do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-782/16: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Timberland Europe v Commission
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, Viet Nam, anti-dumping duty, equal treatment, footwear industry, import (EU), leather, principle of legal certainty, retroactivity of a law








C_2023035EN.01008101.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/81






Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Timberland Europe v Commission
(Case T-782/16) (1)

(2023/C 35/102)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 14, 16.1.2017.
Case C-153/21, Ministre de l’Immigration et de l’Asile: Order of the President of the Court of 30 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif — Luxembourg) — A, B, C, legally represented by his parents v Ministre de l’Immigration et de l’Asile
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: child of migrant, children's rights, residence permit, right of asylum








C_2023104EN.01002001.xml










20.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/20






Order of the President of the Court of 30 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif — Luxembourg) — A, B, C, legally represented by his parents v Ministre de l’Immigration et de l’Asile
(Case C-153/21, (1) Ministre de l’Immigration et de l’Asile)
(2023/C 104/25)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 189, 17.5.2021.
Case T-611/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk v EUIPO — ESSAtech (Accessory for wireless remote control) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing an accessory for wireless remote control — Ground for invalidity — Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 41(1) and (2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, electronic device








C_2023045EN.01001601.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/16






Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk v EUIPO — ESSAtech (Accessory for wireless remote control)
(Case T-611/21) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing an accessory for wireless remote control - Ground for invalidity - Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function - Article 8(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 41(1) and (2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
(2023/C 45/24)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. (Sosnowiec, Poland) (represented by: M. Oleksyn, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Chylińska and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: ESSAtech (Přistoupim, Czech Republic)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 July 2021 (Case R 1070/2020-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 July 2021 (Case R 1070/2020-3);










2.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings both before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO and before the Court.






(1)  OJ C 502, 13.12.2021.
Report pursuant to Article 92(4) of the Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 on any contingent liabilities arising as a result of the performance by the Single Resolution Board, the Council or the Commission of their tasks under this Regulation for the 2021 financial year 2022/C 454/03
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: Council of the European Union, EU banking union, EU office or agency, European Commission, auditing, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financial control, operation of the Institutions








C_2022454EN.01011101.xml










30.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 454/111






Report pursuant to Article 92(4) of the Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 on any contingent liabilities arising as a result of the performance by the Single Resolution Board, the Council or the Commission of their tasks under this Regulation for the 2021 financial year
(2022/C 454/03)
The European Court of Auditors has published its report pursuant to Article 92(4) of the Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 on any contingent liabilities arising as a result of the performance by the Single Resolution Board, the Council or the Commission of their tasks under this Regulation for the 2021 financial year, together with their replies, on 30 November 2022.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website:
https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=62323
Case T-141/18: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Deichmann-Shoes UK v Commission
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, Viet Nam, anti-dumping duty, footwear industry, import (EU), institutional balance (EU), originating product, principle of legal certainty, retroactivity of a law








C_2023045EN.01003503.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/35






Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Deichmann-Shoes UK v Commission
(Case T-141/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/54)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Case T-612/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk v EUIPO — ESSAtech (Accessory for wireless remote control) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing an accessory for a wireless remote control — Ground for invalidity — Features of appearance of a product which are solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 41(1) and (2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, electronic device








C_2023035EN.01005301.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/53






Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk v EUIPO — ESSAtech (Accessory for wireless remote control)
(Case T-612/21) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing an accessory for a wireless remote control - Ground for invalidity - Features of appearance of a product which are solely dictated by its technical function - Article 8(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 41(1) and (2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
(2023/C 35/62)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. (Sosnowiec, Poland) (represented by: M. Oleksyn, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Chylińska and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: ESSAtech (Přistoupim, Czech Republic)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 July 2021 (Case R 1072/2020-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 July 2022 (Case R 1072/2020-3);










2.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO and before the General Court.






(1)  OJ C 502, 13.12.2021.
Cases T-790/16 and T-861/16: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — C & J Clark International v Commission
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, Viet Nam, anti-dumping duty, footwear industry, import (EU), originating product, principle of legal certainty








C_2023045EN.01003301.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/33






Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — C & J Clark International v Commission
(Cases T-790/16 and T-861/16) (1)

(2023/C 45/42)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the cases be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 14, 16.1.2017.
Case T-12/22: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Hasco TM v EUIPO — Esi (NATURCAPS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark NATURCAPS — Earlier national word mark NATURKAPS — No genuine use of the earlier trade mark — Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Classification of pharmaceutical products and food supplements)
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dietary product, food supplement, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023035EN.01005702.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/57






Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Hasco TM v EUIPO — Esi (NATURCAPS)
(Case T-12/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark NATURCAPS - Earlier national word mark NATURKAPS - No genuine use of the earlier trade mark - Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Classification of pharmaceutical products and food supplements)
(2023/C 35/69)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Hasco TM sp. z o.o. sp.k. (Wrocław, Poland) (represented by: M. Krekora, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Esi Srl (Albisola Superiore, Italy)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 November 2021 (Case R 617/2021-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Hasco TM sp. z o.o. sp.k. to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 109, 7.3.2022.
Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 454/05
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Middle Norrland (Sweden), North Middle Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden, Upper Norrland (Sweden), air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2022454EN.01011401.xml










