004/512/EC and 2008/633/JHA, for the purpose of reforming the Visa Information System

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 248 of 13 July 2021
)


On page 45, Article 1, point 26, new Article 22b(12), first and second subparagraphs:
for:


‘12.   Any hit pursuant to paragraph 6 shall be manually verified by the competent visa or immigration authority of the Member State processing the application for a long-stay visa or residence permit.
For the purposes of manual verification under the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the competent authority shall have access to the application file and any linked application files, as well as to the hits triggered during the automated processing pursuant to paragraph 6.’

,read:


‘12.   Any hit pursuant to paragraph 8 shall be manually verified by the competent visa or immigration authority of the Member State processing the application for a long-stay visa or residence permit.
For the purposes of manual verification under the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the competent authority shall have access to the application file and any linked application files, as well as to the hits triggered during the automated processing pursuant to paragraph 8.’

.
Case T-481/21: Order of the General Court of 1 December 2022 — Foz v Council
Date: 2022-12-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2023035EN.01008102.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/81






Order of the General Court of 1 December 2022 — Foz v Council
(Case T-481/21) (1)

(2023/C 35/103)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 412, 11.10.2021.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10956 – AURELIUS INVESTMENT LUX SEVEN / SAPPI FINLAND ONE / SAPPI FINLAND OPERATIONS / SAPPI MAASTRICHT REAL ESTATE / SAPPI STOCKSTADT) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 471/04
Date: 2022-12-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, pulp and paper industry








C_2022471EN.01000401.xml










12.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 471/4






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10956 – AURELIUS INVESTMENT LUX SEVEN / SAPPI FINLAND ONE / SAPPI FINLAND OPERATIONS / SAPPI MAASTRICHT REAL ESTATE / SAPPI STOCKSTADT)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 471/04)
On 1 December 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10956. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Special report 26/2022: ‘European statistics - Potential to further improve quality’ 2022/C 458/03
Date: 2022-12-01
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU Member State, EU statistics, Eurostat, data collection, disclosure of information, dissemination of EU information, national statistics, official statistics, statistical method








C_2022458EN.01000301.xml










1.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 458/3






Special report 26/2022:
‘European statistics - Potential to further improve quality’
(2022/C 458/03)
The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 26/2022: ‘European statistics - Potential to further improve quality’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=62590
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries 2022/C 458/06
Date: 2022-12-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, Norway, Norwegian Sea, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing, territorial waters








C_2022458EN.01000801.xml










1.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 458/8






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2022/C 458/06)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


28.10.2022




Duration


28.10.2022 — 31.12.2022




Member State


European Union (All Member States)




Stock or Group of stocks


HER/*4N-S62




Species


Herring (Clupea harengus)




Zone


Norwegian waters south of 62° N




Type(s) of fishing vessels


---




Reference number


10/TQ109






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries 2022/C 458/05
Date: 2022-12-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, Norway, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing, territorial waters








C_2022458EN.01000701.xml










1.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 458/7






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2022/C 458/05)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


11.11.2022




Duration


11.11.2022 - 31.12.2022




Member State


European Union (All Member States)




Stock or Group of stocks


POK/1N2AB.




Species


Saithe (Pollachius virens)




Zone


Norwegian waters of 1 and 2




Type(s) of fishing vessels


---




Reference number


11/TQ109






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case C-743/22, DISA: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 1 December 2022 — DISA SUMINISTROS Y TRADING, S. L. U. (DISA) v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria
Date: 2022-12-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT rate, environmental tax, local tax, mineral oil, tax collection, tax relief








C_2023121EN.01000401.xml










3.4.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 121/4






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 1 December 2022 — DISA SUMINISTROS Y TRADING, S. L. U. (DISA) v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria
(Case C-743/22, DISA)
(2023/C 121/05)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: DISA SUMINISTROS Y TRADING, S. L. U. (DISA)

Respondent: Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria

Question referred

Must [Council] Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, (1) in particular Article 5 thereof, be interpreted as precluding a national provision, such as Article 50ter of Ley 38/1992 de Impuestos Especiales (Law 38/1992 on excise duties) of 28 December 1992, which authorised the autonomous communities to set differentiated rates of the excise duties on mineral oils for each territory in respect of the same product?


(1)  
            OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 30 November 2022 2022/C 458/01
Date: 2022-12-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022458EN.01000101.xml










1.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 458/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

30 November 2022
(2022/C 458/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0376 




JPY


Japanese yen


144,28 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4366 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86488 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,9345 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9854 




ISK


Iceland króna


147,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,2648 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,338 




HUF


Hungarian forint


408,40 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6635 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9245 




TRY


Turkish lira


19,3333 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5425 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4021 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,0944 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6634 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4180 




KRW


South Korean won


1 365,14 




ZAR


South African rand


17,5768 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3437 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5490 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 271,81 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6147 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,697 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,588 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5063 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,0111 




INR


Indian rupee


84,4215 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-653/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 — European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Guillaume Vincenti (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 45(1) — Promotion — Decision not to promote an official — Article 41(1) and (2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to be heard — Duty to state reasons)
Date: 2022-12-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European official, promotion, rights of the defence, staff regulations (EU)








C_2023035EN.01000501.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/5






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 — European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Guillaume Vincenti
(Case C-653/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 45(1) - Promotion - Decision not to promote an official - Article 41(1) and (2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to be heard - Duty to state reasons)
(2023/C 35/05)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and K. Tóth, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: Guillaume Vincenti (represented by: H. Tettenborn, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 148, 26.4.2021.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M. 10890 – MARCEGAGLIA STEEL / OLPUK / OSB / FSAB) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 458/07
Date: 2022-12-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, economic concentration, flat product, iron and steel industry, merger control, non-flat product, semi-manufactured goods








C_2022458EN.01000901.xml










1.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 458/9






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M. 10890 – MARCEGAGLIA STEEL / OLPUK / OSB / FSAB)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 458/07)

1.   
On 17 November 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Marcegaglia Steel S.p.A (‘Marcegaglia Steel’, Italy), controlled by Marcegaglia Holding S.r.l (Italy),










—


Outokumpu Long Products Limited (‘OLPUK’, UK), Outokumpu Stainless Bar LLC (‘OSB’, USA) and Fagersta Stainless AB (‘FSAB’, Sweden), controlled by Outokumpu Oyj (Finland).




