do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice pursuant to Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director for Standards, Dissemination, Cooperation in the European Statistical System (AD 14) in the Directorate-General Eurostat (Luxembourg) COM/2022/10420 2022/C 438/06
Date: 2022-11-18
Institutions: Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security, European Commission
Subjects: European Statistical System, administrator, competition (EU), dissemination of EU information, job vacancy, managing director, recruitment, standardisation








C_2022438EN.01000601.xml










18.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 438/6






NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS
Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director for Standards, Dissemination, Cooperation in the European Statistical System (AD 14) in the Directorate-General Eurostat
(Luxembourg)
COM/2022/10420
(2022/C 438/06)
The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2022/10420) for the function of Director for Standards, Dissemination, Cooperation in the European Statistical System (AD 14) in the Directorate-General Eurostat (Luxembourg).
To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website: https://europa.eu/!XVXW4m
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10790 – SALIC / OLAM / OLAM AGRI) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 464/04
Date: 2022-11-18
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: agri-foodstuffs, agricultural trade, economic concentration, farming sector, food industry, investment company, merchant, merger control, subsidiary, value chain








C_2022464EN.01000401.xml










6.12.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 464/4






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10790 – SALIC / OLAM / OLAM AGRI)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 464/04)
On 18 November 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10790. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/2276 of 18 November 2022 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/2009 in support of Ukraine’s efforts to combat illicit trafficking in weapons, ammunition and explosives, in cooperation with the OSCE
Date: 2022-11-18
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: OSCE, Ukraine, arms control, arms trade, cooperation policy, explosive, fight against crime, firearms and munitions, illicit trade, non-proliferation of arms




L_2022300EN.01004201.xml










21.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 300/42








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2022/2276
of 18 November 2022
         
amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/2009 in support of Ukraine’s efforts to combat illicit trafficking in weapons, ammunition and explosives, in cooperation with the OSCE


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty of the European Union, and in particular Articles 28(1) and 31(1) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 2 December 2019, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/2009 (1).












(2)


Decision (CFSP) 2019/2009 provides for a 36-month implementation period for the activities referred to in Article 1 thereof from the date of the conclusion of the financing agreement referred to in Article 3(3) thereof.












(3)


The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) requested an extension of the implementation period of Decision (CFSP) 2019/2009 by thirteen months, until 23 January 2024, considering the delay in the implementation of project activities under Decision (CFSP) 2019/2009 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia’s unprovoked and unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine.












(4)


The continuation of the activities referred to in Article 1 of Decision (CFSP) 2019/2009 until 23 January 2024 can be performed without any consequences as regards financial resources.












(5)


The request for extension should be accepted by amending Article 5(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2019/2009 accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
In Decision (CFSP) 2019/2009, Article 5, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:


‘2.   This Decision shall expire on 23 January 2024.’.




Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 18 November 2022.


For the Council


The President

M. BEK
            





(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/2009 of 2 December 2019 in support of Ukraine’s efforts to combat illicit trafficking in weapons, ammunition and explosives, in cooperation with the OSCE (OJ L 312, 3.12.2019, p. 42).
Case C-712/22 P: Appeal brought on 18 November 2022 by WT against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 07 September 2022 in Case T-91/20, WT v Commission
Date: 2022-11-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European official, administrative sanction, disciplinary proceedings, harassment at work, indemnification, principle of legal certainty, psychological harassment, rights of the defence








C_2023223EN.01000901.xml










26.6.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 223/9






Appeal brought on 18 November 2022 by WT against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 07 September 2022 in Case T-91/20, WT v Commission
(Case C-712/22 P)
(2023/C 223/11)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: WT (represented by: D. Birkenmaier, Rechtsanwalt; D. Rovetta, et V. Villante, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 04 May 2023, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded and that WT should bear her own costs.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 17 November 2022 2022/C 438/05
Date: 2022-11-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2022438EN.01000501.xml










