do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-736/22: Action brought on 25 November 2022 — Campofrio Food Group v EUIPO — Cerioti Holding (SNACK MI)
Date: 2022-11-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, confectionery, confectionery product, foodstuff, processed foodstuff, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law, wholesale trade








C_2023024EN.01006901.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/69






Action brought on 25 November 2022 — Campofrio Food Group v EUIPO — Cerioti Holding (SNACK MI)
(Case T-736/22)
(2023/C 24/95)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Campofrio Food Group, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Erdozain López and M. Del Río Aragó, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cerioti Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark SNACK MI — Application for registration No 18 201 028

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 August 2022 in Case R 59/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and Cerioti Holding SA, if it intervenes in this case, to bear the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 24 November 2022 2022/C 448/02
Date: 2022-11-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022448EN.01000201.xml










25.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 448/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

24 November 2022
(2022/C 448/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0413 




JPY


Japanese yen


143,90 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4369 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85933 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,8573 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9818 




ISK


Iceland króna


146,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,3435 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,392 




HUF


Hungarian forint


413,33 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6958 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9205 




TRY


Turkish lira


19,3969 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5414 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3894 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,1324 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6598 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4319 




KRW


South Korean won


1 382,28 




ZAR


South African rand


17,7246 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,4442 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5470 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 295,35 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6806 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,992 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,258 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5504 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,1501 




INR


Indian rupee


85,0295 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-731/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Austria) lodged on 25 November 2022 — IJ and PO GesbR, IJ v Agrarmarkt Austria
Date: 2022-11-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: aid per hectare, aid to agriculture, eligibility criteria, farmer, irrigation, plantation, single payment scheme, soil preparation, tenant farming, utilised agricultural area








C_2023094EN.01001702.xml










13.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/17






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Austria) lodged on 25 November 2022 — IJ and PO GesbR, IJ v Agrarmarkt Austria
(Case C-731/22)
(2023/C 94/19)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: IJ and PO GesbR, IJ

Defendant Authority: Agrarmarkt Austria

Question referred

Is Article 4(1), (b) and (c), read in conjunction with Article 33(1) of Regulation 1307/2013 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an area is to be regarded as being managed by, and at the disposal of, the farmer if, although that area is owned by the farmer and the farmer also carries out the initial soil cultivation and crop cultivation, as well as the ongoing irrigation of the crop cultures, the area is divided into parcels of different sizes and handed over — from the beginning of the season in April/early May until the end of the season in October — to various users for maintenance and harvesting in consideration for a fixed fee, but without the farmer being entitled to a direct share in the success of the harvest?


(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 608).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10638 – ALD / LEASEPLAN)
Date: 2022-11-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, management, merger control, provision of services, vehicle fleet, vehicle rental








C_202300478EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/478


24.10.2023






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10638 – ALD / LEASEPLAN)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2023/478)

On 25 November 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10638. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/478/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2331 of 25 November 2022 on the appointment of the Chair and a full-time member of the Single Resolution Board
Date: 2022-11-25
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU banking union, EU office or agency, appointment of members, bank resolution, company in difficulties, credit institution, investment company




L_2022308EN.01001601.xml










29.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 308/16








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2022/2331
of 25 November 2022
         
on the appointment of the Chair and a full-time member of the Single Resolution Board


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (1), and in particular Article 56(6) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,


Having regard to the approval by the European Parliament,

Whereas:







(1)


On 28 September 2022, after hearing the Single Resolution Board (the ‘Board’), in its plenary session, the Commission adopted shortlists of candidates for the appointment of the Chair and of a full-time member of the Board and provided them to the European Parliament.












(2)


The Council was also informed of the shortlists provided to the European Parliament.












(3)


Pursuant to Article 56(5) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014, the term of office of the Chair and of the member of the Board is to be 5 years.












(4)


On 12 October 2022, the Commission adopted a proposal for the appointment of Mr Dominique LABOUREIX as Chair of the Board and of Ms Tuija TAOS as a full-time member of the Board and submitted the proposal to the European Parliament for approval.












(5)


The European Parliament approved that proposal on 10 November 2022,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1

1.   The following person is hereby appointed as Chair of the Single Resolution Board for a term of office of five years as from 9 January 2023:






—


Mr Dominique LABOUREIX.






2.   The following person is hereby appointed as a full-time member of the Single Resolution Board for a term of office of five years as from 22 March 2023:






—


Ms Tuija TAOS.







Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.





Done at Brussels, 25 November 2022.


For the Council


The President

J. SÍKELA
            





(1)  
            OJ L 225, 30.7.2014, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10862 – OLIN / MITSUI / BWA JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 448/09
Date: 2022-11-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, firearms and munitions, inorganic chemical product, merger control, purchase, sale








C_2022448EN.01003701.xml










25.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 448/37






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10862 – OLIN / MITSUI / BWA JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 448/09)

1.   
On 17 November 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Olin Corporation (‘Olin’, USA),










—


Mitsui & Co., Ltd (‘Mitsui’, Japan),










—


The Blue Water Alliance Joint Venture (‘BWA JV’, UK), a newly created joint venture.