30.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 454/114






Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 454/05)






Member State


Sweden




Concerned routes








 


Arvidsjaur–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Gällivare–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Hagfors–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Hemavan–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Kramfors-Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Lycksele–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Mora – Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Pajala–Luleå










 


Sveg–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Torsby–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Vilhelmina–Stockholm/Arlanda










 


Östersund–Umeå








Period of validity of the contract


27 October 2023 – 26 October 2027




Deadline for submission of tenders


2 months from publication of this notice




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained


Web address for more information about the tender:
https://upphandling.trafikverket.se
For further information please contact:
Swedish Transport Administration
Tel. 0771 921921
Int. Phone: +46 771921921
Contact person: Lisa Berglund
Email: lisa.a.berglund@trafikverket.se






Address:


Trafikverket




 


781 89 Borlänge




 


SWEDEN




Internet: www.trafikverket.se
Case T-221/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Italy v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Area-related aid scheme — Financial corrections — Definition of ‘permanent grasslands’ — Article 4(1)(h) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 — Article 5(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 499/2014)
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, EU control, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, eligibility criteria, grassland, single payment scheme








C_2023035EN.01005001.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/50






Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Italy v Commission
(Case T-221/21) (1)

(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Area-related aid scheme - Financial corrections - Definition of ‘permanent grasslands’ - Article 4(1)(h) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 - Article 5(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 499/2014)
(2023/C 35/58)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and C. Gerardis, G. Rocchitta and E. Feola, avvocati dello Stato)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi, J. Aquilina and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the Italian Republic seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/261 of 17 February 2021 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2021 L 59, p. 10), in so far as it concerns certain expenditure it has incurred.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/261 of 17 February 2021 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) in so far as it imposes a flat rate correction of 2 % on the Italian Republic relating to area aid granted in Italy in the amount of EUR 67 368 272,99 for the claim year 2017;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the Italian Republic and the European Commission to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 228, 14.6.2021.
Case T-780/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Lila Rossa Engros v EUIPO (LiLAC) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark LiLAC — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, cosmetic product, hairdressing and beauty care, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law, wholesale trade








C_2023035EN.01005701.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/57






Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Lila Rossa Engros v EUIPO (LiLAC)
(Case T-780/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark LiLAC - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 35/68)
Language of the case: Romanian

Parties


Applicant: Lila Rossa Engros SRL (Voluntari, Romania) (represented by: O. Anghel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 September 2021 (Case R 441/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Lila Rossa Engros SRL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.
Case T-124/18: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Wendel and Others v Commission
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, Viet Nam, anti-dumping duty, footwear industry, import (EU), institutional balance (EU), originating product, principle of legal certainty, retroactivity of a law








C_2023045EN.01003403.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/34






Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Wendel and Others v Commission
(Case T-124/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/49)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Case T-351/17: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Nike European Operations Netherlands and Others v Commission
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, Viet Nam, anti-dumping duty, footwear industry, import (EU), originating product, principle of legal certainty








C_2023045EN.01003305.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/33






Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Nike European Operations Netherlands and Others v Commission
(Case T-351/17) (1)

(2023/C 45/46)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 249, 31.7.2017.
Case T-131/18: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Deichmann v Commission
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, Viet Nam, anti-dumping duty, footwear industry, import (EU), institutional balance (EU), originating product, principle of legal certainty, retroactivity of a law








C_2023045EN.01003502.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/35






Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Deichmann v Commission
(Case T-131/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/53)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Case T-130/18: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — adidas International Trading and Others v Commission
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, Viet Nam, anti-dumping duty, footwear industry, import (EU), originating product








C_2023045EN.01003501.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/35






Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — adidas International Trading and Others v Commission
(Case T-130/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/52)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Case T-698/16: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Trasta Komercbanka and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB — Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation — Death of an applicant — No need to adjudicate in part — Powers of the national authorities of participating Member States and of the ECB under the Single Supervisory Mechanism — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Misuse of powers — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, Latvia, bank, banking supervision, credit institution, equal treatment, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, rights of the defence, trade licence








C_2023035EN.01004301.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/43






Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Trasta Komercbanka and Others v ECB
(Case T-698/16) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Death of an applicant - No need to adjudicate in part - Powers of the national authorities of participating Member States and of the ECB under the Single Supervisory Mechanism - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Legitimate expectations - Legal certainty - Misuse of powers - Rights of the defence - Obligation to state reasons)
(2023/C 35/49)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Trasta Komercbanka AS (Riga, Latvia), and six other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the judgment (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Koupepidou, C. Hernández Saseta and A. Witte, acting as Agents, and by B. Schneider, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: K. Pommere and J. Davidoviča, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Decision ECB/SSM/2016-529900WIP0INFDAWTJ81/2 WOANCA-2016-0005 of the ECB of 11 July 2016 withdrawing the authorisation of Trasta Komercbanka for access to the activities of a credit institution.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in so far as it was brought by Mr Igors Buimisters;










2.


Dismisses the action;










3.


Orders Trasta Komercbanka AS and the other applicants whose names are included in the annex, with the exception of Mr Buimisters, to pay the costs;










4.


Orders Mr Buimisters to bear his own costs;










5.


Orders the European Commission and the Republic of Latvia to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.