do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10900 – PLATINUM EQUITY GROUP / IMERYS HTSM) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 464/05
Date: 2022-11-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, information technology, iron and steel industry, logistics, merger control, metallurgical industry, provision of services, telecommunications








C_2022464EN.01000501.xml










6.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 464/5






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10900 – PLATINUM EQUITY GROUP / IMERYS HTSM)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 464/05)
On 24 November 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10900. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-719/22, Openbaar Ministerie and Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 24 November 2022 — Openbaar Ministerie, Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën v Profit Europe NV, Gosselin Forwarding Services NV
Date: 2022-11-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, cast-iron, import (EU), originating product, piping, tube








C_2023189EN.01000502.xml










30.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/5






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 24 November 2022 — Openbaar Ministerie, Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën v Profit Europe NV, Gosselin Forwarding Services NV
(Case C-719/22, Openbaar Ministerie and Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën)
(2023/C 189/07)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Openbaar Ministerie, Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën

Defendants: Profit Europe NV, Gosselin Forwarding Services NV

Question referred

Do Regulation (EU) No 1071/2012 (1) and Regulation (EU) No 430/2013 (2) violate Articles 1, 5, 6 and 9 of Basic Regulation 1225/2009, (3) in so far as they subject imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of spheroidal graphite cast iron, originating in the People’s Republic of China to anti-dumping duties upon import, when neither the complaint for the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding nor the notice of initiation of the anti-dumping measure identified such goods as the product concerned, no evidence of dumping, injury and a causal link was produced and the European Commission did not in any way investigate their normal value, export price, possible margin of dumping, possible injury, the extent of the injury, the impact of other known factors on the injury, the causal link between dumping and injury and the need to subject those goods (threaded tube or pipe cast fittings) to anti-dumping duties in the interest of the Union?


(1)  Commission Regulation (EU) No 1071/2012 of 14 November 2012 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in the People's Republic of China and Thailand (OJ 2012 L 318, p. 10).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 430/2013 of 13 May 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in the People’s Republic of China and Thailand and terminating the proceeding with regard to Indonesia (OJ 2013 L 129, p. 1).

(3)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ 2009 L 343, p. 51).
Public holidays in 2023: EEA/EFTA States and EEA institutions 2022/C 446/05
Date: 2022-11-24
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: EEA joint institution, EFTA countries, public holiday








C_2022446EN.01002701.xml










24.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 446/27






Public holidays in 2023: EEA/EFTA States and EEA institutions
(2022/C 446/05)










 


Iceland


Liechtenstein


Norway


EFTA Surveillance Authority


EFTA Court




Monday 2 January


 


 


 


X


X




Friday 6 January


 


X


 


 


 




Thursday 2 February


 


X


 


 


 




Tuesday 21 February


 


X


 


 


 




Thursday 6 April


X


 


X


X


X




Friday 7 April


X


X


X


X


X




Monday 10 April


X


X


X


X


X




Thursday, 20 April


X


 


 


 


 




Monday 1 May


X


X


X


X


X




Tuesday 9 May


 


 


 


 


X




Wednesday 17 May


 


 


X


 


 




Thursday 18 May


X


X


X


X


X




Friday 19 May


 


 


 


X


X




Monday 29 May


X


X


X


X


X




Thursday 8 June


 


X


 


 


 




Friday 23 June


 


 


 


 


X




Monday 7 August


X


 


 


 


 




Tuesday 15 August


 


X


 


 


X




Friday 8 September


 


X


 


 


 




Wednesday 1 November


 


X


 


X


X




Friday 8 December


 


X


 


 


 




Thursday 21 December


 


 


 


X


 




Friday 22 December


 


 


 


X


 




Monday 25 December


X


X


X


X


X




Tuesday 26 December


X


X


X


X


X




Wednesday 27 December


 


 


 


X


X




Thursday 28 December


 


 


 


X


X




Friday 29 December


 


 


 


X


X










**


Public holidays falling on Saturdays and Sundays are not listed.










