do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-85/22: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ v EUIPO — Stayer Ibérica (STAYER) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark STAYER — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15 and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Classification of the goods in respect of which genuine use has been shown)
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, distributive trades, electrical equipment, electronic equipment, machinery, metalworking, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, wire








C_2023035EN.01005801.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/58






Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ v EUIPO — Stayer Ibérica (STAYER)
(Case T-85/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark STAYER - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15 and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Classification of the goods in respect of which genuine use has been shown)
(2023/C 35/70)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: N. Bürglen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Stayer Ibérica, SA (Pinto, Spain) (represented by: P. Creta, A. Lanzarini, B. Costa and M. Lazzarotto, lawyers)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 December 2021 (Case R 932/2021-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 158, 11.4.2022.
Case T-678/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Mendes v EUIPO — Actial Farmaceutica (VSL3TOTAL) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark VSL3TOTAL — Earlier EU word mark VSL#3 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dietary product, food supplement, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023035EN.01005401.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/54






Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Mendes v EUIPO — Actial Farmaceutica (VSL3TOTAL)
(Case T-678/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark VSL3TOTAL - Earlier EU word mark VSL#3 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2023/C 35/64)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Mendes SA (Lugano, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Cavattoni, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Actial Farmaceutica Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Mostardini, F. Mellucci and F. Rombolà, lawyers)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 August 2021 (Case R 1568/2020-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mendes SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 502, 13.12.2021.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10927 – ACTION LOGEMENT / AG2R LA MONDIALE / BNP PARIBAS / JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 20/04
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, economic concentration, housing, joint venture, merger control, ownership, provision of services, real estate business, subsidiary








C_2023020EN.01001401.xml










20.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 20/14






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10927 – ACTION LOGEMENT / AG2R LA MONDIALE / BNP PARIBAS / JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 20/04)
On 30 November 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10927. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-24/18: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — adidas International Trading and Others v Commission
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, Viet Nam, anti-dumping duty, equal treatment, footwear industry, import (EU), originating product, principle of legal certainty, retroactivity of a law








C_2023045EN.01003402.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/34






Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — adidas International Trading and Others v Commission
(Case T-24/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/48)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 94, 12.3.2018.
Case T-142/18: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Buffalo — Boots v Commission
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, Viet Nam, anti-dumping duty, footwear industry, import (EU), institutional balance (EU), originating product, principle of legal certainty, retroactivity of a law








C_2023045EN.01003504.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/35






Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Buffalo — Boots v Commission
(Case T-142/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/55)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Case T-401/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — KN v Parliament (Institutional law — Member of the EESC — Discharge procedure in respect of the implementation of the EESC’s budget for the 2019 financial year — Resolution of the Parliament designating the applicant as the perpetrator of psychological harassment — Action for annulment — Non-actionable measure — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Protection of personal data — Presumption of innocence — Duty of confidentiality — Principle of sound administration — Proportionality — Sufficiently serious infringement of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Economic and Social Committee, budgetary discharge, data protection, disciplinary proceedings, harassment at work, personal data, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, rights of the defence








C_2023035EN.01005101.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/51






Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — KN v Parliament
(Case T-401/21) (1)

(Institutional law - Member of the EESC - Discharge procedure in respect of the implementation of the EESC’s budget for the 2019 financial year - Resolution of the Parliament designating the applicant as the perpetrator of psychological harassment - Action for annulment - Non-actionable measure - Inadmissibility - Action for damages - Protection of personal data - Presumption of innocence - Duty of confidentiality - Principle of sound administration - Proportionality - Sufficiently serious infringement of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)
(2023/C 35/59)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: KN (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld and M. Aboudi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: R. Crowe, C. Burgos and M. Allik, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action, the applicant seeks, first, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, annulment of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2021/1552 of the European Parliament of 28 April 2021 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2019, Section VI — European Economic and Social Committee (OJ 2021 L 340, p. 140), and of Resolution (EU) 2021/1553 of the European Parliament of 29 April 2021 with comments forming an integral part of the decision on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2019, Section VI — European Economic and Social Committee (OJ 2021 L 340, p. 141), and, secondly, on the basis of Article 268 TFEU, compensation for the damage which it has allegedly suffered as a result of the contested acts.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders KN to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 338, 23.8.2021.
Case T-360/17: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Jana shoes and Others v Commission
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, Viet Nam, anti-dumping duty, footwear industry, import (EU), originating product, principle of legal certainty








C_2023045EN.01003401.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/34






Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Jana shoes and Others v Commission
(Case T-360/17) (1)

(2023/C 45/47)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 249, 31.7.2017.
Initiation of proceedings (Case M.10433 – VIVENDI / LAGARDERE) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 471/01
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, Internet, advertising, audiovisual industry, culture industry, economic concentration, mass media, merger control, publishing, travel agency








C_2022471EN.01000101.xml










12.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 471/1






Initiation of proceedings
(Case M.10433 – VIVENDI / LAGARDERE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 471/01)
On 30 November 2022, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference No. M.10433 – VIVENDI / LAGARDERE, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 29 November 2022 2022/C 454/02
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022454EN.01011001.xml










30.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 454/110






Euro exchange rates (1)

29 November 2022
(2022/C 454/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0366 




JPY


Japanese yen


143,36 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4367 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86218 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,9010 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9862 




ISK


Iceland króna


147,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,3313 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,334 




HUF


Hungarian forint


406,50 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6730 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9193 




TRY


Turkish lira


19,3181 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5414 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4005 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,0965 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6639 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4237 




KRW


South Korean won


1 375,70 




ZAR


South African rand


17,6027 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,4289 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5500 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 301,58 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6735 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,640 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,706 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5126 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,8075 




INR


Indian rupee


84,6548 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-155/22: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ v EUIPO — Stayer Ibérica (STAYER) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark STAYER — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15 and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Classification of the goods in respect of which genuine use has been shown)
Date: 2022-11-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, distributive trades, electric machinery, hand tool, metalworking, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, wire








C_2023035EN.01005901.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/59






Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ v EUIPO — Stayer Ibérica (STAYER)
(Case T-155/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark STAYER - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15 and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Classification of the goods in respect of which genuine use has been shown)
(2023/C 35/72)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: N. Bürglen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Stayer Ibérica, SA (Pinto, Spain) (represented by: P. Creta, A. Lanzarini, A. Sponzilli, B. Costa and M. Lazzarotto, lawyers)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 December 2021 (Case R 931/2021-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 198, 16.5.2022.