Olin and Mitsui will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of BWA JV.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


Olin is a global manufacturer and distributor of chemical products and a manufacturer of ammunition. The chemical products produced by Olin include chlorine, ethylene dichloride and caustic soda, vinyls, epoxies, chlorinated organics, bleach, and hydrochloric acid,










—


Mitsui is a trading, business management and project development company which operates worldwide via the following operating segments: (i) mineral & metal resources; (ii) energy; (iii) machinery & infrastructure; (iv) chemicals; (v) iron & steel products; (vi) lifestyle; (vii) innovation & corporate development,










—


BWA JV will be active in the procurement, sale, and marketing of caustic soda and ethylene dichloride.






3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10862 – OLIN / MITSUI / BWA JV
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Case T-734/22: Action brought on 25 November 2022 — Pumpyanskiy v Council
Date: 2022-11-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, economic sanctions, equal treatment, international sanctions, natural person, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2023024EN.01006702.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/67






Action brought on 25 November 2022 — Pumpyanskiy v Council
(Case T-734/22)
(2023/C 24/93)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Alexander Dmitrievich Pumpyanskiy (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by: T. Bontinck, A. Guillerme and L. Burguin, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1530 of 14 September 2022, (1) in so far as it maintains the applicant’s name as entry No 719 in the annex to that decision;










—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1529 of 14 September 2022, (2) in so far as it maintains the applicant’s name as entry No 719 in Annex I to that regulation;










—


order the Council to make a provisional payment amounting to EUR 100 000 in compensation of the non-material damage suffered by the applicant, and










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to effective judicial protection and of the duty to state reasons.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment regarding the reasons advanced by the Council.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality and of fundamental rights.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principles of legal certainty and of equal treatment.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to be heard.






(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1530 of 14 September 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 239, p. 149).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1529 of 14 September 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 239, p. 1).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10947 – ATLAS ARTERIA / OTPP / SKYWAY CONCESSION COMPANY) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 459/02
Date: 2022-11-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Canada, France, Germany, United States, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, pension scheme, road network, teacher, toll








C_2022459EN.01000201.xml










2.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 459/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10947 – ATLAS ARTERIA / OTPP / SKYWAY CONCESSION COMPANY)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 459/02)
On 25 November 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10947. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-748/22: Action brought on 25 November 2022 — Kantor v Council
Date: 2022-11-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, economic sanctions, equal treatment, international sanctions, natural person, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2023024EN.01008001.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/80






Action brought on 25 November 2022 — Kantor v Council
(Case T-748/22)
(2023/C 24/106)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Viatcheslav Moshe Kantor (Herzliya, Israel) (represented by: T. Bontinck, A. Guillerme and M. Brésart, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1530 of 14 September 2022, (1) in so far as it extends the applicant’s listing as entry No 896 in the annex to Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022, for the same reasons as those stated in the latter;










—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1529 of 14 September 2022, (2) in so far as it extends the applicant’s listing as entry No 896 in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2014/269, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022, by reason of identity of grounds with the latter;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law, which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-734/22, Pumpyanskiy v Council.


(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1530 of 14 September 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 239, p. 149).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1529 of 14 September 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 239, p. 1).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10897 – PREDICA / VAUBAN / TELEFONICA / BLUEVIA) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 474/04
Date: 2022-11-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: culture industry, economic concentration, health insurance, investment company, life assurance, mass media, merger control, telecommunications








C_2022474EN.01002701.xml










14.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 474/27






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10897 – PREDICA / VAUBAN / TELEFONICA / BLUEVIA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 474/04)
On 25 November 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10897. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/2318 of 25 November 2022 amending Decision 2010/452/CFSP on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, EUMM Georgia
Date: 2022-11-25
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Georgia, fact-finding mission








L_2022307EN.01013301.xml










28.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 307/133








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2022/2318
of 25 November 2022
         
amending Decision 2010/452/CFSP on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, EUMM Georgia


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 42(4) and 43(2) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 12 August 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/452/CFSP (1), which extended the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia), established by Council Joint Action 2008/736/CFSP (2).












(2)


On 3 December 2020, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2020/1990 (3), extending EUMM Georgia until 14 December 2022.












(3)


Following a strategic review of the Mission, the Political and Security Committee recommended that the mandate of EUMM Georgia be extended until 14 December 2024.












(4)


Decision 2010/452/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly.












(5)


The Mission will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Decision 2010/452/CFSP is amended as follows:






(1)


in Article 14(1), the following subparagraph is added:

                              ‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the Mission between 15 December 2022 and 14 December 2024 shall be EUR 47 141 684,02.’;










(2)


in Article 18, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:

                              ‘It shall expire on 14 December 2024.’.






Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
It shall apply from 15 December 2022.




Done at Brussels, 25 November 2022.


For the Council


The President

J. SÍKELA
            





(1)  Council Decision 2010/452/CFSP of 12 August 2010 on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, EUMM Georgia (OJ L 213, 13.8.2010, p. 43).

(2)  Council Joint Action 2008/736/CFSP of 15 September 2008 on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, EUMM Georgia (OJ L 248, 17.9.2008, p. 26).

(3)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1990 of 3 December 2020 amending Decision 2010/452/CFSP on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, EUMM Georgia (OJ L 411, 7.12.2020, p. 1).