18.11.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 438/5






Euro exchange rates (1)

17 November 2022
(2022/C 438/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0319 




JPY


Japanese yen


144,80 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4383 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87475 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,9871 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9818 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,4980 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,399 




HUF


Hungarian forint


415,60 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,7153 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9254 




TRY


Turkish lira


19,2124 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5526 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3820 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,0770 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6986 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4221 




KRW


South Korean won


1 394,06 




ZAR


South African rand


18,0961 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,3859 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5410 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 224,01 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7122 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,293 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,123 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,6535 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,0620 




INR


Indian rupee


84,3940 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-138/22: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie — Poland) — TD, SD v mBank S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency — Unfair terms — Invalidity of the contract on account of the inclusion of unfair or unlawful terms — Choice of the consumer — Interpretation of national law — Clear lack of jurisdiction)
Date: 2022-11-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, jurisdiction, real estate credit, unfair terms of contract








C_2023035EN.01002002.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/20






Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie — Poland) — TD, SD v mBank S.A.
(Case C-138/22) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency - Unfair terms - Invalidity of the contract on account of the inclusion of unfair or unlawful terms - Choice of the consumer - Interpretation of national law - Clear lack of jurisdiction)
(2023/C 35/23)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: TD, SD

Defendant: mBank S.A.

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie (District Court of Warsaw-Śródmieście, Warsaw, Poland) by decision of 18 January 2022.


(1)  Date lodged: 25.2.2022.
Case C-711/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 18 November 2022 — Advance Pharma sp. z o.o. v The Treasury — Chief Pharmaceuticals Inspector
Date: 2022-11-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Court of Human Rights, appeal, civil law, right to justice








C_2023045EN.01000902.xml










6.2.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/9






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 18 November 2022 — Advance Pharma sp. z o.o. v The Treasury — Chief Pharmaceuticals Inspector
(Case C-711/22)
(2023/C 45/16)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Advance Pharma sp. z o.o.

Defendant: The Treasury — Chief Pharmaceuticals Inspector

Question referred

In the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, read in conjunction with Article 19(1) and (2) TEU, does a remedy available in certain legal systems of the Member States of the European Union, in the form of the possibility of seeking revision of proceedings which led to a final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights finding a breach of the provisions of the Convention, constitute an essential element of the right to effective judicial protection in civil matters where the legal system of a Member State provides for another legal remedy for the purpose of protecting the judicial rights of a party to proceedings which have resulted in a final judgment?
Case T-730/22: Action brought on 18 November 2022 — LG and Others v Commission
Date: 2022-11-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU control, European Anti-fraud Office, disclosure of information, fraud against the EU, rights of the defence








C_2023035EN.01007101.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/71






Action brought on 18 November 2022 — LG and Others v Commission
(Case T-730/22)
(2023/C 35/92)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: LG and seven other applicants (represented by: A. Sigal and M. Teder, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


declare that the defendant has acted unlawfully under Article 9(4) of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, (1) as amended by Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2223, (2) by not sending the applicants reasonably detailed and clear fact statements that would clarify whether and how the applicants’ actions have, in OLAF’s views, harmed the interests of the European Union, and not providing the applicants an additional opportunity to comment on such fact statements; and










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that OLAF has failed to act by not providing the applicants, who have been named as persons concerned in an OLAF investigation, a meaningful opportunity to comment on the facts concerning them, in accordance with Article 9(4) and Article 9(b)(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, as amended by Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2223.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that OLAF has failed to act in accordance with the principle of good administration by not disclosing, with the statement of facts provided to the applicants, the preliminary allegations against the applicants that would allow them to assess the relevance of the stated facts and to comment on such facts.






(1)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999 (OJ 2013 L 248, p. 1).

(2)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2223 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 December 2020 amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, as regards cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the effectiveness of the European Anti-Fraud Office investigations (OJ 2020 L 437, p. 49).