do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-699/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Seamist v Commission
Date: 2022-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2023024EN.01005501.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/55






Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Seamist v Commission
(Case T-699/22)
(2023/C 24/76)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Seamist, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.
Case T-702/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — TA v Commission
Date: 2022-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2023024EN.01005601.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/56






Action brought on 12 November 2022 — TA v Commission
(Case T-702/22)
(2023/C 24/78)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: TA (represented by: A. Ferreira Correia and R. da Palma Borges, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in respect of Articles 1 and 4, on the grounds of failure to state reasons, or in so far as those articles apply to beneficiaries on account of the fact that they have employees who are non-resident in the outermost region, or that those beneficiaries obtain earnings from transactions outside the outermost region;










—


order the defendant institution to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action brought against Commission Decision (EU) 2022/1414 of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III (notified under document C(2020) 8550) (OJ 2022 L 217, p. 49), the applicant relies on five pleas in law.
First plea in law, alleging failure to state reasons in the contested decision.
Second plea in law, alleging error of assessment of fact and of law in the contested decision, in that benefits conferred on undertakings that were established regionally, but had relationships with the exterior, were found not to be compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3) TFEU.
Third plea in law, alleging error of assessment of fact and of law in the contested decision, in benefits conferred on undertakings that were established regionally, but maintained employment relationships with employees, who were not in the outermost region on a permanent basis, were found not to be compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3) TFEU.
Fourth plea in law, alleging error of assessment of fact and of law in the contested decision, in that benefits conferred on undertakings that do not exceed the quantitative limits laid down in the Regional State Aid Guidelines 2007 and in the General Block Exemption Regulation 2014, were found not to be compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3) TFEU.
Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of general principles of EU law: legal certainty, legitimate expectations and legality.
Case T-695/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Khayamedia v Commission
Date: 2022-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2023024EN.01005301.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/53






Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Khayamedia v Commission
(Case T-695/22)
(2023/C 24/72)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Khayamedia Comércio Internacional de Eventos Desportivos, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.
Case T-693/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Hilza v Commission
Date: 2022-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2023024EN.01005202.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/52






Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Hilza v Commission
(Case T-693/22)
(2023/C 24/71)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Hilza — Pharmaceuticals, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.
Case T-698/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Swan Lake v Commission
Date: 2022-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2023024EN.01005402.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/54






Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Swan Lake v Commission
(Case T-698/22)
(2023/C 24/75)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Swan Lake Serviços e Consultores, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.
Case T-704/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Poppysle v Commission
Date: 2022-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2023024EN.01005702.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/57






Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Poppysle v Commission
(Case T-704/22)
(2023/C 24/80)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Poppysle — Comércio Internacional e Serviços, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: A. Ferreira Correia and R. da Palma Borges, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in respect of Articles 1 and 4;










—


order the defendant institution to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action brought against Commission Decision (EU) 2022/1414 of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III (notified under document C(2020) 8550) (OJ 2022 L 217, p. 49), the applicant relies on six pleas in law that are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-702/22, TA v Commission.
Case T-703/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Everblacks Towage v Commission
Date: 2022-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2023024EN.01005701.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/57






Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Everblacks Towage v Commission
(Case T-703/22)
(2023/C 24/79)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Everblacks Towage — Serviços Marítimos, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: A. Ferreira Correia and R. da Palma Borges, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in respect of Articles 1 and 4;










—


order the defendant institution to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action brought against Commission Decision (EU) 2022/1414 of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III (notified under document C(2020) 8550) (OJ 2022 L 217, p. 49), the applicant relies on six pleas in law that are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-702/22, TA v Commission.
Case T-700/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Mission v Commission
Date: 2022-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2023035EN.01006502.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/65






Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Mission v Commission
(Case T-700/22)
(2023/C 35/82)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Mission — Trading, Gestão e Serviços, Unipessoal, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.
Case T-696/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Fratelli Cosulich v Commission
Date: 2022-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2023024EN.01005302.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/53






Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Fratelli Cosulich v Commission
(Case T-696/22)
(2023/C 24/73)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Fratelli Cosulich, Unipessoal, SA (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.
Case T-701/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Pamastock Investments v Commission
Date: 2022-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2023024EN.01005502.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/55






Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Pamastock Investments v Commission
(Case T-701/22)
(2023/C 24/77)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Pamastock Investments, SA (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.
Case T-691/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Fontwell v Commission
Date: 2022-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2023035EN.01006501.xml










30.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/65






Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Fontwell v Commission
(Case T-691/22)
(2023/C 35/81)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Fontwell — Import, Export, Unipessoal, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.
Case T-697/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Ommiacrest v Commission
Date: 2022-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2023024EN.01005401.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/54






Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Ommiacrest v Commission
(Case T-697/22)
(2023/C 24/74)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Ommiacrest Trading, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.
Case T-692/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Dabrezco Internacional v Commission
Date: 2022-11-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief








C_2023024EN.01005201.xml










23.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/52






Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Dabrezco Internacional v Commission
(Case T-692/22)
(2023/C 24/70)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Dabrezco Internacional, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.