**


Judicial vacations of the EFTA Court 2023 are as follows: Monday 2 January 2023 to Sunday 8 January 2023, Monday 3 April 2023 to Sunday 16 April 2023, Monday 17 July 2023 to Thursday 31 August 2023, Monday 18 December 2023 to Monday 8 January 2024
Corrigendum to the corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2022/109 of 27 January 2022 fixing for 2022 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in Union waters and for Union fishing vessels in certain non-Union waters (Official Journal of the European Union L 34 of 16 February 2022)
Date: 2022-11-24
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU waters, catch by species, catch quota, conservation of fish stocks, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_2022304EN.01010401.xml










24.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 304/104







Corrigendum to the corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2022/109 of 27 January 2022 fixing for 2022 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in Union waters and for Union fishing vessels in certain non-Union waters

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 34 of 16 February 2022
)


On page 57, the following part should be corrected:
for:











‘Species:


Plaice

Pleuronectes platessa



Zone:


Kattegat
(PLE/03AS.)




Denmark


 


493


 


Analytical TAC
Article 8(2) of this Regulation applies’




Germany


 


6


 




Sweden


 


56


 




Union


 


55


 




 


 


 


 




TAC


 


1 038 


 




 





read:











‘Species:


Plaice

Pleuronectes platessa



Zone:


Kattegat
(PLE/03AS.)




Denmark


 


493


 


Analytical TAC
Article 8(2) of this Regulation applies’




Germany


 


6


 




Sweden


 


56


 




Union


 


555


 




 


 


 


 




TAC


 


1 038
Case T-733/22: Action brought on 24 November 2022 — Khudaynatov v Council
Date: 2022-11-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, economic sanctions, fundamental rights, international sanctions, natural person, principle of proportionality, right to justice








C_2023024EN.01006701.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/67






Action brought on 24 November 2022 — Khudaynatov v Council
(Case T-733/22)
(2023/C 24/92)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Eduard Yurevich Khudaynatov (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: T. Bontinck, D. Rovetta and M. Moretto, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1530 of 14 September 2022, (1) in so far as it makes Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022 including the applicant’s name in the annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP applicable until 15 March 2023;










—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1529 of 14 September 2022, (2) in so far as it maintains the applicant’s name in the list set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 and










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law, which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-732/22, Deripaska v Council.


(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1530 of 14 September 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 239, p. 149).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1529 of 14 September 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 239, p. 1).
Case C-723/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München (Germany) lodged on 24 November 2022 — Citadines Betriebs GmbH v MPLC Deutschland GmbH
Date: 2022-11-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: cable distribution, copyright, hotel industry, quasi-fiscal charge, television equipment








C_2023094EN.01001301.xml










13.3.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/13






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München (Germany) lodged on 24 November 2022 — Citadines Betriebs GmbH v MPLC Deutschland GmbH
(Case C-723/22)
(2023/C 94/14)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht München

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Citadines Betriebs GmbH

Respondent: MPLC Deutschland GmbH

Question referred

Must Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 March 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (1) be interpreted as precluding a national provision or practice according to which the provision of physical facilities for enabling or making a communication — such as television sets in hotel rooms or hotel fitness rooms — is regarded as communication to the public when, while the transmission signal, in addition, is retransmitted to the physical facilities via the hotel’s own cable distribution system, that cable retransmission takes place lawfully on the basis of a licence acquired by the hotel?


(1)  OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10949 – GONVARRI / MAJORITY SHAREHOLDERS / HIDRIA) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 485/02
Date: 2022-11-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, handling, industrial product, iron and steel industry, merger control, motor vehicle industry, provision of services, shareholder, vehicle parts








C_2022485EN.01009101.xml










21.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 485/91






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10949 – GONVARRI / MAJORITY SHAREHOLDERS / HIDRIA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 485/02)
On 24 November 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10949. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
P9_TA(2022)0412 ‘Macro-Financial Assistance+’ instrument for providing support to Ukraine for 2023 European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 November 2022 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Instrument for providing support to Ukraine for 2023 (macro-financial assistance +) (COM(2022)0597 — C9-0373/2022 — 2022/0371(COD)) P9_TC1-COD(2022)0371 Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 24 November 2022 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2022/… of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an instrument for providing support to Ukraine for 2023 (macro-financial assistance +)
Date: 2022-11-24
Institutions: Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: EU aid, EU loan, European neighbourhood policy, Russia, Ukraine, economic reform, economic stabilisation, fund (EU), macro-financial assistance, territorial dispute








C_2023167EN.01016901.xml










11.5.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 167/169






P9_TA(2022)0412
‘Macro-Financial Assistance+’ instrument for providing support to Ukraine for 2023
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 November 2022 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Instrument for providing support to Ukraine for 2023 (macro-financial assistance +) (COM(2022)0597 — C9-0373/2022 — 2022/0371(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
(2023/C 167/34)

The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2022)0597),










—


having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 212 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C9-0373/2022),










—


having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 16 November 2022 to approve Parliament’s position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to Rules 59 and 163 of its Rules of Procedure,












1.


Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;












2.


Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;












3.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.








P9_TC1-COD(2022)0371
Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 24 November 2022 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2022/… of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an instrument for providing support to Ukraine for 2023 (macro-financial assistance +)

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EU) 2022/2463.)
Case T-732/22: Action brought on 24 November 2022 — Deripaska v Council
Date: 2022-11-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, damages, economic sanctions, fundamental rights, international sanctions, natural person, principle of proportionality, right to justice








C_2023024EN.01006601.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/66






Action brought on 24 November 2022 — Deripaska v Council
(Case T-732/22)
(2023/C 24/91)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Oleg Vladimirovich Deripaska (Khutor Sokolsky, Russia) (represented by: T. Bontinck, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1530 of 14 September 2022, (1) in so far as it makes Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022, which included the applicant’s name in the annex to Decision 2014/145, applicable until 15 March 2023;










—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1529 of 14 September 2022, (2) in so far as it maintains the applicant’s name in the list set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 269/2014 of 17 March 2014;










—


order the Council to make a provisional payment of EUR 1 000 000 in respect of the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to effective judicial protection and of the duty to state reasons.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment regarding the reasons advanced by the Council.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality and of fundamental rights.






(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1530 of 14 September 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 239, p. 149).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1529 of 14 September 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 239, p. 1).
Case C-91/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 November 2022 — Vincent Thunus and Others v European Investment Bank (EIB) (Appeal — Civil service — Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) — Remuneration — Annual salary adjustment — Action for annulment and for damages)
Date: 2022-11-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: pay, pay rise, servant (EU), wage determination








C_2023024EN.01000602.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/6






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 November 2022 — Vincent Thunus and Others v European Investment Bank (EIB)
(Case C-91/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) - Remuneration - Annual salary adjustment - Action for annulment and for damages)
(2023/C 24/07)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellants: Vincent Thunus, Jaime Barragán, Marc D’hooge, Alexandra Felten, Christophe Nègre, Patrick Vanhoudt (represented by: L. Levi, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (represented by: A. V. García Sanchez, T. Gilliams, J. Klein and E. Manoukian, acting as Agents, and by P.–E. Partsch, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Vincent Thunus, Mr Jaime Barragán, Mr Marc D’hooge, Ms Alexandra Felten, Mr Christophe Nègre and Mr Patrick Vanhoudt to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 228, 14.6.2021.
Case T-737/22: Action brought on 24 November 2022 — Pumpyanskaya v Council
Date: 2022-11-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, protection of privacy, rights of the defence, rule of law








C_2023024EN.01007001.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/70






Action brought on 24 November 2022 — Pumpyanskaya v Council
(Case T-737/22)
(2023/C 24/96)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya (Ekaterinburg, Russia) (represented by: G. Lansky, P. Goeth, A. Egger, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


pursuant to Article 263, 275(2) and 277 TFEU, declare the inapplicability of Article 2(1), final paragraph, of Council Decision No 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision No 2022/329/CFSP, and of Article 3(1), final paragraph, of Council Regulation (EU) 269/2014, as amended by Council Regulation (EU) 2022/330 (the ‘Contested Listing Criteria’);










—


pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1530 of 14 September 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (1), as well as Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1529 of 14 September 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (2) (the ‘Contested Acts’), in so far as those acts concern the applicant (Listing Entry No. 724).










—


order the Council to pay the costs pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure





Pleas in law and main arguments

in support of the action under Article 263 TFEU:






1.


Plea under Article 277 TFEU, alleging that the Contested Listing Criteria are in irresolvable conflict with the principle of foreseeability, with the values contained and with the rule of law.










2.


First plea in law, alleging a violation of the applicant’s rights of defence.










3.


Second plea in law, alleging an error of assessment by the Council in including the applicant’s name in the annexes to the Contested Acts.










4.


Third plea in law, alleging an infringement of the obligation to state reasons as laid down in the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU.










5.


Fourth plea in law, alleging an unlawful infringement of the applicant’s fundamental rights, including the right to private and family life, home and communications, as well as property.






(1)  OJ 2022, L 239, p. 149.

(2)  OJ 2022, L 239, p. 1.