do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2022/2317 of 22 November 2022 on the reconfirmation of the authorisation of the European Union military operation in the Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI) (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI/5/2022)
Date: 2022-11-22
Institutions: Political and Security Committee
Subjects: EU military mission, EU restrictive measure, Libya, Mediterranean region (EU), arms trade, firearms and munitions, illicit trade, military cooperation








L_2022307EN.01013201.xml










28.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 307/132








            POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2022/2317
of 22 November 2022
         
on the reconfirmation of the authorisation of the European Union military operation in the Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI) (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI/5/2022)


THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 38 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/472 of 31 March 2020 on a European Union military operation in the Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI) (1), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


On 31 March 2020, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2020/472, which established and launched a European Union military operation in the Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI) for the period until 31 March 2021.












(2)


Article 8(3) of Decision (CFSP) 2020/472 provides that, notwithstanding that period, the authorisation of the operation is to be reconfirmed every four months and that the Political and Security Committee is to prolong the operation unless the deployment of maritime assets of the operation produces a pull effect on migration on the basis of substantiated evidence gathered according to the criteria set out in the Operations Plan.












(3)


On 26 March 2021, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2021/542 (2), extending the operation until 31 March 2023, subject to the same reconfirmation procedure.












(4)


The Operation Commander provided monthly pull factor reports.












(5)


The authorisation of the operation should be reconfirmed for the ninth four-month sub-period of its mandate and the operation should be prolonged accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The authorisation of EUNAVFOR MED IRINI is hereby reconfirmed and the operation is prolonged from 1 December 2022 to 31 March 2023.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 22 November 2022.


For the Political and Security Committee


The Chairperson

D. PRONK
            





(1)  
            OJ L 101, 1.4.2020, p. 4.

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/542 of 26 March 2021 amending Decision (CFSP) 2020/472 on the European Union military operation in the Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI) (OJ L 108, 29.3.2021, p. 57).
Opinion 07/2022 (pursuant to Article 322(1)(a), TFEU) concerning the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 as regards the establishment of a diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing method [2022/0370 (COD)] 2022/C 459/04
Date: 2022-11-22
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU aid, EU borrowing, EU financing arrangements, EU strategy, Ukraine, financial aid, financial management, general budget (EU)








C_2022459EN.01000401.xml










2.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 459/4






Opinion 07/2022


(pursuant to Article 322(1)(a), TFEU)


concerning the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 as regards the establishment of a diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing method [2022/0370 (COD)]
(2022/C 459/04)
The European Court of Auditors has published its opinion 07/2022 (pursuant to Article 322(1), TFEU) concerning the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 as regards the establishment of a diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing method [2022/0370 (COD)].
The opinion can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=62737
Case T-640/20: Order of the General Court of 22 November 2022 — Validity v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a draft call for proposals co-funded by the ERDF — Documents originating from a Member State — Partial refusal of access — Disclosure after the action had been brought — Interest in bringing proceedings ceasing to exist — No need to adjudicate in part — Request to modify the application — Partial inadmissibility)
Date: 2022-11-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Regional Development Fund, Hungary, access to EU information, distribution of EU funding, independence of people with disabilities, integration of people with disabilities








C_2023035EN.01006101.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/61






Order of the General Court of 22 November 2022 — Validity v Commission
(Case T-640/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a draft call for proposals co-funded by the ERDF - Documents originating from a Member State - Partial refusal of access - Disclosure after the action had been brought - Interest in bringing proceedings ceasing to exist - No need to adjudicate in part - Request to modify the application - Partial inadmissibility)
(2023/C 35/75)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Validity Foundation — Mental Disability Advocacy Centre (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: B. Van Vooren and R. Oyarzabal Arigita, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Commission Decision C(2020) 5540 final of 6 August 2020, by which the Commission refused it access to documents relating to a draft call for proposals from the Hungarian authorities and, secondly, of Commission Decision C(2021) 2834 final of 19 April 2021 granting it access to those documents.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 5540 final of 6 August 2020, by which the Commission refused Validity Foundation — Mental Disability Advocacy Centre access to documents relating to a draft call for proposals of the Hungarian authorities.










2.


The remainder of the action is dismissed as inadmissible.










3.


Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.
Case T-728/22: Action brought on 22 November 2022 — Industrias Lácteas Asturianas v EUIPO — Qingdao United Dairy (NAMLAC)
Date: 2022-11-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, baby food, dietary product, food supplement, milk product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2023024EN.01006302.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/63






Action brought on 22 November 2022 — Industrias Lácteas Asturianas v EUIPO — Qingdao United Dairy (NAMLAC)
(Case T-728/22)
(2023/C 24/88)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Industrias Lácteas Asturianas, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.C. Riera Blanco, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Qingdao United Dairy Co. Ltd (Qingdao, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU word mark NAMLAC — Application for registration No 18 126 515

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 September 2022 in Case R 1563/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.