Marcegaglia Steel will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of OLPUK, OSB and FSAB (the ‘Target’).
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


Marcegaglia Steel is an Italian industrial group in the steel processing sector, with a focus on trading and processing of steel. It mainly produces carbon steel products, but also, to a smaller extent, stainless steel flat and long products.










—


The Target is a producer of stainless steel long products and semi-finished products in the form of wire rods, ingots, billets, blooms and slabs.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 5 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10890 – MARCEGAGLIA STEEL / OLPUK / OSB / FSAB
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case C-419/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie — Poland) — X sp. z o.o. sp.k. v Z (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2011/7/EU — Combating late payment in commercial transactions — Article 2(1) — Concept of ‘commercial transactions’ — Compensation for recovery costs incurred by the creditor due to late payment by the debtor — Article 6 — Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 — Several late payments for supplies of goods or services under a single contract)
Date: 2022-12-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: claim, commercial contract, commercial transaction, deadline for payment, debt, goods and services, supply








C_2023035EN.01001201.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/12






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie — Poland) — X sp. z o.o. sp.k. v Z
(Case C-419/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2011/7/EU - Combating late payment in commercial transactions - Article 2(1) - Concept of ‘commercial transactions’ - Compensation for recovery costs incurred by the creditor due to late payment by the debtor - Article 6 - Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 - Several late payments for supplies of goods or services under a single contract)
(2023/C 35/13)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: X sp. z o.o. sp.k.

Defendant: Z

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 2(1) of Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions
must be interpreted as meaning that:
the concept of ‘commercial transactions’ referred to therein covers each successive delivery of goods or provision of services carried out under a single contract.










2.


Article 6(1) of Directive 2011/7, read in conjunction with Article 4 of that directive,
must be interpreted as meaning that:
where a single contract provides for successive deliveries of goods or provision of services, each requiring payment within a specified period, the fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 by way of compensation for recovery costs is payable to the creditor for each late payment.






(1)  OJ C 490, 6.12.2021.
Case C-370/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I — Germany) — DOMUS-Software-AG v Marc Braschoß Immobilien GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2011/7/EU — Combating late payment in commercial transactions — Compensation for recovery costs incurred by the creditor due to late payment by the debtor — Article 6 — Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 — Several late payments for periodic supplies of goods or services under a single contract)
Date: 2022-12-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: claim, commercial transaction, goods and services, legal expenses, payment








C_2023035EN.01000902.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/9






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I — Germany) — DOMUS-Software-AG v Marc Braschoß Immobilien GmbH
(Case C-370/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2011/7/EU - Combating late payment in commercial transactions - Compensation for recovery costs incurred by the creditor due to late payment by the debtor - Article 6 - Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 - Several late payments for periodic supplies of goods or services under a single contract)
(2023/C 35/10)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht München I

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: DOMUS-Software-AG

Defendant: Marc Braschoß Immobilien GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(1) of Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions, read in conjunction with Article 3 of that directive,
must be interpreted as meaning that:
where a single contract provides for periodic deliveries of goods or provision of services, each requiring payment within a specified period, the fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 by way of compensation for recovery costs is payable to the creditor for each late payment.


(1)  OJ C 349, 30.8.2021.
Case C-595/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht Ansbach — Germany) — LSI — Germany GmbH v Freistaat Bayern (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Provision of food information to consumers — Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 — Article 17 and point 4 of Part A of Annex VI — ‘Name of the food’ — ‘Name of the product’ — Mandatory particulars in food labelling — Component or ingredient used for the partial or whole substitution of the component or ingredient which consumers expect to see normally used or present in a food)
Date: 2022-12-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer information, foodstuff, labelling, product designation








C_2023035EN.01001501.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/15






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht Ansbach — Germany) — LSI — Germany GmbH v Freistaat Bayern
(Case C-595/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Provision of food information to consumers - Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 - Article 17 and point 4 of Part A of Annex VI - ‘Name of the food’ - ‘Name of the product’ - Mandatory particulars in food labelling - Component or ingredient used for the partial or whole substitution of the component or ingredient which consumers expect to see normally used or present in a food)
(2023/C 35/16)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht Ansbach

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: LSI — Germany GmbH

Defendant: Freistaat Bayern

Operative part of the judgment

Article 17(1), (4) and (5) of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004, in conjunction with point 4 of Part A of Annex VI to Regulation No 1169/2011,
must be interpreted as meaning that:
the expression ‘name of the product’ in point 4 of Part A of Annex VI does not have a separate meaning that is different from that of the expression ‘name of the food’, as referred to in Article 17(1) of that regulation, with the result that the special labelling requirements provided for in point 4 of Part A of Annex VI to that regulation do not apply to the ‘name protected as intellectual property’, the ‘brand name’ or the ‘fancy name’ as referred to in Article 17(4) of that regulation.


(1)  OJ C 502, 13.12.2021.